Vouchers to Increase Uptake of Already Free Eye Care
Providing Vouchers Redeemable for Already Free Eye Exams To Increase Uptake Among a Low-Income Minority Population: A Randomized Trial
Studie Overzicht
Toestand
Toestand
Conditie
Conditie
Interventie / Behandeling
Interventie / Behandeling
Studietype
Studietype
Inschrijving (Werkelijk)
Inschrijving
Fase
Fase
- Niet toepasbaar
Contacten en locaties
Studie Locaties
-
-
Maryland
-
Baltimore, Maryland, Verenigde Staten, 21287
- Johns Hopkins Hospital - Wilmer Eye Institute
-
-
Deelname Criteria
Geschiktheidscriteria
Geschiktheidscriteria
Leeftijden die in aanmerking komen voor studie
Accepteert gezonde vrijwilligers
Geslachten die in aanmerking komen voor studie
Beschrijving
Inclusion Criteria:
- Referred for follow-up at a Screening to Prevent Glaucoma (SToP) study screening event (overarching observational study from which trial sample was drawn). SToP participants were referred for follow-up for any of the following conditions: (1) VA worse than 20/40 in at least 1 eye despite autorefraction; (2) signs of retinal abnormalities on fundus photography; (3) uninterpretable fundus photography; (4) cup-to-disc ratio (CDR) greater than or equal to 0.9, and/or CDR between 0.7 and 0.9 with visual field defects or history of glaucoma; and (5) IOP of 23 mm Hg or greater.
Exclusion Criteria:
- SToP participants who were not referred at the time of screening but later contacted after review of fundus photography
- SToP participants who were referred for follow-up but stated at the time of counseling that they were already under the care of an eye doctor
Studie plan
Hoe is de studie opgezet?
Ontwerpdetails
- Primair doel: Onderzoek naar gezondheidsdiensten
- Toewijzing: Gerandomiseerd
- Interventioneel model: Parallelle opdracht
- Masker: Geen (open label)
Aantal wapens
Wapens en interventies
Deelnemersgroep / ArmDeelnemersgroep / Arm |
Interventie / BehandelingInterventie / Behandeling |
|---|---|
|
Geen tussenkomst: No Voucher
Individuals being referred from screening events randomized to "no intervention" received the standard approach to offering free follow-up examinations (patient education, standard counseling, appointment information packet, reminder phone calls).
|
|
|
Experimenteel: Voucher Without Value Information
In addition to receiving the standard approach above, individuals being referred from screening events randomized to "Voucher Without Value Information" received a personal voucher.
|
Patients being referred for follow-up received standard materials, counseling, and reminders as in the 'no information' group and were provided with a physical voucher they were told is redeemable for free follow-up appointment at Johns Hopkins Hospital. The voucher included the patient's name, the screener's name, and an expiration date 90 days from the date of screening. These participants were told: "I am going to give you this voucher for a completely free appointment and a free pair of glasses if you need them. So, with this voucher, both the exam and the glasses will be completely free." |
|
Experimenteel: Voucher With Value Information
In addition to receiving the standard approach above, individuals being referred from screening events randomized to "Voucher With Value Information" received a personal voucher, which differed from the voucher in the second arm since it included a statement of value.
|
Patients being referred for follow-up received standard materials, counseling, and reminders as in the 'no information' group and were provided with a physical voucher they were told is redeemable for free follow-up appointment at Johns Hopkins Hospital, which would normally cost $250. The voucher included the patient's name, the screener's name, an expiration date 90 days from the date of screening, and a statement about the $250 voucher value. These participants were told: "I am going to give you this voucher for a completely free appointment and a free pair of glasses if you need them. These services normally cost about $250, but with this voucher, both the exam and the glasses will be completely free." |
Wat meet het onderzoek?
Primaire uitkomstmaten
Primaire uitkomstmaten
Uitkomstmaat |
Maatregel Beschrijving |
Tijdsspanne |
|---|---|---|
|
Uptake of follow-up appointment
Tijdsspanne: Within 90 days of the date of screening
|
The primary endpoint was attending a follow-up appointment, either on the initially scheduled or on a rescheduled date within 90 days of the date of screening.
Individuals who did not meet this endpoint either stated that they were not interested in follow-up at the screening event itself, cancelled or did not show for their appointments on 3 occasions, stated that they were not interested in follow-up when study staff attempted to reschedule, or did not show for an appointment and could not be reached for rescheduling after 3 attempts.
|
Within 90 days of the date of screening
|
Secundaire uitkomstmaten
Secundaire uitkomstmaten
Uitkomstmaat |
Maatregel Beschrijving |
Tijdsspanne |
|---|---|---|
|
Uptake of initial appointment
Tijdsspanne: Within 90 days of the date of screening
|
Binary indicator for completion of the initially scheduled appointment.
|
Within 90 days of the date of screening
|
Medewerkers en onderzoekers
Sponsor
Sponsor
Medewerkers
Medewerkers
Onderzoekers
Onderzoekers
- Hoofdonderzoeker: Seema Kacker, PhD, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine
- Hoofdonderzoeker: David S Friedman, MD PhD, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Hospital
Publicaties en nuttige links
Studie record data
Bestudeer belangrijke data
Studie start (Werkelijk)
Studie start
Primaire voltooiing (Werkelijk)
Primaire voltooiing
Studie voltooiing (Werkelijk)
Studie voltooiing
Studieregistratiedata
Eerst ingediend
Eerst ingediend
Eerst ingediend dat voldeed aan de QC-criteria
Eerst ingediend dat voldeed aan de QC-criteria
Eerst geplaatst (Werkelijk)
Eerst geplaatst
Updates van studierecords
Laatste update geplaatst (Werkelijk)
Laatste update geplaatst
Laatste update ingediend die voldeed aan QC-criteria
Laatste update ingediend die voldeed aan QC-criteria
Laatst geverifieerd
Laatst geverifieerd
Meer informatie
Termen gerelateerd aan deze studie
Trefwoorden
Aanvullende relevante MeSH-voorwaarden
Andere studie-ID-nummers
Andere studie-ID-nummers
- IRB00054137
Plan Individuele Deelnemersgegevens (IPD)
Bent u van plan om gegevens van individuele deelnemers (IPD) te delen?
Informatie over medicijnen en apparaten, studiedocumenten
Bestudeert een door de Amerikaanse FDA gereguleerd geneesmiddel
Bestudeert een door de Amerikaanse FDA gereguleerd apparaatproduct
Deze informatie is zonder wijzigingen rechtstreeks van de website clinicaltrials.gov gehaald. Als u verzoeken heeft om uw onderzoeksgegevens te wijzigen, te verwijderen of bij te werken, neem dan contact op met register@clinicaltrials.gov. Zodra er een wijziging wordt doorgevoerd op clinicaltrials.gov, wordt deze ook automatisch bijgewerkt op onze website .
Klinische onderzoeken op Glaucoom
-
NCT07359547WervingGLAUCOMA 1, OPEN HOEK, D (aandoening)
-
NCT02665884Onbekend
-
NCT07496957WervingGLAUCOMA 1, OPEN HOEK, D (aandoening)
-
NCT06925477Aanmelden op uitnodigingGLAUCOMA 1, OPEN HOEK, D (aandoening)
-
NCT07436871Nog niet aan het wervenStaar | GLAUCOMA 1, OPEN HOEK, D (aandoening)
-
NCT01612416VoltooidGLAUCOMA 1, OPEN HOEK, D (aandoening)
-
NCT06689696Voltooid24-uurs draagprestatie- en veiligheidsonderzoek van Smartlens MiLens-contactlens voor IOP-monitoringOculaire hypertensie | Glaucoom | Intraoculaire druk | Glaucoom en oculaire hypertensie | IOP | Glaucoom open hoek | Oculaire hypertensie Glaucoom | Oculaire hypertensie (OH) | GLAUCOMA 1, OPEN HOEK, D (aandoening) | Glaucoompatiënten en gezonde controles