International Study for Treatment of Childhood Relapsed Precursor B-Cell ALL 2020 (IntReALL BCP 2020)

International Study for Treatment of Childhood Relapsed Precursor B-Cell ALL 2020 A Randomized Phase III Study Conducted by the Resistant Disease Committee of the International BFM Study Group

The IntReALL BCP 2020 study aims to review recent developments and findings regarding chemoimmunotherapy with inotuzumab and immunotherapy with blinatumomab and to increase the use of promising new immunotherapeutic drugs as replacements for toxic SOC chemotherapy elements.

The IntReALL BCP 2020 study has the potential to improve CR and EFS rates for all SR and HR groups, as well as for patients with IEM recurrence, by replacing toxic chemotherapy with targeted, less toxic immunotherapy strategies, and could establish these new approaches as SOC for children with relapsed BCP ALL in the future.

Study Overview

• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Conditions: B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia
• Intervention / Treatment: Drug: Inotuzumab ozogamicin (INO); Drug: Blinatumomab

Detailed Description

Though survival of children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) has considerably improved over the past few decades, relapsed ALL remains a leading cause of mortality in children with cancer. Prognostic factors for patients with relapsed ALL are duration of first remission, immunophenotype of the malignant clone, site of relapse, molecular response to induction therapy (i.e minimal/measurable residual disease, MRD) and very high risk genetic features. The prognosis of patients with relapsed ALL was substantially improved with intensive multidrug chemotherapy and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in the majority of patients at the cost of acute and long-term toxicity, including early and late treatment-related deaths. Patients with precursor B-cell (BCP) ALL classified as standard risk (SR) with late isolated bone marrow (BM) or combined with extramedullary (EM) disease and without high risk genetic features achieve high remission rates (> 95%) and favorable event-free survival (EFS) rates (65%) with conventional consolidation and maintenance chemotherapy if, after induction therapy, the leukemia could be reduced below the MRD level of 10-3 or 10-4, depending on the induction regimen. About 50% of SR patients experience poor MRD response after conventional chemotherapy induction and require intensified consolidation through allo-HSCT with total body irradiation to achieve EFS rates comparable to that of SR patients with good MRD response. Patients classified as high risk (HR) with early BM/EM relapse still demonstrate poor CR rates of around 65-75% being treated on standard induction therapy, and high rates of subsequent relapse. Consequently, these patients all require allo-HSCT for consolidation of 2nd remission. Patients with isolated extramedullary relapse (IEM) had a better outcome with CNS directed induction / consolidation chemotherapy as provided with the ALL-REZ BFM backbone compared to conventional induction as provided with the ALL-R3 induction. Patients with very high risk (VHR) genetic features (KMT2A::AFF1, TCF3::PBX1, TCF3::HLF rearrangements, low hypodiploidy/near haploidy, TP53 alterations) and/or very early relapses (i.e. those occurring within 18 month after initial diagnosis) have a limited benefit from conventional chemotherapy followed by allo-HSCT since their EFS rates have been reported to be below 20%.

For SR and HR patients, there is a need to replace toxic induction/consolidation chemotherapy with targeted less toxic drugs and to improve the rates of MRD negative remission after induction. In SR patients, reduction of MRD after induction could result in a lower proportion of patients with indication for allo-HSCT, a treatment that - despite being efficacious - is associated with substantial long-term sequelae. For SR patients, there is a medical need to reduce toxic consolidation and maintenance chemotherapy with targeted less toxic and potentially more effective treatment. The CD3/19 directed bi-specific monoclonal antibody blinatumomab has shown better efficacy and less toxicity compared to conventional consolidation chemotherapy in children with relapsed B-cell precursor (BCP) ALL with and without extramedullary involvement in randomized trials. The superiority of blinatumomab has been shown for HR patients before receiving HSCT in a randomized trial in Europe and for HR/IR patients before receiving HSCT and SR patients with MRD good response in a randomized trial conducted by the Children's Oncology Group. In SR patients with MRD good response, a total of 3 courses of Blinatumomab has been applied partly replacing consolidation chemotherapy and partly as add on to the standard therapy. Thus, blinatumomab can be considered as best standard of care (SOC) for early consolidation in this indication. Blinatumomab is currently being developed for subcutaneous administration. This formulation is planned to be tested in phase I/II studies in children with BCP ALL at the end of 2025. Innovative, more efficacious therapies, such as CD19-targeting CAR T cells, are urgently needed for VHR patients, since conventional therapies, including allo-HSCT, have led to dismal results.

Inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO) is a CD22 directed humanized monoclonal antibody linked to the toxin calicheamicin, belonging to the class of antibody-drug conjugate (ADC). CD22 is expressed on nearly all BCP-ALLs. After antigen binding, InO is internalized and the toxin released causing DNA damage and inducing apoptosis. InO has shown high MRD negative remission rates compared to SOC in adult and pediatric patients with relapsed/refractory BCP ALL and a safe and effective dose has been identified in a pediatric phase I/II trial.

The trial IntReALL BCP 2020 aims at integrating these recent developments and findings and at increasing the use of promising new immune-therapeutic drugs replacing toxic SOC chemotherapy elements. SR patients with bone marrow relapse will randomly receive the SOC induction ALLR3 with Mitoxantrone or InO monotherapy. Post induction, they will receive a 1st consolidation chemotherapy element (SCB1). Patients with MRD good response (< 10-4) will receive 3 courses of blinatumomab during consolidation and maintenance therapy, the 1st replacing the consolidation chemotherapy element SCB2, the 2nd added on after the 3rd consolidation chemotherapy element SCB3, and the 3rd added on after the 4rth consolidation element SCB4 and 8 weeks of conventional maintenance therapy, which, at difference of the IntReALL 2010 trial will not include vincristine/dexamethasone pulses. SR patients with MRD poor response will receive SCB1 and one blinatumomab course followed by allo-HSCT. During the course of the trial, the protocol is planned to be amended changing the blinatumomab formulation from IV to SC as soon as the latter becomes available. .

HR patients with bone marrow relapse will be included into an industry sponsored induction window trial and will join the academic IntReALL BCP 2020 study only for consolidation, since all HR patients have an indication for allo-HSCT. HR patients in CR2 after induction will receive one course of consolidation chemotherapy (HC1), one course of blinatumomab as recently established SOC followed by allo-HSCT. Whereas for the European Blina-215 trial (randomized blinatumomab versus HC3) 2 courses HC1 and HC2 were given as standard early consolidation, in the COG trial (AALL1331) the whole consolidation chemotherapy has been replaced by blinatumomab. One standard chemotherapy consolidation course HC1 is considered as feasible compromise and provides time for B-cell regeneration after InO as prerequisite for T-cell expansion during the blinatumomab consolidation course.

Patients with IEM will receive the IntReALL SR2010 arm A backbone with blinatumomab replacing the chemotherapy element SCA3 as bridge to allo-HSCT in those with early relapse or to further consolidation therapy in those with late relapse.

The hypotheses addressed within the IntReALL BCP 2020 trial are, that:

1. EFS-probability in SR patients will be improved in the InO arm leading to higher CR rates, better MRD response and to less patients requiring allo-HSCT compared to standard of care induction chemotherapy ALL R3 in a prospective randomized trial.
2. SR patients with MRD good response will have a better DFS probability with 3 courses of blinatumomab, the 1st replacing the consolidation chemotherapy element SCB2, the 2nd added on after the consolidation chemotherapy element SCB3, and the 3rd added on after the consolidation element SCB4 and 8 weeks of conventional maintenance therapy, followed by maintenance therapy until week 132, being applied without vincristine/dexamethasone pulses, as compared to historical controls. Blinatumomab given subcutaneously is planned to be investigated accordingly after finalization of the recruitment for the IV trial within a planned amendment of the study.
3. HR patients with CR2 after induction will have a non-inferior DFS with HC1 and blinatumomab compared to historical controls with HC1, HC2 and blinatumomab.
4. EFS probability in patients with IEM relapse will be improved and toxicity will be reduced with blinatumomab as late consolidation element compared to historical controls (ALL-REZ BFM 2002).

The IntReALL BCP 2020 trial has the potential to improve CR and EFS rates for all SR and HR groups, as well as in patients with IEM relapse, by replacing toxic chemotherapy with targeted less toxic immunotherapy strategies and may establish these new approaches as SOC for children with relapsed BCP ALL in future. In addition, the IntReALL BCP 2020 trial has the ambition to reduce the proportion of SR patients in need of an allograft for consolidation therapy.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Estimated): 750
• Phase: Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

• Study Contact: Name: Adriane E Napp, Dr. rer. medic, MSc; Phone Number: +17654426233; Email: adriane.napp@charite.de

Study Locations

• Austria
  • Vienna, Austria, 1090
    • St. Anna Kinderspital GmbH
    • Contact: Andishe Attarbaschi, Dr. med., MD; Phone Number: +431401709117; Email: andishe.attarbaschi@ccri.at
• Belgium
  • Ghent, Belgium, B-9000
    • Ghent University Hospital
    • Contact: Barbara De Moerloose, Dr. med., MD
• Czechia
  • Prague, Czechia, 150 00
    • Fakultni nemocnice v Motole
    • Contact: Lucie Šrámková, Dr. med., MD; Phone Number: +420224436400; Email: lucie.sramkova@fnmotol.cz
• Denmark
  • Copenhagen, Denmark, 2100
    • Rigshospitalet
    • Contact: Bodil Als-Nielsen, Dr. med., MD; Phone Number: +45 35451898; Email: bodil.elise.thorhauge.als-nielsen@regionh.dk
• Finland
  • Helsinki, Finland, FIN-00290
    • HUS Helsinki University Hospital
    • Contact: Samppa Ryhänen, Dr. med, MD; Phone Number: +358504270942; Email: samppa.ryhanen@hus.fi
• France
  • Nice, France, 06202
    • CHU de NICE, Hôpital L'ARCHET
    • Contact: Pierre Rohrlich, Dr. med., MD; Phone Number: +33492036377; Email: rohrlich.ps@chu-nice.fr
• Germany
  • Berlin, Germany
    • Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
    • Contact: Arend E von Stackelberg, Dr. med., MD; Phone Number: +4930450666833; Email: adriane.napp@charite.de
• Hungary
  • Budapest, Hungary, 1094
    • Semmelweis University
    • Contact: Dániel Erdély, Dr. med., MD; Phone Number: 52861 +36 1 215 1380; Email: erdelyi.daniel@semmelweis.hu
• Israel
  • Tel Aviv, Israel, 64239
    • Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Centre Dana-Dwek Children's Hospital
    • Contact: Ronit Elhasid, Dr. med., MD; Phone Number: +972-52-4266464; Email: ronite@tlvmc.gov.il
• Italy
  • Rome, Italy, 00165
    • Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesu
    • Contact: Franco Locatelli, Dr. med., MD
• Netherlands
  • Utrecht, Netherlands, 3584 CS
    • Prinses Maxima Centrum
    • Contact: Janine Stutterheim, Dr. med., MD; Phone Number: +31889727272; Email: J.Stutterheim@prinsesmaximacentrum.nl
• Poland
  • Wroclaw, Poland, 50 354
    • University Wroclaw
    • Contact: Monika Mielcarek, Dr. med., MD; Phone Number: +48 71 733 28 31; Email: monika.mielcarek@umw.edu.pl
• Portugal
  • Lisbon, Portugal, 1099-023
    • Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa
    • Contact: Joaquin Duarte, Dr. med., MD; Phone Number: +351 217229892; Email: jduarte@ipolisboa.min-saude.pt
• Romania
  • Bucharest, Romania
    • Fundeni Clinical Institute, Pediatric Clinic Fundeni
    • Contact: Anca Colita, Dr. med., MD; Phone Number: +40722207268; Email: anca.colita@umfcd.ro
• Slovakia
  • Bratislava, Slovakia, 833 40
    • Univerzity Komenského a Národného
    • Contact: Alexandra Kolenová, Dr. med., MD; Phone Number: +421 (0)2 59371 230; Email: alexandra.kolenova@nudch.eu
• Slovenia
  • Ljubljana, Slovenia, 1000
    • University Medical Centre Ljubljana
    • Contact: Marko Kavčič, Dr. med., MD; Phone Number: +386 1 522 34 26; Email: marko.kavcic@kclj.si
• Spain
  • Murcia, Spain, 30120
    • University Clinical Hospital Virgen de la Arrixaca
    • Contact: José Luís Fuster Soler, Dr. med., MD; Phone Number: +34968369500; Email: aaaaa@gmail.com
• Sweden
  • Solna, Sweden, 171 64
    • Karolinska University Hospital
    • Contact: Petter Svenberg, Dr. med., MD; Phone Number: +46812380808; Email: petter.svenberg@regionstockholm.se
• Switzerland
  • Zurich, Switzerland, 8032
    • University Children's Hospital
    • Contact: Jean-Pierre Bourquin, Dr. med., MD; Phone Number: +41 44 249 57 16; Email: jean-pierre.bourquin@kispi.uzh.ch
• Turkey (Türkiye)
  • Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye), 34752
    • Acıbadem University
    • Contact: Koray Yalçın, Dr. med., MD; Phone Number: +905363236449; Email: koray.yalcin@acibadem.com

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: Child; Adult; Older Adult
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

For all study questions:

• Confirmed diagnosis of 1st relapsed B-cell precursor ALL
• Patients ≥ 1 year and less than 18 years of age at diagnosis of primary ALL and less than 21 years of age at date of inclusion into the study
• Patient enrolled in a participating center
• Written informed consent (IC)
• Start of treatment falling into the study period
• No participation in other clinical trials 30 days prior to study enrolment that interfere with this protocol, except trials for primary ALL

Specific for SR induction randomization:

• Meeting SR criteria
• BM involvement (≥ 5% or ≥ 1% leukemic blasts confirmed by 2 quantitative methods)
• CD22 positive ALL (>80% confirmed by flow-cytometry)
• No previous history of veno-occlusive disease (VOD)/ sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS)

Specific for SR MRD poor response consolidation:

• Meeting SR criteria with bone marrow involvement at relapse diagnosis
• M1/CR2 and MRD ≥ 10-4 after induction
• CD19 positive ALL at relapse (>10%)

Specific for SR MRD good response consolidation:

• Meeting SR criteria with bone marrow involvement at relapse diagnosis
• M1/CR2 and MRD < 10-4 after induction
• CD19 positive ALL at relapse (>10%) Specific for HR consolidation arm
• Meeting HR or VHR (in case of no possibility to be treated with CAR T cells) criteria
• M1/CR2 after induction therapy
• CD19 positive ALL at relapse (>10%)

Specific for IEM arm:

• Histology or cytology proven extramedullary relapse
• No bone marrow involvement (M1 at relapse diagnosis) and bone marrow MRD <1%
• CD19 positive ALL at relapse (>10%)

Exclusion Criteria:

• Known hypersensitivity to the active substances or excipients of the IMP's or the SOC drugs, except to PEG-asparaginase which can be replaced by Erwinase
• Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 50% or fractional shortening < 25%, and/or current or prior treatment for cardiomyopathy and/or history of clinically significant arrhythmias
• Pregnancy or positive pregnancy test in female patients (urine sample positive for β-HCG > 10 U/l) at screening or within 7 days prior to the initiation of study treatment
• Sexually active adolescents and adults not willing to use highly effective contraceptive method (pearl index <1) until 12 months after end of anti-leukemic therapy
• Women not willing to refrain from breast feeding until 12 months after end of anti-leukemic therapy
• Relapse post allogeneic HSCT
• Relapse post chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy
• The whole protocol or essential parts are declined either by patient himself/herself or the respective legal guardian
• Objection to the study participation by a minor patient
• Patients in a dependent or subordinate relationship to the investigator or site staff (e.g. employees, relatives, or students)
• No consent is given for saving and propagation of pseudonymized medical data for study reasons

• Patients with any concurrent medical condition, laboratory abnormality, concomitant treatment, or comorbidity that, in the investigator's clinical judgment would

  • compromise the patient's ability to safely receive or tolerate inotuzumab ozogamicin and/or blinatumomab
  • significantly interfere with assessment of treatment efficacy or safety
  • make it unlikely that the patient would derive clinical benefit from protocol therapy
  • preclude adherence to study procedures or follow-up requirements
• Subjects unwilling or unable to comply with the study procedures
• Subjects who are legally detained in an official institute

Specific for SR induction randomization:

• Prior confirmed severe (grade 3 or 4) or ongoing VOD/SOS
• Serious ongoing hepatic disease (e.g., cirrhosis, active hepatitis) not related to the current ALL relapse or current diagnostic/therapeutic measures
• ALT > 2,5 x ULN (at relapse diagnosis before start of cytoreduction) and/or bilirubin > 1.5 x ULN
• Patients with intolerance to PEG-asparagniase and also to Erwinase are stratified to the inotuzumab arm
• Patients with insufficient expression of CD22 (< 80%) on leukemic blasts, they are assigned to the control chemotherapy arrm

Specific for blinatumomab treatment:

• Clinically relevant CNS pathology requiring treatment (eg, unstable epilepsy)
• Evidence of current CNS (CNS 2, CNS 3) involvement by ALL. Subjects with CNS relapse at the time of relapse are eligible if CNS is successfully treated prior to enrollment

Allowed systemic diseases and concomitant medication

• Patients with Down Syndrome (DS) can be included as separate and descriptive population, not joining the study questions. Those with BM involvement receive inotuzumab ozogamicin for induction without randomization. HR patients and SR patients with MRD poor response will be allocated to allo-HSCT indication, or in case CD19 directed CAR-T-cell therapy off-protocol as individualized treatment approach. Patients with MRD good response will get the SR consolidation and maintenance therapy. Those with IEM profile will be treated according to the IEM stratum. Patients not expressing sufficiently CD22 and/or CD19 will receive the respective chemotherapy strategy.
• Patients with BCR::ABL positive (Ph+) or BCR::ABL like (Ph-like) BCP ALL with TKI treatment option can be included as separate and descriptive population, not joining the study questions. Those with BM involvement receive inotuzumab ozogamicin plus TKI (investigators choice) without randomization for induction followed by HC1 and blinatumomab plus TKI followed by allo-HSCT. Those with IEM profile will be treated according to the IEM stratum plus TKI. Patients not expressing sufficiently CD22 and/or CD19 will receive the respective chemotherapy strategy.
• Patients with systemic diseases such as cystic fibrosis or diabetes may be eligible for enrolment in this study only if they presumably will tolerate the protocol treatment and primary dose reductions would not be necessary.
• Any kind of concomitant medication given due to medical reasons is allowed. Incompatibilities and drug interactions with the study medications are listed in the appendix. In case of expected adverse interactions, concomitant therapies should be changed to alternative less problematic agents if possible

Prohibited medication

• Antileukemic therapy other than scheduled in the protocol (except cytoreductive pre-phase with dexamethasone)
• Investigational drugs other than scheduled in the protocol
• Attenuated live vaccines which are strictly prohibited during and until 6 months after end of chemotherapy or 18 months after allo-HSCT

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: None (Open Label)

Number of Arms

4

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: SR induction; prospective, randomized 1:1, open label phase II/III trial comparing arm AI (ALLR3-MITOX) versus arm BI (InO). Randomization is stratified according to frontline treatment group (BFM, AIEOP, ALLTogether, other) and localization of relapse (BM+CNS, other)	Drug: Inotuzumab ozogamicin (INO); Antibody Drug Conjugate (Inotuzumab); Other Names: InO vs. R3 randomisation in SR
Active Comparator: SR MRD good response, consolidation; single arm trial with 3 courses of blinatumomab, the 1st replacing the consolidation chemotherapy element SCB2, the 2nd added on after the consolidation chemotherapy element SCB3, and the 3rd added on after the consolidation element SCB4 and 8 weeks of conventional maintenance therapy, then followed by conventional maintenance therapy being applied without reinduction chemotherapy pulses until week 132, as compared to historical controls (IntReALL BCP 2020 SR SOC induction arm compared with IntReALL SR 2010 arm B without epratuzumab)	Drug: Blinatumomab; Bispecific t-cell enganger BiTE; Other Names: Blinatumumab vs. historical control
Active Comparator: HR with CR2, consolidation; single arm trial with HC1 and 1 course of blinatumomab followed by allo-HSCT compared with historical controls	Drug: Blinatumomab; Bispecific t-cell enganger BiTE; Other Names: Blinatumumab vs. historical control
Active Comparator: Isolated extramedullary manifestations; single arm trial with the IntReALL SR 2010 Arm A (ALL-REZ BFM 2002) including blinatumomab replacing the chemotherapy element SCA3 compared with historical controls. SR patients will receive further conventional consolidation, local irradiation and maintenance, HR patients will be given allo-HSCT after blinatumomab	Drug: Blinatumomab; Bispecific t-cell enganger BiTE; Other Names: Blinatumumab vs. historical control

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
SR induction EFS	timespan of survival until endpoint relevant event (nonresponse, death in remission, relapse, secondary malignancy) or until end of follow up	From enrollment until 2 years after end of treatment
SR-MRD good response consolidation DFS	timespan of survival after achievnemt of eremission until endpoint relevant event (death in remission, relapse, secondary malignancy) or until end of follow up	From enrollment until 2 years after end of treatment
HR with CR2 consolidation DSF	timespan of survival after achievnemt of eremission until endpoint relevant event (death in remission, relapse, secondary malignancy) or until end of follow up	From enrollment until 2 years after end of treatment
Isolated extramedullary manifestations: EFS	timespan of survival until endpoint relevant event (nonresponse, death in remission, relapse, secondary malignancy) or until end of follow up	From enrollment until 2 years after end of treatment
SR induction: Pharmacokinetics Inotuzumab	cumulative area under the concentration-time curve (AUC)	from enrollment until day 28

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Isolated extramedullary manifestations: EFS	timespan of survival until endpoint relevant event (nonresponse, death in remission, relapse, secondary malignancy) or until end of follow up	From enrollment until 2 years after end of treatment
SR induction: MRD	MRD negativity rate after induction quantified by flow- and/or PCR techniques	Day 28 of induction
SR-MRD good response consolidation: OS	timespan of survival until death or until end of follow up	From enrollment until 2 years after end of treatment
SR induction: allo-HSCT	Proportion of patients requiring allo-HSCT	week 14 to 20 after enrollment
SR induction: OS	timespan of survival until death or until end of follow up	from enrollment until 2 years after end of treatment
SR induction: Toxicity	Toxicity (assessed by CTCAE grades and SAE reports)	from enrollement until end of protocol therapy
SR induction: CD19 positive cells	Rate of patients with CD19 positive cells after SCB1 prior to Blinatumomab	week 9 after enrollment
SR-MRD good response consolidation: Toxicity	Toxicity (quantified by CTCAE grades and SAE reports)	from enrollment until end of treatment (week 132)
Isolated extramedullary manifestations: OS	timespan of survival until death or until end of follow up	from enrollment until 2 years after end of treatment
Isolated extramedullary manifestations: DFS by MRD	timespan of survival after achievnemt of eremission until endpoint relevant event (death in remission, relapse, secondary malignancy) or until end of follow up by MD after induction (cut-off 10-4)	from enrollment until 2 years after end of treatment
HR with CR2 consolidation: OS	timespan of survival until death or until end of follow up	from enrollment until 2 years after end of treatment
HR with CR2 consolidation: Toxicity	Toxicity (assessed by CTCAE grades and SAE reports)	from enrollment until end of treatment (day 100 post HSCT)
HR with CR2 consolidation: MRD	MRD negativity rates before allo-HSCT quantified by flow- and/or PCR techniques	week 13 after enrollment
HR with CR2 consolidation: allo-HSCT	allo-HSCT rates	week 14 after enrollment
Inotuzumab PK	Maximum and through concentrations of inotuzumab	from enrollment until end of induction (day 28), before and 1 hour after start of inotuzumab infusion
Inotuzumab PK exposure response relationship	CR- and MRD negativity rates by inotuzumab AUC	from enrollment until end of induction (day 28)

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Charite University, Berlin, Germany
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: Arend Elisabeth von Stackelberg, Dr. med., MD, Charité - Universitätsmedizin

Publications and helpful links

General Publications

• Locatelli F, Zugmaier G, Rizzari C, Morris JD, Gruhn B, Klingebiel T, Parasole R, Linderkamp C, Flotho C, Petit A, Micalizzi C, Mergen N, Mohammad A, Kormany WN, Eckert C, Moricke A, Sartor M, Hrusak O, Peters C, Saha V, Vinti L, von Stackelberg A. Effect of Blinatumomab vs Chemotherapy on Event-Free Survival Among Children With High-risk First-Relapse B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2021 Mar 2;325(9):843-854. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.0987.
• von Stackelberg A, Locatelli F, Zugmaier G, Handgretinger R, Trippett TM, Rizzari C, Bader P, O'Brien MM, Brethon B, Bhojwani D, Schlegel PG, Borkhardt A, Rheingold SR, Cooper TM, Zwaan CM, Barnette P, Messina C, Michel G, DuBois SG, Hu K, Zhu M, Whitlock JA, Gore L. Phase I/Phase II Study of Blinatumomab in Pediatric Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2016 Dec 20;34(36):4381-4389. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.67.3301. Epub 2016 Oct 31.
• Jabbour E, Short NJ, Jain N, Huang X, Montalban-Bravo G, Banerjee P, Rezvani K, Jiang X, Kim KH, Kanagal-Shamanna R, Khoury JD, Patel K, Kadia TM, Daver N, Chien K, Alvarado Y, Garcia-Manero G, Issa GC, Haddad FG, Kwari M, Thankachan J, Delumpa R, Macaron W, Garris R, Konopleva M, Ravandi F, Kantarjian H. Ponatinib and blinatumomab for Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: a US, single-centre, single-arm, phase 2 trial. Lancet Haematol. 2023 Jan;10(1):e24-e34. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(22)00319-2. Epub 2022 Nov 16.
• Foa R, Bassan R, Elia L, Piciocchi A, Soddu S, Messina M, Ferrara F, Lunghi M, Mule A, Bonifacio M, Fracchiolla N, Salutari P, Fazi P, Guarini A, Rambaldi A, Chiaretti S. Long-Term Results of the Dasatinib-Blinatumomab Protocol for Adult Philadelphia-Positive ALL. J Clin Oncol. 2024 Mar 10;42(8):881-885. doi: 10.1200/JCO.23.01075. Epub 2023 Dec 21.
• Brown PA, Ji L, Xu X, Devidas M, Hogan LE, Borowitz MJ, Raetz EA, Zugmaier G, Sharon E, Bernhardt MB, Terezakis SA, Gore L, Whitlock JA, Pulsipher MA, Hunger SP, Loh ML. Effect of Postreinduction Therapy Consolidation With Blinatumomab vs Chemotherapy on Disease-Free Survival in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults With First Relapse of B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2021 Mar 2;325(9):833-842. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.0669.
• Eckert C, Parker C, Moorman AV, Irving JA, Kirschner-Schwabe R, Groeneveld-Krentz S, Revesz T, Hoogerbrugge P, Hancock J, Sutton R, Henze G, Chen-Santel C, Attarbaschi A, Bourquin JP, Sramkova L, Zimmermann M, Krishnan S, von Stackelberg A, Saha V. Risk factors and outcomes in children with high-risk B-cell precursor and T-cell relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: combined analysis of ALLR3 and ALL-REZ BFM 2002 clinical trials. Eur J Cancer. 2021 Jul;151:175-189. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.03.034. Epub 2021 May 16.
• Hagedorn N, Acquaviva C, Fronkova E, von Stackelberg A, Barth A, zur Stadt U, Schrauder A, Trka J, Gaspar N, Seeger K, Henze G, Cave H, Eckert C; Resistant Disease Committee of the International BFM study group. Submicroscopic bone marrow involvement in isolated extramedullary relapses in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a more precise definition of "isolated" and its possible clinical implications, a collaborative study of the Resistant Disease Committee of the International BFM study group. Blood. 2007 Dec 1;110(12):4022-9. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-04-082040. Epub 2007 Aug 24.
• Eckert C, Henze G, Seeger K, Hagedorn N, Mann G, Panzer-Grumayer R, Peters C, Klingebiel T, Borkhardt A, Schrappe M, Schrauder A, Escherich G, Sramkova L, Niggli F, Hitzler J, von Stackelberg A. Use of allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation based on minimal residual disease response improves outcomes for children with relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia in the intermediate-risk group. J Clin Oncol. 2013 Jul 20;31(21):2736-42. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.48.5680. Epub 2013 Jun 17.
• Bader P, Kreyenberg H, von Stackelberg A, Eckert C, Salzmann-Manrique E, Meisel R, Poetschger U, Stachel D, Schrappe M, Alten J, Schrauder A, Schulz A, Lang P, Muller I, Albert MH, Willasch AM, Klingebiel TE, Peters C. Monitoring of minimal residual disease after allogeneic stem-cell transplantation in relapsed childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia allows for the identification of impending relapse: results of the ALL-BFM-SCT 2003 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2015 Apr 10;33(11):1275-84. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.58.4631. Epub 2015 Jan 20.
• Lissat A, van Schewick C, Steffen IG, Arakawa A, Bourquin JP, Burkhardt B, Henze G, Mann G, Peters C, Sramkova L, Eckert C, von Stackelberg A, Chen-Santel C. Other (Non-CNS/Testicular) Extramedullary Localizations of Childhood Relapsed Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia and Lymphoblastic Lymphoma-A Report from the ALL-REZ Study Group. J Clin Med. 2021 Nov 14;10(22):5292. doi: 10.3390/jcm10225292.
• Buchmann S, Schrappe M, Baruchel A, Biondi A, Borowitz M, Campbell M, Cario G, Cazzaniga G, Escherich G, Harrison CJ, Heyman M, Hunger SP, Kiss C, Liu HC, Locatelli F, Loh ML, Manabe A, Mann G, Pieters R, Pui CH, Rives S, Schmiegelow K, Silverman LB, Stary J, Vora A, Brown P. Remission, treatment failure, and relapse in pediatric ALL: an international consensus of the Ponte-di-Legno Consortium. Blood. 2022 Mar 24;139(12):1785-1793. doi: 10.1182/blood.2021012328.
• Brivio E, Locatelli F, Lopez-Yurda M, Malone A, Diaz-de-Heredia C, Bielorai B, Rossig C, van der Velden VHJ, Ammerlaan ACJ, Thano A, van der Sluis IM, den Boer ML, Chen Y, Sleight B, Brethon B, Nysom K, Sramkova L, Ora I, Vinti L, Chen-Santel C, Zwaan CM. A phase 1 study of inotuzumab ozogamicin in pediatric relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ITCC-059 study). Blood. 2021 Mar 25;137(12):1582-1590. doi: 10.1182/blood.2020007848.
• Wu JH, Pennesi E, Bautista F, Garrett M, Fukuhara K, Brivio E, Ammerlaan ACJ, Locatelli F, van der Sluis IM, Rossig C, Chen-Santel C, Bielorai B, Petit A, Stary J, Diaz-de-Heredia C, Rives S, O'Marcaigh A, Rizzari C, Engstler G, Nysom K, Rubio-San-Simon A, Bruno B, Bertrand Y, Brethon B, Rialland F, Plat G, Dirksen U, Sramkova L, Zwaan CM, Huitema ADR. Population Pharmacokinetics of Inotuzumab Ozogamicin in Pediatric Relapsed/Refractory B-Cell Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Results of Study ITCC-059. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2024 Jul;63(7):981-997. doi: 10.1007/s40262-024-01386-z. Epub 2024 Jun 22.
• Stock W, Martinelli G, Stelljes M, DeAngelo DJ, Gokbuget N, Advani AS, O'Brien S, Liedtke M, Merchant AA, Cassaday RD, Wang T, Zhang H, Vandendries E, Jabbour E, Marks DI, Kantarjian HM. Efficacy of inotuzumab ozogamicin in patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cancer. 2021 Mar 15;127(6):905-913. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33321. Epub 2020 Nov 24.
• Pennesi E, Michels N, Brivio E, van der Velden VHJ, Jiang Y, Thano A, Ammerlaan AJC, Boer JM, Beverloo HB, Sleight B, Chen Y, Vormoor-Burger B, Rives S, Bielorai B, Rossig C, Petit A, Rizzari C, Engstler G, Stary J, Bautista Sirvent FJ, Chen-Santel C, Bruno B, Bertrand Y, Rialland F, Plat G, Reinhardt D, Vinti L, Von Stackelberg A, Locatelli F, Zwaan CM. Inotuzumab ozogamicin as single agent in pediatric patients with relapsed and refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia: results from a phase II trial. Leukemia. 2022 Jun;36(6):1516-1524. doi: 10.1038/s41375-022-01576-3. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
• Rabik CA, Wang S, Chadda R, Przepiorka D, Vallejo J, Jiang X, Theoret MR, de Claro RA. FDA Approval Summary: Blinatumomab for the Treatment of B-Cell Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in the Consolidation Phase of Multiphase Chemotherapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2025 Oct 15;31(20):4230-4238. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-25-1034.
• Mejstrikova E, Klinger M, Markovic A, Zugmaier G, Locatelli F. CD19 expression in pediatric patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia pre- and post-treatment with blinatumomab. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2021 Dec;68(12):e29323. doi: 10.1002/pbc.29323. Epub 2021 Sep 14.
• Kantarjian H, Haddad FG, Jain N, Sasaki K, Short NJ, Loghavi S, Kanagal-Shamanna R, Jorgensen J, Khouri I, Kebriaei P, Alvarado Y, Kadia T, Paul S, Garcia-Manero G, Dabaja B, Yilmaz M, Jacob J, Garris R, O'Brien S, Ravandi F, Jabbour E. Results of salvage therapy with mini-hyper-CVD and inotuzumab ozogamicin with or without blinatumomab in pre-B acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Hematol Oncol. 2023 May 2;16(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s13045-023-01444-2.

Helpful Links

• Project homepage

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Estimated): April 1, 2026
• Primary Completion (Estimated): March 31, 2033
• Study Completion (Estimated): March 31, 2033

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: March 2, 2026
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: March 12, 2026
• First Posted (Actual): March 17, 2026

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): March 17, 2026
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: March 12, 2026
• Last Verified: March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: Lymphoblastic
• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Neoplasms; Immune System Diseases; Infections; Virus Diseases; Neoplasms by Histologic Type; DNA Virus Infections; Lymphatic Diseases; Lymphoproliferative Disorders; Immunoproliferative Disorders; Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin; Lymphoma, B-Cell; Lymphoma; Epstein-Barr Virus Infections; Herpesviridae Infections; Tumor Virus Infections; Hemic and Lymphatic Diseases; Burkitt Lymphoma; Amino Acids, Peptides, and Proteins; Proteins; Carbohydrates; Glycosides; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies; Immunoglobulins; Immunoproteins; Blood Proteins; Serum Globulins; Globulins; Aminoglycosides; Calicheamicins; Inotuzumab Ozogamicin; blinatumomab
• Other Study ID Numbers: IntReALL BCP 2020; 2023-509392-17-00 (Ctis)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: NO

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No