- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06089057
Pro-social Power Training Activity for Aging and Well-being With Chronic Kidney Disease
Activation for Self-Care Needs in Older Adults With Chronic Kidney Disease: ACTIVE SENIORS With CKD
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
This will be a randomized controlled pilot trial of a 16-week physical activity and power training intervention trial among 30 pre-frail Veterans with Stage 3B-5 chronic kidney disease. The intervention will contain in-center and at-home components. It will lay the foundation for a large-scale future randomized controlled efficacy trial aimed to reduce frailty risk among Veterans with advanced chronic kidney disease. 30 other Veterans will be part of an attention control.
The outcomes of this pilot trial are feasibility, acceptability, and fidelity. Each of these outcomes will be measured using quantitative surveys and data review as well as qualitative assessments among Veterans at trial close. As this is a pilot feasibility trial, it is intentionally not powered to detect whether the intervention has a significant effect on physical activity frequency, muscle strength, or physical frailty.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Devika Nair, MD
- Phone Number: (504) 210-5210
- Email: devika.nair@va.gov
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Sonya L Williams, MS
- Phone Number: (615) 875-2737
- Email: sonya.l.williams@vumc.org
Study Locations
-
-
Tennessee
-
Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37212-2637
- Tennessee Valley Healthcare System Nashville Campus, Nashville, TN
-
Contact:
- Sonya L Williams, MS
- Phone Number: (615) 875-2737
- Email: sonya.l.williams@vumc.org
-
Principal Investigator:
- Devika Nair, MD
-
Contact:
- Devika Nair, MD
- Phone Number: 504-210-5210
- Email: devika.nair@va.gov
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Participant's nephrologist and/or primary care physician agree that participant may enroll in trial
Participants classified as pre-frail per Fried Frailty phenotype due to slowness (time taken to walk 15 feet is greater than 6 seconds) in Aim 1, OR who report 'YES' to any of the following:
- "For health or physical reasons, do you have difficulty in walking a mile (5-6 blocks)?", OR
- "If no, have you changed the way you walk half a mile (5-6 blocks) because of underlying health problems?", OR
- "For health or physical reasons, do you have difficulty in climbing 1 flight of stairs (10 steps)?", OR
- "If no, have you changed the way you climb 1 flight of stairs (10 steps) because of health problems?"
Exclusion Criteria:
- Myocardial infarction or unstable angina within the prior six months based on electronic medical record review or self-report
- Uncontrolled cardiac arrythmia within the prior six months based on electronic medical record review or self-report
- Systolic blood pressure > 180 mm Hg and/or diastolic blood pressure > 110 mm Hg on more than one occasion within prior six months based on electronic medical record review or self-report
- Cerebrovascular event and/or transient ischemic attack within prior six months based on electronic medical record review or self-report
- Abnormal cardiac stress test within the past year based on electronic medical record review or self-report
- Hemoglobin of 10 g/dL or less based on electronic medical record review or self-report
- Class IV heart failure based on electronic medical record review or self-report
- Dyspnea and/or chest pain at rest
- Dependence on wheelchair for mobility
- Permanent residence in nursing home or other long-term care facility
- Terminal illness or other hospice-qualifying medical condition
- Planned move away from middle Tennessee within the next year
- Planned major surgery in the next six months
- Blindness
- Concurrent enrollment in physical therapy or structured exercise program
- Anticipated dialysis or kidney transplant in upcoming three months
- Non-English speaking
- Severe cognitive impairment based on electronic medical record review or self-report
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Power training and monitored physical activity
This is a 16-week power-training and physical activity-focused intervention that contains in-center and at-home components and motivational coaching.
Participants will meet 2-3 times per week for the in-center power training.
Participants will also be asked to wear accelerometers at home in order for their physical activity frequency to be measured.
|
This is a 16-week power-training and physical activity-focused intervention that contains group in-center and individual at-home components and motivational coaching.
Participants will meet 2-3 times per week for the in-center power training.
Participants will also be asked to wear accelerometers at home in order for their physical activity frequency to be measured.
Other Names:
|
Active Comparator: Attention control
This will be the attention control arm that will involve receipt of a physical activity education booklet, use of an accelerometer, and weekly check-in calls.
No power training or motivational coaching will be delivered.
|
This will be the attention control arm that will involve receipt of a physical activity education booklet, use of an accelerometer, and weekly check-in calls.
No power training or motivational coaching will be delivered.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Feasibility, as measured by the questionnaire, the Feasibility of Intervention Measure
Time Frame: 4 months
|
This will be a brief questionnaire known as the Feasibility of Intervention Measure, that asks participants whether the intervention seems doable to them.
There are four questions, and participants are asked to rate intervention feasibility from a scale of 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 5 (Strongly Agree).
Scores range from 1-5 and are calculated as the mean of all scores.
Higher scores indicate greater perceived feasibility.
This will not be aggregated with any other measure.
|
4 months
|
Feasibility, as measured by a numerical percentage of all participants who consented out of those eligible
Time Frame: 4 months
|
This will be a numeric percentage of participants who consent for the pilot trial out of all eligible participants in Aim 1.
This will not be aggregated with any other measure.
|
4 months
|
Feasibility, as measured by a qualitative description of participants' reasons for declining
Time Frame: 4 months
|
This will be a qualitative description of potential participants' reasons for declining, if applicable.
This will not be aggregated with any other measure.
|
4 months
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Acceptability, as measured by the questionnaire, the Acceptability of Intervention Measure
Time Frame: 4 months
|
This will be a brief questionnaire known as the Acceptability of Intervention Measure, that asks participants whether the intervention seems acceptable and/or enjoyable to them.
There are four questions, and participants are asked to rate intervention acceptability from a scale of 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 5 (Strongly Agree).
Scores range from 1-5 and are calculated as the mean of all scores.
Higher scores indicate greater perceived acceptability.
This will not be aggregated with any other measure.
|
4 months
|
Acceptability, as measured by participants' qualitative descriptions of reasons for intervention enjoyability, if applicable
Time Frame: 4 months
|
This will be a qualitative description of participants' reasons they found the intervention enjoyable to participate in, if applicable.
This will not be aggregated with any other measure.
|
4 months
|
Fidelity, as measured by the percentage of sessions participants attended out of all possible sessions
Time Frame: 4 months
|
This will be a percentage, measured by the number of sessions a participant attended out of all possible sessions that could have have been attended.
This will not be aggregated with any other measure.
|
4 months
|
Fidelity, as measured by participants' descriptions of reasons for adherence vs. nonadherence
Time Frame: 7 months
|
This will be a qualitative description of participants' reasons for adhering to the intervention or not, as applicable.
This will not be aggregated with any other measure.
|
7 months
|
Adverse events, as measured by the type of adverse events reported on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, v5.0
Time Frame: 7 months
|
This will be the type of adverse events as reported by participants from the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0.
This will not be aggregated with any other measure.
|
7 months
|
Fidelity, as measured by accelerometer step count during prior week
Time Frame: 5 months, 6 months, and 7 months
|
This will be the step count during the prior week recorded on an accelerometer worn by each participant.
This will be measured at each of the following time points: one, two, and three months after intervention close.
That is to say, this will be measured at 5 months, 6 months, and 7 months after intervention start.
This will not be aggregated with any other measure.
|
5 months, 6 months, and 7 months
|
Fidelity, as measured by the questionnaire, the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly
Time Frame: 5 months, 6 months, and 7 months
|
This will be measured using the questionnaire, the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly, a ten-item questionnaire that inquires about the frequency, duration, and intensity of physical activity during the prior week.
Scores range from 0-793, with higher scores indicating completion of more frequent and/or intense physical activity.
This will be measured at each of the following time points: one, two, and three months after intervention close.
That is to say, this will be measured at 5 months, 6 months, and 7 months after intervention start.
This will not be aggregated with any other measure.
|
5 months, 6 months, and 7 months
|
Adverse events, as measured by the the number of participants who report adverse events from the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, v5.0
Time Frame: 7 months
|
This will be the total number of participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0.
This will not be aggregated with any other measure.
|
7 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Devika Nair, MD, Tennessee Valley Healthcare System Nashville Campus, Nashville, TN
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- NEPH-007-23S
- 1IK2CX002595-01A2 (Other Grant/Funding Number: CSRD)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Lower Extremity Muscle Strength
-
Okan UniversityBitlis Eren UniversityCompletedMuscle Strength | Vibration; Exposure | Lower LimbTurkey
-
Okan UniversityCompletedExercise Addiction | Upper Extremity | Wrestling | Trunk Muscle StrengthTurkey
-
Universidade Estadual do Norte do ParanáCompletedMuscle Strength | Muscle Strength DynamometerBrazil
-
University GhentCompletedReliability and Validity of Strength Measurement of the Lower Limbs in Typically Developing ChildrenChildren | Muscle Strength | Knee | Reproducibility of Results | Muscle Strength DynamometerBelgium
-
University Hospital, Strasbourg, FranceTerminated
-
Koç UniversityCompletedMuscle Strength | Posture | Abdominal MuscleTurkey
-
Riphah International UniversityRecruiting
-
Rodrigo Antonio Carvalho AndrausNot yet recruiting
-
Quiropraxia y EquilibrioSuspended
-
University of Nove de JulhoCompleted