- ICH GCP
- Register voor klinische proeven in de VS.
- Klinische proef NCT01032135
Adaptive Treatment for Alcohol and Cocaine Dependence
Primary objective #1: Determine the relative effectiveness of MI-IOP and MI-PC in the full study sample with regard to treatment engagement over weeks 1-12 and cocaine/alcohol use over weeks 1-24.
- Hypothesis 1: An intervention that explores several possible treatment options with the patient and provides the chosen option (e.g., MI-PC) will produce higher rates of treatment engagement than an intervention focused on engagement in IOP only (e.g., MI-IOP).
- Hypothesis 2: An intervention that explores several possible treatment options with the patient and provides the chosen option (e.g., MI-PC) will produce better cocaine/alcohol use outcomes than an intervention focused on engagement in IOP only (MI-IOP).
- Secondary analysis 1: Among the Non-engaged patients, determine rates of selection of each of the three options in MI-PC, retention rates within each option, and cocaine/alcohol use outcomes in each option.
- Secondary analysis 2: Among the Engaged patients, determine rates of selection of each of the three options in MI-PC, retention rates within each option, and cocaine/alcohol use outcomes in each option.
Primary objective #2: Determine whether the relative effectiveness of MI-IOP and MI-PC varies as a function of engagement group, with regard to treatment engagement over weeks 1-12 and cocaine/alcohol use outcomes over weeks 1-24.
- Hypothesis 1: The predicted main effect on retention favoring MI-PC over MI-IOP will be significantly larger among patients in the Non-engaged group than among those in the Engaged group.
- Hypothesis 2: The predicted main effect on cocaine/alcohol use outcomes favoring MI-PC over MI-IOP will be significantly larger among patients in the Non-engaged group than among those in the Engaged group.
Studie Overzicht
Toestand
Gedetailleerde beschrijving
3. Secondary objective #1: Examine outcomes on three secondary measures: percent days abstinent from all substances, negative consequences of drug use, and HIV high risk behaviors.
Hypothesis 1: Outcomes on the secondary measures will be better in MI-PC than in MI-IOP.
4. Secondary objective #2: Test hypotheses concerning potential mediators of the predicted main effect favoring MI-PC over MI-IOP.
Hypothesis 1: The predicted advantage of MI-PC over MI-IOP will be mediated by greater increases in motivation, self-efficacy, commitment to abstinence, and self-help involvement in MI-PC.
5. Secondary objective #3: Test hypotheses concerning effect of additional MI intervention after initial non-engagement persists through 12 weeks.
- Hypothesis 1: A second telephone MI intervention will produce higher rates of subsequent engagement and less cocaine use than no further MI.
Studietype
Inschrijving (Werkelijk)
Fase
- Fase 2
- Fase 3
Contacten en locaties
Studie Locaties
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Verenigde Staten, 19104
- Presbyterian Medical Center
-
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Verenigde Staten, 19123
- NorthEast Treatment Center
-
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Verenigde Staten, 19104
- VAMC
-
-
Deelname Criteria
Geschiktheidscriteria
Leeftijden die in aanmerking komen voor studie
Accepteert gezonde vrijwilligers
Geslachten die in aanmerking komen voor studie
Beschrijving
Inclusion Criteria:
- meet DSM-IV criteria for lifetime cocaine or alcohol dependence and have used cocaine or alcohol in the prior 6 months;
- be > 18 years of age;
- be judged clinically appropriate for IOP (e.g., no current psychotic disorder or evidence of severe dementia, and no acute medical problem requiring inpatient treatment;
- have no regular IV heroin use during the past year;
- have access to a telephone;
- be willing to be randomized and participate in research; and
- no current participation in methadone or other forms of DA treatment, other than IOP. Finally, because of study follow-up requirements, subjects will
- be required to be metropolitan area residents, and
- be able to provide the name, verified telephone number, and address of at least two contacts who can provide locator information on the patient during follow-up. We will include patients with dependence on other substances, provided that they are cocaine dependent and meet other inclusion criteria.
Exclusion Criteria:
- have a current psychotic disorder (as assessed with the psychotic screen from the MINI) or evidence of dementia severe enough to prevent participation in outpatient treatment;
- have acute medical problem requiring immediate inpatient treatment; or
- are currently participating in methadone or other forms of DA treatment, other than IOP.
Studie plan
Hoe is de studie opgezet?
Ontwerpdetails
- Primair doel: Behandeling
- Toewijzing: Gerandomiseerd
- Interventioneel model: Parallelle opdracht
- Masker: Geen (open label)
Wapens en interventies
Deelnemersgroep / Arm |
Interventie / Behandeling |
---|---|
Actieve vergelijker: 1-MI-IOP Engaged
Randomized to treatment as usual, and they attend regularly but dropped out of treatment after randomization.
|
2 sessions at week 2, potential 2 sessions at week 8 if the participant drops out.
Andere namen:
|
Experimenteel: 2-MI-IOP Non-Engaged
Randomized to treatment as usual, and do not attend.
|
2 sessions at week 2, potential 2 sessions at week 8 if the participant drops out.
Andere namen:
one telephone counseling session per week for 10 weeks.
Andere namen:
One CBT session per week, for 10 weeks.
Andere namen:
Prescription for naltrexone
Andere namen:
Return to IOP, group therapy 3 times weekly for about three hours a day.
Andere namen:
|
Actieve vergelijker: 3-MI-PC Engaged
Randomized to treatment choice, but remain attending treatment as usual then dropped out of treatment after randomization.
|
2 sessions at week 2, potential 2 sessions at week 8 if the participant drops out.
Andere namen:
one telephone counseling session per week for 10 weeks.
Andere namen:
One CBT session per week, for 10 weeks.
Andere namen:
|
Experimenteel: 4-MI-PC Non-engaged
Randomized to treatment choice, and do not attend treatment as usual, so the choice option is used.
|
2 sessions at week 2, potential 2 sessions at week 8 if the participant drops out.
Andere namen:
one telephone counseling session per week for 10 weeks.
Andere namen:
One CBT session per week, for 10 weeks.
Andere namen:
Prescription for naltrexone
Andere namen:
Return to IOP, group therapy 3 times weekly for about three hours a day.
Andere namen:
|
Wat meet het onderzoek?
Primaire uitkomstmaten
Uitkomstmaat |
Maatregel Beschrijving |
Tijdsspanne |
---|---|---|
Treatment Engagement
Tijdsspanne: weeks 3 - 12
|
Number of treatment sessions attended
|
weeks 3 - 12
|
Treatment Engagement for Participants Engaged at 2 Weeks, But Disengage Before 8 Weeks
Tijdsspanne: weeks 9 - 12
|
Number of treatment sessions attended
|
weeks 9 - 12
|
Treatment Engagement of Those Non-engaged at 2 Weeks and at 8 Weeks
Tijdsspanne: weeks 9 - 12
|
Number of treatment sessions attended
|
weeks 9 - 12
|
Any Drinking Days in Previous Month
Tijdsspanne: Month 2 (weeks 5 - 8 post baseline)
|
Days of any drinking in previous month, as reported on Time Line Follow Back.
This is a dichotomous measure, so the means that are reported are the percentage of people who have had any days of drinking during the follow up period specified.
In other words, 0.57 indicates that 57% of the sample drank in the follow up period.
|
Month 2 (weeks 5 - 8 post baseline)
|
Any Drinking Days in Previous Month
Tijdsspanne: Month 3 (weeks 9 - 12 post baseline)
|
Any drinking days during previous month, as reported on Time Line Follow Back.
This is a dichotomous measure, so the means that are reported are the percentage of people who have had any days of drinking during the follow up period specified.
In other words, 0.57 indicates that 57% of the sample drank in the follow up period.
|
Month 3 (weeks 9 - 12 post baseline)
|
Any Drinking
Tijdsspanne: Month 4 (weeks 13 - 15 post baseline)
|
Any drinking at follow up, as reported on Time Line Follow Back.
This is a dichotomous measure, so the means that are reported are the percentage of people who have had any days of drinking during the follow up period specified.
In other words, 0.57 indicates that 57% of the sample drank in the follow up period.
|
Month 4 (weeks 13 - 15 post baseline)
|
Any Drinking
Tijdsspanne: Month 5 (weeks 16 - 20 post baseline)
|
Any drinking at follow up, as reported on Time Line Follow Back, This is a dichotomous measure, so the means that are reported are the percentage of people who have had any days of drinking during the follow up period specified.
In other words, 0.57 indicates that 57% of the sample drank in the follow up period.
|
Month 5 (weeks 16 - 20 post baseline)
|
Any Drinking
Tijdsspanne: Month 6 (weeks 21 - 24 post baseline)
|
Any drinking at follow up, as reported on Time Line Follow Back.
This is a dichotomous measure, so the means that are reported are the percentage of people who have had any days of drinking during the follow up period specified.
In other words, 0.57 indicates that 57% of the sample drank in the follow up period.
|
Month 6 (weeks 21 - 24 post baseline)
|
Percent Days Drinking
Tijdsspanne: Month 2 (weeks 5 - 8 post baseline)
|
Percent days of any drinking at follow up, from Time Line Follow Back
|
Month 2 (weeks 5 - 8 post baseline)
|
Percent Days Drinking
Tijdsspanne: Month 3 (weeks 9 - 12 post baseline)
|
Percent days of any drinking at follow up, from Time Line Follow Back
|
Month 3 (weeks 9 - 12 post baseline)
|
Percent Days Drinking
Tijdsspanne: Month 4 (weeks 13 - 16 post baseline)
|
Percent days of any drinking at follow up, from Time Line Follow Back
|
Month 4 (weeks 13 - 16 post baseline)
|
Percent Days Drinking
Tijdsspanne: Month 5 (weeks 17 - 20 post baseline)
|
Percent days of any drinking at follow up, fromTime Line Follow Back
|
Month 5 (weeks 17 - 20 post baseline)
|
Percent Days Drinking
Tijdsspanne: Month 6 (weeks 21 - 24)
|
Percent days of any drinking at follow up, from Time Line Follow Back
|
Month 6 (weeks 21 - 24)
|
Any Heavy Drinking Days
Tijdsspanne: Month 2 (weeks 5 - 8 post baseline)
|
days of five or more drinks per drinking day for men, four or more drinks per drinking day for women, at follow up, from Time Line Follow Back.
This is a dichotomous measure, so the means that are reported are the percentage of people who have had any days of heavy drinking during the follow up period specified.
In other words, 0.57 indicates that 57% of the sample engaged in heavy drinking in the follow up period.
|
Month 2 (weeks 5 - 8 post baseline)
|
Any Heavy Drinking Days
Tijdsspanne: Month 3 (weeks 9 - 12 post baseline)
|
five or more drinks per drinking day for men, four or more drinks per drinking day for women, at follow up, from Time Line Follow Back.
This is a dichotomous measure, so the means that are reported are the percentage of people who have had any days of heavy drinking during the follow up period specified.
In other words, 0.57 indicates that 57% of the sample engaged in heavy drinking in the follow up period.
|
Month 3 (weeks 9 - 12 post baseline)
|
Any Heavy Drinking Days
Tijdsspanne: Month 4 (weeks 13 - 16 post baseline)
|
five or more drinks per drinking day for men, four or more drinks per drinking day for women at follow up, from Time Line Follow Back.
This is a dichotomous measure, so the means that are reported are the percentage of people who have had any days of heavy drinking during the follow up period specified.
In other words, 0.57 indicates that 57% of the sample engaged in heavy drinking in the follow up period.
|
Month 4 (weeks 13 - 16 post baseline)
|
Any Heavy Drinking Days
Tijdsspanne: Month 5 (weeks 17 to 20 post baseline)
|
five or more drinks per day for men, four or more drinks per day for women, from Time Line Follow Back.
This is a dichotomous measure, so the means that are reported are the percentage of people who have had any days of heavy drinking during the follow up period specified.
In other words, 0.57 indicates that 57% of the sample engaged in heavy drinking in the follow up period.
|
Month 5 (weeks 17 to 20 post baseline)
|
Any Heavy Drinking Days
Tijdsspanne: Month 6 (weeks 21 - 24 post baseline)
|
five or more drinks per day for men, four or more drinks per day for women, from Time Line Follow Back.
This is a dichotomous measure, so the means that are reported are the percentage of people who have had any days of heavy drinking during the follow up period specified.
In other words, 0.57 indicates that 57% of the sample engaged in heavy drinking in the follow up period.
|
Month 6 (weeks 21 - 24 post baseline)
|
Percent Days Heavy Drinking
Tijdsspanne: Month 2 (weeks 5 - 8 post baseline)
|
Percent days heavy drinking at follow up, from Time Line Follow Back *heavy drinking is defined as five or more drinks per day for men, four or more for women |
Month 2 (weeks 5 - 8 post baseline)
|
Percent Days Heavy Drinking
Tijdsspanne: Month 3 (weeks 9 - 12 post baseline)
|
Percent days heavy drinking at follow up, from Time Line Follow Back * heavy drinking is defined as five or more drinks per day for men, four or more for women. |
Month 3 (weeks 9 - 12 post baseline)
|
Percent Days Heavy Drinking
Tijdsspanne: Month 4 (weeks 13 - 16 post baseline)
|
Percent days heavy drinking at follow up, from Time Line Follow Back *heavy drinking is defined as five or more drinks per drinking day for men, four or more for women |
Month 4 (weeks 13 - 16 post baseline)
|
Percent Days Heavy Drinking
Tijdsspanne: Month 5 ( weeks 17 - 20 post baseline)
|
Percent days heavy drinking at follow up, from Time Line Follow Back * heavy drinking is defined as five or more drinks per drinking day for men, four or more for women |
Month 5 ( weeks 17 - 20 post baseline)
|
Percent Days Heavy Drinking
Tijdsspanne: Month 6 (weeks 21 - 24 post baseline)
|
Percent days heavy drinking at follow up, from Time Line Follow Back *heavy drinking is defined as five or more drinks per drinking day for men, four or more for women |
Month 6 (weeks 21 - 24 post baseline)
|
Any Cocaine Use
Tijdsspanne: Month 3 (weeks 9 - 12 post baseline)
|
Any cocaine using self report, binary measure of percent days cocaine use.
|
Month 3 (weeks 9 - 12 post baseline)
|
Any Cocaine Use
Tijdsspanne: Month 4 (weeks 13 - 16 post baseline)
|
Any cocaine using self report, binary measure of percent days cocaine use
|
Month 4 (weeks 13 - 16 post baseline)
|
Any Cocaine Use
Tijdsspanne: Month 5 (weeks 17 - 20 post baseline)
|
Any cocaine using self report, binary measure of percent days cocaine use
|
Month 5 (weeks 17 - 20 post baseline)
|
Any Cocaine Use
Tijdsspanne: Month 6 (weeks 21 - 24 post baseline)
|
Any cocaine using self report, binary measure of percent days cocaine use
|
Month 6 (weeks 21 - 24 post baseline)
|
Percent Days Cocaine Use
Tijdsspanne: Month 3 (weeks 9 - 12 post baseline)
|
Percent days of any cocaine use, self reported
|
Month 3 (weeks 9 - 12 post baseline)
|
Percent Days Cocaine Use
Tijdsspanne: Month 5 (weeks 17 - 20 post baseline)
|
Percent days of any cocaine use, self reported
|
Month 5 (weeks 17 - 20 post baseline)
|
Percent Days Cocaine Use
Tijdsspanne: Month 6 (weeks 21 - 24 post baseline)
|
Percent days of any cocaine use, self reported
|
Month 6 (weeks 21 - 24 post baseline)
|
Medewerkers en onderzoekers
Sponsor
Onderzoekers
- Hoofdonderzoeker: James R. McKay, Ph.D, University of Pennsylvania
Studie record data
Bestudeer belangrijke data
Studie start
Primaire voltooiing (Werkelijk)
Studie voltooiing (Werkelijk)
Studieregistratiedata
Eerst ingediend
Eerst ingediend dat voldeed aan de QC-criteria
Eerst geplaatst (Schatting)
Updates van studierecords
Laatste update geplaatst (Werkelijk)
Laatste update ingediend die voldeed aan QC-criteria
Laatst geverifieerd
Meer informatie
Termen gerelateerd aan deze studie
Aanvullende relevante MeSH-voorwaarden
Andere studie-ID-nummers
- 807092
- IND: 101,486
Deze informatie is zonder wijzigingen rechtstreeks van de website clinicaltrials.gov gehaald. Als u verzoeken heeft om uw onderzoeksgegevens te wijzigen, te verwijderen of bij te werken, neem dan contact op met register@clinicaltrials.gov. Zodra er een wijziging wordt doorgevoerd op clinicaltrials.gov, wordt deze ook automatisch bijgewerkt op onze website .
Klinische onderzoeken op Stoornissen in het gebruik van middelen
-
University of HoustonOnbekend
-
New York City Health and Hospitals CorporationBeëindigdGlaucoom | Ziekte van het netvlies | Visuele Pathway DisorderVerenigde Staten
-
Neuro-Eye Diagnostic Systems, LLCNeuro-ophthalmology of Texas PLLCAanmelden op uitnodigingMacula ziekte | Visuele Pathway Disorder | Ziekte van de oogzenuwVerenigde Staten
-
Fondazione G.B. Bietti, IRCCSVoltooidGlaucoom | Optische neuropathie, ischemische | Optische zenuw | Visuele Pathway Disorder | Neurale geleidingItalië
-
University of MiamiNational Eye Institute (NEI)VoltooidGlaucoom | Maculaire degeneratie | Retinale degeneratie | Optische neuropathie | DrDeramus verdachte | Visuele Pathway DisorderVerenigde Staten
-
Isfahan University of Medical SciencesVoltooidZiekte van Tanger | Body Mass Index Quantitative Trait Locus 5 DisorderIran, Islamitische Republiek
-
Weill Medical College of Cornell UniversityUniversity of California, Los Angeles; University of Wisconsin, MilwaukeeVoltooidTourette syndroom | De stoornis van Gilles de la Tourette | Gilles de la Tourette | Gilles de la Tourette-syndroom | Ziekte van Gilles de la Tourette | Tourette-ziekte | Tic Disorder, Gecombineerde Vocale en Multiple Motor | Meerdere motorische en vocale ticstoornis, gecombineerd | Ziekte van Gilles... en andere voorwaarden
Klinische onderzoeken op Motivational Interviewing
-
Ruth Masterson-CreberUniversity of Pennsylvania; Edna G Kynett Memorial FoundationVoltooidHartfalenVerenigde Staten
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA); National Institute of Mental Health...Voltooid
-
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical CenterNational Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)VoltooidAlcohol misbruikVerenigde Staten
-
University of New MexicoVoltooidBeëindiging van de zwangerschapVerenigde Staten
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisNational Cancer Institute, FranceVoltooidKanker | Ouderen | Etnografisch interview | Sociale representatie van ouder worden | Redenen van niet-deelname aan klinische onderzoeken | Kwalitatieve methodeFrankrijk
-
The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen HospitalVoltooid
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA); National Institute on Alcohol Abuse... en andere medewerkersVoltooid
-
ARCIM Institute Academic Research in Complementary...Voltooid
-
Ohio State UniversityNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)Voltooid
-
Northwestern UniversityRegeneron PharmaceuticalsVoltooidPsoriasis | Atopische dermatitis | IchthyoseVerenigde Staten