此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Ultrasonography and Health Education Can Reduce the Unnecessary Caesarean Section in Bangladesh

2022年8月21日 更新者:Dr. Habiba Shirin、Hiroshima University

Ultrasonography and Health Education During the Antenatal Visits Among the Pregnant Women to Reduce the Unnecessary Caesarean Section in a Resource Poor Setting (Bangladesh): a Cluster Randomized Control Trial

A caesarean section (C/S) is a surgical procedure performed to prevent difficulties during childbirth. World Health Organization considered the standard rate for the C/S would be between 10% and 15%. However, since 2000 the rate of C/S was increasing globally, and it became about twofold from 12.1% to 21.1% in 2015.

In Bangladesh, C/S continued to increase from 8% (2007) to 33% (2017). Medically unnecessary C/S was estimated about 77% of all C/S in 2018, and it was increased from 66% since 2016. In Bangladesh, unnecessary C/S observed 9.0% and 3.2% C/S done due to avoid labour pain and 5.8% for the convenience of the mother. The economic burden of each C/S is average USD 612 and unfortunately, each patient spends this amount of money from out of pocket. Aim of this study is to do ultrasonography and health education can reduce unnecessary caesarean section among pregnant women compared to control group in a resource poor setting.

Investigators will conduct this randomized controlled trial (RCT) at Dhaka and Sir Salimullah Medical College & Hospital, and two rural Upazila Health Complexes (Savar Upazila Health Complex and Munshigonj General Hospital). Investigators will randomly select one urban hospital from two urban hospitals and one rural hospital from two rural hospitals for the intervention. The other one urban and one rural hospital will be assigned as control hospitals. One research staff, who will not involve any of the research activity of this trial, will do this randomization. Pregnant mothers will be identified and recruited during their routine antenatal visits. Pregnant mothers receive 2 USG during their routine ANC visits at 1st visit of 8-12 weeks and 4th visit of 36-38 weeks. In the intervention centres, Investigators will perform additional 4 ANC visits at 20, 30, 36 and 40 weeks (total 8 visits) and USG additional 2 times during the 2nd visit of 24-26 weeks and 5th visit of 34 weeks (2 routine USG + 2 USG in 3rd and 5th ANC visits and even more USG if needed + Health education; pictorial flip chart showing danger sign during pregnancy and potential risks for unnecessary caesarean delivery to increase awareness for safe delivery) for all the enrolled pregnant mothers. In the control centres, Investigators will collect information from the pregnant mothers.

Investigators are expecting the pregnant women who will receive antenatal care with ultrasonography and health education will have reduced number of unnecessary C/S compared to control group who will not receive those.

研究概览

研究类型

介入性

注册 (预期的)

288

阶段

  • 不适用

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习联系方式

研究联系人备份

学习地点

      • Dhaka、孟加拉国
        • 招聘中
        • DMCH, SSMC, Munshiganj General Hospital and Bogra District Hospital
        • 首席研究员:
          • Mohammad Delwer Hossain Hawlader, MBBS MPH PhD
        • 首席研究员:
          • Habiba Shirin, MBBS DMU

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

  • 孩子
  • 成人
  • 年长者

接受健康志愿者

有资格学习的性别

女性

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. All the pregnant mothers irrespective of age who will be attending the designated hospitals/health complex.
  2. We will include all pregnant mothers who will have/have not complication to see the delivery outcome with indication of normal delivery and CS.
  3. Willing to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Not willing to participate.
  2. Early Pregnancy with indication for C/S (co-morbidities, H/O previous C/S etc.)

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

  • 主要用途:治疗
  • 分配:随机化
  • 介入模型:并行分配
  • 屏蔽:无(打开标签)

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
无干预:Control Group (CG)
Usual care
实验性的:Intervention Group (IG)
In the intervention hospitals, we will perform USG additional 2 times during the 3rd visit of 24-26 weeks and 5th visit of 34 weeks (2 USG and even more USG if needed + additional 4 ANC + Health education; pictorial flip chart showing danger sign during pregnancy and potential risks for unnecessary caesarean delivery to increase awareness for safe delivery) for all the enolled pregnant mothers.
2 USG in 3rd and 5th ANC visits and even more USG if needed + 4 ANC + Health education
其他名称:
  • 健康教育
  • Additional 4 ANC

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Unnecessary C/S
大体时间:36 weeks
Compare the reduction of the percentage of unnecessary C/S among the intervention compare to control pregnant women
36 weeks

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
ANC
大体时间:36 weeks
The rate of set-number (8 times) of ANC and post-natal (PNC) visits rates among the intervention pregnant women (how many pregnant women in IG followed the protocol.)
36 weeks
USG
大体时间:36 weeks
The rate of set-number (4 times) of USG use among the intervention pregnant women (how many pregnant women in IG followed the protocol.)
36 weeks
Institutional (hospital and clinics) delivery compare to the home delivery
大体时间:36 weeks
The rate of the institutional (hospital and clinics) delivery among the intervention pregnant women, compared with CG.
36 weeks
Delivery related complications
大体时间:36 weeks
The reduction rate of the delivery related complications [ante partum and postpartum haemorrhage (APH, PPH)] among the intervention pregnant women, compared with CG
36 weeks
Rate of still birth
大体时间:36 weeks
The reduction rate of still birth among the intervention pregnant women, compared with CG.
36 weeks

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

出版物和有用的链接

负责输入研究信息的人员自愿提供这些出版物。这些可能与研究有关。

一般刊物

  • 1. World Health Organization 2015. WHO statement on caesarean section rates. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/161442/WHO_RHR_15.02_eng.pdf?sequence=1 2. Boerma T, Ronsmans C, Melesse DY, Barros AJD, Barros FC, Juan L, Moller A-B, Say L, Hosseinpoor AR, Yi M, Neto DdeLR, Temmerman M. Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections. The Lancet, 2018; 392 (10155): 1341 DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31928-7 3. Charvalho PdaS, Hansson BM, Stjernholm VY. Indications for increase in caesarean delivery. Reprod Health, 2019; 16, 72. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-019-0723-8 4. Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey 2017-2018-key indicators.pdf [https://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/PR104/PR104.pdf] 5. Save the Children International 2020. Bangladesh: 51 per cent increase in "unnecessary" C-sections in two years. [https://www.savethechildren.net/news/bangladesh-51-cent-increase-"unnecessary"-c-sections-two-years#_edn2] 6. BDHS 2014 final report[ https://dhsprogram.com/publications/publication-fr311-dhs-final-reports.cfm] 7. Infographic-unnecessary-caesarean-section.pdf[ https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/unnecessary-cs-infographics/en/] 8. Hasan F, Alam MM, Hossain MG. Associated factors and their individual contributions to caesarean delivery among married women in Bangladesh: analysis of Bangladesh demographic and health survey data. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2019;19(1):433. doi:10.1186/s12884-019-2588-9 9. World Health Organization 2016. Pregnant women must be able to access the right care at the right time, says WHO. https://www.who.int/news-room/detail/07-11-2016-pregnant-women-must-be-able-to-access-the-right-care-at-the-right-time-says-who 10. Dowswell T, Carroli G, Duley L, Gates S, Gülmezoglu AM, Khan-Neelofur D, Piaggio G. Alternative versus standard packages of antenatal care for low-risk pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;(7):CD000934 11. World Health Organization 2018. WHO recommendation on antenatal care contact schedules. https://extranet.who.int/rhl/topics/improving-health-system-performance/who-recommendation-antenatal-care-contact-schedules 12. Alland JYK, Ali H, Mehra S, LeFevre AE, Pak SE, Shaikh S, Christian P, Labrique AB. Antenatal care in rural Bangladesh: current state of costs, content and recommendations for effective service delivery. BMC Health Serv Res, 2019; 19, 861. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4696-7 13. World Health Organization 2018. WHO recommendation on early ultrasound in pregnancy. https://extranet.who.int/rhl/topics/preconception-pregnancy-childbirth-and-postpartum-care/antenatal-care/who-recommendation-early-ultrasound-pregnancy 14. Ryan BL, Krishnan RJ, Terry A, Thind A. Do four or more antenatal care visits increase skilled birth attendant use and institutional delivery in Bangladesh? A propensity-score matched analysis. BMC Public Health, 2019;19(1):583. 15. Pervin J, Moran A, Rahman M, Razzaque A, Sibley L, Streatfield PK, Reichenbach LJ, Koblinsky M, Hruschka D, Rahman A. Association of antenatal care with facility delivery and perinatal survival - a population-based study in Bangladesh. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2012;12:111. doi:10.1186/1471-2393-12-111 16. World Bank 2014. The World Bank Annual Report 2014. Washington, DC. © World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/20093 License: CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 IGO. 17. Bangladesh_country_report.pdf [ https://www.who.int/pmnch/knowledge/publications/bangladesh_country_report.pdf] 18. Begum T, Ellis C, Sarker M, et al. A qualitative study to explore the attitudes of women and obstetricians towards caesarean delivery in rural Bangladesh. BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2018;18(1):368. 19. The United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF). Monitoring the situation of children and women. Maternal mortality, 2019. https://data.unicef.org/topic/maternal-health/maternal-mortality/ 20. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/stillbirth/facts.html 21. Ylva Vladic Stjernholm. Caesarean section: reasons for and actions to prevent unnecessary caesareans. Open access peer-reviewed chapter. 2018. DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.76582. https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/63427 22. Charan J, Biswas T. How to calculate sample size for different study designs in medical research?. Indian J Psychol Med. 2013;35(2):121-126. doi:10.4103/0253-7176.116232

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (实际的)

2021年11月28日

初级完成 (预期的)

2022年12月31日

研究完成 (预期的)

2023年12月31日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2021年10月29日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2021年11月13日

首次发布 (实际的)

2021年11月26日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2022年8月23日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2022年8月21日

最后验证

2022年8月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

其他研究编号

  • 2021/OR-NSU/IRB/0804

计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)

计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)?

药物和器械信息、研究文件

研究美国 FDA 监管的药品

研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

3
订阅