The Effect of Vasopressors on the Anti Xa Response to Enoxaparin in Critically Ill Patients

April 19, 2016 updated by: Dr Sharon Einav, Shaare Zedek Medical Center

Prospective Randomised Study of the Effect of Vasopressors on the Anti Xa Response to Enoxaparin in Critically Ill Patients

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of 3 different dosing regimens of enoxaparin in achieving adequate antithrombotic aFXa levels in critically ill patients.

The relationship between appearance of DVT and antithrombotic aFXa levels will also be assessed and risk factors associated with inadequate aFXa levels under standard enoxaparin dosages will be searched for.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Critically ill patients are at increased risk of venous thrombosis and embolism from DVT. Low molecular weigh heparins such as enoxaparin (clexane) have more favorable pharmacokinetic/ pharmacodynamic profiles, equivalent or improved efficacy (e.g. in post trauma and orthopedic surgery patients) and fewer bleeding complications than low-dose unfractionated heparin. These medications are currently recommended for DVT prophylaxis in critically ill patients and are usually administered subcutaneously (SQ). The antithrombotic activity of LMWHs correlates with peak aFXa levels. However, the the appropriate dose and dosing interval of enoxaparin for DVT prophylaxis in critically ill surgical patients has not been established and in particular remains unknown for those patients with severe peripheral edema ans/or decreased peripheral circulation due to therapy with vasopressors. Several studies have recently demonstrated questionable efficacy of standard daily enoxaparin dosing for critically ill patients as DVT prophylaxis.

The current study will be a prospective, randomized, cohort study, conducted at the Shaare Zedek Medical Center over a period of 1 year (100 patients). All critically ill patients aged ≥18 years with a predicted requirement of mechanical ventilation for >3 days will be included. Data collection will be performed anonymously and will include patient demographics and admission details, duplex monitoring for DVT and daily recording of APACHE II scores, renal function, coagulation profile and overall dose of vasopressors.

Patients will be randomized to receive enoxaparin in accordance three DVT prophylaxis protocols- IV by weight, SQ by weight or SQ 40mg x1/day (standard). Blood samples for the evaluation of aFXa will be drawn twice daily for peak and trough activity over a period of 5 days. No further changes will be made in the standard therapy. Patient outcomes and occurrence of adverse events will be recorded. The principle outcome variable will be achievement of target peak and trough levels of aFXa during the 5 day study period.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
39

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Israel
      • Jerusalem, Israel, 91031
        • Shaare Zedek Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

All critically ill patients, aged ≥18 years, with a predicted requirement for mechanical ventilation of more than 3 days and for whom venous thromboembolic prophylaxis is indicated.

-

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients requiring full anticoagulation
  2. Administration of unfractionated heparin in the 8hrs preceding study entry
  3. Existing contraindication to prophylactic dose of enoxaparin.
  4. Platelets < 75,000
  5. Significant renal failure (creatinine clearance <30 ml/min/m2) [39]
  6. BMI > 30
  7. INR > 1.7
  8. Any conditions precluding treatment in the opinion of the primary physician

  9. Patient /surrogate refusal

    -

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: IV by weight
intravenous dose of 0.5 mg/kg enoxaparin once daily
Drug: Enoxaparine

Patients considered eligible will be divided into 2 groups- those receiving vasopressor support and those not receiving vasopressor support at the time of inclusion. The patients in each group will be randomized to receive enoxaparin in accordance with one of the following DVT prophylaxis protocols:

  1. Intravenous Enoxaparine according to their weight (0.5mg/kg x 1/day)
  2. Subcutaneous Enoxaparine according to their weight (0.5mg/kg x 1/day)
  3. Subcutaneous Enoxaparine 40mg x1/day
Active Comparator: SC fixed dose
subcutaneous fixed dose of 40 mg enoxaparin once daily
Drug: Enoxaparine

Patients considered eligible will be divided into 2 groups- those receiving vasopressor support and those not receiving vasopressor support at the time of inclusion. The patients in each group will be randomized to receive enoxaparin in accordance with one of the following DVT prophylaxis protocols:

  1. Intravenous Enoxaparine according to their weight (0.5mg/kg x 1/day)
  2. Subcutaneous Enoxaparine according to their weight (0.5mg/kg x 1/day)
  3. Subcutaneous Enoxaparine 40mg x1/day
Active Comparator: SC by weight
subcutaneous dose of 0.5 mg/kg enoxaparin once daily
Drug: Enoxaparine

Patients considered eligible will be divided into 2 groups- those receiving vasopressor support and those not receiving vasopressor support at the time of inclusion. The patients in each group will be randomized to receive enoxaparin in accordance with one of the following DVT prophylaxis protocols:

  1. Intravenous Enoxaparine according to their weight (0.5mg/kg x 1/day)
  2. Subcutaneous Enoxaparine according to their weight (0.5mg/kg x 1/day)
  3. Subcutaneous Enoxaparine 40mg x1/day

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
To determine the effect of the dosing protocols of enoxaparin for critically ill patients on aFXa activity
Time Frame: 5 days
5 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
bleeding/thrombotic complications
Time Frame: 7 days
7 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Shaare Zedek Medical Center

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Sharon Einav-Bromiker, MD, Shaare Zedek Medical Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 12, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 12, 2006

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 13, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 20, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 19, 2016

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • einav-1-ctil

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Critical Illness

Clinical Trials on Enoxaparine

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings