The Effect of Peer Video Modeling and 3D Jaw Video Modeling Training on Oral Health and Toothbrushing Skills in Children With Autism (RCT)

March 19, 2026 updated by: Müzeyyen Beste Sermet, Ministry of Health, Turkey

This study was conducted to improve the oral hygiene habits of children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and to compare the effects of peer video modeling and three-dimensional (3D) jaw model simulation methods. The research was carried out at Istanbul Hamit Ibrahimiye Special Education Practice School with a randomized controlled experimental design, involving 120 children aged 6-12 years. The participants were divided into three groups: peer video modeling, 3D jaw model simulation, and control. Data collection tools included a sociodemographic information form, oral and dental health knowledge form, plaque index, gingival index and tooth brushing evaluation forms. The study was evaluated based on assessments conducted at baseline, 1st month, 3rd month, and 6th month.

The findings of the study revealed that the peer video modeling method significantly reduced the plaque index (p < 0.05) and led to a notable improvement in tooth brushing skills. The improvement observed in the 3D jaw model simulation group was more limited. In terms of long-term effects, peer video modeling was found to have a lasting impact on children's oral hygiene habits (p < 0.01). These results indicate that peer video modeling is particularly more effective in promoting tooth brushing habits among children with ASD.

In conclusion, peer video modeling appears to be a more effective method for oral and dental health education in children with ASD. Future studies should examine its long-term effects in more detail across different age groups. In addition, developing guideline materials for parents and educators may be beneficial.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

120

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ümraniye
      • Istanbul, Ümraniye, Turkey (Türkiye), 34760
        • Umraniye Community Mental Health Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The child responds to their name when called.
  • The child maintains eye contact for at least 2-5 minutes.
  • The child follows simple instructions (e.g., come, sit, open-close mouth).
  • The child can use at. least one reward (food, toy, or verbal).
  • No sensory hypersensitivity.
  • No antibiotic use in the last month.
  • No additional plaque control application in the last 5 months.
  • At least 20 teeth present.
  • Not undergoing orthodontic treatment.
  • No systemic diseases affecting oral health (e.g., Down syndrome, diabetes).
  • Average intelligence level comparable to peers.
  • Able to brush teeth independently.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to sit in a specific place for 10 minutes.
  • Refusal of physical contact (mouth, face, body).
  • Severe autism (Grade 3).
  • Mental retardation.
  • Lack of parental consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Peer video modeling
After obtaining written parental consent and demographic data, the study protocol is implemented. Oral examinations are conducted in the school infirmary by a pediatric dentist, under the researcher's supervision, using disposable materials. The number of teeth, caries and fillings, plaque index scores, and gingival health are recorded. Children and their parents then watch a 14-step toothbrushing instructional video in a separate classroom, in which a healthy 12-year-old boy demonstrates proper brushing behaviors with verbal instructions. Following the video, children practice brushing using a mirror and materials provided by the researcher. Performance is assessed using a 14-step tool scored from 0 to 3, and parents receive individualized feedback. For the peer video modeling group, a WhatsApp group is created, and parents are instructed to show the video daily before brushing. Assessments are conducted at baseline and at 1, 3, and 6 months using plaque and gingival indices.
After obtaining written parental consent and demographic data, the study protocol is implemented. Oral examinations are conducted in the school infirmary by a pediatric dentist, under the researcher's supervision, using disposable materials. The number of teeth, caries and fillings, plaque index scores, and gingival health are recorded. Children and their parents then watch a 14-step toothbrushing instructional video in a separate classroom, in which a healthy 12-year-old boy demonstrates proper brushing behaviors with verbal instructions. Following the video, children practice brushing using a mirror and materials provided by the researcher. Performance is assessed using a 14-step tool scored from 0 to 3, and parents receive individualized feedback. For the peer video modeling group, a WhatsApp group is created, and parents are instructed to show the video daily before brushing. Assessments are conducted at baseline and at 1, 3, and 6 months using plaque and gingival indices.
Experimental: 3D video modeling
After obtaining written parental consent and demographic data, the study protocol is implemented. Oral examinations are conducted in the school infirmary by a pediatric dentist under researcher supervision using disposable materials. The number of teeth, caries and fillings, plaque index scores, and gingival health are recorded. Children and their parents then watch a 14-step toothbrushing instructional video in a separate classroom, in which a 3D jaw model demonstrates proper brushing behaviors with verbal instructions. Following the video, children practice brushing using a mirror and materials provided by the researcher. Performance is assessed using a 14-step tool scored from 0 to 3, and parents receive individualized feedback. For the peer video modeling group, a WhatsApp group is created, and parents are instructed to show the video daily before brushing. Assessments are conducted at baseline and at 1, 3, and 6 months using plaque and gingival indices.
After obtaining written parental consent and demographic data, the study protocol is implemented. Oral examinations are conducted in the school infirmary by a pediatric dentist under researcher supervision using disposable materials. The number of teeth, caries and fillings, plaque index scores, and gingival health are recorded. Children and their parents then watch a 14-step toothbrushing instructional video in a separate classroom, in which a 3D jaw model demonstrates proper brushing behaviors with verbal instructions. Following the video, children practice brushing using a mirror and materials provided by the researcher. Performance is assessed using a 14-step tool scored from 0 to 3, and parents receive individualized feedback. For the peer video modeling group, a WhatsApp group is created, and parents are instructed to show the video daily before brushing. Assessments are conducted at baseline and at 1, 3, and 6 months using plaque and gingival indices.
No Intervention: Control group
After obtaining written parental consent and demographic information, the study protocol is initiated. Oral examinations are conducted at the school infirmary by a pediatric dentist under researcher supervision using disposable materials. During the examination, the number of teeth, caries and fillings, plaque index scores, and gingival health are systematically recorded. Children in the control group receive no intervention during the study period. Oral health assessments, including plaque index, gingival health, and toothbrushing performance, are conducted at predetermined time points (baseline, 1st, 3rd, and 6th months). At the end of the six-month study, children and their parents who have not received prior training are provided with toothbrushing education. The researcher demonstrates proper brushing techniques using a 3D jaw model in the school conference hall, and a peer video modeling material is sent to parents via e-mail or WhatsApp.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Modified silness-löe plaque ındex (mPLI)
Time Frame: Baseline, 1.,3., and 6. months
Dental plaque accumulation was assessed using the Modified Silness-Löe Plaque Index (mPLI), a widely used tool for evaluating plaque presence on tooth surfaces, particularly suitable for pediatric and special needs populations. In accordance with the FDI tooth numbering system and expert consultation, six index teeth (3 buccal, 8 buccal, 14 buccal, 19 lingual, 24 buccal, and 30 lingual) were selected. Both buccal and lingual surfaces were examined. Each surface was scored on a 4-point scale (0 = no plaque; 1 = plaque detectable by probe; 2 = visible plaque; 3 = abundant plaque). The individual plaque score was calculated by dividing the total score by the number of surfaces examined. Scores were categorized as no (<0.1), mild (0.1-1.0), moderate (1.1-2.0), or severe (2.1-3.0) plaque accumulation.
Baseline, 1.,3., and 6. months
Gingival Index (GI)
Time Frame: Baseline, 1., 3., and 6. months
Gingival health was assessed using the Silness-Löe Gingival Index, a validated tool used to evaluate gingival inflammation and overall periodontal health. Gingival inflammation was measured by gently probing four gingival surfaces of each selected tooth with a WHO periodontal probe, applying a force not exceeding 20 g. Each surface was scored on a 4-point scale (0-3). The individual gingival index score was calculated by dividing the total score by the number of surfaces examined. Scores were classified as no (<0.1), mild (0.1-1.0), moderate (1.1-2.0), or severe (2.1-3.0) inflammation.
Baseline, 1., 3., and 6. months
Toothbrushing assessment form
Time Frame: Baseline, 1., 3., and 6.months
Toothbrushing performance was assessed using a structured 14-step protocol designed to evaluate toothbrushing skills and independence in oral hygiene practices, based on national guidelines and relevant literature. Each step was scored on a 4-point scale (0 = not completed, 1 = completed with caregiver assistance, 2 = completed with verbal guidance, 3 = completed independently). The overall score was calculated by dividing the total score by 14. The protocol includes essential brushing steps, such as cleaning anterior teeth and right and left posterior teeth in both jaws. This tool enables the systematic assessment of brushing accuracy, skill acquisition, and level of independence in children.
Baseline, 1., 3., and 6.months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 20, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 23, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

June 23, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 16, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 19, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 19, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dental Health

Clinical Trials on Peer video modeling

Subscribe