Denne side blev automatisk oversat, og nøjagtigheden af ​​oversættelsen er ikke garanteret. Der henvises til engelsk version for en kildetekst.

Simulation-Based Learning on Clinical Reasoning, Knowledge Retention, and Transfer in Undergraduate Medical Education (SIMCORE)

29. juni 2026 opdateret af: Sibel Zorlu Ozturk, Altinbas University

Does Video-Based Patient Simulation Improve Clinical Reasoning Skills in Medical Students?

This randomized controlled trial evaluates whether a digital, video-based clinical-reasoning simulation improves clinical-reasoning performance compared with conventional lecture-based teaching across multiple clinical disciplines, including orthopedics and ophthalmology.

Within each discipline, participants are randomly allocated 1:1 to an intervention group or a control group. The intervention group learns the assigned topic through an interactive, web-based simulation built on real patient video cases with structured clinical-reasoning steps. The control group receives the same learning objectives and content through a standard didactic lecture, over a comparable duration.

After the learning session, all participants complete the same set of standardized clinical scenarios, scored with a predefined rubric. The primary outcome is the post-intervention clinical-reasoning score. Secondary outcomes include diagnostic accuracy, confidence, and satisfaction.

The trial uses a shared protocol across discipline-specific cohorts to allow consistent, pre-specified comparison of simulation-based versus lecture-based instruction.

Studieoversigt

Status

Afsluttet

Betingelser

Intervention / Behandling

Detaljeret beskrivelse

Background. Clinical reasoning is a core competency across medical disciplines, yet traditional lectures offer limited interactive practice. A digital simulation using authentic patient cases may strengthen reasoning, but comparative evidence is limited.

Objective. To compare a digital, video-based clinical-reasoning simulation with conventional lecture-based teaching on clinical-reasoning performance, using a single shared design applied across discipline-specific cohorts (e.g., orthopedics, ophthalmology, paediatrics).

Design. Single-center, parallel-group, two-arm randomized controlled trial with 1:1 allocation, replicated as pre-specified cohorts by clinical discipline under one common protocol.

Participants. Eligible learners (medical students / residents) within each discipline-specific cohort at primarily Altinbas University.

Randomization. Computer-generated 1:1 randomization performed separately within each cohort; outcome assessors blinded to allocation.

Interventions. Intervention - interactive, web-based clinical-reasoning simulation using real patient video cases with structured reasoning steps. Control - didactic lecture delivering identical learning objectives and content over a comparable duration.

Outcomes. Primary - post-intervention clinical-reasoning score on standardized scenarios rated with a predefined rubric. Secondary - diagnostic accuracy, participant confidence, satisfaction.

Cohorts & analysis. Each discipline-specific cohort is analyzed separately with an independent-samples t-test; inter-rater reliability assessed where applicable. Total target enrollment (n=250) across all cohorts.

Undersøgelsestype

Interventionel

Tilmelding (Faktiske)

250

Fase

  • Ikke anvendelig

Kontakter og lokationer

Dette afsnit indeholder kontaktoplysninger for dem, der udfører undersøgelsen, og oplysninger om, hvor denne undersøgelse udføres.

Studiesteder

Deltagelseskriterier

Forskere leder efter personer, der passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kaldet berettigelseskriterier. Nogle eksempler på disse kriterier er en persons generelle helbredstilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Berettigelseskriterier

Aldre berettiget til at studere

  • Voksen
  • Ældre voksen

Tager imod sunde frivillige

Ja

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Enrolled as a [final-year medical student / resident] in the relevant discipline (orthopedics or ophthalmology) at the participating institution
  • Completed the baseline orientation and agreed to participate
  • Available for the full learning session and the post-session assessment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior completion of the same simulation module or equivalent structured training on the topic
  • Did not complete the assigned learning session
  • Incomplete post-session assessment data

Studieplan

Dette afsnit indeholder detaljer om studieplanen, herunder hvordan undersøgelsen er designet, og hvad undersøgelsen måler.

Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?

Design detaljer

  • Primært formål: Andet
  • Tildeling: Randomiseret
  • Interventionel model: Parallel tildeling
  • Maskning: Enkelt

Våben og indgreb

Deltagergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandling
Eksperimentel: Simulation
Interactive, web-based clinical-reasoning simulation built on real patient video cases. Learners actively work through structured decision points (history, examination, differential diagnosis, investigation, management) and receive immediate feedback.
Andet: Behavioral
Interactive, web-based clinical-reasoning simulation built on real patient video cases. Learners actively work through structured decision points (history, examination, differential diagnosis, investigation, management) and receive immediate feedback.
Andre navne:
  • Digital video-based clinical-reasoning simulation
Aktiv komparator: Lecture
Instructor-led didactic lecture delivering identical learning objectives through expert explanation and slides. Learners receive content passively, without interactive decision steps or video-based case progression.
Adfærdsmæssigt: Lecture
Instructor-led didactic lecture delivering identical learning objectives through expert explanation and slides. Learners receive content passively, without interactive decision steps or video-based case progression.

Hvad måler undersøgelsen?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Clinical-reasoning performance score
Tidsramme: Immediately after the learning session (same day)
Performance on a set of standardized clinical scenarios completed after the learning session, rated with a predefined scoring rubric. Higher scores indicate better clinical-reasoning performance. Assessed separately within each discipline-specific cohort. Scored using the five-domain Clinical Reasoning Score System; total range 0-100, with higher scores indicating better clinical-reasoning performance.
Immediately after the learning session (same day)

Sekundære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Diagnostic accuracy
Tidsramme: Immediately after the learning session (same day)
Proportion of standardized scenarios in which the participant reached the correct diagnosis, scored against a predefined answer key. Reported as the percentage of scenarios with a correct diagnosis (0-100%); higher values indicate better performance.
Immediately after the learning session (same day)
Participant confidence
Tidsramme: Immediately after the learning session (same day)
Self-reported confidence in clinical decision-making, measured on a structured rating scale after the session. Measured on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree); higher scores indicate greater confidence.
Immediately after the learning session (same day)
Participant satisfaction
Tidsramme: Immediately after the learning session (same day)
Self-reported satisfaction with the learning method, measured on a structured rating scale after the session. Measured on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree); higher scores indicate greater satisfaction.
Immediately after the learning session (same day)

Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere

Det er her, du vil finde personer og organisationer, der er involveret i denne undersøgelse.

Sponsor

Altinbas University

Efterforskere

  • Studiestol: Omer Tontus, MD

Datoer for undersøgelser

Disse datoer sporer fremskridtene for indsendelser af undersøgelsesrekord og resumeresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieregistreringer og rapporterede resultater gennemgås af National Library of Medicine (NLM) for at sikre, at de opfylder specifikke kvalitetskontrolstandarder, før de offentliggøres på den offentlige hjemmeside.

Studer store datoer

Studiestart (Faktiske)

20. maj 2025

Primær færdiggørelse (Faktiske)

1. juni 2026

Studieafslutning (Faktiske)

1. juni 2026

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først indsendt

23. juni 2026

Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier

29. juni 2026

Først opslået (Faktiske)

1. juli 2026

Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler

Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)

1. juli 2026

Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier

29. juni 2026

Sidst verificeret

1. juni 2026

Mere information

Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse

Nøgleord

Andre undersøgelses-id-numre

  • Altinbas

Plan for individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)

Planlægger du at dele individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)?

INGEN

Lægemiddel- og udstyrsoplysninger, undersøgelsesdokumenter

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret lægemiddelprodukt

Ingen

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret enhedsprodukt

Ingen

Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .

Kliniske forsøg med Medicinsk Uddannelse

Kliniske forsøg med Behavioral

Søg i lignende forsøg

Sponsorer og samarbejdspartnere

Medicinske tilstande

Narkotikainterventioner

CROs by country

CROs in Djibouti

Betingelser

Sjældne sygdomme

Narkotikainterventioner

Kosttilskud

Sponsor / samarbejdspartnere

Placeringer

3
Abonner