Continuous Dual Aspiration Technique With Zoom System for Stroke (ADAPT 2 0)

May 29, 2026 updated by: Imperative Care, Inc.

Clinical Evaluation of Continuous Dual Aspiration Technique With Zoom System for Stroke (ADAPT 2.0)

This study is designed to evaluate the effectiveness, safety and clinical performance of ADAPT 2.0, first-line aspiration neurothrombectomy with Zoom System with Continuous Dual Aspiration Technique (CDAT).

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

750

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Alabama
      • Huntsville, Alabama, United States, 35801
        • Recruiting
        • Huntsville Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Farrar Hickey
        • Principal Investigator:
          • R. Dana Tomalty, MD
    • California
      • Walnut Creek, California, United States, 94598
        • Recruiting
        • John Muir Health
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Benjamin Yim, MD
        • Contact:
          • Melenie Aaron
    • Florida
      • Tampa, Florida, United States, 33606
        • Recruiting
        • University of South Florida
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Maxim Mokin, MD
        • Contact:
          • Kilaun Robinson
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21201
        • Recruiting
        • University of Maryland
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jacob Cherian, MD
        • Contact:
          • Katie Henry
    • Minnesota
      • Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55407
        • Recruiting
        • Allina Health
        • Contact:
          • Emeryth Beloy
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Collin Torok, MD
    • New York
      • Albany, New York, United States, 12208
        • Recruiting
        • Albany Medical College
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Alexandra Paul, MD
        • Contact:
          • Chelsey Large
      • New York, New York, United States, 10029
        • Recruiting
        • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
        • Contact:
          • Kevin Buttet
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Michael T Caton, MD
    • South Carolina
      • Greenville, South Carolina, United States, 29605
        • Recruiting
        • Prisma Health - Upstate
        • Contact:
          • Shawn Manos
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jan Vargas Machaj, MD
    • Tennessee
      • Memphis, Tennessee, United States, 38120
        • Recruiting
        • Semmes Murphey Foundation
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Lucas Elijovich, MD
        • Contact:
          • Wendell Barnett
    • Texas
      • Kingwood, Texas, United States, 77339
        • Not yet recruiting
        • HCA Houston Healthcare Kingwood
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Mohamad Ezzeldin, MD
        • Contact:
          • Kelechi Ibezim
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78229
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Methodist Healthcare System of San Antonio
        • Contact:
          • Samantha Franklin
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Lee Birnbaum, MD
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78229
        • Recruiting
        • University of Texas Science Health Center at San Antonio
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Justin Mascitelli, MD
        • Contact:
          • Athena Lazaris-Conner
    • Virginia
      • Falls Church, Virginia, United States, 22042
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Inova Fairfax Medical Campus
        • Contact:
          • Lauren Monroe
        • Principal Investigator:
          • James McEachern, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Adult subjects with acute ischemic stroke secondary to large vessel occlusion (LVO) meeting the study eligibility criteria and providing written informed consent.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Subject is ≥ 18 years of age
  2. Subject or legally authorized representative has provided written informed consent prior to any study-specific procedures and no later than 72 hours after the index procedure
  3. Pre-stroke mRS 0-2
  4. Subject is undergoing or has undergone an aspiration thrombectomy using the Zoom System with Continuous Dual Aspiration Technique (CDAT) as the first line device within its intended use

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subjects with a life expectancy of less than 6 months
  2. Female subject who is known to be pregnant at time of admission
  3. Any intracranial hemorrhage in the qualifying head CT or MRI
  4. Presence of tandem internal carotid artery occlusion, multiple occlusion locations (e.g., cavernous ICA and M1, separate M2 occlusions, etc.), or occlusions in multiple territories (e.g., MCA and ACA, bilateral, etc.).
  5. In the opinion of the Investigator, the patient is not a suitable candidate for intervention with the Zoom System
  6. Subject is currently enrolled in or planned to be enrolled in any concurrent interventional study that may impact the safety or performance data collected in this study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
ADAPT 2.0: Zoom System with Continuous Dual Aspiration Technique (CDAT)
The Zoom System is intended to be used as the first-line device and utilized within the FDA-cleared indications for use, consistent with the approved labeling and intended anatomical targets.
Aspiration neurothrombectomy using Zoom System with Continuous Dual Aspiration Technique (CDAT)
Other Names:
  • ADAPT 2.0
  • Aspiration thrombectomy for stroke
  • Continuous dual aspiration
  • Neurovascular aspiration thrombectomy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of patients achieving modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) score of ≥2c at the end of procedure, as adjudicated by independent core-lab
Time Frame: End of procedure
mTICI scale ranges from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating better reperfusion. mTICI 0: No antegrade reperfusion; mTICI 1: Antegrade reperfusion past initial occlusion, limited distal filling; mTICI 2a: Antegrade reperfusion of less than half (<50%) of the previously occluded target artery's ischemic territory; mTICI 2b: Antegrade reperfusion of more than half (≥50%) of the previously occluded target artery's ischemic territory; mTICI 2c: Near-complete (90-99%) reperfusion, or filling of all distal branches with slower flow; mTICI 3: Complete antegrade reperfusion of all branches
End of procedure
Rate of Embolization to New Territory (ENT) on final angiography at the end of the procedure by investigator assessment
Time Frame: End of procedure
Embolization to New Territory (ENT), defined as the presence of new occlusions on final angiography that occur in vascular territories remote from those effected by index stroke, as assessed by the investigator
End of procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to achieve mTICI≥2c, defined as groin puncture to investigator assessment for mTICI≥2c
Time Frame: Intraprocedural

The time from groin puncture to mTICI (modified treatment in cerebral infarction) score ≥ 2c using study device and technique.

mTICI scale ranges from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating better reperfusion. mTICI 0: No antegrade reperfusion; mTICI 1: Antegrade reperfusion past initial occlusion, limited distal filling; mTICI 2a: Antegrade reperfusion of less than half (<50%) of the previously occluded target artery's ischemic territory; mTICI 2b: Antegrade reperfusion of more than half (≥50%) of the previously occluded target artery's ischemic territory; mTICI 2c: Near-complete (90-99%) reperfusion, or filling of all distal branches with slower flow; mTICI 3: Complete antegrade reperfusion of all branches

Intraprocedural
Proportion of cases with clot ingestion, as evidenced by clot captured within the Zoom POD
Time Frame: Intraprocedural
Proportion of cases with clot ingestion, as evidenced by clot captured within at least one of the Zoom PODs
Intraprocedural
Proportion of cases with clot captured within the Zoom POD connected to the outer aspiration catheter
Time Frame: Intraprocedural
Proportion of cases with clot ingestion, as evidenced by clot captured within the outer Zoom PODs
Intraprocedural
Rate of rescue therapy
Time Frame: Intraprocedural
Proportion of cases with rescue therapy, defined as unplanned use of another manufacturer's thrombectomy device, angioplasty, or stenting within the target vessel territory to achieve mTICI≥2c.
Intraprocedural
Proportion of patients achieving First Pass Effect (FPE) mTICI ≥2c as adjudicated by independent core-lab
Time Frame: Intraprocedural

Proportion of cases achieving First Pass Effect (FPE), defined as mTICI ≥2c after the first pass with the study device and technique as adjudicated by independent core-lab

mTICI scale ranges from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating better reperfusion. mTICI 0: No antegrade reperfusion; mTICI 1: Antegrade reperfusion past initial occlusion, limited distal filling; mTICI 2a: Antegrade reperfusion of less than half (<50%) of the previously occluded target artery's ischemic territory; mTICI 2b: Antegrade reperfusion of more than half (≥50%) of the previously occluded target artery's ischemic territory; mTICI 2c: Near-complete (90-99%) reperfusion, or filling of all distal branches with slower flow; mTICI 3: Complete antegrade reperfusion of all branches

Intraprocedural
Rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), as confirmed by imaging and independently adjudicated by medical monitor, at the 24-hour post-procedure
Time Frame: 24-hour post-procedure
Independently adjudicated rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) defined as any apparently extravascular blood in the brain or within the cranium confirmed by imaging that is associated with clinical deterioration as defined by an increase of four or more points in the NIHSS at 24 hours compared to the baseline assessment, or that led to death, and was judged to be the predominant cause of a neurologic deterioration or death, per ECASS III criteria
24-hour post-procedure
90-day all-cause mortality
Time Frame: 90 days post-procedure
Rate of all-cause mortality through 90 days post-procedure
90 days post-procedure
Rate of device-related Serious Adverse Events, independently adjudicated medical monitor
Time Frame: Intraprocedural
Independently adjudicated rate of Serious Adverse Events related to study device
Intraprocedural
Rate of functional independence (mRS 0-2) at 90 days
Time Frame: 90 days post-procedure

Proportion of patients achieving mRS (modified Rankin Scale) ≤2 at 90 days

mRS range: 0 to 6; The mRS scale ranges from 0 (no symptoms) to 5 (severe disability), with an additional category of 6 for death; higher score means worse outcome

90 days post-procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: David Fiorella, MD, Stony Brook University Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: Shahram Majidi, MD, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
  • Principal Investigator: Justin Masciteli, MD, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
  • Principal Investigator: Maxim Mokin, MD, University of South Florida

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 24, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 31, 2030

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 17, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 24, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 1, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 29, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ischemic Stroke

Clinical Trials on Zoom System

Subscribe