Once-Daily Oral Avatrombopag Tablets Used in Subjects With Chronic Liver Diseases and Thrombocytopenia Prior to Elective Surgical or Diagnostic Procedures
A Phase 2, Randomized, Multicenter, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Population Pharmacokinetics of Once-Daily Oral E5501 Tablets Used Up to 7 Days in Subjects With Chronic Liver Diseases and Thrombocytopenia Prior to Elective Surgical or Diagnostic Procedures
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Phase 2
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Louisiana
-
New Orleans, Louisiana, United States, 70121
- Ochsner Clinic Foundation
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Key Inclusion Criteria:
- Males or females ≥ 18 years of age
- Thrombocytopenia (defined as a platelet count ≥ 10,000 - ≤ 50,000 (+15%)/mm^3 )
- Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores ≤ 24
Chronic liver diseases due to one of the following three etiologies:
Chronic Viral Hepatitis from one of the following categories
- Chronic Hepatitis C (defined as the presence of anti-hepatitis C virus [HCV] antibodies and/or detectable serum HCV ribonucleic acid [RNA] levels)
- OR chronic Hepatitis B (defined as the presence of hepatitis B surface antigen [HBsAg] and/or detectable serum hepatitis B virus [HBV] deoxyribonucleic acid [DNA])
- OR chronic Hepatitis B and C co-infection (as defined by the above bullet points)
- OR chronic Hepatitis C and history of alcohol abuse
- OR chronic Hepatitis B and history of alcohol abuse
NASH diagnosed as:
- absence of serologic evidence of viral hepatitis and
- convincing evidence of a history of minimal or no alcohol consumption, and
- histologic picture of steatohepatitis OR
- when histology is unavailable, then clinical, radiographic and laboratory evidence of NASH
Alcoholic liver disease diagnosed as:
- absence of serologic evidence of viral hepatitis and
- history of heavy alcohol consumption and
- histologic picture of alcoholic liver disease OR
- when histology is unavailable, then clinical, radiographic and laboratory evidence of hepatitis combined with years of excessive alcohol intake
- Subjects who are scheduled to undergo an elective invasive procedure between 1 to 4 days post last dose of study drug.
- Adequate renal function as evidenced by a calculated creatinine clearance ≥50 mL/minute per the Cockcroft and Gault formula
- Life expectancy ≥3 months
Key Exclusion Criteria:
- Hepatic encephalopathy that cannot be effectively treated.
- Platelet transfusion within 7 days prior to the first dose of study drug
- Received blood products, eg, FFP and cryoprecipitate 7 days prior to the first dose of study drug
- Have surgical or diagnostic procedure scheduled during the Randomization Phase (Day 1 to Day 8) of this study
- Interferon use within 2 weeks of Day 1
- Hormonal contraceptive use within 60 days of study entry
- History of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection
- Any prohibited concomitant medications or therapy that cannot be discontinued by Visit 1
- Active alcohol abuse, active alcohol dependence syndrome, drug abuse, or drug dependence within 6 months of the study start (unless participating in a controlled rehabilitation program)
- Acute alcoholic hepatitis (chronic alcoholic hepatitis is allowed) within 6 months of the study start
- History of any primary hematologic disorder
- History of arterial or venous thrombosis, including thrombosis of any part of the splenic-mesenteric system
- Any evidence of current portal vein thrombosis (PVT) as detected by Doppler sonography or appropriate MRI/CT imaging at Screening and/or within approximately 30 days prior to Screening
- Any acute/active bleeding (gastrointestinal [GI], central nervous system [CNS], etc)
- Uncompensated congestive heart failure (New York Heart Association [NYHA] Class III or IV)
- Pre-diagnosed Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP)
- History of Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS)
- Females who are pregnant (positive β-hCG test ) or breastfeeding
- Current use of recreational drugs
- Post-transplant patients
- Subjects who have participated in another investigational trial within 30 days prior to Visit 1.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: 1
|
Avatrombopag first Dose 80 mg followed by 10 mg a day for up to 6 additional days
Avatrombopag first Dose 80 mg followed by 20 mg a day for 3 days and then Placebo for 3 additional days
|
|
Experimental: 2
|
Avatrombopag first Dose 80 mg followed by 10 mg a day for up to 6 additional days
Avatrombopag first Dose 80 mg followed by 20 mg a day for 3 days and then Placebo for 3 additional days
Placebo or inactive substance once a day for up to 7 days
|
|
Placebo Comparator: 3
|
Placebo or inactive substance once a day for up to 7 days
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Experiencing Response
Time Frame: Day 8 (Visit 5, EOT)
|
Platelet counts (PC) were determined from blood draws.
A responder is defined as a participant having an increase of at least 20,000/mm^3 PC from Baseline and a PC greater than 50,000/mm^3 at least once during Day 4 through Day 8. Missing PC assessments at any given time point was considered to be a non-response at that point and were not estimated.
For PC measurements taken after the last dose day (end of treatment (EOT)), the postdose windows applied.
If there was more than one PC within the same analysis visit window, the following selection rules were applied sequentially to determine which PC was used for that time point: 1) the PC that was closer to the target date was used, 2) if PC were equal-distance in days from the target day, the later one based on measurement date and time was used, and 3) if there was more than one PC on the same day, if it was a baseline record, the largest one was used; if it was a postbaseline record, the smallest one was used.
|
Day 8 (Visit 5, EOT)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Platelet Count on Day 8 (Visit 5 and/or End of Treatment) From Baseline
Time Frame: Day 8 (Visit 5, EOT)
|
Platelet counts were determined from blood draws.
Missing PC assessments at any given time point was considered to be a non-response at that point and were not estimated.
For PC measurements taken after the last dose day (EOT), the postdose windows applied.
If there was more than one PC within the same analysis visit window, the following selection rules were applied sequentially to determine which PC was used for that time point: 1) the PC that was closer to the target date was used, 2) if PC were equal-distance in days from the target day, the later one based on measurement date and time was used, and 3) if there was more than one PC on the same day, if it was a baseline record, the largest one was used; if it was a postbaseline record, the smallest one was used.
|
Day 8 (Visit 5, EOT)
|
|
Percentage of Participants Experiencing Dose-response by Visit
Time Frame: Day 4 (Visit 3), Day 6 ( Visit 4), Day 8 (Visit 5, EOT), 3 Day Post Last Dose (Visit 6), and 7 Day Post Last Dose (Visit 7)
|
Platelet counts were determined from blood draws.
Missing PC assessments at any given time point was considered to be a non-response at that point and were not estimated.
For PC measurements taken after the last dose day (EOT), the postdose windows applied.
If there was more than one PC within the same analysis visit window, the following selection rules were applied sequentially to determine which PC was used for that time point: 1) the PC that was closer to the target date was used, 2) if PC were equal-distance in days from the target day, the later one based on measurement date and time was used, and 3) if there was more than one PC on the same day, if it was a baseline record, the largest one was used; if it was a postbaseline record, the smallest one was used.
|
Day 4 (Visit 3), Day 6 ( Visit 4), Day 8 (Visit 5, EOT), 3 Day Post Last Dose (Visit 6), and 7 Day Post Last Dose (Visit 7)
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Platelet Count Greater Than 75,000/mm^3 on Day 4
Time Frame: Day 4 (Visit 3)
|
Platelet counts were determined from blood draws.
Missing PC assessments at any given time point was considered to be a non-response at that point and were not estimated.
For PC measurements taken after the last dose day (EOT), the postdose windows applied.
If there was more than one PC within the same analysis visit window, the following selection rules were applied sequentially to determine which PC was used for that time point: 1) the PC that was closer to the target date was used, 2) if PC were equal-distance in days from the target day, the later one based on measurement date and time was used, and 3) if there was more than one PC on the same day, if it was a baseline record, the largest one was used; if it was a postbaseline record, the smallest one was used.
|
Day 4 (Visit 3)
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Platelet Count Greater Than 100,000/mm^3 on Days 4 and 8
Time Frame: Day 4 (Visit 3) and Day 8 (Visit 5, EOT)
|
Platelet counts were determined from blood draws.
Missing PC assessments at any given time point was considered to be a non-response at that point and were not estimated.
For PC measurements taken after the last dose day (EOT), the postdose windows applied.
If there was more than one PC within the same analysis visit window, the following selection rules were applied sequentially to determine which PC was used for that time point: 1) the PC that was closer to the target date was used, 2) if PC were equal-distance in days from the target day, the later one based on measurement date and time was used, and 3) if there was more than one PC on the same day, if it was a baseline record, the largest one was used; if it was a postbaseline record, the smallest one was used.
|
Day 4 (Visit 3) and Day 8 (Visit 5, EOT)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: Tim Jenkins, Eisai Inc.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- E5501-G000-202
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.