Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Effect of a Maintenance Protocol After Surgical Treatment of Peri-implantitis

5 de octubre de 2022 actualizado por: Universidad Complutense de Madrid

Effect of a Maintenance Protocol Based on the Surgical Treatment of Peri-implantitis and Implant Surface Decontamination With Glycine Powder Air-polishing

This study was designed as a 12-month, two arms, randomized clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of a supportive treatment protocol (SPIT). Thirty patients were randomized, six months after access-flap surgery, in two different SPIT groups. After ultrasonic debridement, the affected implant surfaces of the test group were treated with glycine powder air-polishing, while implants in the control group a rubber cup and polishing paste was used. Maintenance visits were carried every 3 months and clinical, radiological, microbiological and biochemical variables were registered at baseline (6 months after surgery) and after a follow-up period of 12 months (18 months after surgery).

Descripción general del estudio

Descripción detallada

Study design:

This study was designed as a 12-month, two arms, RCT to evaluate the efficacy of a SPIC protocol. Thirty patients were randomized, six months after access-flap surgery, in two different SPIT groups. After ultrasonic debridement, the affected implant surfaces of the test group were treated with glycine powder air-polishing, while implants in the control group a rubber cup and polishing paste was used. Maintenance visits were carried every 3 months and clinical, radiological, microbiological and biochemical variables were registered at baseline (6 months after surgery) and after a follow-up period of 12 months (18 months after surgery).

Interventions:

At the 6-month evaluation after the surgery, the baseline data for the present study were obtained and patients were randomised using a computerized block randomization protocol to one of the following SPIC protocols. In the test group, implant surfaces were treated with glycine powder air-polishing after ultrasonic instrumentation; the specific nozzle was activated subgingivally and circumferentially around the implant for 1 minute. In the control group, implants were cleaned with a rubber cup and polishing paste after ultrasonic instrumentation. This SPIC visits were carried out at 6 (baseline visit), 9, 12, 15 and 18 months after surgery.

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Actual)

30

Fase

  • No aplica

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

  • Niño
  • Adulto
  • Adulto Mayor

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Géneros elegibles para el estudio

Todos

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of at least one implant with peri-implantitis, defined as: radiographic evidence of bone loss >2 mm, inflammation of the peri-implant mucosa as defined by positive BoP and/or suppuration, and at least one site with PD ≥ 5 mm.
  • Based on the radiographic examination, the affected implant should not have a vertical peri-implant defect. Positive selection was based on the presence of pe-ri-implant lesions wider than 4 mm, with an angle greater than 35 º.
  • In patients with a history of periodontitis, periodontal therapy should have been provided at least 6 months prior to the initiation of the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of relevant medical conditions and/or systemic medications that would contraindicate the surgical procedure or modify the tissue response after therapy.
  • Patients requiring antibiotic prophylaxis.
  • Heavy smokers (> 10 cigarettes/day).
  • Pregnant or lactating women

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Tratamiento
  • Asignación: Aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
  • Enmascaramiento: Único

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Experimental: Glycine - Test
Polishing treatment with glycine powder air-polishing after ultrasonic plaque debridement.
Every 3 months, ultrasonic instrumentation was carried out with an specific implant tip coated with Polyether Ether Ketone (PEEK), activated subgingivally and circumferentially around the implant. Then, the implants were treated with glycine powder air-polishing.
Comparador activo: Rubber cup - Control
Polishing treatment with a rubber cup and polishing paste after ultrasonic debridement
Every 3 months, ultrasonic instrumentation was carried out with an specific implant tip coated with Polyether Ether Ketone (PEEK), activated subgingivally and circumferentially around the implant. Then, the implants were treated with rubber cup and a polishing paste.

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Probing Pocket Depth
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline, 6 and 18 months after the surgical procedure
Changes in Probing Pocket Depth measured in milimeters with a manual periodontal probe
Baseline, 6 and 18 months after the surgical procedure

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Distance of Gingival Recession
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline, 6 and 18 months after the surgical procedure
Recession distance of the mucosal margin relative to the restoration margin (REC) at the implant (6 sites/implant) measured in milimeters with a manual periodontal probe
Baseline, 6 and 18 months after the surgical procedure
Bleeding on Probing index
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline, 6 and 18 months after the surgical procedure
Rate of Presence / absence Bleeding on Probing at the implant (6 sites/implant)
Baseline, 6 and 18 months after the surgical procedure
Plaque Index
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline, 6 and 18 months after the surgical procedure
Rate of Presence / absence of Plaque at the implant (6 sites/implant)
Baseline, 6 and 18 months after the surgical procedure
Suppuration Index
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline, 6 and 18 months after the surgical procedure
Rate of Presence / absence of suppuration at the implant (6 sites/implant)
Baseline, 6 and 18 months after the surgical procedure
Radiographic bone loss distance measured from the prosthetic connection platform to the bottom of the intraosseous defect
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline, 6 and 18 months after the surgical procedure
Intraoral standardised radiographs of the site of interest measured in digital intraoral radiographs using an image-processing software
Baseline, 6 and 18 months after the surgical procedure
Concentration of the selected cytokines measured in pg/ml (IL1B; Il-6; IL-8; Tumoral Necrosis Factor Alpha)
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline, 6 and 18 months after the surgical procedure
Samples taken from the gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) were taken from each included implant from the deepest PD site with positive BoP, at baseline and at the final evaluation, always prior to microbiological sampling. Samples were taken using the filter paper technique. After isolation of the area with cotton rolls and gentle cleaning with air and a gauze to remove supragingival biofilm deposits and potential saliva contamination, a paper strip of standard length and height was inserted into the peri-implant pocket, until mild resistance was felt and left in place for 30 seconds. The soaked volume of GCF was measured using the Periotron 8000® device. Subsequently, the paper strips were inserted in micro-centrifuge plastic tubes and immediately stored at -80°C until further processing. Analyses were carried out using a Luminex System (Luminex® 200, Luminex Corporation, Austin, TX, USA) to determine volume of the following biomarkers: IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8 and TNF-α.
Baseline, 6 and 18 months after the surgical procedure
Presence of putative periodontal pathogens
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline, 6 and 18 months after the surgical procedure
Sample from the deepest site in the evaluated implant using two consecutive sterile paper-points kept in place for 10 seconds and then transferred into a screw-capped vial, containing 1.5 mL of reduced transport fluid (RTF). Samples were transferred to the microbiological laboratory within 2 hours and homogenized by vortexing for 30 seconds and serially diluted in phosphate buffer saline (PBS). Then, 0.1 mL of each dilution was plated manually on the specific medium Dentaid-1, for the detection of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, and incubated for 3 days in air with 5% CO2 at 37ºC. Samples were also plated into a non-selective blood agar plate, supplemented with haemine (5 mg/l), menadione (1 mg/l) and 5% sterile horse blood, with 7-14 days of anaerobic incubation.
Baseline, 6 and 18 months after the surgical procedure
Frequency of detection of putative periodontal pathogens
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline, 6 and 18 months after the surgical procedure
Sample from the deepest site in the evaluated implant using two consecutive sterile paper-points kept in place for 10 seconds and then transferred into a screw-capped vial, containing 1.5 mL of reduced transport fluid (RTF). Samples were transferred to the microbiological laboratory within 2 hours and homogenized by vortexing for 30 seconds and serially diluted in phosphate buffer saline (PBS). Then, 0.1 mL of each dilution was plated manually on the specific medium Dentaid-1, for the detection of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, and incubated for 3 days in air with 5% CO2 at 37ºC. Samples were also plated into a non-selective blood agar plate, supplemented with haemine (5 mg/l), menadione (1 mg/l) and 5% sterile horse blood, with 7-14 days of anaerobic incubation.
Baseline, 6 and 18 months after the surgical procedure
Proportions of putative periodontal pathogens
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline, 6 and 18 months after the surgical procedure
Sample from the deepest site in the evaluated implant using two consecutive sterile paper-points kept in place for 10 seconds and then transferred into a screw-capped vial, containing 1.5 mL of reduced transport fluid (RTF). Samples were transferred to the microbiological laboratory within 2 hours and homogenized by vortexing for 30 seconds and serially diluted in phosphate buffer saline (PBS). Then, 0.1 mL of each dilution was plated manually on the specific medium Dentaid-1, for the detection of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, and incubated for 3 days in air with 5% CO2 at 37ºC. Samples were also plated into a non-selective blood agar plate, supplemented with haemine (5 mg/l), menadione (1 mg/l) and 5% sterile horse blood, with 7-14 days of anaerobic incubation.
Baseline, 6 and 18 months after the surgical procedure
Counts of putative periodontal pathogens
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline, 6 and 18 months after the surgical procedure
Sample from the deepest site in the evaluated implant using two consecutive sterile paper-points kept in place for 10 seconds and then transferred into a screw-capped vial, containing 1.5 mL of reduced transport fluid (RTF). Samples were transferred to the microbiological laboratory within 2 hours and homogenized by vortexing for 30 seconds and serially diluted in phosphate buffer saline (PBS). Then, 0.1 mL of each dilution was plated manually on the specific medium Dentaid-1, for the detection of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, and incubated for 3 days in air with 5% CO2 at 37ºC. Samples were also plated into a non-selective blood agar plate, supplemented with haemine (5 mg/l), menadione (1 mg/l) and 5% sterile horse blood, with 7-14 days of anaerobic incubation.
Baseline, 6 and 18 months after the surgical procedure

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Actual)

1 de enero de 2013

Finalización primaria (Actual)

1 de agosto de 2021

Finalización del estudio (Actual)

1 de agosto de 2021

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

26 de septiembre de 2022

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

5 de octubre de 2022

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

10 de octubre de 2022

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

10 de octubre de 2022

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

5 de octubre de 2022

Última verificación

1 de septiembre de 2022

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

NO

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Ensayos clínicos sobre Periimplantitis

Ensayos clínicos sobre Glycine air powder

3
Suscribir