Augmented Reality Training for Simulated Vaginal Birth

January 28, 2026 updated by: Jorge Carvajal Cabrera, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile

Augmented Reality Enhances Competency-Based Training in Simulated Vaginal Birth: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

This study evaluated whether an augmented reality (AR)-based training system improves preparation for simulated vaginal birth compared with traditional text- and video-based learning. Vaginal birth is a complex clinical skill that requires integration of technical actions, situational awareness, and professional behaviors, and opportunities for hands-on training may be limited during undergraduate education.

Undergraduate medical students and midwifery students from two universities in Chile and Colombia were randomly assigned to either conventional preparation (text and instructional video) or the same preparation supplemented with an AR training module. The AR system allowed students to explore a simulated vaginal birth scenario in a self-directed manner before participating in hands-on simulation.

All students then completed a standardized simulated vaginal birth using a high-fidelity simulator as part of their regular curriculum. Performance during the first simulation was assessed by blinded evaluators using a validated Direct Observation of Procedural Skills (DOPS) checklist. The primary outcome was achievement of a predefined minimum competency threshold, with secondary outcomes including overall performance scores, completion of critical tasks, and learner satisfaction.

The goal of this study was to determine whether AR-based pre-simulation training enhances early performance in simulated vaginal birth and could serve as a scalable educational tool to support competency-based training in obstetrics.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This multicenter randomized controlled educational study examined the effectiveness of an augmented reality (AR)-based pre-simulation training system for vaginal birth. The study was conducted at two universities in Chile and Colombia and included undergraduate medical students and midwifery students enrolled in obstetrics and gynecology or women's health courses as part of their regular curriculum.

Participants were randomly assigned to one of two groups. The control group received conventional pre-simulation preparation consisting of written materials and an instructional video covering the management of uncomplicated vaginal birth. The intervention group received the same preparation supplemented with a self-directed AR training module, which allowed learners to explore a simulated vaginal birth scenario, navigate procedural steps, and rehearse task sequencing prior to hands-on simulation.

All participants subsequently completed a standardized simulated vaginal birth using a high-fidelity childbirth simulator. Performance during the first simulation attempt was assessed by blinded evaluators using a previously published and validated Direct Observation of Procedural Skills (DOPS) checklist. The primary outcome was achievement of a predefined minimum competency threshold. Secondary outcomes included overall performance scores, completion of critical tasks, and learner satisfaction with the training experience.

The study was designed to isolate the effect of pre-simulation preparation on initial performance, before learning gains from repeated simulation and debriefing. The findings aim to inform the role of augmented reality as a scalable educational tool to support competency-based training in obstetric education.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

389

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Santiago Metropolitan
      • Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan, Chile
        • Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Undergraduate medical students or midwifery students enrolled in obstetrics and gynecology or women's health courses at the participating universities.
  • Enrollment in the corresponding academic cohort during the study period.
  • Age 18 years or older.
  • Willingness to participate and provision of informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Declined participation or withdrawal of consent.
  • Incomplete participation in the simulation session.
  • Incomplete or missing performance assessment data.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Conventional Training
Participants received conventional pre-simulation preparation consisting of text-based materials and an instructional video covering uncomplicated vaginal birth.
Text- and video-based preparation for simulated vaginal birth.
Experimental: Augmented Reality Training
Participants received conventional text- and video-based preparation supplemented with an augmented reality-based pre-simulation training module.
Augmented reality-based pre-simulation training module for vaginal birth.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of participants achieving the minimum competency threshold during simulated vaginal birth
Time Frame: Periprocedural (Day 1, during the first standardized simulated vaginal birth)
Achievement of a predefined minimum competency threshold assessed using a validated Direct Observation of Procedural Skills (DOPS) checklist during a standardized simulated vaginal birth. Competency was defined as a DOPS score ≥35 with successful completion of all critical items.
Periprocedural (Day 1, during the first standardized simulated vaginal birth)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Direct Observation of Procedural Skills (DOPS) score during simulated vaginal birth
Time Frame: Periprocedural (Day 1, during the first standardized simulated vaginal birth)
Overall performance score obtained using the Direct Observation of Procedural Skills (DOPS) checklist (range 0-37), where higher scores indicate better performance, assessed during a standardized simulated vaginal birth.
Periprocedural (Day 1, during the first standardized simulated vaginal birth)
Number of participants completing all critical tasks during simulated vaginal birth
Time Frame: Periprocedural (Day 1, during the first standardized simulated vaginal birth)
Successful completion of all predefined critical motor and attitudinal tasks on the DOPS checklist during the first standardized simulated vaginal birth.
Periprocedural (Day 1, during the first standardized simulated vaginal birth)
Learner satisfaction with the training experience
Time Frame: Immediately after the simulation session
Participant satisfaction assessed using a post-simulation satisfaction questionnaire on a Likert-type scale (range 1-5), where higher scores indicate greater satisfaction.
Immediately after the simulation session

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jorge A Carvajal, PhD, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

  • Valenzuela, M. T., & Carvajal Cabrera, J. A. (2022). Eficiencia del entrenamiento simulado del parto vaginal en estudiantes de enfermería/obstetricia: The efficiency of simulated vaginal birth training in nursing/midwifery students. ARS MEDICA Revista De Ciencias Médicas, 47(4), 25-31. https://doi.org/10.11565/arsmed.v47i4.1911

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 8, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 27, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

December 23, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 20, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 28, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

February 5, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 5, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 28, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data will not be shared due to ethical and confidentiality considerations. The dataset includes educational performance assessments of students, collected under informed consent for the purposes of this study only. Data are stored in accordance with institutional policies and applicable regulations, and no plans for public data sharing were approved by the ethics committees.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Vaginal Birth Education

Clinical Trials on Conventional Training

Subscribe