Effect of Adding Ultrasound Guided IPACK Block to Adductor Canal Block for Postoperative Pain in Knee Tumor Excision

January 25, 2026 updated by: National Cancer Institute, Egypt

Analgesic Efficacy of Adding Ultra Sound Guided IPACK Block to Adductor Canal Block for Postoperative Pain Management After Excision of Tumors Around Knee: a Randomized Controlled Trial

the aim of this study is to determine the analgesic effect of iPACK in combination to ACB after the excision of tumors around the Knee regarding the following:

  • Time to the 1st rescue analgesia.
  • Postoperative morphine consumption.
  • Postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS). This study will include patients, aged 18 to 65 years, belonging to the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status II to IV , undergoing excision of tumors around the knee under spinal anesthesia.

Patients will be randomly allocated Group iPACK plus Adductor canal block (ACB) : patients will receive ACB plus iPACK block.

• Control group : patients will not receive any block but will take morphine 3mg bolus at VAS more than 4 and regular NSAIDS and paracetamol iv.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Immediate alleviation of postoperative pain after knee surgeries is critical for patients' postoperative recovery. Ineffective pain management may result in an extended hospital stay and rehabilitation period, as well as the development of chronic pain Non-opioid analgesics are insufficient to alleviate the pain that is intended to be relieved.

Although using Opioids have concerns regarding their potential side effects, which encompass nausea, vomiting, respiratory depression, and addiction Multimodal analgesia, which may include preemptive analgesia, neuraxial blockade, peripheral nerve block, and narcotic and non-narcotic analgesics, is an optimal approach for the management of acute pain following knee surgeries Adductor canal block (ACB) is an interfascial plane infiltration of local anesthetic used to block a portion of the saphenous nerve, which originates in the adductor canal, as well as the obturator nerve ACB combined with an iPACK block results in significantly better postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) scores, knee ranges of motion, as well as ambulation distances compared with ACB alone

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

70

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Fady Attef, MSc
  • Phone Number: 01224046183

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt, 11769
        • Recruiting
        • National Cancer Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and availability for the duration of the study
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status II-IV.
  • Patients undergoing excision of tumors around the knee under spinal anesthesia

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient refusal.
  • Neuromuscular disorders
  • Allergy to local anesthetics
  • Previous history of knee surgery
  • Patients with a prior knee infection
  • Contraindications to spinal anesthesia as coagulopathies and severe aortic stenosis.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: adductor canal block with iPACK
The adductor canal will be identified. a spinal needle 22 gauge x 3.5 inches will be advanced with the guidance of ultrasound in an in-plane technique, and 15ml of 0.5% bupivacaine will be injected then IPACK block will be performed The probe will be applied to the popliteal fossa for identification of the popliteal artery and femur. Then, the probe will be slid distally for revealing the two femoral condyles followed by proximal sliding of the probe until the humps of the femoral condyles disappeared and the flat metaphysis appeared. a spinal needle 22G x 3.5 inches will be advanced from the lateral aspect and directed across the space between the popliteal artery and femur and once the needle reaches the medial edge of the femur, nearly at the level of the popliteal artery, negative aspiration will be confirmed and 15ml of 0.5% bupivacaine will be injected incrementally as the needle will be withdrawn.
The adductor canal will be identified. a spinal needle 22 gauge x 3.5 inches will be advanced with the guidance of ultrasound in an in-plane technique ,and 15ml of 0.5% bupivacaine will be injected then IPACK block will be performed. The probe will be applied to the popliteal fossa for identification of the popliteal artery and femur. Then, the probe will be slid distally for revealing the two femoral condyles followed by proximal sliding of the probe until the humps of the femoral condyles disappeared and the flat metaphysis appeared. a spinal needle 22G x 3.5 inches will be advanced from the lateral aspect and directed across the space between the popliteal artery and femur and once the needle reaches the medial edge of the femur, nearly at the level of the popliteal artery, negative aspiration will be confirmed and 15ml of 0.5% bupivacaine will be injected incrementally as the needle will be withdrawn
Other: control group
visualizing the adductor canal without doing any block for the control group

The probe will be positioned at the midpoint between the anterior superior iliac spine and the upper pole of the patella.

The adductor canal, which is a hyperechoic structure situated beneath the sartorius muscle, will be identified but no block will be done

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to the 1st rescue analgesia
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperative
Time to the 1st rescue analgesia
24 hours postoperative

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total morphine consumption
Time Frame: first 24 hour
morphine consumed in 1st 24 hours postoperative in mg
first 24 hour
pain score ( visual analogue scale)
Time Frame: at 2 hours ,4 hours,6 hours, 12 hours,18 hours and 24 h postoperatively

assessment of postoperative pain using the visual analogue scale score. the scale is a straight horizontal line (100 mm). The ends are defined as the extreme limits of pain orientated from the left (no pain) to the right (worst pain).The patient marks on the line the point that they feel represents their perception of their current state.

The VAS score is determined by measuring in millimetres from the left hand end of the line to the point that the patient marks.higher VAS score means worse pain

at 2 hours ,4 hours,6 hours, 12 hours,18 hours and 24 h postoperatively

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Ghada Gamal Eldin Elsayed, MD, National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 15, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 25, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 25, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

February 2, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 2, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 25, 2026

Last Verified

August 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cancer Pain

Clinical Trials on adductor canal block with iPACK

Subscribe