Spot Analysis of Natriuresis to Guide up- or Down-titration of Diuretic Therapy in Ambulatory Patients With Chronic Heart Failure (SAND-HF)

March 23, 2026 updated by: Nathaniel Hawkins, Cardiology Research UBC

Spot Analysis of Natriuresis to Guide up- or Down-titration of Diuretic Therapy in Ambulatory Patients With Chronic Heart Failure (SAND-HF)

Heart failure is a chronic condition that causes congestion and frequent hospitalizations. Diuretic doses are usually adjusted based on clinical judgment without an objective measure of response. This study will test the feasibility of using point-of-care urine sodium measurements to guide up-titration or down-titration of loop diuretics in ambulatory patients with heart failure.

Participants will be assigned to one of three groups based on congestion status. Groups 1 and 2 will be randomized 1:1 to natriuresis-guided therapy or standard care. Group 3 will be observational. The 90-day pilot trial will evaluate feasibility, clinical outcomes, and usability of a urine sodium-guided titration strategy.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Heart failure is commonly associated with sodium retention and congestion. Loop diuretics are used to relieve congestion but are typically adjusted based on symptoms and clinical judgment. Spot urine sodium concentration is an objective measure of diuretic response that may help personalize treatment. A point-of-care urine sodium sensor provides rapid results and may support effective decongestion or safe reduction of diuretics when appropriate.

This prospective, two-center pilot study includes three clinical groups:

Group 1: Up-titration cohort Patients with clinical congestion or objective evidence of congestion. These participants will be randomized 1:1 to natriuresis-guided up-titration or standard care.

Group 2: Down-titration cohort Stable, euvolemic patients who may safely reduce diuretic therapy. These participants will be randomized 1:1 to natriuresis-guided down-titration or standard care.

Group 3: Observational cohort The first 100 screened patients who do not meet criteria for Groups 1 or 2. These participants will undergo baseline assessments and routine follow-up without intervention.

Urine sodium will be measured at baseline and follow-up visits. Randomized participants will have diuretic doses adjusted based on predefined algorithms. Standard care participants will receive usual clinical management.

The primary aim is to assess feasibility, including recruitment, retention, adherence to sampling procedures, and workflow implementation. Secondary analyses will describe clinical, laboratory, and symptom-based outcomes to inform development of a larger definitive trial.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

300

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • British Columbia
      • Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
        • Recruiting
        • Vancouver General Hospital
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Nathaniel Hawkins, MD
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Amitai Segev, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥18 years
  • Diagnosis of heart failure according to the Universal Definition
  • Use of loop diuretics
  • Residing in VCH or PHC regions

Group-specific inclusion:

Group 1: Congestion score ≥5 OR objective congestion; stable furosemide ≥1 week Group 2: NYHA I-II; congestion score <5; no recent HF hospitalization; stable furosemide ≥1 month Group 3: First 100 eligible patients not meeting criteria for Groups 1 or 2

Exclusion Criteria:

  • eGFR <20 mL/min/1.73m²
  • Renal replacement therapy
  • High-risk clinical status requiring hospitalization
  • Inability to consent or perform required urine sampling

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group 1 - Natriuresis-Guided Up-Titration
Loop diuretic doses will be up-titrated based on post-diuretic urine sodium concentration measured using a point-of-care sensor. Insufficient natriuresis (<80 mmol/L) will prompt dose escalation according to a predefined algorithm.
Diuretic dose and regimen will be increased based on post-diuretic urine sodium concentration measured by a point-of-care sensor. Insufficient natriuresis (<80 mmol/L) will prompt dose escalation using a predefined algorithm.
Other: Group 1 Standard of Care (Up-Titration Control)
Participants will receive usual clinical management of diuretics at the discretion of their treating physician without access to urine sodium-guided titration.
Participants will receive usual clinical management of loop diuretics at the discretion of the treating physician, without natriuresis-guided adjustment.
Experimental: Group 2 Natriuresis-Guided Down-Titration
Loop diuretic doses will be reduced based on urine sodium levels. If urine sodium ≥80 mmol/L, the current dose will be maintained; if <80 mmol/L, dose will be reduced according to a predefined algorithm. Re-titration criteria include symptomatic weight gain >2 kg in one week.
Loop diuretic doses will be reduced based on urine sodium levels. If urine sodium ≥80 mmol/L, the current dose will be maintained; if <80 mmol/L, dose will be reduced according to a predefined algorithm. Re-titration criteria include symptomatic weight gain >2 kg in one week.
Other: Group 2 Standard Care (Down-Titration Control)
Participants will receive usual care without urine sodium-guided adjustments.
Participants will receive usual clinical management of loop diuretics at the discretion of the treating physician, without natriuresis-guided adjustment.
Other: Group 3 Observational Cohort
Participants who do not meet inclusion criteria for Groups 1 or 2 will undergo baseline urine sodium assessment and routine clinical follow-up. No study-directed titration will occur.
Participants who do not meet inclusion criteria for Groups 1 or 2 will undergo baseline urine sodium assessment and routine clinical follow-up. No study-directed titration will occur.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Successful Down-Titration of Loop Diuretics (Group 2)
Time Frame: 90 Days
Proportion of Group 2 participants who maintain a reduced loop diuretic dose without needing up-titration during follow-up.
90 Days
Change in Clinical Congestion Score (Group 1)
Time Frame: 90 Days
Change in clinical congestion score among Group 1 participants. Minimum Value: 1 Maximum Value: 22 A higher score indicates a worse outcome.
90 Days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Dyspnea Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Area Under the Curve
Time Frame: 90 Days
Change in dyspnea over time measured using serial VAS assessments.
90 Days
Signs of Volume Overload
Time Frame: Proportion of participants with clinical signs of volume overload.
90 Days
Proportion of participants with clinical signs of volume overload.
Change in Body Weight
Time Frame: 90 Days
Change in Body weight
90 Days
Loop Diuretic Use and Dose
Time Frame: Baseline, 30 days, 90 days
Loop Diuretic Use and Dose at different timepoints
Baseline, 30 days, 90 days
Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy (GDMT) Use
Time Frame: 90 days
Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy (GDMT) Use
90 days
NT-proBNP Concentration
Time Frame: 90 days
NT-proBNP Concentration changes
90 days
Hemoconcentration
Time Frame: 90 days
Changes in hemoglobin and hematocrit.
90 days
Change in Creatinine and BUN
Time Frame: 90 days
Change in Creatinine and BUN
90 days
Worsening Renal Function
Time Frame: 90 days
Creatinine increase ≥100% from baseline.
90 days
Hypokalemia
Time Frame: 90 Days
Frequency of potassium <3.5 mEq/L.
90 Days
Urine Sodium ≥80 mmol/L (Group 1)
Time Frame: 90 Days
Proportion of follow-up urine samples ≥80 mmol/L.
90 Days
Point-of-Care vs Laboratory Sodium Measurement Agreement
Time Frame: Baseline to 90 days
Correlation between point-of-care and laboratory urine sodium measurements.
Baseline to 90 days
Change in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ-12) Score
Time Frame: 90 Days

Change in heart-failure related quality of life using the KCCQ-12. 12-item version.

Minimum Value: 0 Maximum Value: 100 Outcome Meaning: A higher score indicates a better outcome.

90 Days
Change in New York Heart Association Functional (NYHA) Functional Classification
Time Frame: Baseline, 30 days, 90 days
Change in New York Heart Association functional classification. Minimum Value: 1 Maximum Value: 4 Outcome Meaning: A higher class indicates a worse outcome.
Baseline, 30 days, 90 days
System Usability Scale
Time Frame: 90 Days
Usability of the natriuresis-guided process. Minimum Value: 0 Maximum Value: 100 Outcome Meaning: A higher score indicates a better outcome.
90 Days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 4, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 31, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 18, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 18, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

January 27, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 27, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 23, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Pilot feasibility study; data not intended for reuse.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heart Failure

Clinical Trials on Natriuresis-Guided Up-Titration

Subscribe