- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07444866
Machine Learning Enabled Management of Behavioural and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia Intervention for Dementia Caregivers
May 14, 2026 updated by: Chou Kee Lee, Education University of Hong Kong
Developing and Testing a Machine Learning Enabled Management of Behavioural and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia Intervention for Dementia Caregivers: A Hybrid Experimental Design Study
Develop and test a machine learning enabled management of behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia intervention for dementia caregivers.
Study Overview
Status
Not yet recruiting
Conditions
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Estimated)
550
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
- The Education University of Hong Kong
-
Contact:
- Kee Lee Chou, PhD
- Phone Number: +85229487473
- Email: klchou@eduhk.hk
-
Contact:
- Vivien Tang, MSc
- Email: s1135125@s.eduhk.hk
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- aged 18 above
- family caregiver of an individual with a confirmed medical diagnosis of any type of dementia who has been residing in the community
- having been providing care for ADLs and IADLs for at least 20 hours per week for at least one year prior to recruitment
- have a smartphone
- have mild to moderate stress (the 14-item Chinese version Perceived Stress Scale).
Exclusion Criteria:
- having participated in any structured mind-body intervention, cognitive therapy, or structured psychosocial intervention in the 6 months prior to recruitment
- having acute psychiatric and medical comorbidities that are potentially life-threatening (e.g. suicidal ideation) or that limit the caregivers' participation or adherence (e.g. acute psychosis)
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Active control
|
No APP based coaching, no human coaching, no rerandomization, no MRT
|
|
Experimental: App & Human Coaching + Continue Intervention
First-line of coaching: App + Human Coaching Responder
|
Continue with existing intervention plan
|
|
Experimental: App & Human Coaching + Increase intensity in human coaching
First-line of coaching: App + Human Coaching Non-Responder
|
Increase intensity of human coaching
|
|
Experimental: App & Human Coaching + Booster
First-line of coaching: App + Human Coaching Non-Responder
|
Add a booster session
|
|
Experimental: App Coaching + Continue Intervention
First-line of coaching: App Coaching Responder
|
Continue with existing intervention plan
|
|
Experimental: App Coaching + Increase intensity in human coaching
First-line of coaching: App Coaching Non-Responder
|
Increase intensity of human coaching
|
|
Experimental: App Coaching + Booster
First-line of coaching: App Coaching Non-Responder
|
Add a booster session
|
|
Experimental: Human Coaching + Continue Intervention
First-line of coaching: Human Coaching Responder
|
Continue with existing intervention plan
|
|
Experimental: Human Coaching + Increase intensity in human coaching
First-line of coaching: Human Coaching Non-Responder
|
Increase intensity of human coaching
|
|
Experimental: Human Coaching + Booster
First-line of coaching: Human Coaching Non-Responder
|
Add a booster session
|
|
Experimental: No Coaching + Continue Intervention
First-line of coaching: No Coaching Responder
|
Continue with existing intervention plan
|
|
Experimental: No Coaching + Increase intensity in human coaching
First-line of coaching: No Coaching Non-Responder
|
Increase intensity of human coaching
|
|
Experimental: No Coaching + Booster
First-line of coaching: No Coaching Non-Responder
|
Add a booster session
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Stress
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), 6 weeks after baseline assessment (T1), 10 weeks after baseline assessment (T2), 20 weeks after baseline assessment (T3), 32 weeks after baseline assessment (T4)
|
10-item Perceived Stress Scale; each item will be rated from 0=Never to 4=Very often.
Total scores range from 0 to 40.
|
Baseline (T0), 6 weeks after baseline assessment (T1), 10 weeks after baseline assessment (T2), 20 weeks after baseline assessment (T3), 32 weeks after baseline assessment (T4)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Depression
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), 6 weeks after baseline assessment (T1), 10 weeks after baseline assessment (T2), 20 weeks after baseline assessment (T3), 32 weeks after baseline assessment (T4)
|
Patient Health Questionnaire-9; Each item will be rated from 0=Not at all to 3=nearly everyday.
Total scores range from 0 to 27
|
Baseline (T0), 6 weeks after baseline assessment (T1), 10 weeks after baseline assessment (T2), 20 weeks after baseline assessment (T3), 32 weeks after baseline assessment (T4)
|
|
Anxiety
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), 6 weeks after baseline assessment (T1), 10 weeks after baseline assessment (T2), 20 weeks after baseline assessment (T3), 32 weeks after baseline assessment (T4)
|
Generalised Anxiety Disorder; each item will be rated from 0=not at all to 3=nearly every day.
Total score range from 0 to 21.
|
Baseline (T0), 6 weeks after baseline assessment (T1), 10 weeks after baseline assessment (T2), 20 weeks after baseline assessment (T3), 32 weeks after baseline assessment (T4)
|
|
Physical Health
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), 32 weeks after baseline assessment (T4)
|
Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living; each item will be rated 0=dependent to 1=independent.
Total scores range from 0 to 8.
|
Baseline (T0), 32 weeks after baseline assessment (T4)
|
|
Physical Health
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), 32 weeks after baseline assessment (T4)
|
Activities of Daily Living; each item will be rate from 0=dependent to 5/10=independent.
Total scores range from 0 to 100.
|
Baseline (T0), 32 weeks after baseline assessment (T4)
|
|
Physical Symptoms
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), 32 weeks after baseline assessment (T4)
|
Wahler Physical Symptoms Inventory; each item will be rated from 0=almost never agree to 5=agree almost every day.
Total score range from 0 to 210.
|
Baseline (T0), 32 weeks after baseline assessment (T4)
|
|
Chronic Illness
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), 32 weeks after baseline assessment (T4)
|
Participants will indicate any presence of chronic illness (e.g., diabetes, asthma, high blood pressure).
|
Baseline (T0), 32 weeks after baseline assessment (T4)
|
|
Caregiver Burden
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), 6 weeks after baseline assessment (T1), 10 weeks after baseline assessment (T2), 20 weeks after baseline assessment (T3), 32 weeks after baseline assessment (T4)
|
12-item Zarit Burden Interview Scale ; each item will be rated from 0=Never to 4=Nearly always.
Total scores range from 0 to 48.
|
Baseline (T0), 6 weeks after baseline assessment (T1), 10 weeks after baseline assessment (T2), 20 weeks after baseline assessment (T3), 32 weeks after baseline assessment (T4)
|
|
Psychological Well-Being
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), 6 weeks after baseline assessment (T1), 10 weeks after baseline assessment (T2), 20 weeks after baseline assessment (T3), 32 weeks after baseline assessment (T4)
|
18-item Ryff Psychological Well-Being scale, each item range from 1-strongly agree to 7-strongly disagree.
Total score range from 18-126.
|
Baseline (T0), 6 weeks after baseline assessment (T1), 10 weeks after baseline assessment (T2), 20 weeks after baseline assessment (T3), 32 weeks after baseline assessment (T4)
|
|
Memory and Behaviour Problems
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), 6 weeks after baseline assessment (T1), 10 weeks after baseline assessment (T2), 20 weeks after baseline assessment (T3), 32 weeks after baseline assessment (T4)
|
Revised Memory and Behavior Problems Checklist; a 24-item checklist from 0=never occurred/not at all to 4=daily/extremely.
Higher score indicate more frequent behavioral problems/caregiver distress
|
Baseline (T0), 6 weeks after baseline assessment (T1), 10 weeks after baseline assessment (T2), 20 weeks after baseline assessment (T3), 32 weeks after baseline assessment (T4)
|
|
Neuropsychiatric
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), 6 weeks after baseline assessment (T1), 10 weeks after baseline assessment (T2), 20 weeks after baseline assessment (T3), 32 weeks after baseline assessment (T4)
|
Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire; classified each of the 12 domain into presence of symptom, frequency, severity, and caregiver distress.
|
Baseline (T0), 6 weeks after baseline assessment (T1), 10 weeks after baseline assessment (T2), 20 weeks after baseline assessment (T3), 32 weeks after baseline assessment (T4)
|
|
Sleep Quality
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), 6 weeks after baseline assessment (T1), 10 weeks after baseline assessment (T2), 20 weeks after baseline assessment (T3), 32 weeks after baseline assessment (T4)
|
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index; each item will be rated from 0=No difficulty to 3=Severe difficulty.
Total scores range from 0 to 21.
Higher scores indicating poorer sleep quality
|
Baseline (T0), 6 weeks after baseline assessment (T1), 10 weeks after baseline assessment (T2), 20 weeks after baseline assessment (T3), 32 weeks after baseline assessment (T4)
|
|
Physical and Mental Health
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), 6 weeks after baseline assessment (T1), 10 weeks after baseline assessment (T2), 20 weeks after baseline assessment (T3), 32 weeks after baseline assessment (T4)
|
12-item Short Form Health Survey, Version 2 (SF-12v2).
Item responses are aggregated using standard scoring procedures to generate two summary scores: physical and mental.
Higher scores indicating better health status
|
Baseline (T0), 6 weeks after baseline assessment (T1), 10 weeks after baseline assessment (T2), 20 weeks after baseline assessment (T3), 32 weeks after baseline assessment (T4)
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Caregiving
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), 6 weeks after baseline assessment (T1), 10 weeks after baseline assessment (T2), 20 weeks after baseline assessment (T3), 32 weeks after baseline assessment (T4)
|
Revised Scale for Caregiving Self-efficacy; 15-item scale.
Total score is 100.
|
Baseline (T0), 6 weeks after baseline assessment (T1), 10 weeks after baseline assessment (T2), 20 weeks after baseline assessment (T3), 32 weeks after baseline assessment (T4)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Kee Lee Chou, PhD, The Education University of Hong Kong
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
June 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
November 30, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
November 30, 2027
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
February 25, 2026
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
February 25, 2026
First Posted (Actual)
March 3, 2026
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
May 18, 2026
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 14, 2026
Last Verified
May 1, 2026
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2023-2024-0387
- 22231921 (Other Grant/Funding Number: Research Fund Secretariat, Health Bureau)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Dementia Caregiver
-
The University of Hong KongNot yet recruiting
-
Center for Clinical Research and PreventionMunicipality of Frederiksberg, Denmark; Copenhagen Municipality, DenmarkNot yet recruitingDementia Caregiver | Digital Education InterventionsDenmark
-
Rendever, Inc.National Institute on Aging (NIA); RANDRecruitingDementia Caregiver | Peer Support | Caregiver Social Support | Direct Care Workers | In-Home CareUnited States
-
Milton S. Hershey Medical CenterNYU Langone Health; National Institute on Aging (NIA)Not yet recruitingDementia | Caregiver Burden | Caregiver Stress | Caregiver Burden of People With DementiaUnited States
-
Emory UniversityNational Institute on Aging (NIA)Completed
-
Massachusetts General HospitalCompleted
-
VA Office of Research and DevelopmentTerminatedDementia Family Caregiver Burden and ConflictUnited States
-
University of Southern CaliforniaCalifornia Department of Public HealthRecruitingCaregiver Burden of People With DementiaUnited States
-
University of RostockGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE)Completed
-
Hülya Nuray BayraktarHacettepe UniversityCompletedHealthy | Caregiver Burden | Self Efficacy | Caregiver | Caregiver Stress | Caregiver Burden of People With DementiaTurkey
Clinical Trials on Active Control
-
Shanghai SIMR Biotechnology Co., Ltd.CompletedPeripheral Neuropathic PainAustralia
-
Vanda PharmaceuticalsCompleted
-
George Mason UniversityNational Endowment for the Arts, United StatesCompletedQuality of Life | Physical Activity | Cognitive Impairment | Self-Perception | Social Isolation | Mental Status ChangeUnited States
-
University of RochesterCompleted
-
Federal University of Health Science of Porto AlegreCompleted
-
BeHnam KhodaRahmiNot yet recruitingStress Regulation and Well-being in Non-clinical ContextsUnited Kingdom
-
Hungarian University of Sports ScienceSemmelweis UniversityActive, not recruiting
-
University of California, San DiegoNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH); University of Miami; The University...RecruitingSchizoaffective Disorder | Psychotic Disorder | Schizophrenia DisordersUnited States
-
University Medical Center GroningenCompletedEsophageal Cancer | Lung CancerNetherlands