- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07536009
"Effectiveness of a Telerehabilitation Program Versus a Conventional Rehabilitation Program in Patients With Subacromial Pain"
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Chronic subacromial pain represents a significant public health challenge and the most common musculoskeletal disorder after back and neck pain. Its etiology is multifactorial, causing substantial functional limitations, work disability, and a decrease in quality of life. The management of subacromial pain is primarily conducted through conservative interventions, with therapeutic exercise constituting the cornerstone of treatment to reduce joint pain, optimize shoulder function, and improve muscle strength.
Despite its efficacy, adherence to home exercise programs is often low due to a lack of supervision and motivation, which compromises long-term outcomes. While supervised, conventional in-person physical therapy improves adherence and functional outcomes, it presents significant logistical and economic barriers, such as travel costs, distance, and difficulty accommodating appointments within work schedules. This creates a gap in care, preventing many patients from receiving the necessary amount of therapy for optimal recovery.
Telerehabilitation, a remote healthcare delivery modality utilizing information and communication technologies, emerges as a promising solution to mitigate these barriers. Assisted digital therapy programs can be utilized to maximize treatment intensity, provide real-time biofeedback, and allow physical therapists to progressively adjust exercise complexity under remote guidance. This approach can potentially improve treatment adherence and reduce indirect costs for patients by eliminating travel needs and decreasing time off work.
Although current evidence provides compelling data regarding the efficacy of telerehabilitation, establishing its superiority over static home exercise programs, there is a lack of standardized protocols. Furthermore, a clear consensus has not been established regarding its non-inferiority to the conventional in-person model within a standard, non-pandemic clinical setting.
To address this gap, this study proposes a prospective, randomized, parallel-group, single-center, controlled non-inferiority clinical trial. The primary objective is to compare the change in shoulder function, as measured by the QuickDASH, at the end of a 12-week program between a telerehabilitation group and a conventional rehabilitation group. Secondary objectives include comparing changes in pain intensity (VAS) and range of motion (flexion, abduction, and external rotation), as well as evaluating treatment adherence, patient satisfaction, and long-term functional outcomes at 6 months. Answering this question will lay the groundwork for establishing a standardized, evidence-based telerehabilitation protocol as a highly accessible and sustainable care modality for patients with subacromial pain.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Roberto Carlos Pech Argüelles, MD
- Phone Number: 9991520786
- Email: drrobertopech@hotmail.com
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Men and women aged 18 years or older.
- Diagnosis of Subacromial Impingement Syndrome (SIS) based on clinical criteria (pain with overhead activities, painful arc, positive Neer, Hawkins, or Jobe test). Radiological confirmation (ultrasound and/or magnetic resonance imaging) is accepted.
- Access to the internet and a device (smartphone, tablet, or computer) capable of running the telerehabilitation platform.
- Willingness and ability to provide written informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Shoulder pain caused by fractures, tumors, infections, or severe systemic pathologies.
- Previous surgery on the affected shoulder within the last 3 months.
- Prior joint injection (corticosteroid infiltration) in the affected shoulder within the last 3 months.
- Subjects with partial or full-thickness rotator cuff tears.
- Patients currently receiving concurrent physical therapy (PT) or any other external interventions for the shoulder condition.
- Current participation in another rehabilitation or exercise program.
- Pregnancy.
- Cognitive impairment, communication barriers, or any condition that prevents the patient from following the remote instructions.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Telerehabilitation
A 12- to 24-week digital intervention program including a structured exercise protocol, health education, and cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) delivered via the Moodle platform.
Exercises focus on mobility, stretching, and gradual strengthening of the shoulder/scapular muscles, recommended 3-4 sessions per week (30 minutes daily).
|
Multimodal digital intervention delivered via the Moodle platform.
It includes a structured therapeutic exercise program (mobility, stretching, and progressive strengthening of rotator cuff and periscapular muscles), asynchronous remote monitoring by a physical therapist, and digital health education.
Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) components focused on pain reconceptualization and coping strategies are also integrated.
Patients perform 30-minute daily sessions, 3-4 times per week, for a duration of 12 to 24 weeks.
|
|
Active Comparator: Conventional Rehabilitation
High-dose, in-person physical therapy at the clinic.
The program includes therapeutic exercises with graded exposure to movement, manual therapy, and verbal education.
Recommended 2-3 in-person sessions per week (30 minutes per session), complemented by home exercises.
|
Standard in-person rehabilitation program conducted at the clinic.
The intervention consists of supervised therapeutic exercises (similar to the experimental group), manual therapy techniques (joint mobilization and soft tissue manipulation as clinically indicated), and verbal health education provided by the physical therapist.
Patients attend 2-3 in-person sessions per week, each lasting 30 minutes, for 12 to 24 weeks, complemented by printed home exercise instructions.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Shoulder Function
Time Frame: Baseline, 12 and 24 weeks
|
Measured by the short version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (QuickDASH).
The QuickDASH is an 11-item self-report questionnaire that measures physical function and symptoms in people with any or multiple musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limb.
Scores range from 0 to 100, where 0 indicates no disability (best outcome) and 100 indicates the most severe disability (worst outcome).
|
Baseline, 12 and 24 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Pain Intensity
Time Frame: Baseline, 12 and 24 weeks
|
Measured by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
Participants rate their subjective intensity of pain on a continuous line or numeric rating scale.
Scores range from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates "no pain" (best outcome) and 10 indicates the "worst imaginable pain" (worst outcome).
|
Baseline, 12 and 24 weeks
|
|
Change in Range of Motion (ROM)
Time Frame: Baseline, 12 and 24 weeks
|
Measurement of active and passive range of motion of the affected shoulder using a clinical goniometer.
The assessment includes the measurement in degrees of forward flexion, abduction, external rotation, and internal rotation.
An increase in degrees indicates an improvement in mobility (better outcome).
|
Baseline, 12 and 24 weeks
|
|
Treatment Adherence
Time Frame: Baseline, 12 and 24 weeks
|
Defined as the degree to which the participant complies with the prescribed exercise plan.
It is calculated as the percentage (%) of completed exercise sessions relative to the total number of scheduled sessions.
For the telerehabilitation group, adherence is derived from the Moodle platform metrics (login days, resources accessed, time spent).
For the control group, it is manually recorded via the physical therapist's log.
|
Baseline, 12 and 24 weeks
|
|
Patient Satisfaction
Time Frame: Baseline, 12 and 24 weeks
|
Participant's level of conformity or satisfaction with the assigned rehabilitation program.
It is assessed using a numeric rating scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates "completely dissatisfied" (worst outcome) and 10 indicates "extremely satisfied" (best outcome).
|
Baseline, 12 and 24 weeks
|
|
Long-Term Shoulder Function
Time Frame: 24 weeks postintervention
|
Long-term functional outcomes evaluated using the QuickDASH questionnaire.
Scores range from 0 to 100, where 0 indicates no disability (best outcome) and 100 indicates the most severe disability (worst outcome).
|
24 weeks postintervention
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Kane LT, Thakar O, Jamgochian G, Lazarus MD, Abboud JA, Namdari S, Horneff JG. The role of telehealth as a platform for postoperative visits following rotator cuff repair: a prospective, randomized controlled trial. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Apr;29(4):775-783. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.12.004.
- Gava V, Ribeiro LP, Barreto RPG, Camargo PR. Effectiveness of physical therapy given by telerehabilitation on pain and disability of individuals with shoulder pain: A systematic review. Clin Rehabil. 2022 Jun;36(6):715-725. doi: 10.1177/02692155221083496. Epub 2022 Mar 1.
- Gutierrez-Espinoza H, Araya-Quintanilla F, Cereceda-Muriel C, Alvarez-Bueno C, Martinez-Vizcaino V, Cavero-Redondo I. Effect of supervised physiotherapy versus home exercise program in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Phys Ther Sport. 2020 Jan;41:34-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2019.11.003. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
- Correia FD, Molinos M, Luis S, Carvalho D, Carvalho C, Costa P, Seabra R, Francisco G, Bento V, Lains J. Digitally Assisted Versus Conventional Home-Based Rehabilitation After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2022 Mar 1;101(3):237-249. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001780.
- Martinez-Rico S, Lizaur-Utrilla A, Sebastia-Forcada E, Vizcaya-Moreno MF, de Juan-Herrero J. The Impact of a Phone Assistance Nursing Program on Adherence to Home Exercises and Final Outcomes in Patients Who Underwent Shoulder Instability Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Study. Orthop Nurs. 2018 Nov/Dec;37(6):372-378. doi: 10.1097/NOR.0000000000000501.
- Huang T, Zhang W, Yan B, Liu H, Girard O. Comparing Telerehabilitation and Home-based Exercise for Shoulder Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2024 Nov;105(11):2214-2223. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2024.02.723. Epub 2024 Mar 2.
- Petersson AH, Bjornsson Hallgren HC, Adolfsson LE, Holmgren TM. No need for subacromial decompression in responders to specific exercise treatment: a 10-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2025 Jun;34(6):e477-e487. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.10.027. Epub 2024 Dec 21.
- Sheth U, Nam D, Richards R, Palinkas V, Wainwright A, Dunn PC, Razmjou H. Agreement on clinical examination and management between virtual videoconferencing and in-person assessment in a tertiary shoulder center. JSES Int. 2025 Jan 28;9(3):859-863. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2024.12.021. eCollection 2025 May.
- Sabbagh R, Shah N, Jenkins S, Macdonald J, Foote A, Matar R, Steffensmeier A, Grawe B. The COVID-19 pandemic and follow-up for shoulder surgery: The impact of a shift toward telemedicine on validated patient-reported outcomes. J Telemed Telecare. 2023 Jul;29(6):484-491. doi: 10.1177/1357633X21990997. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
- Zhang B, Fang Z, Nian K, Sun B, Ji B. The effects of telemedicine on Rotator cuff-related shoulder function and pain symptoms: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Aug 14;19(1):478. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-04986-4.
- Pak SS, Janela D, Freitas N, Costa F, Moulder R, Molinos M, Areias AC, Bento V, Cohen SP, Yanamadala V, Souza RB, Correia FD. Comparing Digital to Conventional Physical Therapy for Chronic Shoulder Pain: Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res. 2023 Aug 18;25:e49236. doi: 10.2196/49236.
- Kromer TO, Kohl M, Bastiaenen CHG. Factors predicting long-term outcomes following physiotherapy in patients with subacromial pain syndrome: a secondary analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Jul 24;25(1):579. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07686-6.
- Lafrance S, Charron M, Dube MO, Desmeules F, Roy JS, Juul-Kristensen B, Kennedy L, McCreesh K. The Efficacy of Exercise Therapy for Rotator Cuff-Related Shoulder Pain According to the FITT Principle: A Systematic Review With Meta-analyses. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2024 Aug;54(8):499-512. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2024.12453.
- Paavola M, Kanto K, Ranstam J, Malmivaara A, Inkinen J, Kalske J, Savolainen V, Sinisaari I, Taimela S, Jarvinen TL; Finnish Shoulder Impingement Arthroscopy Controlled Trial (FIMPACT) Investigators. Subacromial decompression versus diagnostic arthroscopy for shoulder impingement: a 5-year follow-up of a randomised, placebo surgery controlled clinical trial. Br J Sports Med. 2021 Jan;55(2):99-107. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2020-102216. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
- Back M, Paavola M, Aronen P, Jarvinen TLN, Taimela S; Finnish Shoulder Impingement Arthroscopy Controlled Trial (FIMPACT) Investigators. Return to work after subacromial decompression, diagnostic arthroscopy, or exercise therapy for shoulder impingement: a randomised, placebo-surgery controlled FIMPACT clinical trial with five-year follow-up. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Oct 19;22(1):889. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04768-7.
- Aguilar Garcia M, Gonzalez Munoz A, Perez Montilla JJ, Aguilar Nunez D, Hamed Hamed D, Pruimboom L, Navarro Ledesma S. Which Multimodal Physiotherapy Treatment Is the Most Effective in People with Shoulder Pain? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses. Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Jun 20;12(12):1234. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12121234.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Shoulder Injuries
- Pain
- Neurologic Manifestations
- Musculoskeletal Diseases
- Wounds and Injuries
- Joint Diseases
- Arthralgia
- Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms
- Signs and Symptoms
- Shoulder Pain
- Shoulder Impingement Syndrome
- Health Services Administration
- Delivery of Health Care
- Therapeutics
- Patient Care
- Health Services
- Health Care Facilities Workforce and Services
- Rehabilitation
- Aftercare
- Continuity of Patient Care
- Telemedicine
- Patient Care Management
- Telerehabilitation
Other Study ID Numbers
- R-2026-3201-029
- FMED-001446 (Other Identifier: Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Subacromial Impingement Syndrome
-
Mahidol UniversityCompletedSubacromial Impingement Syndrome | Shoulder Impingement Syndrome | Subacromial Pain Syndrome | Subacromial Impingement | Impingement Syndrome, ShoulderIndonesia
-
Central Finland Hospital DistrictOulu University Hospital; Academy of FinlandActive, not recruitingSubacromial Impingement SyndromeFinland
-
Linkoeping UniversityCompletedSubacromial Impingement SyndromeSweden
-
The University of Texas Medical Branch, GalvestonTerminatedSubacromial Impingement Syndrome | Subacromial ImpingementUnited States
-
Sacred Heart UniversityNova Southeastern UniversityCompletedSubacromial Impingement Syndrome | Subacromial Impingement
-
Hvidovre University HospitalRecruitingSubacromial Impingement Syndrome | Subacromial Pain Syndrome | Subacromial ImpingementDenmark
-
Sevgi Medical CenterCompletedSubacromial Impingement Syndrome | Subacromial ImpingementTurkey
-
Cairo UniversityCompletedSubacromial Impingement SyndromeEgypt
-
Sandra Jiménez-del-BarrioSanidad de Castilla y LeónActive, not recruitingSubacromial Impingement SyndromeSpain
-
Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo LeonCompletedSubacromial Impingement Syndrome | Rotator Cuff Impingement Syndrome | Subacromial BursitisMexico
Clinical Trials on Digital Physical Therapy (Telerehabilitation)
-
Universita di VeronaUniversità degli Studi di FerraraNot yet recruiting
-
National Taiwan University HospitalNational Science Council, TaiwanCompleted
-
University of HaifaMaccabi Healthcare Services, IsraelCompleted
-
WizecareCompletedParkinson DiseaseUnited States
-
Oregon Health and Science UniversityCompletedDistal Radius Fracture
-
Universita di VeronaNot yet recruiting
-
Mayo ClinicCompletedKnee Osteoarthritis | Knee Injuries | Patellofemoral SyndromeUnited States
-
Universidad de GranadaUniversity of MalagaEnrolling by invitation
-
Sword Health, SAEmory UniversityCompleted
-
Universidad de ValparaisoHospital Dr. Gustavo Fricke; Fundación Dr. Jorge Kaplan MeierCompletedCardiovascular Diseases | Cardiac SurgeryChile