Early Cardiac Toxicity of Adjuvant CT in Elderly BC.

August 29, 2013 updated by: Jules Bordet Institute

Early Detection of Chemotherapy Induced Cardiac Damage in Elderly Patients With Early Breast Cancer: a Randomized Phase II Trial Comparing (Neo) Adjuvant Epirubicin-cyclophosphamide (EC) Versus Docetaxel (Taxotere)-Cyclophosphamide (TC.)

The primary objective is to evaluate the difference in cardiac strain rate evolution in elderly early BC patients treated with (neo) adjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy compared with a non-anthracycline regimen (Taxotere-cyclophosphamide) CT.

This study also will compare the serum biomarkers profile during and after the (neo) adjuvant CT in both treatment arms, assess whether MRI allows detecting earlier than standard echocardiography the signs of cardiotoxicity, during and after adjuvant (neo) CT, assess whether brain PET-CT allows detecting regional functional impairment in patients receiving CT, evaluate cognitive function before and after (neo) adjuvant CT in both treatment arms, evaluate distress and functional autonomy before and after (neo) adjuvant CT in both treatment arms, evaluate psychological state and burden of primary caregivers before and after (neo) adjuvant CT in both treatment arms, evaluate primary caregivers abilities to detect patients' distress and functional autonomy before and after (neo) adjuvant CT in both treatment arms, evaluate the short and long-term toxicity profile of the regimens, estimate the 10-year risk of relapse and/or death using the Adjuvant!Online tool, and estimate the Framingham risk score for Hard Coronary Heart Disease (10-year risk).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Considering that both anthracycline-based and Taxotere-cyclophosphamide CT have established efficacy in the adjuvant treatment of elderly patients with early breast cancer, and the paucity of data for early cardiac toxicities with anthracycline-based adjuvant therapy compared to non-anthracycline regimen, this is the first randomized study to evaluate early cardiac signs based on doppler myocardial imaging (DMI). The results of this study could improve the monitoring of the cardiac function of elderly patients candidates to receive adjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
2

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Belgium
      • Brussels, Belgium, 1000
        • Institut Jules Bordet

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

  1. Patient selection criteria

    • Female aged equal or more than 65 years.
    • Histological diagnosis of early BC for which the treating physician considers (neo) adjuvant chemotherapy to be beneficial. Recommended situations are:
    • Triple negative BC if pT > 1cm.
    • HER-2 positive BC if pT1 > 1cm; and trastuzumab will be given after study chemotherapy.
    • "Luminal B" cancers defined as ER+, PgR + or neg, Ki-67 ≥ 14%, and pT1 > 1cm.
    • "Luminal A" cancers (ER+, PgR+ and Ki-67 < 14%) will be considered only if ≥ 4 nodes.
    • Poor response to a preoperative endocrine therapy.
    • WHO performance status equal or less than 1.
    • Baseline LVEF equal or more than 50% measured by echocardiography.
    • Adequate organ function including:
    • neutrophils more or equal to 1.5 x 109/L.
    • platelets more or equal to100 x 109/L.
    • bilirubin < 1.25 x upper limit of normal (ULN) for the institution.
    • transaminases: AST < 2.5 x ULN , ALT < 2.5 x ULN and alkaline phosphatase ≤ 2.5 x ULN for the institution.
    • Estimated creatinine clearance > 30ml/min (using the Crockoft and Gault formula) (See Appendix E) .
    • No previous exposure to chemotherapy in this neoadjuvant or adjuvant setting.
    • No serious cardiac illness or medical conditions as judged by the investigator including, but not confined to:Symptomatic ventricular arrhythmias,Clinical and/or ECG evidence of myocardial infarction within the last 12 months,Coronary artery disease requiring medication,High-risk uncontrolled arrhythmias,Poorly controlled hypertension (e.g. systolic >180 mm Hg or diastolic >100 mm Hg).
    • Other concurrent serious diseases that may interfere with planned treatment including severe pulmonary conditions/illness.
    • No participation to other clinical trials involving therapeutic agents within the 6 weeks prior to the randomization.
    • No prior or concurrent diagnosis of cancer, except for adequately treated basocellular and squamous cell carcinoma of the skin or cervical uterine in situ tumor
    • Absence of any psychological, familial, sociological or geographical condition potentially hampering compliance with the study protocol and follow-up schedule; those conditions should be discussed with the patient before registration in the trial.
    • Signed written informed consent must be given according to ICH-GCP and national/local regulations, prior to any study specific screening procedures and randomization.

  2. Caregiver selection criteria

    • to be identified by participating patients as their primary caregivers i.e the person who helps them the most to cope with cancer in their everyday life
    • to be at least eighteen years old
    • to be aware of the cancer diagnosis of the patients to be fit enough to complete the questionnaires
    • to be French speaking
    • to be free of any cognitive dysfunction.
    • to give their written informed consent as regards participation in the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Epirubicin/Cyclophosphamide
Treatment arm 1: EC - epirubicin (100mg/m2 IV) and cyclophosphamide (600mg/m2 IV) every 3 weeks for 4 cycles
Drug: epirubicin, cyclophosphamide, docetaxel
  • Treatment arm 1: EC - epirubicin (100mg/m2 IV) and cyclophosphamide (600mg/m2 IV) every 3 weeks for 4 cycles.
  • Treatment Arm 2: TC - docetaxel (75mg/m2 IV) and cyclophosphamide (600mg/m2 IV) every 3 weeks for 4 cycles.
Other Names:
  • Docetaxel: Taxotere
  • Cyclophosphamide: Endoxan
  • Epirubicin: Epirubicin Teva
Active Comparator: docetaxel/cyclophosphamide
Treatment Arm 2: TC - docetaxel (Taxotere) (75mg/m2 IV) and cyclophosphamide (600mg/m2 IV) every 3 weeks for 4 cycles.
Drug: epirubicin, cyclophosphamide, docetaxel
  • Treatment arm 1: EC - epirubicin (100mg/m2 IV) and cyclophosphamide (600mg/m2 IV) every 3 weeks for 4 cycles.
  • Treatment Arm 2: TC - docetaxel (75mg/m2 IV) and cyclophosphamide (600mg/m2 IV) every 3 weeks for 4 cycles.
Other Names:
  • Docetaxel: Taxotere
  • Cyclophosphamide: Endoxan
  • Epirubicin: Epirubicin Teva

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The difference between cardiac strain rates measured at baseline and after 4 cycles of chemotherapy.
Time Frame: Before chemotherapy, after chemotherapy, at 6 months, one , two and 3 years from randomization.

The primary null hypothesis is that the means are equal versus the alternative hypothesis that the means are different. We plan to perform the comparison using a two-sided Student's t-test with α=5%. The power of the study to detect the difference described below has been set at 90%.

One hundred twenty patients candidate to receive neoadjuvant or adjuvant CT for early BC will be randomized 1:1 to receive either epirubicin-cyclophosphamide (EC) or docetaxel (Taxotere) -cyclophosphamide (TC) for 4 cycles.
Before chemotherapy, after chemotherapy, at 6 months, one , two and 3 years from randomization.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Jules Bordet Institute

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Sanofi

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Lissandra Dal Lago, MD, Jules Bordet Institute
  • Principal Investigator: Evandro De Azambuja, MD, Jules Bordet Institute

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 1, 2013

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 18, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 18, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 23, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 30, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 29, 2013

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2011

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • IJB 11-01
  • 2011-000562-35 (EudraCT Number)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Cancer

Clinical Trials on epirubicin, cyclophosphamide, docetaxel

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings