- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07489950
Non-apnea Electrical Impedance Tomography for Bedside Ventilation-Perfusion Assessment: a Prospective Cross-over Validation Study (NELSB)
Non-apnea Saline-contrast EIT for Lung Perfusion Imaging in Spontaneously Breathing Patients: A Prospective Cross-over Study
Title: Validating the Accuracy of Lung Blood Flow Monitoring Without Breath-Holding Under Spontaneous Breathing Support
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of a new Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) technique that measures lung blood flow (perfusion) without requiring patients to hold their breath. We aim to determine if this "non-apnea" method provides results consistent with the current clinical gold standard (the "pause" method).
Background: EIT is a non-invasive bedside tool used to monitor lung function. The traditional method for measuring lung blood flow requires patients to hold their breath for 5-8 seconds during a saline injection to avoid interference from breathing. However, many patients-especially those using a nasal cannula, high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO), or pressure support ventilation (PSV)-must maintain continuous spontaneous breathing and find it difficult or unsafe to hold their breath. If a "non-apnea" method is proven accurate, it will make monitoring safer and easier for these patients.
What the Study Involves: The study includes stable adult patients who are breathing spontaneously. Each patient undergoes two measurements in a randomized order:
Standard Reference (Pause Method): Measurement taken during a brief, guided breath-hold.
Test Method (Non-Apnea Method): Measurement taken during normal, uninterrupted breathing while receiving respiratory support (Nasal Cannula, HFNO, or PSV).
Expected Significance: By comparing the lung images and ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) data from both methods, this study seeks to validate the reliability and precision of the non-apnea approach. This would allow clinicians to assess lung health in spontaneously breathing patients without interrupting their natural breathing rhythm.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Design
This is a prospective, randomized, cross-over, within-subject validation study of accuracy.
The primary objective is to quantitatively assess the agreement between lung perfusion data acquired during uninterrupted spontaneous breathing (non-apnea method) and data acquired during the standard end-expiratory pause (pause method).
Participant Population and Respiratory Support
The study enrolls stable adult patients with active spontaneous breathing efforts.
Participants are categorized by the level of respiratory support they receive: Conventional Oxygen Therapy (Nasal Cannula), High-Flow Nasal Oxygen (HFNO), or Pressure Support Ventilation (PSV).
Conventional Oxygen Therapy includes patients using a nasal cannula or simple mask without pressure support.
HFNO and PSV groups include patients receiving constant high-flow oxygen or patient-triggered mechanical ventilation.
Procedures and Interventions
Each participant receives two 10 mL boluses of 10% NaCl (hypertonic saline) via a central venous catheter.
A 10-minute washout period is maintained between injections.
In the Pause Method, injection occurs during a 5-8 second end-expiratory hold (coached for nasal cannula/HFNO; ventilator-controlled for PSV).
In the Non-Apnea Method, injection occurs during continuous, ongoing breathing without any breathing commands or ventilator setting changes.
Technical Approach to Ensure Accuracy
Specialized algorithms are used to extract saline-contrast signals from the "noise" of spontaneous tidal breaths.
Advanced frequency filtering is applied to separate ventilation-related and perfusion-related impedance changes.
In non-apnea mode, the software identifies the perfusion window using a pixel-triggered approach.
This method detects the impedance drop relative to the End-Expiratory Lung Impedance (EELI) baseline to maintain precision despite moving baselines.
Outcome Measures
The primary outcome is the pixel-wise correlation of perfusion maps between the two methods, assessed by the Spearman correlation coefficient (r).
Secondary outcomes include the agreement of V/Q match%, dead space%, and shunt% using Bland-Altman analysis.
The study also assesses whether the type of support (Nasal Cannula vs. HFNO vs. PSV) affects the accuracy of the non-apnea method.
Feasibility is documented by the success rate of analyzable acquisitions and categorized failure reasons.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Shanghai Municipality
-
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China, 200025
- Department of Critical Care Medicine,Ruijin Hospital,Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients aged ≥ 18 years.
Requiring respiratory support including Nasal Cannula, High-Flow Nasal Oxygen (HFNO), or Pressure Support Ventilation (PSV).
Hemodynamically stable.
Able to tolerate a brief respiratory pause (for the reference group).
Signed informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
Contraindications to electrical impedance tomography (e.g., cardiac pacemaker, skin integrity issues on the chest).
Severe circulatory failure or cardiogenic shock.
Known allergy to hypertonic saline.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Standard Breath-hold Method
|
Participants receive a central venous bolus injection of 10 mL 10% NaCl.
Lung perfusion is then assessed using Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT).
The intervention evaluates two acquisition conditions: one during a brief respiratory pause (reference) and one during uninterrupted spontaneous breathing (test).
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: Non-apnea Method
|
Participants receive a central venous bolus injection of 10 mL 10% NaCl.
Lung perfusion is then assessed using Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT).
The intervention evaluates two acquisition conditions: one during a brief respiratory pause (reference) and one during uninterrupted spontaneous breathing (test).
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Spearman correlation coefficient (r)
Time Frame: Within 30 minutes
|
The Spearman correlation coefficient will be calculated to assess the voxel-by-voxel agreement of lung perfusion maps generated by the non-apnea algorithm compared to the reference standard (breath-hold method).
|
Within 30 minutes
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Chair: Hongping Qu, Department of Critical Care Medicine,Ruijin Hospital,Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2026063
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Critical Illness
-
Duke UniversityEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development...Not yet recruitingDecision Making | Neonatal Critical Illness | Pediatric Critical IllnessUnited States
-
Duke UniversityNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS); National Institutes...CompletedNeonatal Critical Illness | Pediatric Critical IllnessUnited States
-
Istituto Clinico HumanitasRecruitingCritical Illness Myopathy | Critical Illness Polyneuropathy | Critical Illness PolyneuromyopathyItaly
-
Yale UniversityNational Institute on Aging (NIA)RecruitingCritical Illness | Illness, CriticalUnited States
-
McMaster UniversityLondon Health Sciences Centre; McMaster Children's Hospital; Canadian Critical...CompletedPediatric Critical IllnessCanada
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisEuropean Society of Intensive Care Medicine; French Society for Intensive Care and other collaboratorsRecruitingCritical Illness | Intensive Care Patients | Critical Illness Requiring Intensive Care - Sepsis | Critical Illness Requiring Intensive Care - Acute Brain Injury | Critical Illness Requiring Intensive Care - Major Surgery | Critical Illness Requiring Intensive Care - PolytraumaFrance
-
Boston Children's HospitalCompleted
-
Istanbul Medeniyet UniversityRecruiting
-
St Helens & Knowsley Teaching Hospitals NHS TrustManchester University NHS Foundation TrustCompleted
-
Karolinska InstitutetNot yet recruitingPediatric Critical IllnessSweden
Clinical Trials on Saline-contrast EIT with a non-apnea algorithm
-
Shanghai Eye Disease Prevention and Treatment CenterNot yet recruiting
-
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterCompletedKidney Cancer | Renal CancerUnited States
-
Madigan Army Medical CenterUnknownLow Back Pain | Myofascial Pain Syndrome Lower BackUnited States
-
National Cancer Institute (NCI)Active, not recruitingRecurrent B Acute Lymphoblastic LeukemiaUnited States, Canada, Puerto Rico, Australia, New Zealand