Non-apnea Electrical Impedance Tomography for Bedside Ventilation-Perfusion Assessment: a Prospective Cross-over Validation Study (NELSB)

April 20, 2026 updated by: Ruijin Hospital

Non-apnea Saline-contrast EIT for Lung Perfusion Imaging in Spontaneously Breathing Patients: A Prospective Cross-over Study

Title: Validating the Accuracy of Lung Blood Flow Monitoring Without Breath-Holding Under Spontaneous Breathing Support

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of a new Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) technique that measures lung blood flow (perfusion) without requiring patients to hold their breath. We aim to determine if this "non-apnea" method provides results consistent with the current clinical gold standard (the "pause" method).

Background: EIT is a non-invasive bedside tool used to monitor lung function. The traditional method for measuring lung blood flow requires patients to hold their breath for 5-8 seconds during a saline injection to avoid interference from breathing. However, many patients-especially those using a nasal cannula, high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO), or pressure support ventilation (PSV)-must maintain continuous spontaneous breathing and find it difficult or unsafe to hold their breath. If a "non-apnea" method is proven accurate, it will make monitoring safer and easier for these patients.

What the Study Involves: The study includes stable adult patients who are breathing spontaneously. Each patient undergoes two measurements in a randomized order:

Standard Reference (Pause Method): Measurement taken during a brief, guided breath-hold.

Test Method (Non-Apnea Method): Measurement taken during normal, uninterrupted breathing while receiving respiratory support (Nasal Cannula, HFNO, or PSV).

Expected Significance: By comparing the lung images and ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) data from both methods, this study seeks to validate the reliability and precision of the non-apnea approach. This would allow clinicians to assess lung health in spontaneously breathing patients without interrupting their natural breathing rhythm.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Study Design

This is a prospective, randomized, cross-over, within-subject validation study of accuracy.

The primary objective is to quantitatively assess the agreement between lung perfusion data acquired during uninterrupted spontaneous breathing (non-apnea method) and data acquired during the standard end-expiratory pause (pause method).

Participant Population and Respiratory Support

The study enrolls stable adult patients with active spontaneous breathing efforts.

Participants are categorized by the level of respiratory support they receive: Conventional Oxygen Therapy (Nasal Cannula), High-Flow Nasal Oxygen (HFNO), or Pressure Support Ventilation (PSV).

Conventional Oxygen Therapy includes patients using a nasal cannula or simple mask without pressure support.

HFNO and PSV groups include patients receiving constant high-flow oxygen or patient-triggered mechanical ventilation.

Procedures and Interventions

Each participant receives two 10 mL boluses of 10% NaCl (hypertonic saline) via a central venous catheter.

A 10-minute washout period is maintained between injections.

In the Pause Method, injection occurs during a 5-8 second end-expiratory hold (coached for nasal cannula/HFNO; ventilator-controlled for PSV).

In the Non-Apnea Method, injection occurs during continuous, ongoing breathing without any breathing commands or ventilator setting changes.

Technical Approach to Ensure Accuracy

Specialized algorithms are used to extract saline-contrast signals from the "noise" of spontaneous tidal breaths.

Advanced frequency filtering is applied to separate ventilation-related and perfusion-related impedance changes.

In non-apnea mode, the software identifies the perfusion window using a pixel-triggered approach.

This method detects the impedance drop relative to the End-Expiratory Lung Impedance (EELI) baseline to maintain precision despite moving baselines.

Outcome Measures

The primary outcome is the pixel-wise correlation of perfusion maps between the two methods, assessed by the Spearman correlation coefficient (r).

Secondary outcomes include the agreement of V/Q match%, dead space%, and shunt% using Bland-Altman analysis.

The study also assesses whether the type of support (Nasal Cannula vs. HFNO vs. PSV) affects the accuracy of the non-apnea method.

Feasibility is documented by the success rate of analyzable acquisitions and categorized failure reasons.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

24

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Shanghai Municipality
      • Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China, 200025
        • Department of Critical Care Medicine,Ruijin Hospital,Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged ≥ 18 years.

Requiring respiratory support including Nasal Cannula, High-Flow Nasal Oxygen (HFNO), or Pressure Support Ventilation (PSV).

Hemodynamically stable.

Able to tolerate a brief respiratory pause (for the reference group).

Signed informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding.

Contraindications to electrical impedance tomography (e.g., cardiac pacemaker, skin integrity issues on the chest).

Severe circulatory failure or cardiogenic shock.

Known allergy to hypertonic saline.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Standard Breath-hold Method
  1. This arm serves as the reference standard for EIT perfusion measurement.
  2. A 10 mL bolus of 10% NaCl is injected during a 5-8 second end-expiratory pause.
  3. For patients on Nasal Cannula or HFNO, the pause is achieved via coached respiratory instruction; for patients on PSV, the ventilator's end-expiratory hold function is used
Participants receive a central venous bolus injection of 10 mL 10% NaCl. Lung perfusion is then assessed using Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT). The intervention evaluates two acquisition conditions: one during a brief respiratory pause (reference) and one during uninterrupted spontaneous breathing (test).
Other Names:
  • EIT Lung Perfusion Imaging
Experimental: Non-apnea Method
  1. This arm evaluates the feasibility and accuracy of perfusion measurement during uninterrupted breathing.
  2. A 10 mL bolus of 10% NaCl is injected while the patient maintains a natural, continuous breathing rhythm.
  3. This method is tested across all included respiratory support modes, including Nasal Cannula, HFNO, and PSV, without any respiratory pause or instruction.
Participants receive a central venous bolus injection of 10 mL 10% NaCl. Lung perfusion is then assessed using Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT). The intervention evaluates two acquisition conditions: one during a brief respiratory pause (reference) and one during uninterrupted spontaneous breathing (test).
Other Names:
  • EIT Lung Perfusion Imaging

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Spearman correlation coefficient (r)
Time Frame: Within 30 minutes
The Spearman correlation coefficient will be calculated to assess the voxel-by-voxel agreement of lung perfusion maps generated by the non-apnea algorithm compared to the reference standard (breath-hold method).
Within 30 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Hongping Qu, Department of Critical Care Medicine,Ruijin Hospital,Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 19, 2026

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 13, 2026

Study Completion (Actual)

April 13, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 18, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 18, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

March 24, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 23, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 20, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Critical Illness

Clinical Trials on Saline-contrast EIT with a non-apnea algorithm

Subscribe