Early Cardiac Toxicity of Adjuvant CT in Elderly BC.

August 29, 2013 updated by: Jules Bordet Institute

Early Detection of Chemotherapy Induced Cardiac Damage in Elderly Patients With Early Breast Cancer: a Randomized Phase II Trial Comparing (Neo) Adjuvant Epirubicin-cyclophosphamide (EC) Versus Docetaxel (Taxotere)-Cyclophosphamide (TC.)

The primary objective is to evaluate the difference in cardiac strain rate evolution in elderly early BC patients treated with (neo) adjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy compared with a non-anthracycline regimen (Taxotere-cyclophosphamide) CT.

This study also will compare the serum biomarkers profile during and after the (neo) adjuvant CT in both treatment arms, assess whether MRI allows detecting earlier than standard echocardiography the signs of cardiotoxicity, during and after adjuvant (neo) CT, assess whether brain PET-CT allows detecting regional functional impairment in patients receiving CT, evaluate cognitive function before and after (neo) adjuvant CT in both treatment arms, evaluate distress and functional autonomy before and after (neo) adjuvant CT in both treatment arms, evaluate psychological state and burden of primary caregivers before and after (neo) adjuvant CT in both treatment arms, evaluate primary caregivers abilities to detect patients' distress and functional autonomy before and after (neo) adjuvant CT in both treatment arms, evaluate the short and long-term toxicity profile of the regimens, estimate the 10-year risk of relapse and/or death using the Adjuvant!Online tool, and estimate the Framingham risk score for Hard Coronary Heart Disease (10-year risk).

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Detailed Description

Considering that both anthracycline-based and Taxotere-cyclophosphamide CT have established efficacy in the adjuvant treatment of elderly patients with early breast cancer, and the paucity of data for early cardiac toxicities with anthracycline-based adjuvant therapy compared to non-anthracycline regimen, this is the first randomized study to evaluate early cardiac signs based on doppler myocardial imaging (DMI). The results of this study could improve the monitoring of the cardiac function of elderly patients candidates to receive adjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

2

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Brussels, Belgium, 1000
        • Institut Jules Bordet

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

  1. Patient selection criteria

    • Female aged equal or more than 65 years.
    • Histological diagnosis of early BC for which the treating physician considers (neo) adjuvant chemotherapy to be beneficial. Recommended situations are:
    • Triple negative BC if pT > 1cm.
    • HER-2 positive BC if pT1 > 1cm; and trastuzumab will be given after study chemotherapy.
    • "Luminal B" cancers defined as ER+, PgR + or neg, Ki-67 ≥ 14%, and pT1 > 1cm.
    • "Luminal A" cancers (ER+, PgR+ and Ki-67 < 14%) will be considered only if ≥ 4 nodes.
    • Poor response to a preoperative endocrine therapy.
    • WHO performance status equal or less than 1.
    • Baseline LVEF equal or more than 50% measured by echocardiography.
    • Adequate organ function including:
    • neutrophils more or equal to 1.5 x 109/L.
    • platelets more or equal to100 x 109/L.
    • bilirubin < 1.25 x upper limit of normal (ULN) for the institution.
    • transaminases: AST < 2.5 x ULN , ALT < 2.5 x ULN and alkaline phosphatase ≤ 2.5 x ULN for the institution.
    • Estimated creatinine clearance > 30ml/min (using the Crockoft and Gault formula) (See Appendix E) .
    • No previous exposure to chemotherapy in this neoadjuvant or adjuvant setting.
    • No serious cardiac illness or medical conditions as judged by the investigator including, but not confined to:Symptomatic ventricular arrhythmias,Clinical and/or ECG evidence of myocardial infarction within the last 12 months,Coronary artery disease requiring medication,High-risk uncontrolled arrhythmias,Poorly controlled hypertension (e.g. systolic >180 mm Hg or diastolic >100 mm Hg).
    • Other concurrent serious diseases that may interfere with planned treatment including severe pulmonary conditions/illness.
    • No participation to other clinical trials involving therapeutic agents within the 6 weeks prior to the randomization.
    • No prior or concurrent diagnosis of cancer, except for adequately treated basocellular and squamous cell carcinoma of the skin or cervical uterine in situ tumor
    • Absence of any psychological, familial, sociological or geographical condition potentially hampering compliance with the study protocol and follow-up schedule; those conditions should be discussed with the patient before registration in the trial.
    • Signed written informed consent must be given according to ICH-GCP and national/local regulations, prior to any study specific screening procedures and randomization.
  2. Caregiver selection criteria

    • to be identified by participating patients as their primary caregivers i.e the person who helps them the most to cope with cancer in their everyday life
    • to be at least eighteen years old
    • to be aware of the cancer diagnosis of the patients to be fit enough to complete the questionnaires
    • to be French speaking
    • to be free of any cognitive dysfunction.
    • to give their written informed consent as regards participation in the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Epirubicin/Cyclophosphamide
Treatment arm 1: EC - epirubicin (100mg/m2 IV) and cyclophosphamide (600mg/m2 IV) every 3 weeks for 4 cycles
  • Treatment arm 1: EC - epirubicin (100mg/m2 IV) and cyclophosphamide (600mg/m2 IV) every 3 weeks for 4 cycles.
  • Treatment Arm 2: TC - docetaxel (75mg/m2 IV) and cyclophosphamide (600mg/m2 IV) every 3 weeks for 4 cycles.
Other Names:
  • Docetaxel: Taxotere
  • Cyclophosphamide: Endoxan
  • Epirubicin: Epirubicin Teva
Active Comparator: docetaxel/cyclophosphamide
Treatment Arm 2: TC - docetaxel (Taxotere) (75mg/m2 IV) and cyclophosphamide (600mg/m2 IV) every 3 weeks for 4 cycles.
  • Treatment arm 1: EC - epirubicin (100mg/m2 IV) and cyclophosphamide (600mg/m2 IV) every 3 weeks for 4 cycles.
  • Treatment Arm 2: TC - docetaxel (75mg/m2 IV) and cyclophosphamide (600mg/m2 IV) every 3 weeks for 4 cycles.
Other Names:
  • Docetaxel: Taxotere
  • Cyclophosphamide: Endoxan
  • Epirubicin: Epirubicin Teva

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The difference between cardiac strain rates measured at baseline and after 4 cycles of chemotherapy.
Time Frame: Before chemotherapy, after chemotherapy, at 6 months, one , two and 3 years from randomization.

The primary null hypothesis is that the means are equal versus the alternative hypothesis that the means are different. We plan to perform the comparison using a two-sided Student's t-test with α=5%. The power of the study to detect the difference described below has been set at 90%.

One hundred twenty patients candidate to receive neoadjuvant or adjuvant CT for early BC will be randomized 1:1 to receive either epirubicin-cyclophosphamide (EC) or docetaxel (Taxotere) -cyclophosphamide (TC) for 4 cycles.

Before chemotherapy, after chemotherapy, at 6 months, one , two and 3 years from randomization.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Lissandra Dal Lago, MD, Jules Bordet Institute
  • Principal Investigator: Evandro De Azambuja, MD, Jules Bordet Institute

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2013

Study Completion (Anticipated)

March 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 18, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 18, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

February 23, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

August 30, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 29, 2013

Last Verified

February 1, 2011

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Cancer

Clinical Trials on epirubicin, cyclophosphamide, docetaxel

3
Subscribe