Videolaryngoscopes for Double Lumen Tube Intubations in Simulated Easy and Difficult Airway
A Comparison of Three Videolaryngoscopes for Double-lumen Tubes Intubation in Simulated Easy and Difficult Airways
The investigators hypothesized that the use of the King Vision™ and the Airtraq® VL would reduce the time to DLT intubation compared with the GlideScope® and Macintosh in simulated easy and difficult airways. The investigators have considered to assess the efficacy of each device in manikins before considering to evaluate them in patients undergoing thoracic procedures.
Twenty-one staff anaesthesiologists who had limited prior experience in using the VLs for DLT intubation participated in this randomised crossover study. Following a brief demonstration and two practice attempts, participants were volunteered to insert a DLT using the Macintosh, GlideScope®, Airtraq®, and King Vision™ on two high-fidelity easy and difficult airway simulators in a computer-generated randomized sequence. The primary endpoint, time to DLT intubation, as well as, the views obtained at laryngoscopy, ease of intubation, numbers of laryngoscopy attempts and optimisation manoeuvers, and failure to intubation; defined as an attempt took longer than 150 seconds, were recorded.
연구 개요
상태
상세 설명
Several regional surveys demonstrated that most thoracic anesthesiologists are using the double-lumen endobronchial tubes (DLT) as the first-choice lung separation technique. DLT, when compared with single lumen tracheal tube, can be more difficult to insert in patients with difficult airways. The videolaryngoscopes (VL) have the potential to facilitate the placement of the DLTs for lung separation in patients with predicted or unanticipated difficult airway.
The use of GlideScope® (Verathon Inc., Bothell, WA, USA), a VL with an angulated blade, has been associated with variable times to DLT intubation according to the prior experience of the operators, despite superior visualization of the glottis The channeled Airtraq® (Prodol Meditec S.A., Vizcaya, Spain) and standard non-channeled blade of the King Vision™ (Ambu, Ballerup, Copenhagen, Denmark), may offer additional benefits for DLT intubation in patients with limited mouth opening or restricted neck movement, in whom the use of traditional VL like as the Glidescope® could be difficult. This is because of the larger outer diameter, the distal curvature and the increased rigidity of the DLT. Of note, the longer times to DLT intubation with the use of different VL could be shortened with building up the operator's experience.
To the best of the investigators knowledge, the comparison of the effects of the Macintosh, GlideScope®, Airtraq®, and King Vision™ VL on the time to DLT intubation in simulated easy and difficult airways has not yet been studied.
Two high-fidelity simulators (Airway Management Trainer, model AA-3100, Laerdal, Kent, UK) were prepared to simulate easy and difficult airway situations, as described by Marshall et al. and Wang et al. The "easy" airway was established with the manikin in a neutral position. The "difficult" airway setting was obtained by placing an Oasis Elite™ Prone Head Rest, Adult (140 mm in height) (Covidien, Mansfield, MA) under the occiput and securing the head position with adhesive tape, object to replicate cervical-collar use. Positioning was confirmed after each attempt to ensure consistency.
연구 유형
등록 (실제)
단계
- 해당 없음
연락처 및 위치
연구 장소
-
-
EP
-
Al-Khobar, EP, 사우디 아라비아, 31952
- Dammam University KFHU
-
-
참여기준
자격 기준
공부할 수 있는 나이
건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다
연구 대상 성별
설명
Inclusion Criteria:
- Staff anesthesiologists
- Signed consent
- Limited experience in using videolaryngoscopes for inserting double lumen tubes
Exclusion Criteria:
- Decline to sign the consent
- Non receiving the prior training demonstration
- Non practicing once with each device tested on each simulator scenario
공부 계획
연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?
디자인 세부사항
- 할당: 무작위
- 중재 모델: 크로스오버 할당
- 마스킹: 없음(오픈 라벨)
무기와 개입
참가자 그룹 / 팔 |
개입 / 치료 |
|---|---|
|
위약 비교기: Macintosh
The participants intubated the easy airway simulator with a double lumen tube using the Macintosh laryngoscope followed with intubating the difficult airway simulator
|
The participants intubated the easy airway simulator with a double lumen tube using the Macintosh laryngoscope followed with intubating the difficult airway simulator
|
|
위약 비교기: GlideScope
The participants intubated the easy airway simulator with a double lumen tube using the GlideScope laryngoscope followed with intubating the difficult airway simulator
|
The participants intubated the easy airway simulator with a double lumen tube using the GlideScope followed with intubating the difficult airway simulator
|
|
활성 비교기: Airtraq
The participants intubated the easy airway simulator with a double lumen tube using the Airtraq laryngoscope followed with intubating the difficult airway simulator
|
The participants intubated the easy airway simulator with a double lumen tube using the Airtraq followed with intubating the difficult airway simulator
|
|
활성 비교기: King Vision
The participants intubated the easy airway simulator with a double lumen tube using the King Vision followed with intubating the difficult airway simulator
|
The participants intubated the easy airway simulator with a double lumen tube using the King Vision followed with intubating the difficult airway simulator
|
연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?
주요 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
Time to achieve successful double lumen tube intubation
기간: for 6 min after using each device
|
defined as the time when the investigated laryngoscope passed the central incisors to when the tip of the bronchial lumen passed through the glottis, as confirmed visually by the operator (in the Macintosh group) or by the investigator, thanks to remote screens (in the VLs groups).
|
for 6 min after using each device
|
2차 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
Best view during laryngoscopy using the classification described by Cormack and Lehane
기간: for 1 min after laryngoscopy
|
using the classification described by Cormack and Lehane
|
for 1 min after laryngoscopy
|
|
Difficulty of intubation using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
기간: for 6 min after using each device
|
The difficulty of intubation was evaluated using a visual analog scale (VAS) (ranging from 0: extremely easy, to 100: extremely difficult) expressed by the anesthesiologists after the DLT intubation
|
for 6 min after using each device
|
|
Number of first-pass success
기간: for 3 min after using each device
|
first-pass success calculated as number of first-attempt successes/number of patients with an intubation attempt
|
for 3 min after using each device
|
|
Number of the required optimisation manoeuvers
기간: for 6 min after using each device
|
When the anaesthesiologists encountered difficulty in visualising vocal cords or placing the tube, they were allowed to use any manoeuver they would normally use to navigate the tube into the trachea including readjustment of the blade or tube or to ask the supervising investigator to help solve the problem, and gave suggestions or instructions
|
for 6 min after using each device
|
공동 작업자 및 조사자
수사관
- 수석 연구원: Mohamed R El Tahan, MD, Anesthesiology Department, Dammam University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
- 연구 책임자: Abdulmohsen A Al Ghamdi, MD, Anesthesiology Department, Dammam University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
연구 기록 날짜
연구 주요 날짜
연구 시작
기본 완료 (실제)
연구 완료 (실제)
연구 등록 날짜
최초 제출
QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출
처음 게시됨 (추정)
연구 기록 업데이트
마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (추정)
QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출
마지막으로 확인됨
추가 정보
이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .
Macintosh에 대한 임상 시험
-
University Hospital, Clermont-FerrandSociété Française d'Anesthésie-Réanimation (SFAR)아직 모집하지 않음기관내삽관 | 삽관 합병증 | 삽관; 어렵거나 실패
-
University Health Network, Toronto완전한
-
The University of Texas Health Science Center,...KARL STORZ Endoscopy-America, Inc.완전한
-
University Health Network, Toronto완전한