- ICH GCP
- Registro de ensaios clínicos dos EUA
- Ensaio Clínico NCT02880839
Digital Navigation Enhances Cervical Pedicle Screw Placement Accuracy and Safety
Digital Navigation Enhances Cervical Pedicle Screw Placement Accuracy and Safety: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Visão geral do estudo
Status
Condições
Descrição detalhada
History and current status of related studies
The cervical pedicle is a tiny structure adjacent to important tissues including the spinal cord and vertebral artery. Cervical pedicle screw internal fixation is the conventional treatment for cervical spine fracture, and the technique provides acceptable internal fixation; however, current manipulation methods result in high pedicle screw penetration rates, a high risk of damage to peripheral vessels and nerves, and high rates of postoperative deformity. Improved techniques and minimally invasive methods such as transcutaneous pedicle screw implantation have been designed to effectively reduce surgery-related injury while maintaining the accuracy and safety of pedicle screw implantation. Unfortunately, there is no unified standard regarding implantation of cervical pedicle screws, and many pedicle screw implantation methods are used including partial cervical lamina excision and pipeline-dredge discharge. However, both of these techniques are clinically limited because of poor maneuverability. Digital navigation is an emerging technique based on the discrete-accumulation principle. The technique integrates computer methods, numerical control, laser and new materials, and provides a new digital technique for confirming the location and orientation of cervical pedicle screws, ensuring safe surgical operation.
Features different from other related studies
Previous studies focused primarily on investigating the curative effects of pedicle screw implantation in cervical spine fracture. To the best of the investigators knowledge, there are no studies of cervical spine fracture treatment by digital navigation-assisted cervical pedicle screw placement before June 2006 in Web of Science. The investigators located two similar articles (Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Surgical Trial (identifier: NCT02076113) and Slotted Hole Versus Fixed Hole C-Tek (identifier: NCT00585923)) in a search of ClinicalTrials.gov up to June 2006. The outcome measures in these two studies included bony fusion Short Form 36 and the physical component score. In contrast to these two studies regarding inclusion criteria and grouping, the investigators study was designed to investigate the accuracy and safety of digital navigation-assisted cervical pedicle screw placement, hoping to provide valuable quantitative evidence for the clinical application of this technique.
Adverse events
Possible adverse events included any expected or unexpected symptoms. If severe adverse events occurred, their details including the date of occurrence and measures taken to treat the adverse events were reported to the principal investigator and the institutional review board within 24 hours.
Data collection, management, analysis and open access
Data collection: Case report forms with demographic data, disease diagnosis, accompanying diseases, drug allergy history, and adverse events were collected, processed using Epidata software (Epidata Association, Odense, Denmark), collated, and then recorded electronically by data managers using a double-data entry strategy.
Data management: The locked electronic database was accessible and locked only by the project manager, and was not altered. Paper and electronic data regarding screening, informed consent, and clinical outcomes have been preserved at the Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, China.
Data analysis: The electronic database was statistically analyzed by a professional statistician who created an outcome analysis report that was submitted to the lead researchers. An independent data monitoring committee supervised and managed the trial data, ensuring a scientific and stringent trial to yield accurate and complete data.
Data open access: Anonymized trial data was published at http://www.figshare.com.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed by a statistician using SPSS 19.0 software (SPSS Inc.) and followed the intention-to-treat principle. Normally distributed measurement data was expressed as mean, standard deviation, and minimums and maximums. Non-normally distributed measurement data were expressed as lower quartile (q1), and median and upper quartile (q3). The Kruskal-Wallis H-test was used to compare the visual analogue scale spine scores among the three groups, and Fisher's exact test was used to compare the degree of bony fusion of the atlantoaxial joint and the incidence of adverse reactions. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Tipo de estudo
Inscrição (Real)
Estágio
- Não aplicável
Critérios de participação
Critérios de elegibilidade
Idades elegíveis para estudo
Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis
Gêneros Elegíveis para o Estudo
Descrição
Inclusion Criteria:
- Fracture of the posterior column of the cervical spine or fracture of the anterior-posterior column of the cervical spine without severe vertebral body injury
- Non-traumatic cervical lamina destabilization, including metastatic tumor and rheumatoid arthritis
- Kyphotic deformity after cervical lamina resection
- Segmental destabilization after nerve root or spinal cord decompression
- Subjected to revision after anterior cervical spine surgery
- Scheduled to undergo internal fixation by cervical pedicle screw
- Age approximately 62 years
- Either sex
- Provision of signed informed consent to participate in the trial
Exclusion Criteria:
- Cervical pedicle injury resulting from trauma or tumor
- Severe osteoporosis
- Anatomical variation of the vertebral artery
- Unable or declined to proceed with internal fixation by pedicle screws
Plano de estudo
Como o estudo é projetado?
Detalhes do projeto
- Finalidade Principal: Tratamento
- Alocação: Randomizado
- Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição Paralela
- Mascaramento: Nenhum (rótulo aberto)
Armas e Intervenções
Grupo de Participantes / Braço |
Intervenção / Tratamento |
---|---|
Experimental: Partial cervical lamina excision group
Patients in the cervical lamina partial excision group underwent partial cervical lamina excision and cervical pedicle screw internal fixation.
|
Patients with cervical fracture were assigned to undergo partial cervical lamina excision and cervical pedicle screw internal fixation.
|
Experimental: Pipeline-dredge discharge group
Patients in the pipeline-dredge discharge group underwent pipeline-dredge discharge and cervical pedicle screw internal fixation.
|
Patients with cervical fracture were assigned to undergo pipeline-dredge discharge and cervical pedicle screw internal fixation.
|
Experimental: Digital navigation group
Patients in the digital navigation group underwent digital navigation-assisted cervical pedicle placement.
|
Patients with cervical fracture were assigned to undergo digital navigation assisted cervical pedicle screw placement.
Outros nomes:
|
O que o estudo está medindo?
Medidas de resultados primários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
---|---|---|
the penetration degree of the cervical pedicle screws
Prazo: 12 months after internal fixation
|
According to whether screws penetrated the pedicle and the degree of penetration, screw insertion was graded in three levels: grade I, pedicle screws do not penetrate the pedicular cortex; grade II, screw threads penetrate the cortex at the isthmic portion of the pedicle (no more than 1/4 length of the screw diameter); grade III, screws obviously penetrate the cortex at the isthmic portion of the pedicle (> 1/4 length of the screw diameter) with risk of peripheral nerve and vessel injury, and poor stabilization of the internal fixation.
|
12 months after internal fixation
|
Medidas de resultados secundários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
---|---|---|
bony fusion rate of the atlantoaxial joint
Prazo: 12 and 36 months after internal fixation
|
To evaluate fracture healing.
Bone fusion rate in the atlantoaxial joint was calculated as the percentage of patients with bony fusion of the atlantoaxial joint divided by the total patient number in each group.
|
12 and 36 months after internal fixation
|
Visual analogue scale spine score
Prazo: prior to and 12 and 36 months after internal fixation
|
To evaluate cervical neck pain.
The visual analogue scale spine score ranges
|
prior to and 12 and 36 months after internal fixation
|
American Spinal Injury Association Classification
Prazo: prior to and 12 and 36 months after internal fixation
|
To evaluate improvements in neurological function
|
prior to and 12 and 36 months after internal fixation
|
incidence of adverse events
Prazo: 12 and 36 months after internal fixation
|
To evaluate the safety of each pedicle screw implantation method.
The incidence of adverse events was calculated as the percentage of patients developing adverse events divided by the total patient number in each group.
|
12 and 36 months after internal fixation
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Patrocinador
Investigadores
- Investigador principal: Junjie Guan, Master, Affiliated Hospital Of Nantong University
Datas de registro do estudo
Datas Principais do Estudo
Início do estudo
Conclusão Primária (Antecipado)
Conclusão do estudo (Antecipado)
Datas de inscrição no estudo
Enviado pela primeira vez
Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ
Primeira postagem (Estimativa)
Atualizações de registro de estudo
Última Atualização Postada (Estimativa)
Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade
Última verificação
Mais Informações
Termos relacionados a este estudo
Termos MeSH relevantes adicionais
Outros números de identificação do estudo
- NantongU_001
Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)
Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?
Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo
Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
produto fabricado e exportado dos EUA
Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .
Ensaios clínicos em Fratura da Coluna Cervical
-
Stanford UniversityConcluídoCirurgia Cervical Posterior | Fusão Cervical Posterior | Laminectomia cervical posterior | Laminoplastia Cervical PosteriorEstados Unidos
-
M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterRetiradoCâncer cervical estágio IB3 FIGO 2018 | Câncer Cervical Estágio II FIGO 2018 | Câncer Cervical Estágio IIA FIGO 2018 | Câncer Cervical Estágio IIA1 FIGO 2018 | Câncer Cervical Estágio IIA2 FIGO 2018 | Câncer Cervical Estágio IIB FIGO 2018 | Câncer cervical estágio III FIGO 2018 | Câncer cervical estágio... e outras condições
-
Mayo ClinicNational Cancer Institute (NCI)RecrutamentoCarcinoma Adenoescamoso Cervical | Carcinoma Espinocelular Cervical Sem Outra Especificação | Carcinoma Cervical Recorrente | Câncer cervical estágio IB3 FIGO 2018 | Câncer Cervical Estágio II FIGO 2018 | Câncer Cervical Estágio IIA FIGO 2018 | Câncer Cervical Estágio IIA1 FIGO 2018 | Câncer Cervical... e outras condiçõesEstados Unidos
-
Gazi UniversityRecrutamentoRadiculopatia Cervical | Dor Radicular Cervical | Radiculite Cervical | Síndrome da raiz cervicalPeru
-
M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Ativo, não recrutandoCarcinoma de células escamosas cervical localmente avançado, sem outra especificação | Câncer cervical estágio IB3 FIGO 2018 | Câncer Cervical Estágio II FIGO 2018 | Câncer Cervical Estágio IIA FIGO 2018 | Câncer Cervical Estágio IIA1 FIGO 2018 | Câncer Cervical Estágio IIA2 FIGO 2018 | Câncer Cervical... e outras condiçõesEstados Unidos
-
National Cancer Institute (NCI)NRG OncologyAtivo, não recrutandoAdenocarcinoma Cervical | Carcinoma Adenoescamoso Cervical | Carcinoma Espinocelular Cervical | Câncer cervical estágio IB2 AJCC v8 | Câncer Cervical Estágio II AJCC v8 | Câncer cervical estágio IIA AJCC v8 | Câncer cervical estágio IIA1 AJCC v8 | Câncer cervical estágio IIA2 AJCC v8 | Câncer cervical... e outras condiçõesEstados Unidos
-
M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterRecrutamentoCarcinoma Neuroendócrino de Células Grandes Cervicais | Carcinoma Neuroendócrino Cervical | Carcinoma Cervical de Pequenas Células | Carcinoma Indiferenciado Cervical | Câncer Cervical Estágio I AJCC v8 | Câncer Cervical Estágio IA AJCC v8 | Câncer cervical estágio IA1 AJCC v8 | Câncer cervical estágio... e outras condiçõesEstados Unidos
-
Valérie SchuermansRecrutamentoDoença do Disco Cervical | Fusão Cervical | Fusão da Coluna Vertebral | Espondilose cervical | Hérnia de Disco Cervical | Mielopatia Cervical | Degeneração do Disco Cervical | Radiculopatia Cervical | Mielopatia Compressiva | Radiculopatia, Região Cervical | Radiculopatia; na espondilose | Radiculopatia; no Distúrbio... e outras condiçõesHolanda
-
M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Ativo, não recrutandoAdenocarcinoma Cervical | Carcinoma Adenoescamoso Cervical | Carcinoma Espinocelular Cervical Sem Outra Especificação | Câncer cervical estágio IB3 FIGO 2018 | Câncer Cervical Estágio II FIGO 2018 | Câncer Cervical Estágio IIA FIGO 2018 | Câncer Cervical Estágio IIA1 FIGO 2018 | Câncer Cervical Estágio... e outras condiçõesEstados Unidos
-
University of AarhusDesconhecidoCâncer cervical | Câncer de colo do útero | Displasia Cervical | Lesão Cervical | Neoplasia Cervical | Doença cervicalDinamarca