The Effectiveness of Engagement-based Personalization of a Digital Mental Health Intervention

June 7, 2023 updated by: Saskia Kelders, University of Twente

The Effectiveness of Engagement-based Personalization of a Two-week Digital Mental Health Intervention Targeting Wellbeing: a Randomized Controlled Trial

This study will investigate the effectiveness of an engagement-based personalized 2-week mobile wellbeing intervention, vs the effectiveness of a non-personalized 2-week mobile wellbeing intervention.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

200

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Enschede, Netherlands
        • University of Twente

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • at least mild depressive or anxiety complaints; >4 Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale OR Patient Health Questionnaire 9-item scale
  • access to smartphone with internet
  • adequate English literacy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • none

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Personalized
Participants in the personalized arm will receive the optimal combination of content, feedback and design, based on their baseline engagement scores.

For the study, 27 versions of a 2-week mobile wellbeing intervention are created. These versions vary on content (Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, meaning, positive psychology), feedback (text, text with avatar, pre-recorded video) and design (non-gamified, competitively gamified, storyline gamified). At baseline, participants preview all variations and indicate their expected engagement. Participants in the personalized condition will receive the optimal combination of content, feedback and design, based on their baseline engagement scores.

Each version of the intervention consists of a module per day. Each module contains psychoeducation and exercises based on content of the version. Moreover, each module contains pre-specified general feedback and supportive messages.

Active Comparator: non-personalized
Participants in the non-personalized arm will receive a randomly selected version of the 27 possible interventions, regardless of their baseline engagement scores.

For the study, 27 versions of a 2-week mobile wellbeing intervention are created. These versions vary on content (Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, meaning, positive psychology), feedback (text, text with avatar, pre-recorded video) and design (non-gamified, competitively gamified, storyline gamified). At baseline, participants preview all variations and indicate their expected engagement. Participants in the non-personalized condition will receive a random version of the intervention.

Each version of the intervention consists of a module per day. Each module contains psychoeducation and exercises based on content of the version. Moreover, each module contains pre-specified general feedback and supportive messages.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline in wellbeing, measured with the Mental Health Continuum Short Form, at 3 weeks.
Time Frame: baseline, 3 weeks
Wellbeing will be measured in an online survey, using the Mental Health Continuum Short Form. This validated scale consists of 14 items. The scale's total scores range from 14 to 84, with higher scores indicating higher wellbeing and thus better outcomes.
baseline, 3 weeks
Change from baseline in depressive symptoms, measured with the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, at 3 weeks.
Time Frame: baseline, 3 weeks
Depressive symptoms will be measured in an online survey, using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9. This validated scale consists of 9 items. The scale's total scores range from 0 to 27, with higher scores indicating higher depressive symptoms and thus worse outcomes.
baseline, 3 weeks
Change from baseline in anxiety symptoms, measured with the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale, at 3 weeks.
Time Frame: baseline, 3 weeks
Depressive symptoms will be measured in an online survey, using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale. This validated scale consists of 6 items. The scale's total scores range from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating higher anxiety symptoms and thus worse outcomes.
baseline, 3 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adherence
Time Frame: after 3 weeks
Number of modules completed
after 3 weeks
Engagement, measured with the TWente Engagement with Ehealth Technologies Scale.
Time Frame: after 1 day
Engagement will be measured within the intervention, with the validated TWente Engagement with Ehealth Technologies Scale. This is a 9 item scale, with a total score ranging from 0 to 36, with higher scores indicating higher engagement and thus better outcomes.
after 1 day
Engagement, measured with the TWente Engagement with Ehealth Technologies Scale.
Time Frame: after 7 days
Engagement will be measured within the intervention, with the validated TWente Engagement with Ehealth Technologies Scale. This is a 9 item scale, with a total score ranging from 0 to 36, with higher scores indicating higher engagement and thus better outcomes.
after 7 days
Engagement, measured with the TWente Engagement with Ehealth Technologies Scale.
Time Frame: after 3 weeks
Engagement will be measured within the intervention, with the validated TWente Engagement with Ehealth Technologies Scale. This is a 9 item scale, with a total score ranging from 0 to 36, with higher scores indicating higher engagement and thus better outcomes.
after 3 weeks
Change from baseline in wellbeing, measured with the Mental Health Continuum Short Form, at 8 weeks.
Time Frame: baseline, 8 weeks
Wellbeing will be measured in an online survey, using the Mental Health Continuum Short Form. This validated scale consists of 14 items. The scale's total scores range from 14 to 84, with higher scores indicating higher wellbeing and thus better outcomes.
baseline, 8 weeks
Change from baseline in depressive symptoms, measured with the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, at 8 weeks.
Time Frame: baseline, 8 weeks
Depressive symptoms will be measured in an online survey, using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9. This validated scale consists of 9 items. The scale's total scores range from 0 to 27, with higher scores indicating higher depressive symptoms and thus worse outcomes.
baseline, 8 weeks
Change from baseline in anxiety symptoms, measured with the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale, at 8 weeks.
Time Frame: baseline, 8 weeks
Depressive symptoms will be measured in an online survey, using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale. This validated scale consists of 6 items. The scale's total scores range from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating higher anxiety symptoms and thus worse outcomes.
baseline, 8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Saskia M Kelders, PhD, University of Twente

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 3, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 17, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

March 29, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 8, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 7, 2023

Last Verified

June 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Personalization Trial

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

The plan is to share anonymized data from the study in a open science database. Specifics are not yet established.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Well-being

Clinical Trials on personalized 2-week mobile wellbeing intervention

3
Subscribe