Pre-Insertion Ultrasound for Lateral-Position Spinal in Cesarean Delivery

April 22, 2021 updated by: Naida Margaret Cole, Brigham and Women's Hospital

The Impact of Pre-Insertion Ultrasound for Lateral-Position Spinal in Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of lumbar ultrasound anatomic mapping using the Accuro device on the number of needle redirections, when performing spinal anesthesia in the lateral decubitus position on patients undergoing elective cesarean delivery.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Training in neuraxial placement most commonly occurs with patients in the sitting position, since it is easy to master. However lateral placement may be preferred in emergent situations and for patient comfort. In order to provide safe and effective anesthesia to parturients, providers must be competent with the technique in both sitting and lateral positions.

Ultrasound examination prior to spinal placement is a safe, non-invasive method of determining depth, midline, and interspinous location. Its use may decrease the number of needle insertions and needle passes in parturients in the sitting position, however little is known about the benefit of ultrasound use in the placement of lateral spinals.

The use of lumbar ultrasound with Accuro may improve success rates, safety, and the education of residents as they learn neuraxial placement in the lateral position. This will be the first study to examine the use of Accuro for lateral neuraxial placement.

The study investigators hypothesize that lumbar ultrasound with the handheld Accuro device by an experienced provider prior to spinal insertion will result in fewer needle redirections compared to palpation of landmarks when performed by anesthesia residents or fellows.

The two arms of the study are as follows:

Group 1: Control Group: sham pre-puncture ultrasound procedure with the handheld Accuro device turned off, followed by a sham marking on the participant's back using the Accuro locator marker attached to the device.

Group 2: Ultrasound Group: pre-puncture ultrasound with Accuro followed by marking placed at the L3-4 interspace in the midline using the attached Accuro locator marker.

All ultrasound exams will be performed by an unblinded physician study investigator.

All study participants will have a spinal anesthetic in lateral position performed by one of the residents or fellows participating in the study.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

110

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
        • Recruiting
        • Brigham and Women's Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • pregnant women
  • 18 years or older
  • singleton pregnancy
  • at least 37 weeks gestational age
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Classification II
  • body mass index (BMI) <35 kg/m2
  • plan for elective and scheduled cesarean section with spinal anesthesia

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patient refusal of spinal anesthesia
  • uncorrected coagulopathy
  • infection at the skin site of spinal placement
  • increased intracranial pressure
  • untreated hemodynamic instability
  • history of scoliosis or spine surgery
  • BMI >/=35 kg/m2
  • allergy to local anesthetic
  • allergy to opioids

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Sham Comparator: Control
The sham group will receive a pre-procedure sham scan (the handheld image guidance Accuro device will be placed on the back, but it will be turned off) followed by sham marking on the subject's back.
Experimental: Accuro ultrasound
The intervention will consist of a pre-procedural scan of the lumbar spine using the handheld image guidance device, Accuro, to determine spinal landmarks and anticipated depth of the intrathecal space.
Other Names:
  • Accuro

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Needle Redirections
Time Frame: through study completion, average of 3 hours
Number of times the angle of the spinal introducer needle is adjusted, without exiting and re-entering the skin
through study completion, average of 3 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Needle Passes
Time Frame: through study completion, average of 3 hours
Number of times the spinal introducer needle exits the skin and re-enters the skin at a new location
through study completion, average of 3 hours
Procedural Time
Time Frame: through study completion, average of 3 hours
The time from subcutaneous injection of local anesthetic prior to spinal placement until the return of cerebrospinal fluid through the spinal needle is confirmed
through study completion, average of 3 hours
Patient Satisfaction with procedure
Time Frame: through study completion, average of 3 hours
Patient's rating of their satisfaction with the spinal procedure using a 0-10 numeric rating scale, as measured by a blinded study investigator
through study completion, average of 3 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 22, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

October 1, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 28, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 13, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

October 19, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 26, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 22, 2021

Last Verified

April 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2020P

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

There is no current IPD sharing plan for this data.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cesarean Section

Clinical Trials on Accuro SpineNav3D

3
Subscribe