Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Ultrasonography and Health Education Can Reduce the Unnecessary Caesarean Section in Bangladesh

21 de agosto de 2022 actualizado por: Dr. Habiba Shirin, Hiroshima University

Ultrasonography and Health Education During the Antenatal Visits Among the Pregnant Women to Reduce the Unnecessary Caesarean Section in a Resource Poor Setting (Bangladesh): a Cluster Randomized Control Trial

A caesarean section (C/S) is a surgical procedure performed to prevent difficulties during childbirth. World Health Organization considered the standard rate for the C/S would be between 10% and 15%. However, since 2000 the rate of C/S was increasing globally, and it became about twofold from 12.1% to 21.1% in 2015.

In Bangladesh, C/S continued to increase from 8% (2007) to 33% (2017). Medically unnecessary C/S was estimated about 77% of all C/S in 2018, and it was increased from 66% since 2016. In Bangladesh, unnecessary C/S observed 9.0% and 3.2% C/S done due to avoid labour pain and 5.8% for the convenience of the mother. The economic burden of each C/S is average USD 612 and unfortunately, each patient spends this amount of money from out of pocket. Aim of this study is to do ultrasonography and health education can reduce unnecessary caesarean section among pregnant women compared to control group in a resource poor setting.

Investigators will conduct this randomized controlled trial (RCT) at Dhaka and Sir Salimullah Medical College & Hospital, and two rural Upazila Health Complexes (Savar Upazila Health Complex and Munshigonj General Hospital). Investigators will randomly select one urban hospital from two urban hospitals and one rural hospital from two rural hospitals for the intervention. The other one urban and one rural hospital will be assigned as control hospitals. One research staff, who will not involve any of the research activity of this trial, will do this randomization. Pregnant mothers will be identified and recruited during their routine antenatal visits. Pregnant mothers receive 2 USG during their routine ANC visits at 1st visit of 8-12 weeks and 4th visit of 36-38 weeks. In the intervention centres, Investigators will perform additional 4 ANC visits at 20, 30, 36 and 40 weeks (total 8 visits) and USG additional 2 times during the 2nd visit of 24-26 weeks and 5th visit of 34 weeks (2 routine USG + 2 USG in 3rd and 5th ANC visits and even more USG if needed + Health education; pictorial flip chart showing danger sign during pregnancy and potential risks for unnecessary caesarean delivery to increase awareness for safe delivery) for all the enrolled pregnant mothers. In the control centres, Investigators will collect information from the pregnant mothers.

Investigators are expecting the pregnant women who will receive antenatal care with ultrasonography and health education will have reduced number of unnecessary C/S compared to control group who will not receive those.

Descripción general del estudio

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Anticipado)

288

Fase

  • No aplica

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Estudio Contacto

Copia de seguridad de contactos de estudio

Ubicaciones de estudio

      • Dhaka, Bangladesh
        • Reclutamiento
        • DMCH, SSMC, Munshiganj General Hospital and Bogra District Hospital
        • Investigador principal:
          • Mohammad Delwer Hossain Hawlader, MBBS MPH PhD
        • Investigador principal:
          • Habiba Shirin, MBBS DMU

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

  • Niño
  • Adulto
  • Adulto Mayor

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Géneros elegibles para el estudio

Femenino

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. All the pregnant mothers irrespective of age who will be attending the designated hospitals/health complex.
  2. We will include all pregnant mothers who will have/have not complication to see the delivery outcome with indication of normal delivery and CS.
  3. Willing to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Not willing to participate.
  2. Early Pregnancy with indication for C/S (co-morbidities, H/O previous C/S etc.)

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Tratamiento
  • Asignación: Aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
  • Enmascaramiento: Ninguno (etiqueta abierta)

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Sin intervención: Control Group (CG)
Usual care
Experimental: Intervention Group (IG)
In the intervention hospitals, we will perform USG additional 2 times during the 3rd visit of 24-26 weeks and 5th visit of 34 weeks (2 USG and even more USG if needed + additional 4 ANC + Health education; pictorial flip chart showing danger sign during pregnancy and potential risks for unnecessary caesarean delivery to increase awareness for safe delivery) for all the enolled pregnant mothers.
2 USG in 3rd and 5th ANC visits and even more USG if needed + 4 ANC + Health education
Otros nombres:
  • Educación para la salud
  • Additional 4 ANC

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Unnecessary C/S
Periodo de tiempo: 36 weeks
Compare the reduction of the percentage of unnecessary C/S among the intervention compare to control pregnant women
36 weeks

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
ANC
Periodo de tiempo: 36 weeks
The rate of set-number (8 times) of ANC and post-natal (PNC) visits rates among the intervention pregnant women (how many pregnant women in IG followed the protocol.)
36 weeks
USG
Periodo de tiempo: 36 weeks
The rate of set-number (4 times) of USG use among the intervention pregnant women (how many pregnant women in IG followed the protocol.)
36 weeks
Institutional (hospital and clinics) delivery compare to the home delivery
Periodo de tiempo: 36 weeks
The rate of the institutional (hospital and clinics) delivery among the intervention pregnant women, compared with CG.
36 weeks
Delivery related complications
Periodo de tiempo: 36 weeks
The reduction rate of the delivery related complications [ante partum and postpartum haemorrhage (APH, PPH)] among the intervention pregnant women, compared with CG
36 weeks
Rate of still birth
Periodo de tiempo: 36 weeks
The reduction rate of still birth among the intervention pregnant women, compared with CG.
36 weeks

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Publicaciones y enlaces útiles

La persona responsable de ingresar información sobre el estudio proporciona voluntariamente estas publicaciones. Estos pueden ser sobre cualquier cosa relacionada con el estudio.

Publicaciones Generales

  • 1. World Health Organization 2015. WHO statement on caesarean section rates. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/161442/WHO_RHR_15.02_eng.pdf?sequence=1 2. Boerma T, Ronsmans C, Melesse DY, Barros AJD, Barros FC, Juan L, Moller A-B, Say L, Hosseinpoor AR, Yi M, Neto DdeLR, Temmerman M. Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections. The Lancet, 2018; 392 (10155): 1341 DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31928-7 3. Charvalho PdaS, Hansson BM, Stjernholm VY. Indications for increase in caesarean delivery. Reprod Health, 2019; 16, 72. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-019-0723-8 4. Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey 2017-2018-key indicators.pdf [https://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/PR104/PR104.pdf] 5. Save the Children International 2020. Bangladesh: 51 per cent increase in "unnecessary" C-sections in two years. [https://www.savethechildren.net/news/bangladesh-51-cent-increase-"unnecessary"-c-sections-two-years#_edn2] 6. BDHS 2014 final report[ https://dhsprogram.com/publications/publication-fr311-dhs-final-reports.cfm] 7. Infographic-unnecessary-caesarean-section.pdf[ https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/unnecessary-cs-infographics/en/] 8. Hasan F, Alam MM, Hossain MG. Associated factors and their individual contributions to caesarean delivery among married women in Bangladesh: analysis of Bangladesh demographic and health survey data. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2019;19(1):433. doi:10.1186/s12884-019-2588-9 9. World Health Organization 2016. Pregnant women must be able to access the right care at the right time, says WHO. https://www.who.int/news-room/detail/07-11-2016-pregnant-women-must-be-able-to-access-the-right-care-at-the-right-time-says-who 10. Dowswell T, Carroli G, Duley L, Gates S, Gülmezoglu AM, Khan-Neelofur D, Piaggio G. Alternative versus standard packages of antenatal care for low-risk pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;(7):CD000934 11. World Health Organization 2018. WHO recommendation on antenatal care contact schedules. https://extranet.who.int/rhl/topics/improving-health-system-performance/who-recommendation-antenatal-care-contact-schedules 12. Alland JYK, Ali H, Mehra S, LeFevre AE, Pak SE, Shaikh S, Christian P, Labrique AB. Antenatal care in rural Bangladesh: current state of costs, content and recommendations for effective service delivery. BMC Health Serv Res, 2019; 19, 861. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4696-7 13. World Health Organization 2018. WHO recommendation on early ultrasound in pregnancy. https://extranet.who.int/rhl/topics/preconception-pregnancy-childbirth-and-postpartum-care/antenatal-care/who-recommendation-early-ultrasound-pregnancy 14. Ryan BL, Krishnan RJ, Terry A, Thind A. Do four or more antenatal care visits increase skilled birth attendant use and institutional delivery in Bangladesh? A propensity-score matched analysis. BMC Public Health, 2019;19(1):583. 15. Pervin J, Moran A, Rahman M, Razzaque A, Sibley L, Streatfield PK, Reichenbach LJ, Koblinsky M, Hruschka D, Rahman A. Association of antenatal care with facility delivery and perinatal survival - a population-based study in Bangladesh. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2012;12:111. doi:10.1186/1471-2393-12-111 16. World Bank 2014. The World Bank Annual Report 2014. Washington, DC. © World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/20093 License: CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 IGO. 17. Bangladesh_country_report.pdf [ https://www.who.int/pmnch/knowledge/publications/bangladesh_country_report.pdf] 18. Begum T, Ellis C, Sarker M, et al. A qualitative study to explore the attitudes of women and obstetricians towards caesarean delivery in rural Bangladesh. BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2018;18(1):368. 19. The United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF). Monitoring the situation of children and women. Maternal mortality, 2019. https://data.unicef.org/topic/maternal-health/maternal-mortality/ 20. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/stillbirth/facts.html 21. Ylva Vladic Stjernholm. Caesarean section: reasons for and actions to prevent unnecessary caesareans. Open access peer-reviewed chapter. 2018. DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.76582. https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/63427 22. Charan J, Biswas T. How to calculate sample size for different study designs in medical research?. Indian J Psychol Med. 2013;35(2):121-126. doi:10.4103/0253-7176.116232

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Actual)

28 de noviembre de 2021

Finalización primaria (Anticipado)

31 de diciembre de 2022

Finalización del estudio (Anticipado)

31 de diciembre de 2023

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

29 de octubre de 2021

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

13 de noviembre de 2021

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

26 de noviembre de 2021

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

23 de agosto de 2022

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

21 de agosto de 2022

Última verificación

1 de agosto de 2022

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Otros números de identificación del estudio

  • 2021/OR-NSU/IRB/0804

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

No

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

3
Suscribir