Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

A Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of a Single Application of Capsaicin 8%Transdermal Delivery System Compared to Placebo in Reducing Pain Intensity in Subjects With Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy (PDPN) (STEP)

12. Oktober 2015 aktualisiert von: Astellas Pharma Inc

A Phase III, Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of QUTENZA® in Subjects With Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy

The purpose of the study is to assess efficacy and safety of a single treatment of Capsaicin 8% transdermal delivery system in reducing pain from damaged nerves (neuropathic pain) caused by diabetes.

Studienübersicht

Status

Abgeschlossen

Bedingungen

Intervention / Behandlung

Detaillierte Beschreibung

Participants were divided into 2 groups of approximately equal size. In the first group, participants received a Capsaicin 8% patch applied for 30 minutes to the feet; in the second group, participants received a placebo patch applied for 30 minutes to the feet. Participants were involved in the study for approximately 12 weeks and have visited the clinic approximately 6 times.

Studientyp

Interventionell

Einschreibung (Tatsächlich)

369

Phase

  • Phase 3

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienorte

  • Vereinigte Staaten
    • Alabama
      • Anniston, Alabama, Vereinigte Staaten, 36207
        • Site: 125
    • California
      • Fresno, California, Vereinigte Staaten, 93720
        • Site: 131
      • Long Beach, California, Vereinigte Staaten, 90806
        • Site: 123
      • Los Angeles, California, Vereinigte Staaten, 90033
        • Site: 116
      • Orange, California, Vereinigte Staaten, 92868
        • Site: 112
      • Walnut Creek, California, Vereinigte Staaten, 94597
        • Site: 130
    • Connecticut
      • Milford, Connecticut, Vereinigte Staaten, 06460
        • Site: 113
      • New London, Connecticut, Vereinigte Staaten, 06320
        • Site: 119
    • Florida
      • Boynton Beach, Florida, Vereinigte Staaten, 33435
        • Site: 117
      • Bradenton, Florida, Vereinigte Staaten, 34205
        • Site: 124
      • Clearwater, Florida, Vereinigte Staaten, 33765
        • Site: 107
      • Jupiter, Florida, Vereinigte Staaten, 33458
        • Site: 120
      • Orlando, Florida, Vereinigte Staaten, 32806
        • Site: 108
      • Oviedo, Florida, Vereinigte Staaten, 32765
        • Site: 132
      • St. Petersburg, Florida, Vereinigte Staaten, 33709
        • Site: 127
      • Tampa, Florida, Vereinigte Staaten, 33606
        • Site: 122
    • Hawaii
      • Honolulu, Hawaii, Vereinigte Staaten, 96814
        • Site: 133
    • Massachusetts
      • New Bedford, Massachusetts, Vereinigte Staaten, 02740
        • Site: 126
    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, Vereinigte Staaten, 48104
        • Site: 115
    • Missouri
      • Hazelwood, Missouri, Vereinigte Staaten, 63042
        • Site: 128
    • New York
      • New York, New York, Vereinigte Staaten, 10029
        • Site:111
    • North Carolina
      • Winston-Salem, North Carolina, Vereinigte Staaten, 27103
        • Site: 110
    • Ohio
      • Kettering, Ohio, Vereinigte Staaten, 45429
        • Site: 121
    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, Vereinigte Staaten, 75230
        • Site:106
      • Houston, Texas, Vereinigte Staaten, 77030
        • Site: 118
      • Houston, Texas, Vereinigte Staaten, 77098
        • Site: 114
      • Lubbock, Texas, Vereinigte Staaten, 79410
        • Site: 103
      • San Antonio, Texas, Vereinigte Staaten, 78228
        • Site: 105
      • San Antonio, Texas, Vereinigte Staaten, 78229
        • Site: 102

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

18 Jahre und älter (Erwachsene, Älterer Erwachsener)

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Nein

Studienberechtigte Geschlechter

Alle

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of painful, distal, symmetrical, sensorimotor polyneuropathy which is due to diabetes, for at least 1 year prior to screening visit
  • Average Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) score over the last 24 hours of ≥4 at the screening and the baseline visit

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Primary pain associated with PDPN (Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy) in the ankles or above
  • Pain that could not be clearly differentiated from, or conditions that might interfere with the assessment of PDPN (Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy), neurological disorders unrelated to diabetic neuropathy (e.g., phantom limb pain from amputation); skin condition in the area of the neuropathy that could alter sensation (e.g., plantar ulcer)
  • Current or previous foot ulcer as determined by medical history and medical examination
  • Any amputation of lower extremity
  • Severe renal disease as defined by a creatinine clearance of <30 ml/min calculated according to the Cockcroft-Gault formula
  • Clinically significant cardiovascular disease within 6 months prior to screening visit defined as cerebrovascular accident, unstable or poorly controlled hypertension, transient ischemic attack, myocardial infarction, unstable angina, current arrhythmia, any heart surgery including coronary artery bypass graft surgery, percutaneous coronary angioplasty/stent placement, or valvular heart disease
  • Significant peripheral vascular disease (intermittent claudication or lack of pulsation of either the dorsalis pedis or posterior tibial artery, or ankle-brachial systolic blood pressure index of <0.80)
  • Clinically significant foot deformities, including hallux rigidus, hallux valgus, or rigid toe as determined by physical examination as judged by the investigator
  • Clinically significant ongoing, uncontrolled or untreated abnormalities in cardiac, renal, hepatic, or pulmonary function that may interfere either with the ability to complete the study or the evaluation of adverse events
  • Diagnosis of any poorly controlled major psychiatric disorder
  • Active substance abuse or history of chronic substance abuse within 1 year prior to screening visit or any prior chronic substance abuse (including alcoholism) likely to re-occur during the study period as judged by the investigator
  • Hypersensitivity to capsaicin (i.e., chili peppers or over-the-counter [OTC] capsaicin products), any Capsaicin 8% transdermal delivery system excipients, Eutectic Mixture of Local Anaesthetics (EMLA) ingredients or adhesives
  • Use of any topical pain medication, such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, menthol, methyl salicylate, local anesthetics, steroids or capsaicin products on the painful areas within 7 days preceding the first patch application at the baseline visit
  • Use of oral or transdermal opioids exceeding a total daily dose of morphine of 80 mg/day, or equivalent; or any parenteral opioids, regardless of dose, within 7 days preceding the first patch application at the baseline visit
  • Skin areas to be treated with Capsaicin 8% transdermal delivery system showing changes such as crusting or ulcers
  • Planned elective surgery during the trial

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Behandlung
  • Zuteilung: Zufällig
  • Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
  • Maskierung: Vervierfachen

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandlung
Experimental: Capsaicin 8%
Capsaicin 8% patch was applied for 30 minutes to the painful area(s) on Day 1
Arzneimittel: Capsaicin 8%
Capsaicin 8% transdermal delivery system
Andere Namen:
  • Qutenza
Placebo-Komparator: Placebo
Placebo patch was applied for 30 minutes to the painful area(s) on Day 1
Arzneimittel: Placebo
Placebo Patch

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Percent Change in the Average Daily Pain Score From Baseline to Between Weeks 2 and 8
Zeitfenster: Baseline to between Weeks 2 to 8
Percent change in the average daily pain score from baseline to between Weeks 2 and 8, measured using Question 5 of the Brief Pain Inventory-Diabetic Neuropathy (BPI-DN). Participants assessed their pain due to diabetes in the last 24 hours on a numeric rating scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine).
Baseline to between Weeks 2 to 8

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Percent Change in the Average Daily Pain Score From Baseline to Between Weeks 2 and 12
Zeitfenster: Baseline to between Weeks 2 and 12
Percent Change in the Average Daily Pain Score from baseline to between Weeks 2 and 12 measured using Question 5 of the Brief Pain Inventory-Diabetic Neuropathy (BPI-DN). Participants assessed their pain due to diabetes in the last 24 hours on a numeric rating scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine).
Baseline to between Weeks 2 and 12
Weekly Percent Change From Baseline in Average Daily Pain Score
Zeitfenster: Baseline to Weeks 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,10, 11 and 12
Weekly Percent Change from baseline in average daily pain score from baseline to Week 12 measured using Question 5 of the Brief Pain Inventory-Diabetic Neuropathy (BPI-DN). Participants assessed their pain due to diabetes in the last 24 hours on a numeric rating scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine).
Baseline to Weeks 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,10, 11 and 12
Weekly Average of Average Daily Pain at Baseline and Every Week After Baseline
Zeitfenster: Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12
Weekly average of average daily pain score at Baseline and Weeks 2,4,8 and 12 measured using Question 5 of the Brief Pain Inventory-Diabetic Neuropathy (BPI-DN). Participants assessed their pain due to diabetes in the last 24 hours on a numeric rating scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine).
Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12
Percentage of Participants With 30% Reduction in Average Daily Pain Score.
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Weeks 2-8 and Weeks 2-12
Percentage of participants achieving 30% decrease in the average daily pain score in Weeks 2 and 8 and Weeks 2 and 12 measured using Question 5 of the Brief Pain Inventory-Diabetic Neuropathy (BPI-DN). Participants assessed their pain on a numeric rating scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine).
Baseline, Weeks 2-8 and Weeks 2-12
Percentage of Participants With 50% Reduction in Average Daily Pain Score.
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Weeks 2-8 and Weeks 2-12
Percentage of participants achieving 50% decrease in the average daily pain score in Weeks 2 and 8 and Weeks 2 and 12 measured using Question 5 of the Brief Pain Inventory-Diabetic Neuropathy (BPI-DN). Participants assessed their pain on a numeric rating scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine).
Baseline, Weeks 2-8 and Weeks 2-12
Overall Participant Status Assessed Using Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Self-assessment Questionnaire in Week 2
Zeitfenster: Baseline to Week 2
Overall participant status assessed using Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) self-assessment questionnaire which was used by participants to report on 7 categories listed as follows; Very Much Improved, Much Improved, Minimally Improved, No Change, Minimally Worse, Much Worse and Very Much Worse in Week 2
Baseline to Week 2
Overall Participant Status Assessed Using Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Self-assessment Questionnaire in Week 8
Zeitfenster: Baseline to Week 8
Overall participant status assessed using Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) self-assessment questionnaire which was used by participants to report on 7 categories listed as follows; Very Much Improved, Much Improved, Minimally Improved, No Change, Minimally Worse, Much Worse and Very Much Worse in Week 8
Baseline to Week 8
Overall Participant Status Assessed Using Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Self-assessment Questionnaire in Week 12
Zeitfenster: Baseline to Week 12
Overall participant status assessed using Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) self-assessment questionnaire which was used by participants to report on 7 categories listed as follows; Very Much Improved, Much Improved, Minimally Improved, No Change, Minimally Worse, Much Worse and Very Much Worse in Week 12
Baseline to Week 12
Change From Baseline in the European Quality Of Life (QOL) Questionnaire in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) With Visual Analog Scale (VAS) to Weeks 2, 8 and 12
Zeitfenster: Baseline to Weeks 2, 8 and 12
Change from Baseline in the European Quality Of Life (QOL) questionnaire in 5 dimensions (EQ-5D) with Visual Analog Scale (VAS) to Weeks 2, 8 and 12. EQ-5D self-reported questionnaire is used to measure health-related quality of life by measuring 5 dimensions of health: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The EQ-5D questionnaire includes a visual analog scale (VAS) which records participants self-rated health status on a graduated (0-100) scale with higher scores indicating higher Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL).
Baseline to Weeks 2, 8 and 12
Change in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Anxiety Scale From Baseline to Weeks 2, 8 and 12
Zeitfenster: Baseline to Weeks 2, 8 and 12
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) is a self-report scale developed for the assessment of anxiety and depression, that contain 14 items rated on a 4-point Likert-type scale. There are 2 subscales,one assessing depression and the other anxiety. The 7-item depression and anxiety subscales yield scores of 0 to 21 that are interpreted with the following cut-off points: 0 to 7, normal; 8 to 10, mild mood disturbance; 11 to 14, moderate mood disturbance; and 15 to 21, severe mood disturbance.
Baseline to Weeks 2, 8 and 12
Change in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Depression Scale From Baseline to Weeks 2, 8 and 12.
Zeitfenster: Baseline to Weeks 2, 8 and 12
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) is a self-report scale developed for the assessment of anxiety and depression, it contains 14 items rated on a 4-point Likert-type scale. There are 2 subscales,one assessing depression and the other anxiety. The 7-item depression and anxiety subscales yield scores of 0 to 21 that are interpreted with the following cut-off points: 0 to 7, normal; 8 to 10, mild mood disturbance; 11 to 14, moderate mood disturbance; and 15 to 21, severe mood disturbance.
Baseline to Weeks 2, 8 and 12
Treatment Satisfaction Assessment Based on Self-Assessment of Treatment (SAT II) Questionnaire at Baseline, Weeks 8 and 12
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Weeks 8 and 12
Treatment satisfaction assessment based on Self-Assessment Treatment (SAT II) questionnaire and the question "Over the past 7 days, how much has the study treatment improved your pain level?"
Baseline, Weeks 8 and 12
Percent Change in Average Sleep Interference Score From Baseline to Between Weeks 2-8 and Weeks 2-12
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Weeks 2-8 and Weeks 2-12
Percent change in average sleep interference was measured by Question 9F of the Brief Pain Inventory-Diabetic Neuropathy (BPI DN) and was used to assess pain and sleep interference index. Daily sleep interference rating scale consists of an 11-point numerical scale with which the patient describes how pain related to diabetes has interfered with their sleep during the past 24 hours. On a scale 0 identifies "pain does not interfere with sleep" and 10 identifies "pain completely interferes with sleep". Average sleep interference score is assessed from baseline to Weeks 2-8 and Weeks 2-12.
Baseline, Weeks 2-8 and Weeks 2-12
Tolerability of Patch Application Assessed by Dermal Assessment on Day 1, 15 Minutes and 60 Minutes After Patch Removal.
Zeitfenster: Day 1, 15 minutes and 60 minutes after patch removal
Tolerability of patch application was assessed by dermal assessment (0 to 7 point severity score on Dermal Assessment Scale). Data reported is based on the number of participants in the combined category with a score ≥ 4 (Definite edema or higher), 15 and 60 minutes after patch removal.
Day 1, 15 minutes and 60 minutes after patch removal
Change From Pre-application in"Pain Now" Score
Zeitfenster: Pre-application and 15 minutes and 60 minutes after patch removal
Change from pre-application in"Pain Now" score was measured on a scale from 0-10 where 0 equates to "No Pain" and 10 to "Pain as bad as you can imagine". Participants were asked to provide pain ratings relative only to the area of pain undergoing treatment.
Pre-application and 15 minutes and 60 minutes after patch removal
Number of Participants Who Used Rescue Pain Medication Days 1 Through 5
Zeitfenster: Days 1 - 5
Summarized number of participants who used Rescue Pain Medications for Pain
Days 1 - 5
Safety Assessed Through Adverse Events (AE) and Serious Adverse Events (SAE), Vital Signs, and Laboratory Analyses From Baseline to Week 12
Zeitfenster: Baseline to Week 12
Number of patients assessed for Safety through Adverse Events (AE) and Serious Adverse Events (SAE), vital signs, and laboratory analyses from baseline to week 12
Baseline to Week 12

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Sponsor

Astellas Pharma Inc

Publikationen und hilfreiche Links

Die Bereitstellung dieser Publikationen erfolgt freiwillig durch die für die Eingabe von Informationen über die Studie verantwortliche Person. Diese können sich auf alles beziehen, was mit dem Studium zu tun hat.

Allgemeine Veröffentlichungen

Nützliche Links

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn

1. Februar 2012

Primärer Abschluss (Tatsächlich)

1. Februar 2014

Studienabschluss (Tatsächlich)

1. Februar 2014

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

12. Februar 2012

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

14. Februar 2012

Zuerst gepostet (Schätzen)

15. Februar 2012

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Schätzen)

4. November 2015

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

12. Oktober 2015

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. Oktober 2015

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Schlüsselwörter

Zusätzliche relevante MeSH-Bedingungen

Andere Studien-ID-Nummern

  • E05-CL-3004

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Klinische Studien zur Schmerzen

Klinische Studien zur Capsaicin 8%

Suchen Sie nach ähnlichen Studien

Sponsoren und Mitarbeiter

Krankheiten

Drogeninterventionen

CROs by country

CROs in Lebanon

Bedingungen

Seltene Krankheiten

Drogeninterventionen

Nahrungsergänzungsmittel

Sponsor / Mitarbeiter

Standorte

Abonnieren