- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07446829
Effect of Different Needle Insertion Positions on the Clinical Outcomes of YAMANE Technique
Effect of Different Needle Insertion Positions on the Clinical Outcomes of YAMANE Technique for Intrascleral Intraocular Lens Fixation: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
For patients with insufficient capsular bag support caused by congenital developmental abnormalities, trauma, or other etiologies and who meet the indications for intraocular lens (IOL) implantation, IOL suspension surgery is the primary surgical procedure. As an innovative IOL suspension technique, the YAMANE technique has been widely favored by ophthalmologists. Due to its sutureless feature, this technique reduces the risk of postoperative complications such as infection and hypotony, while greatly simplifying surgical procedures.
In previous studies on the YAMANE technique, needle insertion sites were commonly set at 2 mm and 2.5 mm posterior to the cornea limbus. Among them, the 2.5 mm post-limbal insertion point was associated with a smaller mean absolute refractive prediction error and better clinical outcomes. Although a few studies have evaluated the clinical efficacy of the YAMANE technique, no study has systematically compared its clinical outcomes between different needle insertion positions. Considering that differences in the insertion point may directly affect postoperative refractive status, IOL stability, and visual outcomes, evaluating the impact of different insertion sites on surgical results is critical for optimizing surgical strategies and improving therapeutic efficacy.
In this randomized controlled trial, the investigators will systematically investigate the clinical efficacy of needle insertion at 2 mm versus 2.5 mm posterior to the cornea limbus in the YAMANE technique. Through this study, the investigators aim to provide evidence for ophthalmic clinical practice, explore the optimal needle insertion point, and offer a more precise and safe surgical plan for patients undergoing the YAMANE technique.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Guangming Jin
- Phone Number: +86 13560035613
- Email: jinguangming@gzzoc.com
Study Locations
-
-
Province
-
Guangdong, Province, China, 510060
- Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science
-
Contact:
- Guangming Jin
- Phone Number: +86 13560035613
- Email: jinguangming@gzzoc.com
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients aged 4-18 years (regardless of gender) who meet the indications for YAMANE technique.
- Patients who can complete a follow-up period of at least 3 months after surgery.
- Patients or their legal guardians who provide informed consent to participate in this study.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with concurent secondary qlaucoma, retinal detachment, strabismus, or other relevant ocular complications (excluding refractive errors).
- Patients participating in other trials that may affect the results of this study.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: intervention group(suture needle insertion at 2.5 mm posterior to the cornea limbus)
Participants in the intervention group should complete a comprehensive ophthalmic examination at baseline, undergo needle insertion 2.5mm post-limbal during surgery,and receive routine follow-up at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months postoperatively.
|
Participants in the intervention group should complete a comprehensive ophthalmic examination at baseline, undergo needle insertion 2.5mm post-limbal during surgery, and receive routine follow-up at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months postoperatively.
|
|
No Intervention: compare group(suture needle insertion at 2 mm posterior to the cornea limbus)
Participants in the intervention group should complete a comprehensive ophthalmic examination at baseline, undergo needle insertion 2mm post-limbal during surgery,and receive routine follow-up at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months postoperatively
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Refractive Predictive Error of Patients at the 3-month Postoperative Follow-up
Time Frame: 3-month Postoperative Follow-up
|
Case report form records
|
3-month Postoperative Follow-up
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Corneal Endothelial Cell Count of Patients at the 3-Month Postoperative Follow-up
Time Frame: 3-month Postoperative Follow-up
|
Measured using a corneal endothelial microscope
|
3-month Postoperative Follow-up
|
|
Incidence of Postoperative Complications at the 3-Month Postoperative Follow-up
Time Frame: 3-month Postoperative Follow-up
|
3-month Postoperative Follow-up
|
|
|
Uncorrected Visual Acuity (UCVA) of Patients at the 3-Month Postoperative Follow-up
Time Frame: 3-month Postoperative Follow-up
|
Measured using the EDTRS chart
|
3-month Postoperative Follow-up
|
|
Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) of Patients at the 3-Month Postoperative Follow-up
Time Frame: 3-month Postoperative Follow-up
|
Measured using the EDTRS chart
|
3-month Postoperative Follow-up
|
|
IOL Tilt in Patients at the 3-Month Postoperative Follow-up
Time Frame: 3-month Postoperative Follow-up
|
by the Casia 2 AS-OCT Instrument
|
3-month Postoperative Follow-up
|
|
IOL Decentration in Patients at the 3-Month Postoperative Follow-up
Time Frame: 3-month Postoperative Follow-up
|
by the Casia 2 AS-OCT Instrument
|
3-month Postoperative Follow-up
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Study Chair: Danying Zheng, Guangdong Provincial Clinical ResearchCenter for Ocular Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science,Guangzhou, Guangdong
- Principal Investigator: Guangming Jin, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science,Guangzhou, Guangdong
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Qu Y, Duan P, Huo S, Li F, Li J. Sutured Intrascleral Posterior Chamber Intraocular Lens Fixation with Ciliary Sulcus Location Guided by Ultrasonic Biological Microscopy: A Retrospective Analysis of Anatomical and Refractive Outcome. J Ophthalmol. 2020 Jun 4;2020:5843410. doi: 10.1155/2020/5843410. eCollection 2020.
- Rocke JR, McGuinness MB, Atkins WK, Fry LE, Kane JX, Fabinyi DCA, Yeoh J, Chiu D, Essex MBiostat RW, Roufail E, Sheridan AM, Allen PJ, Edwards TL. Refractive Outcomes of the Yamane Flanged Intrascleral Haptic Fixation Technique. Ophthalmology. 2020 Oct;127(10):1429-1431. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.03.032. Epub 2020 Apr 3. No abstract available.
- Blagun N, Krix-Jachym K, Rekas M. Comparison of Safety and Efficacy of Four-Point Scleral Intraocular Lens Fixation and the Yamane Technique. Ophthalmol Ther. 2024 Jul;13(7):1955-1966. doi: 10.1007/s40123-024-00962-7. Epub 2024 May 21.
- Trivedi V, Lee S, Lee PSY, Me R, You Q, Im J, Ross B, Tran DV, Le KH, Malbin B, Lin X. Comparative Analysis of Effective Lens Position and Refractive Outcomes in Scleral-Fixated versus Intracapsular Intraocular Lenses. Clin Ophthalmol. 2024 Dec 25;18:3949-3955. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S486044. eCollection 2024.
- Erakgun T, Gobeka HH. The novel haptic-twist method for a sutureless double-needle intrascleral haptic fixation technique. Int Ophthalmol. 2021 Sep;41(9):3013-3020. doi: 10.1007/s10792-021-01862-6. Epub 2021 May 20.
- Schranz M, Reumuller A, Kostolna K, Novotny C, Schartmuller D, Abela-Formanek C. Refractive outcome and lens power calculation after intrascleral intraocular lens fixation: a comparison of three-piece and one-piece intrascleral fixation technique. Eye Vis (Lond). 2023 Jun 9;10(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s40662-023-00341-6.
- Limon U, Akcay BIS. A novel Yamane technique modification: Reverse intraocular lens implantation for simplifying trailing haptic insertion. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2023 May;71(5):2244-2246. doi: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_3158_22.
- Sahin Vural G, Guven YZ, Karahan E, Zengin MO. Long term outcomes of Yamane technique in various indications. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2023 Nov;33(6):2210-2216. doi: 10.1177/11206721231167198. Epub 2023 Apr 10.
- Shasha R. Yamane intrascleral haptic fixation, white-to-white distance, and the temporal approach. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2023 May 1;49(5):543-544. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001172. No abstract available.
- Tang Y, Gao Y, Chu Y, Liu Y, Han Q. Modified Yamane technique with a 26-gauge needle: single corneal incision and simplified haptic insertion. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2022 Jan 1;48(1):e1-e4. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000816.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2025KYPJ137
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- ANALYTIC_CODE
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Congenital Ectopia Lentis
-
Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen UniversityActive, not recruitingEctopia LentisChina
-
Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen UniversityRecruitingEctopia Lentis | Lens Subluxation or DislocationChina
-
Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen UniversityRecruitingEctopia Lentis | Dislocation, LensChina
-
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine,...Completed
-
Hospices Civils de LyonCompletedMarfan Syndrome | Ectopia LentisFrance
-
Anglia Ruskin UniversityMid and South Essex NHS Foundation TrustUnknownCataract | Pseudoexfoliation Syndrome | Ectopia Lentis | Marfan's Syndrome With Ocular Manifestations | PhakodonesisUnited Kingdom
-
University of British ColumbiaRecruitingHip Dislocation, Congenital | Congenital Hip Dysplasia | Congenital Dysplasia of the Hip | Congenital Hip Dislocation | Hip Dysplasia, Congenital, Nonsyndromic | Congenital Hip Displacement | Dislocation, Congenital Hip | Displacement, Congenital Hip | Dysplasia, Congenital Hip | Hip Displacement, Congenital and other conditionsCanada
-
The Children's Hospital of Zhejiang University...Beijing Children's Hospital; Children's Hospital of Nanjing Medical UniversityNot yet recruitingCongenital Heart Disease in Children | Congenital Heart Disease (CHD)China
-
Céline PEBREL-RICHARDRecruiting
Clinical Trials on YAMANE technique(Suture Needle Insertion at 2.5 mm Posterior to the Limbus)
-
Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen UniversityNot yet recruiting