Team-Based Learning Integrated Into Clinical Simulation in Nursing Students (TBLab)

March 14, 2026 updated by: Nicola Pagnucci, University of Pisa

Effectiveness of Team-Based Learning Integrated Into Clinical Simulation in Nursing Education: A Randomized Controlled Trial (TBLab)

This study aims to evaluate whether integrating Team-Based Learning (TBL) into clinical simulation improves learning outcomes in undergraduate nursing students compared with traditional simulation alone.

Team-Based Learning (TBL) is an educational approach that actively involves students in small groups through individual preparation, teamwork, and application of knowledge to real-world problems. Clinical simulation is already widely used in nursing education to help students practice technical and non-technical skills in a safe environment. Combining these two approaches may enhance learning, but evidence is still limited.

In this randomized controlled trial, third-year nursing students enrolled in the Bachelor of Nursing program at the University of Pisa will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group will receive a Team-Based Learning session before participating in a clinical simulation, while the control group will take part in standard simulation activities without TBL.

The study will assess students' knowledge, technical skills, and teamwork competencies immediately after the educational activities and again at three and six months to evaluate retention of learning outcomes. Participation is voluntary and does not involve additional risks beyond standard educational activities.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study is a single-center randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate the effectiveness of integrating Team-Based Learning (TBL) into clinical simulation activities in undergraduate nursing education. The trial will be conducted within the Bachelor of Nursing program at the University of Pisa and will involve third-year nursing students participating in curricular simulation-based training.

Participants who provide informed consent will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either an experimental group or a control group. The experimental group will receive a structured Team-Based Learning intervention prior to the clinical simulation session. This intervention includes individual preparation using evidence-based learning materials, an Individual Readiness Assurance Test (I-RAT), a Team Readiness Assurance Test (T-RAT), team-based application activities, and structured feedback and debriefing.

The control group will participate in standard clinical simulation activities according to the existing undergraduate nursing curriculum, without integration of the Team-Based Learning methodology. All simulation activities focus on tracheobronchial suctioning through a tracheostomy tube, a complex nursing procedure requiring integration of theoretical knowledge, technical skills, and teamwork competencies.

Outcome measures include knowledge acquisition, technical skill performance assessed through a structured checklist, and teamwork competencies measured using validated instruments. Assessments will be conducted immediately after the intervention (T0) and at follow-up time points of three months (T1) and six months (T2) to evaluate both immediate learning effects and retention over time.

The study is embedded within routine educational activities and is classified as minimal risk. No clinical interventions are involved, and participation or non-participation does not affect students' academic evaluation or progression. Results will contribute to the evidence base on innovative educational strategies in nursing education and support the development of effective, evidence-informed teaching practices.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

150

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Enrollment in the third year of the Bachelor of Nursing program at the University of Pisa.
  • Participation in scheduled clinical simulation activities as part of the undergraduate nursing curriculum.
  • Provision of written informed consent to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • None

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experimental
Team-Based Learning Integrated Simulation

Participants receive a structured educational intervention integrating Team-Based Learning into a clinical simulation session. The intervention includes individual pre-class preparation using evidence-based learning materials, an Individual Readiness Assurance Test (I-RAT), a Team Readiness Assurance Test (T-RAT), team-based application activities focused on clinical decision-making, and structured feedback and debriefing facilitated by trained tutors.

The Team-Based Learning session is delivered prior to the clinical simulation and is aligned with curricular objectives of undergraduate nursing education.

Active Comparator: Control
Traditional Clinical Simulation

Participants receive standard clinical simulation activities as part of the undergraduate nursing curriculum. The simulation follows established educational practices routinely used in nursing education and does not include Team-Based Learning components such as readiness assurance tests, structured team application activities, or formal peer evaluation.

Simulation content, learning objectives, duration, and assessment time points are aligned with those of the experimental group.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Knowledge acquisition related to tracheobronchial suctioning
Time Frame: Immediately post-intervention (T0), 3 months (T1), and 6 months (T2)
Level of theoretical knowledge related to tracheobronchial suctioning through a tracheostomy tube, including indications, procedural steps, safety aspects, and evidence-based recommendations. Knowledge is assessed using the Individual Readiness Assurance Test (I-RAT) consisting of 10 multiple-choice questions. Each correct answer is awarded 1 point, while incorrect answers receive 0 points. Total scores range from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating greater knowledge.
Immediately post-intervention (T0), 3 months (T1), and 6 months (T2)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Technical skills performance in clinical simulation
Time Frame: Immediately post-intervention (T0), 3 months (T1), and 6 months (T2)
Ability to correctly perform tracheobronchial suctioning through a tracheostomy tube in a simulated clinical setting. Technical skills are evaluated using a structured checklist based on the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) model. The checklist includes 35 procedural steps, each scored 1 (correctly performed) or 0 (not performed or incorrectly performed). Total scores range from 0 to 35, with higher scores indicating better technical performance.
Immediately post-intervention (T0), 3 months (T1), and 6 months (T2)
Teamwork competencies
Time Frame: Immediately post-intervention (T0), 3 months (T1), and 6 months (T2)
Self-reported teamwork competencies, including communication, coordination, problem-solving, and collaboration within a team. Competencies are measured using the validated Teamwork Competency Scale (TCS), consisting of 31 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = never, 5 = always). Total scores range from 31 to 155, with higher scores indicating better perceived teamwork competencies
Immediately post-intervention (T0), 3 months (T1), and 6 months (T2)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Attitude toward Team-Based Learning
Time Frame: Immediately post-intervention (T0), 3 months (T1), and 6 months (T2)
Students' attitudes toward the Team-Based Learning methodology, including satisfaction, perceived usefulness, engagement, and contribution to learning. Attitudes are assessed using the Attitude Toward Team-Based Learning (ATL) questionnaire, consisting of 6 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = not at all; 5 = very much). Total scores range from 6 to 30, with higher scores indicating a more positive attitude toward Team-Based Learning.
Immediately post-intervention (T0), 3 months (T1), and 6 months (T2)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Nicola Pagnucci, RN, MSN, PhD, University of Pisa

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

March 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 24, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 24, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

March 2, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 17, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 14, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data will not be shared because the study involves undergraduate students and collects educational data that are anonymized and intended to be analyzed and reported only in aggregated form, in accordance with data protection regulations.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Nursing Education

Clinical Trials on Team-Based Learning Integrated Clinical Simulation

Subscribe