Evaluation of the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Lacosamide in Major Depressive Episodes of Bipolar Disorder Types I and II.

February 18, 2026 updated by: Diego Freitas Tavares, University of Sao Paulo

Evaluation of the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Lacosamide in Major Depressive Episodes of Bipolar Disorder Types I and II: a Randomized, Controlled, Double-blind, Parallel-group Clinical Trial.

Initially, observational studies suggested a possible effect of Lacosamide on depressive and anxious symptoms in individuals with epilepsy, and later, an open-label study demonstrated the efficacy of lacosamide in improving depressive and manic symptoms in individuals with bipolar disorder (BD). The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of combining lacosamide as an augmentation treatment to first- or second-line medication treatments in moderate to severe major depressive episodes of treatment-resistant BD I and II (failure of at least two adequate treatments during the current episode). The main hypothesis of the study is that lacosamide produces a greater reduction in depression scores compared to a placebo treatment and that both groups will exhibit similar rates of side effects and adverse events. We will conduct a double-blind, randomized, parallel-group pilot study, comparing the enhancement of the treatment that patients had been using with lacosamide and placebo, over a duration of 12 weeks. Forty subjects aged between 18 and 65 years with a diagnosis of BD (I or II) in a moderate or severe major depressive episode, despite the use of first- or second-line treatments, will be selected. The primary outcome will be the assessment of lacosamide efficacy through the difference in scores on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) from the initial visit to the end of week 12 of intervention between the lacosamide and placebo groups.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

40

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • São Paulo
      • São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
        • Recruiting
        • Instituto de Psiquiatia (IPQ)
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Diagnosis of bipolar disorder (type I or II) confirmed by structured clinical interview;
  2. acute major depressive episode of moderate or severe intensity;
  3. no response to at least two adequate pharmacological interventions to treat the current episode.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Current diagnosis of schizophrenia, dementia, intellectual disability, organic mental disorder (by clinical assessment). Comorbidity with other psychiatric disorders (personality disorders, anxiety disorders, substance use disorders, eating disorders, and attention deficit disorder) will be permitted provided the primary diagnosis is bipolar disorder;
  2. acute suicidal ideation (defined by HAMD-17 item 3 ≥ 3 points or by clinical assessment);
  3. current depressive episode with psychotic features (by clinical assessment);
  4. suspected or confirmed pregnancy;
  5. severe or unstable clinical illnesses;
  6. previous history of non-response to an adequate course of at least 8 sessions of electroconvulsive therapy;
  7. previous history of non-response to an adequate course of ketamine treatment.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo Group
Placebo tablets are similar in its features to the active drug, but without any pharmacological agent inside.
Experimental: Active Group
Lacosamide 50mg twice a day
Lacosamide 50mg will be give twice a day por 2 weeks, then Lacosamide 100mg twice a day until the end of the study.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Primary outcome
Time Frame: week 12
The efficacy of lacosamide assessed by the difference in Hamilton Depression Scale score from the initial visit to the end of week 12 of the intervention between the lacosamide and placebo groups. Minimum: 0 point Maximum: 50 points. The increase in the pontuation of the scale is related to worse outcomes.
week 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Secondary outcome
Time Frame: week 12
Difference in side effects from the initial visit to the end of week 12 of intervention, between the lacosamide and placebo groups;
week 12
Secondary Outcome
Time Frame: week 12
Difference in response rates (50% or more reduction) assessed by the Hamilton Depression Scale from the initial visit to the end of week 12 of intervention, between the lacosamide and placebo groups;
week 12
Secondary outcome
Time Frame: week 12
Difference in response rates (50% or more reduction) assessed by the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rate Scale from the initial visit to the end of week 12 of intervention, between the lacosamide and placebo groups;
week 12
Secondary outcome
Time Frame: week 12
Difference in remission rates (< 7 points) assessed by the Hamilton Depression Scale from the initial visit to the end of week 12 of intervention, between the lacosamide and placebo groups;
week 12
Secondary outcome
Time Frame: week 12
Difference in remission rates (<11 points) assessed by the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rate Scale from the initial visit to the end of week 12 of intervention, between the lacosamide and placebo groups;
week 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 9, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 6, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 12, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

February 17, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 20, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 18, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Bipolar Affective Disorder

Clinical Trials on Lacosamide

Subscribe