- ICH GCP
- Amerikanska kliniska prövningsregistret
- Klinisk prövning NCT01032135
Adaptive Treatment for Alcohol and Cocaine Dependence
Primary objective #1: Determine the relative effectiveness of MI-IOP and MI-PC in the full study sample with regard to treatment engagement over weeks 1-12 and cocaine/alcohol use over weeks 1-24.
- Hypothesis 1: An intervention that explores several possible treatment options with the patient and provides the chosen option (e.g., MI-PC) will produce higher rates of treatment engagement than an intervention focused on engagement in IOP only (e.g., MI-IOP).
- Hypothesis 2: An intervention that explores several possible treatment options with the patient and provides the chosen option (e.g., MI-PC) will produce better cocaine/alcohol use outcomes than an intervention focused on engagement in IOP only (MI-IOP).
- Secondary analysis 1: Among the Non-engaged patients, determine rates of selection of each of the three options in MI-PC, retention rates within each option, and cocaine/alcohol use outcomes in each option.
- Secondary analysis 2: Among the Engaged patients, determine rates of selection of each of the three options in MI-PC, retention rates within each option, and cocaine/alcohol use outcomes in each option.
Primary objective #2: Determine whether the relative effectiveness of MI-IOP and MI-PC varies as a function of engagement group, with regard to treatment engagement over weeks 1-12 and cocaine/alcohol use outcomes over weeks 1-24.
- Hypothesis 1: The predicted main effect on retention favoring MI-PC over MI-IOP will be significantly larger among patients in the Non-engaged group than among those in the Engaged group.
- Hypothesis 2: The predicted main effect on cocaine/alcohol use outcomes favoring MI-PC over MI-IOP will be significantly larger among patients in the Non-engaged group than among those in the Engaged group.
Studieöversikt
Status
Betingelser
Detaljerad beskrivning
3. Secondary objective #1: Examine outcomes on three secondary measures: percent days abstinent from all substances, negative consequences of drug use, and HIV high risk behaviors.
Hypothesis 1: Outcomes on the secondary measures will be better in MI-PC than in MI-IOP.
4. Secondary objective #2: Test hypotheses concerning potential mediators of the predicted main effect favoring MI-PC over MI-IOP.
Hypothesis 1: The predicted advantage of MI-PC over MI-IOP will be mediated by greater increases in motivation, self-efficacy, commitment to abstinence, and self-help involvement in MI-PC.
5. Secondary objective #3: Test hypotheses concerning effect of additional MI intervention after initial non-engagement persists through 12 weeks.
- Hypothesis 1: A second telephone MI intervention will produce higher rates of subsequent engagement and less cocaine use than no further MI.
Studietyp
Inskrivning (Faktisk)
Fas
- Fas 2
- Fas 3
Kontakter och platser
Studieorter
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Förenta staterna, 19104
- Presbyterian Medical Center
-
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Förenta staterna, 19123
- NorthEast Treatment Center
-
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Förenta staterna, 19104
- VAMC
-
-
Deltagandekriterier
Urvalskriterier
Åldrar som är berättigade till studier
Tar emot friska volontärer
Kön som är behöriga för studier
Beskrivning
Inclusion Criteria:
- meet DSM-IV criteria for lifetime cocaine or alcohol dependence and have used cocaine or alcohol in the prior 6 months;
- be > 18 years of age;
- be judged clinically appropriate for IOP (e.g., no current psychotic disorder or evidence of severe dementia, and no acute medical problem requiring inpatient treatment;
- have no regular IV heroin use during the past year;
- have access to a telephone;
- be willing to be randomized and participate in research; and
- no current participation in methadone or other forms of DA treatment, other than IOP. Finally, because of study follow-up requirements, subjects will
- be required to be metropolitan area residents, and
- be able to provide the name, verified telephone number, and address of at least two contacts who can provide locator information on the patient during follow-up. We will include patients with dependence on other substances, provided that they are cocaine dependent and meet other inclusion criteria.
Exclusion Criteria:
- have a current psychotic disorder (as assessed with the psychotic screen from the MINI) or evidence of dementia severe enough to prevent participation in outpatient treatment;
- have acute medical problem requiring immediate inpatient treatment; or
- are currently participating in methadone or other forms of DA treatment, other than IOP.
Studieplan
Hur är studien utformad?
Designdetaljer
- Primärt syfte: Behandling
- Tilldelning: Randomiserad
- Interventionsmodell: Parallellt uppdrag
- Maskning: Ingen (Open Label)
Vapen och interventioner
Deltagargrupp / Arm |
Intervention / Behandling |
---|---|
Aktiv komparator: 1-MI-IOP Engaged
Randomized to treatment as usual, and they attend regularly but dropped out of treatment after randomization.
|
2 sessions at week 2, potential 2 sessions at week 8 if the participant drops out.
Andra namn:
|
Experimentell: 2-MI-IOP Non-Engaged
Randomized to treatment as usual, and do not attend.
|
2 sessions at week 2, potential 2 sessions at week 8 if the participant drops out.
Andra namn:
one telephone counseling session per week for 10 weeks.
Andra namn:
One CBT session per week, for 10 weeks.
Andra namn:
Prescription for naltrexone
Andra namn:
Return to IOP, group therapy 3 times weekly for about three hours a day.
Andra namn:
|
Aktiv komparator: 3-MI-PC Engaged
Randomized to treatment choice, but remain attending treatment as usual then dropped out of treatment after randomization.
|
2 sessions at week 2, potential 2 sessions at week 8 if the participant drops out.
Andra namn:
one telephone counseling session per week for 10 weeks.
Andra namn:
One CBT session per week, for 10 weeks.
Andra namn:
|
Experimentell: 4-MI-PC Non-engaged
Randomized to treatment choice, and do not attend treatment as usual, so the choice option is used.
|
2 sessions at week 2, potential 2 sessions at week 8 if the participant drops out.
Andra namn:
one telephone counseling session per week for 10 weeks.
Andra namn:
One CBT session per week, for 10 weeks.
Andra namn:
Prescription for naltrexone
Andra namn:
Return to IOP, group therapy 3 times weekly for about three hours a day.
Andra namn:
|
Vad mäter studien?
Primära resultatmått
Resultatmått |
Åtgärdsbeskrivning |
Tidsram |
---|---|---|
Treatment Engagement
Tidsram: weeks 3 - 12
|
Number of treatment sessions attended
|
weeks 3 - 12
|
Treatment Engagement for Participants Engaged at 2 Weeks, But Disengage Before 8 Weeks
Tidsram: weeks 9 - 12
|
Number of treatment sessions attended
|
weeks 9 - 12
|
Treatment Engagement of Those Non-engaged at 2 Weeks and at 8 Weeks
Tidsram: weeks 9 - 12
|
Number of treatment sessions attended
|
weeks 9 - 12
|
Any Drinking Days in Previous Month
Tidsram: Month 2 (weeks 5 - 8 post baseline)
|
Days of any drinking in previous month, as reported on Time Line Follow Back.
This is a dichotomous measure, so the means that are reported are the percentage of people who have had any days of drinking during the follow up period specified.
In other words, 0.57 indicates that 57% of the sample drank in the follow up period.
|
Month 2 (weeks 5 - 8 post baseline)
|
Any Drinking Days in Previous Month
Tidsram: Month 3 (weeks 9 - 12 post baseline)
|
Any drinking days during previous month, as reported on Time Line Follow Back.
This is a dichotomous measure, so the means that are reported are the percentage of people who have had any days of drinking during the follow up period specified.
In other words, 0.57 indicates that 57% of the sample drank in the follow up period.
|
Month 3 (weeks 9 - 12 post baseline)
|
Any Drinking
Tidsram: Month 4 (weeks 13 - 15 post baseline)
|
Any drinking at follow up, as reported on Time Line Follow Back.
This is a dichotomous measure, so the means that are reported are the percentage of people who have had any days of drinking during the follow up period specified.
In other words, 0.57 indicates that 57% of the sample drank in the follow up period.
|
Month 4 (weeks 13 - 15 post baseline)
|
Any Drinking
Tidsram: Month 5 (weeks 16 - 20 post baseline)
|
Any drinking at follow up, as reported on Time Line Follow Back, This is a dichotomous measure, so the means that are reported are the percentage of people who have had any days of drinking during the follow up period specified.
In other words, 0.57 indicates that 57% of the sample drank in the follow up period.
|
Month 5 (weeks 16 - 20 post baseline)
|
Any Drinking
Tidsram: Month 6 (weeks 21 - 24 post baseline)
|
Any drinking at follow up, as reported on Time Line Follow Back.
This is a dichotomous measure, so the means that are reported are the percentage of people who have had any days of drinking during the follow up period specified.
In other words, 0.57 indicates that 57% of the sample drank in the follow up period.
|
Month 6 (weeks 21 - 24 post baseline)
|
Percent Days Drinking
Tidsram: Month 2 (weeks 5 - 8 post baseline)
|
Percent days of any drinking at follow up, from Time Line Follow Back
|
Month 2 (weeks 5 - 8 post baseline)
|
Percent Days Drinking
Tidsram: Month 3 (weeks 9 - 12 post baseline)
|
Percent days of any drinking at follow up, from Time Line Follow Back
|
Month 3 (weeks 9 - 12 post baseline)
|
Percent Days Drinking
Tidsram: Month 4 (weeks 13 - 16 post baseline)
|
Percent days of any drinking at follow up, from Time Line Follow Back
|
Month 4 (weeks 13 - 16 post baseline)
|
Percent Days Drinking
Tidsram: Month 5 (weeks 17 - 20 post baseline)
|
Percent days of any drinking at follow up, fromTime Line Follow Back
|
Month 5 (weeks 17 - 20 post baseline)
|
Percent Days Drinking
Tidsram: Month 6 (weeks 21 - 24)
|
Percent days of any drinking at follow up, from Time Line Follow Back
|
Month 6 (weeks 21 - 24)
|
Any Heavy Drinking Days
Tidsram: Month 2 (weeks 5 - 8 post baseline)
|
days of five or more drinks per drinking day for men, four or more drinks per drinking day for women, at follow up, from Time Line Follow Back.
This is a dichotomous measure, so the means that are reported are the percentage of people who have had any days of heavy drinking during the follow up period specified.
In other words, 0.57 indicates that 57% of the sample engaged in heavy drinking in the follow up period.
|
Month 2 (weeks 5 - 8 post baseline)
|
Any Heavy Drinking Days
Tidsram: Month 3 (weeks 9 - 12 post baseline)
|
five or more drinks per drinking day for men, four or more drinks per drinking day for women, at follow up, from Time Line Follow Back.
This is a dichotomous measure, so the means that are reported are the percentage of people who have had any days of heavy drinking during the follow up period specified.
In other words, 0.57 indicates that 57% of the sample engaged in heavy drinking in the follow up period.
|
Month 3 (weeks 9 - 12 post baseline)
|
Any Heavy Drinking Days
Tidsram: Month 4 (weeks 13 - 16 post baseline)
|
five or more drinks per drinking day for men, four or more drinks per drinking day for women at follow up, from Time Line Follow Back.
This is a dichotomous measure, so the means that are reported are the percentage of people who have had any days of heavy drinking during the follow up period specified.
In other words, 0.57 indicates that 57% of the sample engaged in heavy drinking in the follow up period.
|
Month 4 (weeks 13 - 16 post baseline)
|
Any Heavy Drinking Days
Tidsram: Month 5 (weeks 17 to 20 post baseline)
|
five or more drinks per day for men, four or more drinks per day for women, from Time Line Follow Back.
This is a dichotomous measure, so the means that are reported are the percentage of people who have had any days of heavy drinking during the follow up period specified.
In other words, 0.57 indicates that 57% of the sample engaged in heavy drinking in the follow up period.
|
Month 5 (weeks 17 to 20 post baseline)
|
Any Heavy Drinking Days
Tidsram: Month 6 (weeks 21 - 24 post baseline)
|
five or more drinks per day for men, four or more drinks per day for women, from Time Line Follow Back.
This is a dichotomous measure, so the means that are reported are the percentage of people who have had any days of heavy drinking during the follow up period specified.
In other words, 0.57 indicates that 57% of the sample engaged in heavy drinking in the follow up period.
|
Month 6 (weeks 21 - 24 post baseline)
|
Percent Days Heavy Drinking
Tidsram: Month 2 (weeks 5 - 8 post baseline)
|
Percent days heavy drinking at follow up, from Time Line Follow Back *heavy drinking is defined as five or more drinks per day for men, four or more for women |
Month 2 (weeks 5 - 8 post baseline)
|
Percent Days Heavy Drinking
Tidsram: Month 3 (weeks 9 - 12 post baseline)
|
Percent days heavy drinking at follow up, from Time Line Follow Back * heavy drinking is defined as five or more drinks per day for men, four or more for women. |
Month 3 (weeks 9 - 12 post baseline)
|
Percent Days Heavy Drinking
Tidsram: Month 4 (weeks 13 - 16 post baseline)
|
Percent days heavy drinking at follow up, from Time Line Follow Back *heavy drinking is defined as five or more drinks per drinking day for men, four or more for women |
Month 4 (weeks 13 - 16 post baseline)
|
Percent Days Heavy Drinking
Tidsram: Month 5 ( weeks 17 - 20 post baseline)
|
Percent days heavy drinking at follow up, from Time Line Follow Back * heavy drinking is defined as five or more drinks per drinking day for men, four or more for women |
Month 5 ( weeks 17 - 20 post baseline)
|
Percent Days Heavy Drinking
Tidsram: Month 6 (weeks 21 - 24 post baseline)
|
Percent days heavy drinking at follow up, from Time Line Follow Back *heavy drinking is defined as five or more drinks per drinking day for men, four or more for women |
Month 6 (weeks 21 - 24 post baseline)
|
Any Cocaine Use
Tidsram: Month 3 (weeks 9 - 12 post baseline)
|
Any cocaine using self report, binary measure of percent days cocaine use.
|
Month 3 (weeks 9 - 12 post baseline)
|
Any Cocaine Use
Tidsram: Month 4 (weeks 13 - 16 post baseline)
|
Any cocaine using self report, binary measure of percent days cocaine use
|
Month 4 (weeks 13 - 16 post baseline)
|
Any Cocaine Use
Tidsram: Month 5 (weeks 17 - 20 post baseline)
|
Any cocaine using self report, binary measure of percent days cocaine use
|
Month 5 (weeks 17 - 20 post baseline)
|
Any Cocaine Use
Tidsram: Month 6 (weeks 21 - 24 post baseline)
|
Any cocaine using self report, binary measure of percent days cocaine use
|
Month 6 (weeks 21 - 24 post baseline)
|
Percent Days Cocaine Use
Tidsram: Month 3 (weeks 9 - 12 post baseline)
|
Percent days of any cocaine use, self reported
|
Month 3 (weeks 9 - 12 post baseline)
|
Percent Days Cocaine Use
Tidsram: Month 5 (weeks 17 - 20 post baseline)
|
Percent days of any cocaine use, self reported
|
Month 5 (weeks 17 - 20 post baseline)
|
Percent Days Cocaine Use
Tidsram: Month 6 (weeks 21 - 24 post baseline)
|
Percent days of any cocaine use, self reported
|
Month 6 (weeks 21 - 24 post baseline)
|
Samarbetspartners och utredare
Sponsor
Utredare
- Huvudutredare: James R. McKay, Ph.D, University of Pennsylvania
Studieavstämningsdatum
Studera stora datum
Studiestart
Primärt slutförande (Faktisk)
Avslutad studie (Faktisk)
Studieregistreringsdatum
Först inskickad
Först inskickad som uppfyllde QC-kriterierna
Första postat (Uppskatta)
Uppdateringar av studier
Senaste uppdatering publicerad (Faktisk)
Senaste inskickade uppdateringen som uppfyllde QC-kriterierna
Senast verifierad
Mer information
Termer relaterade till denna studie
Ytterligare relevanta MeSH-villkor
Andra studie-ID-nummer
- 807092
- IND: 101,486
Denna information hämtades direkt från webbplatsen clinicaltrials.gov utan några ändringar. Om du har några önskemål om att ändra, ta bort eller uppdatera dina studieuppgifter, vänligen kontakta register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ändring har implementerats på clinicaltrials.gov, kommer denna att uppdateras automatiskt även på vår webbplats .
Kliniska prövningar på Substansmissbruk
-
University of KonstanzAfrica Mental Health FoundationAvslutad
-
University of KonstanzAfrica Mental Health FoundationAvslutadPosttraumatisk stressyndrom | Khat Use DisorderKenya
-
University of Nove de JulhoOkänd
-
University of Kansas Medical CenterHar inte rekryterat ännuEsophagogastric Junction Disorder
-
Al-Azhar UniversityAvslutad
-
Assiut UniversityOkändTal Cortex Disorder
-
University Hospital, MontpellierAvslutadEustachian Tube DisorderFrankrike
-
Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of MedicineAvslutadTissue Expander DisorderKina
-
Alexandria UniversityAvslutad
Kliniska prövningar på Motivational Interviewing
-
The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen HospitalAvslutad
-
University of MiamiAB InBev FoundationAvslutad
-
The Cleveland ClinicAmerican Academy of Sleep MedicineRekryteringObstruktiv sömnapné | Akut dekompenserad hjärtsvikt | Motiverande förbättring | PAP-anslutningFörenta staterna
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA); National Institute of Mental Health...Avslutad
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA); National Institute on Alcohol... och andra samarbetspartnersAvslutadHIV-infektionFörenta staterna
-
Centre for Addiction and Mental HealthAvslutad
-
UConn HealthNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)Avslutad
-
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical CenterNational Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)AvslutadAlkoholmissbrukFörenta staterna
-
The University of Texas Health Science Center at...AvslutadHanddesinfektionFörenta staterna
-
UConn HealthDonaghue Medical Research FoundationAvslutad