Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

Effects of Cognitive Fatigue on Gait

13. Juli 2026 aktualisiert von: Alexis Gomez Hernandez, State University of New York at Buffalo

The goal of this study is to comprehend how mental fatigue could affect human gait. The main questions to answer are:

  • Does mental fatigue change how people walk?
  • How long does it take for walking patterns to return to normal after mental fatigue sets in?
  • What role do constructs like boredom, sleepiness, and motivation play in this relationship?

To achieve this, participants will take part in the experiment, split into two sessions:

Day 1 (online, about 25 minutes): Practice session. Participants will practice a computer task that will be used to induce mental fatigue in the next session.

Day 2 (in-person, about 1.5 to 2 hours): Participants will wear several wearable sensors: motion sensors on their legs, feet, and back, sensor insoles in their shoes, a cap that measures brain activity, and glasses that track eye movement. After sensor placement, participants will walk in a straight line for 10 meters to measure their normal walking pattern. They will then complete a 32-minute computer task designed to induce mental fatigue. Afterward, participants will walk in a straight line for 10 meters again, rest for 3 minutes, and repeat this walk-and-rest cycle 3 more times. Participants will also answer short questions about how tired, bored, and alert they feel throughout the session.

Studienübersicht

Status

Noch keine Rekrutierung

Bedingungen

Intervention / Behandlung

Detaillierte Beschreibung

Background:

Most prior research on mental fatigue and gait has examined concurrent dual-task walking, in which a cognitive task and walking occur simultaneously. It remains unclear whether gait is altered following (rather than during) a mentally fatiguing task. This study addresses that gap using TloadDback, an adaptive N-back paradigm (Borragán et al., 2016) that individually calibrates cognitive demand to maintain consistent task difficulty across participants, as the mental fatigue induction method.

Design:

This is a within-subject, repeated-measures design. All primary analyses will be conducted on data collected during the in-person session. Sample size (up to 30 enrolled, target N = 24) was determined via a power analysis using pilot data (N = 5; within-subject design, α = 0.05, power = 0.90).

Mental Fatigue Induction Task:

TloadDback is administered as a single continuous 32-minute block. Participants view a continuous sequence of number-letter-number stimuli and respond via keypress (odd/even number), when seeing a number, or spacebar (letter repeat), when seeing a letter. Stimulus-presentation speed is individually calibrated during the practice session to the maximum speed at which the participant maintains greater than 85% accuracy, ensuring standardized cognitive demand across participants during the main session.

Sensor:

Inertial measurement units (IMUs): 8 units, placed at the shanks (2), thighs (2), feet (2), upper spine (1), and lower back (1), capturing spatiotemporal and kinematic gait parameters.

Pressure-sensing insoles: worn inside participants' shoes to detect gait events (heel strike, toe-off), complementing IMU-derived timing data.

Eye tracker: recording pupil diameter, blink rate, and fixation duration.

EEG cap: records brain's electrical voltage fluctuaction to obtain metrics such as frequency band analysis and neural signals related.

IMUs and insoles are used primarily to obtain gait parameters, whereas eye tracking and EEG are used only during the mental fatigue-inducing computer task, serving as physiological metrics to corroborate fatigue.

Procedures

Practice session (remote, online via PsychoPy/Pavlovia): Participants complete a familiarization run of TloadDback for individual speed calibration

In-person session pipeline:

Demographic questionnaire. Sensor placement: IMUs and insoles Baseline gait trial (10-meter straight-line walk). A 3-minute Psychomotor Vigilance Task (PVT), in which participants respond as quickly as possible by pressing the spacebar each time a visual stimulus (a dot) appears at random inter-stimulus intervals.

Sensor placement: Eye tracker and EEG. TloadDback task (32 minutes continuous). Repeat the 3-minute Psychomotor Vigilance Task (PVT). Take off the Eye Tracker and EEG. Post-task gait and recovery assessment: repeated cycles of a straight-line walk trial followed by a 3-minute rest, for a total of 4 post-task walk assessments.

Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ratings (fatigue, boredom) are collected at multiple points across the session to track the time course of fatigue and alertness.

Studientyp

Interventionell

Einschreibung (Geschätzt)

30

Phase

  • Unzutreffend

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienkontakt

  • Name: Alexis M Gomez Hernandez
  • Telefonnummer: PhD Candidate 330-554-0868
  • E-Mail: agomezhe@buffalo.edu

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

  • Erwachsene

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Ja

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults aged 18-60 years.
  • Neurotypical individuals with no self-reported history of neurological or cognitive disorders.
  • Able to walk independently, without an assistive device.
  • Fluent in English.
  • Recruitment will aim for gender balance across the sample.
  • For Day 2, participants must arrive with clean, dry hair, free of styling products (e.g., gels, oils), to ensure adequate EEG electrode contact.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Outside the age range of 18-60 years.
  • Self-reported history of neurological or cognitive disorders (e.g., epilepsy, multiple sclerosis, stroke/traumatic brain injury).
  • Any musculoskeletal condition or injury affecting normal gait.
  • Use of an assistive device for walking (e.g., cane, walker, brace).
  • Self-reported photosensitive epilepsy or seizure disorder triggered by screen/visual stimuli.
  • Non-English speaking.
  • Day 2 restrictions: less than 6 hours of sleep the night before; caffeine within 2 hours of the session; alcohol within 24 hours of the session.

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Behandlung
  • Zuteilung: N / A
  • Interventionsmodell: Einzelgruppenzuweisung
  • Maskierung: Keine (Offenes Etikett)

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandlung
Experimental: Mental fatigue

Day 1 (remote): online familiarization session with the TloadDback cognitive task to individually calibrate stimulus speed.

Day 2 (in-person): gait (spatiotemporal parameters and kinematics) is assessed using wearable motion sensors and pressure-sensing insoles, before and repeatedly after a computer task (32-minute TloadDback session), used to induce mental fatigue. Eye tracking and EEG are recorded during the task as physiological fatigue indices. Subjective (VAS) and behavioral (PVT) measures of fatigue and alertness are also collected throughout the session.

Participants will undergo a mental fatigue induction protocol to examine its effects on gait parameters.
Andere Namen:
  • Cognitive fatigue

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Subjective fatigue (VAS fatigue rating)
Zeitfenster: Right at the beginning of the experiment and right after the 32-minutes TloadDback task
Change in self-reported mental fatigue from baseline (PRE) to immediately after the mental fatigue induction task (POST), measured using the Visual Analog Scale for Fatigue (VAS). The VAS is a single-item, self-report scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates "not tired at all" and 10 indicates "extremely tired." Higher scores indicate greater self-reported mental fatigue.
Right at the beginning of the experiment and right after the 32-minutes TloadDback task
Change in Mean Reaction Time of the Psychomotor Vigilance Task (PVT)
Zeitfenster: Right at the beginning and right after the 32-minute TloadDback cognitive task.
Change in mean reaction time on the Psychomotor Vigilance Task from PRE to POST TloadDback, used as a behavioral indicator of mental fatigue-related vigilance decrement. Slower reaction time in the POST, compared to PRE, means more mentally fatigued.
Right at the beginning and right after the 32-minute TloadDback cognitive task.
Change in Gait Velocity
Zeitfenster: Right at the beginning and right after the 32-minute TloadDback cognitive task.
Change in gait velocity (meters/second), comparing baseline (PRE) walking trials to post-task (POST) walking trials, measured using inertial measurement units and pressure-sensing insoles. Here, there is no clear pattern; however, we expect participants to slow their gait spede after the fatigue intervention.
Right at the beginning and right after the 32-minute TloadDback cognitive task.
Change in Gait Cadence
Zeitfenster: Immediately before and immediately after the 32-minute TloadDback task
Change in gait cadence (steps/minute), comparing baseline (PRE) walking trials to post-task (POST) walking trials, measured using inertial measurement units and pressure-sensing insoles. There is no clear pattern here; however, we are expecting the cadence (steps/minute) to decrease after the fatigue intervention.
Immediately before and immediately after the 32-minute TloadDback task
Change in Stance and Swing Phase Duration
Zeitfenster: Immediately before and immediately after the 32-minute TloadDback task
Change in stance phase duration and swing phase duration, each expressed as a percentage of the gait cycle, comparing baseline (PRE) walking trials to post-task (POST) walking trials, measured using inertial measurement units and pressure-sensing insoles. Stance phase refers to the portion of the gait cycle when the foot is in contact with the ground, while swing phase refers to the portion when the foot is off the ground and advancing forward. An increase in stance phase duration (with a corresponding decrease in swing phase duration) is generally associated with a more cautious, conservative gait pattern. A decrease in stance phase duration (with a corresponding increase in swing phase) may reflect a faster, less guarded walking pattern.
Immediately before and immediately after the 32-minute TloadDback task
Change in Lower Extremity Joint Angles (Hip, Knee, Ankle)
Zeitfenster: Immediately before and immediately after the 32-minute TloadDback task
Change in peak hip, knee, and ankle joint angles (degrees) during walking, comparing baseline (PRE) walking trials to post-task (Post) walking trials, measured using inertial measurement units. Joint angles reflect the range of motion at each joint during the gait cycle. A reduction in joint angle range (i.e., smaller peak flexion/extension excursions) is commonly interpreted in the literature as a more restricted or cautious movement strategy, sometimes associated with reduced motor control.
Immediately before and immediately after the 32-minute TloadDback task

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Gait Velocity During Post-Task Recovery
Zeitfenster: 3, 6, 9, and 12 minutes after the 32-minute TloadDback task
Gait velocity (meters/second), measured at 3, 6, 9, and 12 minutes after the TloadDback task, where participants will rest for 3 minutes, walk 10 meters, and repeat this cycle 4 times. The idea is to examine whether and how walking speed changes as participants rest and recover from mental fatigue. Values will be reported separately for each timepoint. We will be expecting the gait velocity to increase after resting.
3, 6, 9, and 12 minutes after the 32-minute TloadDback task
Gait Cadence During Post-Task Recovery
Zeitfenster: 3, 6, 9, and 12 minutes after the 32-minute TloadDback task
Gait cadence (steps/minute), measured at 3, 6, 9, and 12 minutes after the TloadDback task, where participants will rest for 3 minutes, walk 10 meters, and repeat this cycle 4 times. The idea is to examine whether and how stepping rate changes as participants rest and recover from mental fatigue. Values will be reported separately for each time point.
3, 6, 9, and 12 minutes after the 32-minute TloadDback task
Stance and Swing Phase Duration During Post-Task Recovery
Zeitfenster: 3, 6, 9, and 12 minutes after the 32-minute TloadDback task
Stance phase duration and swing phase duration, each expressed as a percentage of the gait cycle, measured at 3, 6, 9, and 12 minutes after the TloadDback task, where participants will rest for 3 minutes, walk 10 meters, and repeat this cycle 4 times. The idea is to examine whether and how the distribution of gait phases changes as participants rest and recover from mental fatigue. Values will be reported separately for stance and swing phase at each timepoint. Stance phase is the gait phase where the foot is on the ground, while swing phase is the gait phase where the foot is moving forward (off the ground).
3, 6, 9, and 12 minutes after the 32-minute TloadDback task
Lower Extremity Joint Angles During Post-Task Recovery (Hip/Knee/Ankle)
Zeitfenster: 3, 6, 9, and 12 minutes after the 32-minute TloadDback task
Peak hip, knee, and ankle joint angles (degrees) during walking, measured at 3, 6, 9, and 12 minutes after the TloadDback task, where participants will rest for 3 minutes, walk 10 meters, and repeat this cycle 4 times. The idea is to examine whether and how the joint range of motion changes as participants rest and recover from mental fatigue. Values will be reported separately for hip, knee, and ankle at each time point.
3, 6, 9, and 12 minutes after the 32-minute TloadDback task
Self-Reported Mental Fatigue During Post-Task Recovery
Zeitfenster: 3, 6, 9, and 12 minutes after the 32-minute TloadDback task
Self-reported mental fatigue, measured using the Visual Analog Scale for Fatigue (VAS), at 3, 6, 9, and 12 minutes after the TloadDback task, where participants will rest for 3 minutes, walk 10 meters, and repeat this cycle 4 times. The idea is to examine whether and how perceived fatigue changes as participants rest and recover. The VAS ranges from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates "not tired at all" and 10 indicates "extremely tired"; higher scores indicate greater fatigue. Values will be reported separately for each time point.
3, 6, 9, and 12 minutes after the 32-minute TloadDback task
Change in electroencephalography (EEG) Band Spectral Power
Zeitfenster: During the 32-minute TloadDback task
Change in relative electroencephalography (EEG) spectral power (%) in theta and alpha frequency bands, recorded during the TloadDback task, providing physiological confirmation of mental fatigue induction. Increases in theta and alpha power, particularly over central and posterior regions, are commonly reported in the literature as indicators of cognitive fatigue accumulation. Values will be reported separately for each frequency band.
During the 32-minute TloadDback task
Change in Pupil Diameter
Zeitfenster: During the 32-minute TloadDback task
Change in pupil diameter (millimeters), recorded during the TloadDback task using eye-tracking, providing physiological confirmation of mental fatigue induction. A decrease in pupil diameter over the course of the task is commonly reported in the literature as an indicator of increasing mental fatigue.
During the 32-minute TloadDback task
Change in Blink Rate
Zeitfenster: During the 32-minute TloadDback task
Change in blink rate (blinks per minute), recorded during the TloadDback task using eye-tracking, providing physiological confirmation of mental fatigue induction. An increase in blink rate over the course of the task is commonly reported in the literature as an indicator of increasing mental fatigue.
During the 32-minute TloadDback task

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Ermittler

  • Studienstuhl: Lora Cavuoto, PhD, University at Buffalo

Publikationen und hilfreiche Links

Die Bereitstellung dieser Publikationen erfolgt freiwillig durch die für die Eingabe von Informationen über die Studie verantwortliche Person. Diese können sich auf alles beziehen, was mit dem Studium zu tun hat.

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn (Geschätzt)

1. September 2026

Primärer Abschluss (Geschätzt)

1. November 2026

Studienabschluss (Geschätzt)

1. November 2026

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

6. Juli 2026

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

13. Juli 2026

Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)

17. Juli 2026

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

17. Juli 2026

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

13. Juli 2026

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. Juli 2026

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)

Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?

UNENTSCHIEDEN

Beschreibung des IPD-Plans

A decision on data sharing has not yet been finalized. I intend to complete the IRB review process first, incorporating any feedback or requirements related to data collection, de-identification, and storage. Once IRB approval is obtained, a formal individual participant data (IPD) sharing plan will be developed, taking into account any applicable restrictions on data publication and participant privacy protections.

Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt

Nein

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt

Nein

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Klinische Studien zur Geistige Erschöpfung

Klinische Studien zur Mental fatigue

3
Abonnieren