Accuracy of the Accuro 3S

March 3, 2026 updated by: Yale University

Feasibility and Accuracy of the Accuro 3S

The main purpose of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of the Accuro 3S to provide live guidance when performing a neuraxial technique (e.g., spinal, or epidural).

The Accuro 3S is a new device that was designed to allow for midline live neuraxial guidance. If the device can perform as the manufacturers claim the device will permit the performance of epidurals as close as doing them under fluoroscopy.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Feasibility will be assessed in terms of how easily the device can be used and if it poses any discomfort to the patient. Live guidance is defined as the ability to see and change, if needed, the needle trajectory as it is advanced. Accuracy is defined as a measurement of depth by device versus the actual depth of the needle, number of needle attempts (skin punctures) and number of needle redirection.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Connecticut
      • New Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06520
        • Yale New Haven Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The anesthetic plan for the patient includes a neuraxial anesthetic (spinal or epidural) as the main anesthetic for labor, surgery (e.g. orthopedic surgery, cesarean delivery) or for postoperative pain management (e.g, major abdominal surgery). *Given our labor and delivery volume (~300 epidurals/month) investigators think that they will only recruitc obstetric patients. In case of difficulty recruiting, then investigators will seek out a different patient population.
  • No history of allergic reactions to adhesives used in standard epidural placements as per chart review or self-reported.
  • Patient skin is intact in the area of placement of the epidural or spinal anesthesia.
  • The patient is English speaking.
  • For obstetric patients, the patient is admitted for cesarean delivery or for induction and is not in active labor. *Clarification - Patients scheduled for elective cesarean delivery will be approached for spinal anesthesia. Given that spinal anesthesia carries a smaller risk for post-dural puncture headache and other morbidities, investigators will recruit and perform 10 spinals on this patient population. Once comfortable with the technology, then will move to recruiting and performing epidurals. If during the spinal anesthesia trial the device does not provide accurate and clear needle visualization, the study will be culminated.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindication to epidural catheter placement including bleeding diathesis (essential thrombocythemia, idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, von Willebrand disease, and hemophilia A or B), neurological dysfunction (multiple sclerosis, subacute myeloopticoneuropathy or preexisting lower limb neurological deficit), prior extensive spinal surgery or major spinal deformity, pre-operative use of anti-coagulant with planned use of therapeutic dose of anti-coagulant in post-operatively, documented pre-operative coagulopathy (INR greater than 1.3 not on Coumadin or PTT greater than 42), platelets less than 100, 000, or evidence of infection at potential epidural site.
  • Presence of orthopedic implants in the spine.
  • Skin dyscrasias or allergies to the ultrasound procedure.
  • Unable to assume sitting position.
  • Body Mass Index (BMI) less than 18.5 kg/m2.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Standard of Care and neuraxial guidance
Spinal or Epidural will be performed utilizing neuraxial guidance and standard of care techniques for placement. The spinal or epidural technique will not deviate from the standard of care. The device will only add the use of the disposable sterile drape and the use of the image will guide change of needle trajectory (without the need for contrast or radiation exposure) but not changing the technique.
Provides anatomical guidance during the placement of needles or catheters using real-time visualization.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean number of needle attempts
Time Frame: At time of procedure, 1 day
Defined as the number of times the needle is inserted into patients back
At time of procedure, 1 day
Mean number of needle redirections
Time Frame: At time of procedure, 1 day
Defined as number of needle movements in a cephalad, caudal or lateral position.
At time of procedure, 1 day
Accuracy of device
Time Frame: At time of procedure, 1 day
The ultrasound device can be used to measure the distance from skin to epidural space, this will be recorded as the estimated distance to epidural space (EDES). Once the epidural space is accessed the needle will be marked and measured. This will represent the Distance to epidural space (DES). The difference between EDES and DES will provide the accuracy of the device. Mean distance in centimeters (cm).
At time of procedure, 1 day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient satisfaction
Time Frame: 20 minutes post procedure
Likert scale asking the patient "How satisfied are you with the procedure performed?" Very dissatisfied, dissatisfied, Satisfied, very satisfied, extremely satisfied. Total score range 1-5 with higher scores indicating more satisfaction.
20 minutes post procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Antonio Gonzalez-Fiol, MD, Yale University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

July 15, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 15, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 15, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 19, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 3, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

March 9, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 9, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 3, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neuraxial Technique

Clinical Trials on ACCURO 3S

Subscribe