Multimodal Chewing Gum Flavour Training to Aid Flavour Perception Recovery - a Pilot Study. (FITS)

March 23, 2026 updated by: University of Nottingham

Developing a Multimodal Flavour Training Using Chewing Gum to Aid Flavour Perception Recovery - a Pilot Study

Olfactory training is developed for people who have partly or completely lost their sense of smell (olfactory dysfunction). Participants expose themselves to odours twice daily for usually 12 weeks or longer. It has been proven to effectively help people improve their sense of smell. However, when abnormal flavour perception is reported it may involve not only a dysfunctional sense of smell, but also taste and trigeminal perception (e.g. burning from chilly, cooling from mint, etc.). The stimulation of multiple sensations can theoretically enhance overall flavour perception. Therefore, we propose a pilot study to test the feasibility testing multi-sensation flavour impairment training approach using chewing gum that target sensations of smell, taste and trigeminal. This will be in comparison with an existing olfactory training approach.

Individuals (aged 18 to 65) with changed flavour perception (self-perceived, within 3 months to 2 years) will be invited to take part in this study. Participants will be randomly and evenly allocated to 3 groups which are: flavour impairment training using chewing gum (FIT), olfactory training (OT) using smelling strips, and a waiting list control group (CTR) (delaying FIT training for 12 weeks). In the first two groups, a 12-week training will be conducted. The training will be undertaken twice a day (in the morning and evening). All participants will use four flavours in a pre-determined and randomised order. One flavour of chewing gum (FIT group) or smelling strips (OT group) will be used each time. Each training session is expected to last around 3 minutes. In addition to the training, all participants will be asked to pay two visits to the lab, once before and once after completing the 12-week training, or the 12-week wait, to evaluate their flavour (smell, taste and trigeminal) perception capability. Participants will also be asked to conduct flavour perception tests at home before and after training following instructions to evaluate if their flavour perception capability has improved due to the training. The OT group and the CTR group will be offered the FIT treatment after they have undertaken the 12 weeks of their study group allocation.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Eligibility will be checked via an online questionnaire, where information of flavour perception impairment (self-report), chewing gum consumption habit, potential allergy to chewing gum/smelling bottle ingredients, and difficulty in chewing gums will be checked according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria .

Eligible participants will then be contacted via email for session time confirmation and taking consent. Upon their first visit to the lab, written consent will be taken, and training kit will be given to them.

Participants will be asked to pay two visits to the lab - to evaluate their smell perception using Sniffin' Sticks following a standard protocol (Rumeau et al., 2016) and taste perception using filter-paper disc (Nishijima et al., 2013). Upon their first lab visit, they will taste the four flavours (1 tablet per flavour) of the chewing gum that will be used in the following training. They will be given a questionnaire to indicate their perception and liking of all flavours. If there is any flavour, they find particularly disturbing that they do not wish to use to conduct the training, they have the opportunity to withdraw. Please see Fig.2. participant activities for lab visits and training at home. For both lab visits, participants will be given aromatic sticks to sniff to evaluate their Threshold, Discrimination and Identification (TDI score) of olfactory functions. Participants will also be given filter-paper discs of four tastes of sweet (sucrose), salty (sodium chloride), sour (citric acid) and bitter (quinine), and two trigeminal of cooling (menthol) and hot/burning (capsaicin) to evaluate their identification capability and threshold of taste and trigeminal sensations. Each session is expected to take up to 2 hours. On their first lab visit, participants will also be given logging-in information (by participant number) to an Xerte webpage so that they can access training protocol and their flavour selection if needed. Subsequently to the two lab visits, participants will be asked to conduct two at-home tests (once before and once after the 12-week training/waiting) to evaluate their smell, taste and trigeminal perception. For both OT and CTR groups, participants will be offered chewing gum training kit on their second lab visit.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Leicestershire
      • Loughborough, Leicestershire, United Kingdom, LE12 5RD
        • University of Nottingham

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • • Aged between 18 and 65 years male and female

    • Have impairment in smell and/or taste (with a medical diagnosis or self-perception of between 3 months and 2 years)
    • Were able to smell and taste normally prior to the impairment (we anticipate that participants will have experienced the condition following a viral infection or idiopathically, etc)
    • Voluntary participation in the study
    • Willing to travel to Nottingham for 2 lab visits
    • Able to give informed written consent
    • Having not taken part in olfactory training or related research in the last 3 months or any study providing an inconvenience allowance.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • • Physical damage in oral and/or nasal cavity due to surgery, trauma, etc.

    • Active infection with a virus that impedes smell and/or taste perception, sinonasal diseases, Parkinson's disease
    • Chewing or biting difficulty that would restrict chewing gum regularly
    • Allergy to chewing gum ingredients
    • Pregnancy or lactating
    • Having taken part in a research study in the last 3 months involving invasive procedures or an inconvenience allowance (this must remain for ALL UoN FMHS UREC approved studies)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Waiting list control group
Participants are randomly allocated once baseline data has been collected to a waiting list control group where no action will be taken.
Participants are randomly allocated once baseline data has been collected to a waiting list control group where no action will be taken.
Experimental: Flavour impairment training using chewing gum group (FIT)
Participants are randomly allocated to chew gum twice a day for 12 weeks whilst at home.
Participants are randomly allocated to chew gum twice a day for 12 weeks whilst at home.
Active Comparator: Olfactory training group (OT)
Participants are randomly allocated to smell liquid flavouring twice a day for 12 weeks whilst at home.
Participants are randomly allocated to smell liquid flavouring twice a day for 12 weeks whilst at home.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall Threshold Discrimination and Identification (TDI) score using Sniffin' Sticks.
Time Frame: From enrolment to study to after 12 weeks.
Participants will be required to sniff aromatic pens to evaluate their Threshold Discrimination and Identification of aromas at the at start and end of the study.
From enrolment to study to after 12 weeks.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Identification of taste using four basic taste solutions
Time Frame: From enrolment to study to after 12 weeks.
Participants are required to identify whether they can taste four different basic tastes at the start and end of the study.
From enrolment to study to after 12 weeks.
At home smell test
Time Frame: From enrolment to study to after 12 weeks.
Participants, whilst blindfolded, will be required to attempt to identify 5 smells commonly found in the home.
From enrolment to study to after 12 weeks.
Training compliance
Time Frame: From enrolment to study to after 12 weeks.
Participants will be required to submit weekly completion questionnaires online for 12 weeks.
From enrolment to study to after 12 weeks.
Reflection on training and feasibility of the study.
Time Frame: From enrolment to study to after 12 weeks.
Participants will be required to complete a questionnaire exploring their perceptions of the feasibility of the study.
From enrolment to study to after 12 weeks.
Reflection on severity of abnormality in flavour perception
Time Frame: From enrolment to study to after 12 weeks.
Participants will be required to complete a questionnaire recording their perception of the severity of their abnormality in flavour perception
From enrolment to study to after 12 weeks.
Perception of impact on life experience of changes in flavour perception.
Time Frame: From enrolment to study to after 12 weeks.
Participants will be required to complete a questionnaire exploring the impact of their flavour perception on their life experience.
From enrolment to study to after 12 weeks.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Moira A Taylor, PhD, University of Nottingham
  • Principal Investigator: Ni Yang, PhD, University of Nottingham
  • Principal Investigator: Rebecca Ford, PhD, University of Nottingham

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 21, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 19, 2026

Study Completion (Actual)

March 19, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 23, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 23, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

March 27, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 27, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 23, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

All aspects

IPD Sharing Time Frame

April 2025- indefinitely

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Information will be available on request.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anosmia

Clinical Trials on Waiting list control group

Subscribe