Improving Digital Wellbeing in Saudi Adolescents

Improving Digital Wellbeing in Saudi Adolescents: Cluster-randomized Trial

Background: In Saudi Arabia, the rapid expansion of digital technology use-particularly among adolescents-has raised growing concerns about internet addiction and its impact on mental health and overall wellbeing. Building on formative work including national surveys, stakeholder interviews, and pilot testing, there is now a pressing need to rigorously evaluate interventions that can promote healthy digital habits among youth.

Study aims/objective: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a school-based digital wellbeing intervention, with and without a supplemental parent engagement component, using a cluster randomized controlled trial design. The primary objective is to determine whether exposure to the student curriculum alone or in combination with a parent-focused intervention improves digital literacy, technology use behaviors, and psychosocial wellbeing among high school students. Secondary objectives include assessing changes in parent-child communication and parental attitudes toward digital media use.

Methods: Twenty (20) high schools across Qassim and Riyadh regions in Saudi Arabia will be randomly assigned to one of two study arms: (1) treatment as usual (TAU) will receive the Ministry of Education (MOE) Digital Wellbeing Unit that is implemented in 12th grad as part of the Digital Citizenship Curriculum and a brief self-paced online teacher training, or (2) enhanced treatment including the MOE Digital Wellbeing Unit plus a WhatsApp-based intervention for parents and a brief self-paced online teacher training. Approximately 125 students per school (~2,500 total) will complete surveys before and after the intervention period, assessing digital media habits, wellbeing, and communication patterns. Parent surveys will be administered in the enhanced arm to assess intervention engagement and parenting practices. Surveys with teachers will assess motivation and self-efficacy in delivering the digital wellbeing unit and fidelity of delivery.

Results: The study will generate evidence on the efficacy of school- and family-based strategies for improving adolescent digital wellbeing in the Saudi context. It will also provide insight into mechanisms of change, including the role of parental involvement in shaping adolescent digital habits.

Conclusion: Findings from this cluster randomized trial will inform national digital wellbeing policy and practice, offering a scalable model for youth-targeted behavioral health interventions in Saudi Arabia and similar settings.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

2500

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Johannes Thrul
  • Phone Number: +14433186633
  • Email: jthrul@jhu.edu

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The study will include students enrolled in Grade 12 at participating high schools that are randomly assigned to one of the study arms.
  • In addition, parents or legal guardians of these students will be eligible to participate in the parent-focused component of the intervention if the student is assigned to the enhanced curriculum group.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Students and parents will be excluded from the study if the students and parents do not provide assent or consent to participate, in accordance with ethical guidelines.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Treatment as usual
(1) treatment as usual (TAU) will receive the Ministry of Education (MOE) Digital Wellbeing Unit that is implemented in 12th grade as part of the Digital Citizenship Curriculum and a brief self-paced online teacher training
(1) The student component utilizes the existing Digital Wellbeing Unit embedded within the national Digital Citizenship Curriculum, as implemented by the Saudi Ministry of Education. This curriculum is delivered by classroom teachers over the course of approximately one month, typically as part of standard instruction during the academic term. The content focuses on responsible digital media use, online safety, screen time awareness, and strategies for achieving digital balance. All instructional materials and delivery methods align with Ministry guidelines and are integrated into the regular school schedule.
(3) Teachers in both arms will complete a brief self-paced online training (~45 minutes total) prior to delivering the Digital Wellbeing Unit. The training introduces key digital wellbeing concepts, provides implementation guidance aligned with the Ministry of Education curriculum, and includes resources to support classroom delivery. Completion will be monitored to ensure fidelity across schools.
Experimental: Enhanced treatment
(2) enhanced treatment including the MOE Digital Wellbeing Unit plus a WhatsApp-based intervention for parents and a brief self-paced online teacher training.
(1) The student component utilizes the existing Digital Wellbeing Unit embedded within the national Digital Citizenship Curriculum, as implemented by the Saudi Ministry of Education. This curriculum is delivered by classroom teachers over the course of approximately one month, typically as part of standard instruction during the academic term. The content focuses on responsible digital media use, online safety, screen time awareness, and strategies for achieving digital balance. All instructional materials and delivery methods align with Ministry guidelines and are integrated into the regular school schedule.
(3) Teachers in both arms will complete a brief self-paced online training (~45 minutes total) prior to delivering the Digital Wellbeing Unit. The training introduces key digital wellbeing concepts, provides implementation guidance aligned with the Ministry of Education curriculum, and includes resources to support classroom delivery. Completion will be monitored to ensure fidelity across schools.
(2) The parental component, developed by the research team, is included in the enhanced intervention arm. It consists of structured engagement through WhatsApp groups formed with parents of students enrolled in the intervention schools. Parents in this group will receive daily messages for the duration of the curriculum delivery (approximately 4 weeks). These messages will include infographics, short expert video lectures, and brief videos designed to reinforce the concepts taught in the student curriculum. Content will focus on promoting healthy digital habits, improving communication between parents and children about technology use, and modeling appropriate digital behaviors at home.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Weekday leisure screen-time hours assessed by survey
Time Frame: Baseline, pre-intervention, post-intervention (1 month)
Weekday (screen time for leisure)
Baseline, pre-intervention, post-intervention (1 month)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Social Media Disorder Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, pre-intervention, post-intervention (1 month)
Social Media Disorder Scale: Score range from 9-45 with higher scores indicating higher degree of Social Media Disorder
Baseline, pre-intervention, post-intervention (1 month)
Internet Gaming Disorder Scale-ShortForm (IGDS9-SF)
Time Frame: Baseline, pre-intervention, post-intervention (1 month)
Internet Gaming Disorder Scale-ShortForm (IGDS9-SF): Score range from 9-45 with higher scores indicating higher degree of Internet Gaming Disorder
Baseline, pre-intervention, post-intervention (1 month)
Digital wellbeing knowledge 1 assessed by survey
Time Frame: Baseline, pre-intervention, post-intervention (1 month)
Knowledge regarding digital wellbeing topics covered in the curriculum; items were developed by the research team: Score range from 0-10 with higher scores indicating more digital wellbeing knowledge
Baseline, pre-intervention, post-intervention (1 month)
Digital well-being knowledge 2 assessed by survey
Time Frame: Baseline, pre-intervention, post-intervention (1 month)
Knowledge regarding digital wellbeing topics covered in the curriculum; items were developed by the research team: Score range from 3-15 with higher scores indicating more digital wellbeing knowledge
Baseline, pre-intervention, post-intervention (1 month)
Digital well-being attitudes assessed by survey
Time Frame: Baseline, pre-intervention, post-intervention (1 month)
Attitudes regarding digital wellbeing topics covered in the curriculum; items were developed by the research team: Score range from 5-25 with higher scores indicating more favorable attitudes toward digital balance and healthy technology use
Baseline, pre-intervention, post-intervention (1 month)
Digital well-being self-efficacy assessed by survey
Time Frame: Baseline, pre-intervention, post-intervention (1 month)
Self-efficacy regarding digital wellbeing topics covered in the curriculum; items were developed by the research team: Score range from 5-25 with higher scores indicating stronger digital wellbeing self-efficacy
Baseline, pre-intervention, post-intervention (1 month)
Digital well-being behavior change 1 assessed by survey: notification-checking frequency
Time Frame: Baseline, pre-intervention, post-intervention (1 month)
Self-reported changes in digital media habits or wellbeing practices as a result of the intervention; items were developed by the research team: This item captures unnecessary notification-checking frequency with score range 1-5 and higher scores indicating worse digital wellbeing behavior.
Baseline, pre-intervention, post-intervention (1 month)
Digital well-being behavior change 2 assessed by survey: device use before sleep
Time Frame: Baseline, pre-intervention, post-intervention (1 month)
Self-reported changes in digital media habits or wellbeing practices as a result of the intervention; items were developed by the research team: This item captures avoiding device use before sleep with score range 1-5 and higher scores indicating better digital wellbeing behavior.
Baseline, pre-intervention, post-intervention (1 month)
Digital well-being behavior change 3 assessed by survey: engagement in non-digital activities
Time Frame: Baseline, pre-intervention, post-intervention (1 month)
Self-reported changes in digital media habits or wellbeing practices as a result of the intervention; items were developed by the research team: This item captures engagement in non-digital activities with score range 1-5 and higher scores indicating better digital wellbeing behavior.
Baseline, pre-intervention, post-intervention (1 month)
Digital well-being behavior change 4 assessed by survey: use of apps or tools to monitor and manage digital habits
Time Frame: Baseline, pre-intervention, post-intervention (1 month)
Self-reported changes in digital media habits or wellbeing practices as a result of the intervention; items were developed by the research team: This item captures use of apps or tools to monitor and manage digital habits with score range 1-5 and higher scores indicating better digital wellbeing behavior.
Baseline, pre-intervention, post-intervention (1 month)
Number of participants who upload phone screen shots of Screentime app
Time Frame: Baseline, pre-intervention, post-intervention (1 month)
The investigators will explore feasibility of collecting objective data from students including screenshots of Screentime app
Baseline, pre-intervention, post-intervention (1 month)
Weekend leisure screen-time hours assessed by survey
Time Frame: Baseline, pre-intervention, post-intervention (1 month)
Weekend day (screen time for leisure)
Baseline, pre-intervention, post-intervention (1 month)
Weekday work/study screen-time hours assessed by survey
Time Frame: Baseline, pre-intervention, post-intervention (1 month)
Weekday (screen time for work/study)
Baseline, pre-intervention, post-intervention (1 month)
Weekend work/study screen-time hours assessed by survey
Time Frame: Baseline, pre-intervention, post-intervention (1 month)
Weekend day (screen time for work/study)
Baseline, pre-intervention, post-intervention (1 month)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Johannes Thrul, Johns Hopkins University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 25, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 7, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 7, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

January 15, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 16, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 13, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Data will be shared upon reasonable request.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Supporting information will be shared upon reasonable request.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Supporting information will be shared upon reasonable request.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ANALYTIC_CODE

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Internet Gaming Disorder

Clinical Trials on Digital Wellbeing Unit

Subscribe