Deze pagina is automatisch vertaald en de nauwkeurigheid van de vertaling kan niet worden gegarandeerd. Raadpleeg de Engelse versie voor een brontekst.

Adaptive Treatment for Alcohol and Cocaine Dependence

1 augustus 2017 bijgewerkt door: University of Pennsylvania
  1. Primary objective #1: Determine the relative effectiveness of MI-IOP and MI-PC in the full study sample with regard to treatment engagement over weeks 1-12 and cocaine/alcohol use over weeks 1-24.

    • Hypothesis 1: An intervention that explores several possible treatment options with the patient and provides the chosen option (e.g., MI-PC) will produce higher rates of treatment engagement than an intervention focused on engagement in IOP only (e.g., MI-IOP).
    • Hypothesis 2: An intervention that explores several possible treatment options with the patient and provides the chosen option (e.g., MI-PC) will produce better cocaine/alcohol use outcomes than an intervention focused on engagement in IOP only (MI-IOP).
    • Secondary analysis 1: Among the Non-engaged patients, determine rates of selection of each of the three options in MI-PC, retention rates within each option, and cocaine/alcohol use outcomes in each option.
    • Secondary analysis 2: Among the Engaged patients, determine rates of selection of each of the three options in MI-PC, retention rates within each option, and cocaine/alcohol use outcomes in each option.
  2. Primary objective #2: Determine whether the relative effectiveness of MI-IOP and MI-PC varies as a function of engagement group, with regard to treatment engagement over weeks 1-12 and cocaine/alcohol use outcomes over weeks 1-24.

    • Hypothesis 1: The predicted main effect on retention favoring MI-PC over MI-IOP will be significantly larger among patients in the Non-engaged group than among those in the Engaged group.
    • Hypothesis 2: The predicted main effect on cocaine/alcohol use outcomes favoring MI-PC over MI-IOP will be significantly larger among patients in the Non-engaged group than among those in the Engaged group.

Studie Overzicht

Gedetailleerde beschrijving

3. Secondary objective #1: Examine outcomes on three secondary measures: percent days abstinent from all substances, negative consequences of drug use, and HIV high risk behaviors.

  • Hypothesis 1: Outcomes on the secondary measures will be better in MI-PC than in MI-IOP.

    4. Secondary objective #2: Test hypotheses concerning potential mediators of the predicted main effect favoring MI-PC over MI-IOP.

  • Hypothesis 1: The predicted advantage of MI-PC over MI-IOP will be mediated by greater increases in motivation, self-efficacy, commitment to abstinence, and self-help involvement in MI-PC.

    5. Secondary objective #3: Test hypotheses concerning effect of additional MI intervention after initial non-engagement persists through 12 weeks.

  • Hypothesis 1: A second telephone MI intervention will produce higher rates of subsequent engagement and less cocaine use than no further MI.

Studietype

Ingrijpend

Inschrijving (Werkelijk)

500

Fase

  • Fase 2
  • Fase 3

Contacten en locaties

In dit gedeelte vindt u de contactgegevens van degenen die het onderzoek uitvoeren en informatie over waar dit onderzoek wordt uitgevoerd.

Studie Locaties

    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Verenigde Staten, 19104
        • Presbyterian Medical Center
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Verenigde Staten, 19123
        • NorthEast Treatment Center
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Verenigde Staten, 19104
        • VAMC

Deelname Criteria

Onderzoekers zoeken naar mensen die aan een bepaalde beschrijving voldoen, de zogenaamde geschiktheidscriteria. Enkele voorbeelden van deze criteria zijn iemands algemene gezondheidstoestand of eerdere behandelingen.

Geschiktheidscriteria

Leeftijden die in aanmerking komen voor studie

18 jaar tot 75 jaar (Volwassen, Oudere volwassene)

Accepteert gezonde vrijwilligers

Nee

Geslachten die in aanmerking komen voor studie

Vrouw

Beschrijving

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. meet DSM-IV criteria for lifetime cocaine or alcohol dependence and have used cocaine or alcohol in the prior 6 months;
  2. be > 18 years of age;
  3. be judged clinically appropriate for IOP (e.g., no current psychotic disorder or evidence of severe dementia, and no acute medical problem requiring inpatient treatment;
  4. have no regular IV heroin use during the past year;
  5. have access to a telephone;
  6. be willing to be randomized and participate in research; and
  7. no current participation in methadone or other forms of DA treatment, other than IOP. Finally, because of study follow-up requirements, subjects will
  8. be required to be metropolitan area residents, and
  9. be able to provide the name, verified telephone number, and address of at least two contacts who can provide locator information on the patient during follow-up. We will include patients with dependence on other substances, provided that they are cocaine dependent and meet other inclusion criteria.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. have a current psychotic disorder (as assessed with the psychotic screen from the MINI) or evidence of dementia severe enough to prevent participation in outpatient treatment;
  2. have acute medical problem requiring immediate inpatient treatment; or
  3. are currently participating in methadone or other forms of DA treatment, other than IOP.

Studie plan

Dit gedeelte bevat details van het studieplan, inclusief hoe de studie is opgezet en wat de studie meet.

Hoe is de studie opgezet?

Ontwerpdetails

  • Primair doel: Behandeling
  • Toewijzing: Gerandomiseerd
  • Interventioneel model: Parallelle opdracht
  • Masker: Geen (open label)

Wapens en interventies

Deelnemersgroep / Arm
Interventie / Behandeling
Actieve vergelijker: 1-MI-IOP Engaged
Randomized to treatment as usual, and they attend regularly but dropped out of treatment after randomization.
2 sessions at week 2, potential 2 sessions at week 8 if the participant drops out.
Andere namen:
  • MI
Experimenteel: 2-MI-IOP Non-Engaged
Randomized to treatment as usual, and do not attend.
2 sessions at week 2, potential 2 sessions at week 8 if the participant drops out.
Andere namen:
  • MI
one telephone counseling session per week for 10 weeks.
Andere namen:
  • Telephone based stepped care.
One CBT session per week, for 10 weeks.
Andere namen:
  • CBT
Prescription for naltrexone
Andere namen:
  • MM
Return to IOP, group therapy 3 times weekly for about three hours a day.
Andere namen:
  • IOP
Actieve vergelijker: 3-MI-PC Engaged
Randomized to treatment choice, but remain attending treatment as usual then dropped out of treatment after randomization.
2 sessions at week 2, potential 2 sessions at week 8 if the participant drops out.
Andere namen:
  • MI
one telephone counseling session per week for 10 weeks.
Andere namen:
  • Telephone based stepped care.
One CBT session per week, for 10 weeks.
Andere namen:
  • CBT
Experimenteel: 4-MI-PC Non-engaged
Randomized to treatment choice, and do not attend treatment as usual, so the choice option is used.
2 sessions at week 2, potential 2 sessions at week 8 if the participant drops out.
Andere namen:
  • MI
one telephone counseling session per week for 10 weeks.
Andere namen:
  • Telephone based stepped care.
One CBT session per week, for 10 weeks.
Andere namen:
  • CBT
Prescription for naltrexone
Andere namen:
  • MM
Return to IOP, group therapy 3 times weekly for about three hours a day.
Andere namen:
  • IOP

Wat meet het onderzoek?

Primaire uitkomstmaten

Uitkomstmaat
Maatregel Beschrijving
Tijdsspanne
Treatment Engagement
Tijdsspanne: weeks 3 - 12
Number of treatment sessions attended
weeks 3 - 12
Treatment Engagement for Participants Engaged at 2 Weeks, But Disengage Before 8 Weeks
Tijdsspanne: weeks 9 - 12
Number of treatment sessions attended
weeks 9 - 12
Treatment Engagement of Those Non-engaged at 2 Weeks and at 8 Weeks
Tijdsspanne: weeks 9 - 12
Number of treatment sessions attended
weeks 9 - 12
Any Drinking Days in Previous Month
Tijdsspanne: Month 2 (weeks 5 - 8 post baseline)
Days of any drinking in previous month, as reported on Time Line Follow Back. This is a dichotomous measure, so the means that are reported are the percentage of people who have had any days of drinking during the follow up period specified. In other words, 0.57 indicates that 57% of the sample drank in the follow up period.
Month 2 (weeks 5 - 8 post baseline)
Any Drinking Days in Previous Month
Tijdsspanne: Month 3 (weeks 9 - 12 post baseline)
Any drinking days during previous month, as reported on Time Line Follow Back. This is a dichotomous measure, so the means that are reported are the percentage of people who have had any days of drinking during the follow up period specified. In other words, 0.57 indicates that 57% of the sample drank in the follow up period.
Month 3 (weeks 9 - 12 post baseline)
Any Drinking
Tijdsspanne: Month 4 (weeks 13 - 15 post baseline)
Any drinking at follow up, as reported on Time Line Follow Back. This is a dichotomous measure, so the means that are reported are the percentage of people who have had any days of drinking during the follow up period specified. In other words, 0.57 indicates that 57% of the sample drank in the follow up period.
Month 4 (weeks 13 - 15 post baseline)
Any Drinking
Tijdsspanne: Month 5 (weeks 16 - 20 post baseline)
Any drinking at follow up, as reported on Time Line Follow Back, This is a dichotomous measure, so the means that are reported are the percentage of people who have had any days of drinking during the follow up period specified. In other words, 0.57 indicates that 57% of the sample drank in the follow up period.
Month 5 (weeks 16 - 20 post baseline)
Any Drinking
Tijdsspanne: Month 6 (weeks 21 - 24 post baseline)
Any drinking at follow up, as reported on Time Line Follow Back. This is a dichotomous measure, so the means that are reported are the percentage of people who have had any days of drinking during the follow up period specified. In other words, 0.57 indicates that 57% of the sample drank in the follow up period.
Month 6 (weeks 21 - 24 post baseline)
Percent Days Drinking
Tijdsspanne: Month 2 (weeks 5 - 8 post baseline)
Percent days of any drinking at follow up, from Time Line Follow Back
Month 2 (weeks 5 - 8 post baseline)
Percent Days Drinking
Tijdsspanne: Month 3 (weeks 9 - 12 post baseline)
Percent days of any drinking at follow up, from Time Line Follow Back
Month 3 (weeks 9 - 12 post baseline)
Percent Days Drinking
Tijdsspanne: Month 4 (weeks 13 - 16 post baseline)
Percent days of any drinking at follow up, from Time Line Follow Back
Month 4 (weeks 13 - 16 post baseline)
Percent Days Drinking
Tijdsspanne: Month 5 (weeks 17 - 20 post baseline)
Percent days of any drinking at follow up, fromTime Line Follow Back
Month 5 (weeks 17 - 20 post baseline)
Percent Days Drinking
Tijdsspanne: Month 6 (weeks 21 - 24)
Percent days of any drinking at follow up, from Time Line Follow Back
Month 6 (weeks 21 - 24)
Any Heavy Drinking Days
Tijdsspanne: Month 2 (weeks 5 - 8 post baseline)
days of five or more drinks per drinking day for men, four or more drinks per drinking day for women, at follow up, from Time Line Follow Back. This is a dichotomous measure, so the means that are reported are the percentage of people who have had any days of heavy drinking during the follow up period specified. In other words, 0.57 indicates that 57% of the sample engaged in heavy drinking in the follow up period.
Month 2 (weeks 5 - 8 post baseline)
Any Heavy Drinking Days
Tijdsspanne: Month 3 (weeks 9 - 12 post baseline)
five or more drinks per drinking day for men, four or more drinks per drinking day for women, at follow up, from Time Line Follow Back. This is a dichotomous measure, so the means that are reported are the percentage of people who have had any days of heavy drinking during the follow up period specified. In other words, 0.57 indicates that 57% of the sample engaged in heavy drinking in the follow up period.
Month 3 (weeks 9 - 12 post baseline)
Any Heavy Drinking Days
Tijdsspanne: Month 4 (weeks 13 - 16 post baseline)
five or more drinks per drinking day for men, four or more drinks per drinking day for women at follow up, from Time Line Follow Back. This is a dichotomous measure, so the means that are reported are the percentage of people who have had any days of heavy drinking during the follow up period specified. In other words, 0.57 indicates that 57% of the sample engaged in heavy drinking in the follow up period.
Month 4 (weeks 13 - 16 post baseline)
Any Heavy Drinking Days
Tijdsspanne: Month 5 (weeks 17 to 20 post baseline)
five or more drinks per day for men, four or more drinks per day for women, from Time Line Follow Back. This is a dichotomous measure, so the means that are reported are the percentage of people who have had any days of heavy drinking during the follow up period specified. In other words, 0.57 indicates that 57% of the sample engaged in heavy drinking in the follow up period.
Month 5 (weeks 17 to 20 post baseline)
Any Heavy Drinking Days
Tijdsspanne: Month 6 (weeks 21 - 24 post baseline)
five or more drinks per day for men, four or more drinks per day for women, from Time Line Follow Back. This is a dichotomous measure, so the means that are reported are the percentage of people who have had any days of heavy drinking during the follow up period specified. In other words, 0.57 indicates that 57% of the sample engaged in heavy drinking in the follow up period.
Month 6 (weeks 21 - 24 post baseline)
Percent Days Heavy Drinking
Tijdsspanne: Month 2 (weeks 5 - 8 post baseline)

Percent days heavy drinking at follow up, from Time Line Follow Back

*heavy drinking is defined as five or more drinks per day for men, four or more for women

Month 2 (weeks 5 - 8 post baseline)
Percent Days Heavy Drinking
Tijdsspanne: Month 3 (weeks 9 - 12 post baseline)

Percent days heavy drinking at follow up, from Time Line Follow Back

* heavy drinking is defined as five or more drinks per day for men, four or more for women.

Month 3 (weeks 9 - 12 post baseline)
Percent Days Heavy Drinking
Tijdsspanne: Month 4 (weeks 13 - 16 post baseline)

Percent days heavy drinking at follow up, from Time Line Follow Back

*heavy drinking is defined as five or more drinks per drinking day for men, four or more for women

Month 4 (weeks 13 - 16 post baseline)
Percent Days Heavy Drinking
Tijdsspanne: Month 5 ( weeks 17 - 20 post baseline)

Percent days heavy drinking at follow up, from Time Line Follow Back

* heavy drinking is defined as five or more drinks per drinking day for men, four or more for women

Month 5 ( weeks 17 - 20 post baseline)
Percent Days Heavy Drinking
Tijdsspanne: Month 6 (weeks 21 - 24 post baseline)

Percent days heavy drinking at follow up, from Time Line Follow Back

*heavy drinking is defined as five or more drinks per drinking day for men, four or more for women

Month 6 (weeks 21 - 24 post baseline)
Any Cocaine Use
Tijdsspanne: Month 3 (weeks 9 - 12 post baseline)
Any cocaine using self report, binary measure of percent days cocaine use.
Month 3 (weeks 9 - 12 post baseline)
Any Cocaine Use
Tijdsspanne: Month 4 (weeks 13 - 16 post baseline)
Any cocaine using self report, binary measure of percent days cocaine use
Month 4 (weeks 13 - 16 post baseline)
Any Cocaine Use
Tijdsspanne: Month 5 (weeks 17 - 20 post baseline)
Any cocaine using self report, binary measure of percent days cocaine use
Month 5 (weeks 17 - 20 post baseline)
Any Cocaine Use
Tijdsspanne: Month 6 (weeks 21 - 24 post baseline)
Any cocaine using self report, binary measure of percent days cocaine use
Month 6 (weeks 21 - 24 post baseline)
Percent Days Cocaine Use
Tijdsspanne: Month 3 (weeks 9 - 12 post baseline)
Percent days of any cocaine use, self reported
Month 3 (weeks 9 - 12 post baseline)
Percent Days Cocaine Use
Tijdsspanne: Month 5 (weeks 17 - 20 post baseline)
Percent days of any cocaine use, self reported
Month 5 (weeks 17 - 20 post baseline)
Percent Days Cocaine Use
Tijdsspanne: Month 6 (weeks 21 - 24 post baseline)
Percent days of any cocaine use, self reported
Month 6 (weeks 21 - 24 post baseline)

Medewerkers en onderzoekers

Hier vindt u mensen en organisaties die betrokken zijn bij dit onderzoek.

Onderzoekers

  • Hoofdonderzoeker: James R. McKay, Ph.D, University of Pennsylvania

Studie record data

Deze datums volgen de voortgang van het onderzoeksdossier en de samenvatting van de ingediende resultaten bij ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieverslagen en gerapporteerde resultaten worden beoordeeld door de National Library of Medicine (NLM) om er zeker van te zijn dat ze voldoen aan specifieke kwaliteitscontrolenormen voordat ze op de openbare website worden geplaatst.

Bestudeer belangrijke data

Studie start

1 oktober 2008

Primaire voltooiing (Werkelijk)

1 december 2013

Studie voltooiing (Werkelijk)

1 december 2013

Studieregistratiedata

Eerst ingediend

14 december 2009

Eerst ingediend dat voldeed aan de QC-criteria

14 december 2009

Eerst geplaatst (Schatting)

15 december 2009

Updates van studierecords

Laatste update geplaatst (Werkelijk)

5 september 2017

Laatste update ingediend die voldeed aan QC-criteria

1 augustus 2017

Laatst geverifieerd

1 augustus 2017

Meer informatie

Termen gerelateerd aan deze studie

Andere studie-ID-nummers

  • 807092
  • IND: 101,486

Deze informatie is zonder wijzigingen rechtstreeks van de website clinicaltrials.gov gehaald. Als u verzoeken heeft om uw onderzoeksgegevens te wijzigen, te verwijderen of bij te werken, neem dan contact op met register@clinicaltrials.gov. Zodra er een wijziging wordt doorgevoerd op clinicaltrials.gov, wordt deze ook automatisch bijgewerkt op onze website .

Klinische onderzoeken op Stoornissen in het gebruik van middelen

Klinische onderzoeken op Motivational Interviewing

3
Abonneren