Scale-up the Introduction of Simulation Into Four New Health Professional Training Institutions in East and West Africa (Sim-II)

Scale-up and Introduction of Simulation Into Four New Health Professional Training Institutions in East and West Africa and the Factors That Influence Simulation Adoption at These Sites

Simulation based learning practice is limited in Sub-Saharan Africa. Experiences gained from our prior implementation in Phase I of this program show that simulation is feasible and significantly contributes to learning. However, the growth and sustainability of simulation methodologies in health training and service delivery institutions is subject to variability and institution specific factors. These factors may include but are not limited to ease of adoption of new technologies, human resources, space and institutional culture. These factors are likely to vary widely in Sub-Saharan Africa across countries and institutions.

It's not known how institutional factors will influence the introduction, adoption and sustainability of simulation methodologies in East and West African health training and service delivery institutions. We have partnered with four institutions in East and West Africa (in Uganda, Tanzania, and Nigeria) to learn about the process of introduction and scaling of simulation based learning in new frontiers.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The investigators in this proposal have partnered and propose to expand Simulation Based Learning to Lira University in northern Uganda, Busitema University in Eastern Uganda, the Catholic University of Health and Allied Sciences (CUHAS), Tanzania and University of Jos in Nigeria. All these health training and service institutions serve large rural and peri-urban populations with poor access to health care.

The investigators will engage the partners in the co-design of implementation plans to design solutions for the barriers to implementation that are anticipated, and ensure appropriate tailoring to the local context. The investigators will use a Train of trainers (ToT) Faculty development model and this will include web-based debrief mentorship using recorded debriefing sessions from real simulations at partner sites. These videos will be loaded onto a centralization server to facilitate peer-to-peer feedback using a quality of debriefing framework.

Based on the investigators' learning experience from Phase I of implementation, the team aims to develop two categories of simulation facilitators: 1) Simulation implementation faculty (SiF) and 2) Lead simulation faculty. Lead simulation faculty (LsF) will be trained at the Mbarara University of Science and Technology (MUST) simulation center of excellence and will receive support in assessing their sites' barriers and facilitators regarding the Sim intervention. The faculty trainees will undergo an intensive 1.5-day faculty development course followed by a 2-day placement at MUST sim center for mentored scenario execution practice.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

4

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Francis Bajunirwe, MD, PhD
  • Phone Number: 0772 576 396
  • Email: fbaj@must.ac.ug

Study Locations

      • Mbarara, Uganda, 256
        • Recruiting
        • Mbarara University of Science and Technology
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Health professions Institutions in East and West Africa in the Sim for life program
  • Institutional commitment to adopt simulation based learning Faculty at these health professions institutions

Exclusion Criteria: Institutions outside East and West Africa Sim for life program

-

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Before/After
Before and after simulation; Institutional faculty and facilities
Faculty development courses on simulation based learning

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adoption of simulation based learning
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 12 months after introduction of simulation based techniques
Adoption of simulation based learning
Change from baseline to 12 months after introduction of simulation based techniques
Barriers to simulation
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 12 months after introduction of simulation based techniques
Barriers to simulation based learning
Change from baseline to 12 months after introduction of simulation based techniques

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Facilitators
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 12 months after introduction of simulation based techniques
Facilitators of simulation based learning
Change from baseline to 12 months after introduction of simulation based techniques
Institutional readiness
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 12 months after introduction of simulation based learning
Institutional readiness to adopt simulation based learning
Change from baseline to 12 months after introduction of simulation based learning

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 30, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 18, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 29, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

May 5, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 5, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 29, 2021

Last Verified

April 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2020/MUST-2/SIM-II

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Ethics approval is required

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Simulation-based Learning

Clinical Trials on Simulation based learning

3
Subscribe