A Comparison of Indirect and Direct MR Arthrography of the Shoulder Using Arthroscopic Correlation

March 24, 2014 updated by: Milton S. Hershey Medical Center

A Prospective Comparison of Indirect and Direct MR Arthrography of the Shoulder Using Arthroscopic Correlation

This study will prospectively compare the findings of two diagnostic tests, Direct Magnetic Resonance Arthrography(MRA) and Indirect MRA, to the findings during shoulder arthroscopy in patients with shoulder pain. The sensitivity and specificity of both Direct and Indirect MRA's in diagnosing specific pathologies of the shoulder will be determined using shoulder arthroscopy as the gold standard.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Withdrawn

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Direct MR arthrography (MRA) requires the injection of a contrast agent into the shoulder under fluoroscopic or ultrasound guidance, followed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). This is invasive, risks infection, and requires time and resources. It has recently been shown that the intravenous administration of gadopentetate dimeglumine enhances the joint cavity during an MRI and thus indirectly produces an arthrographic effect(Indirect MRA). The study will enroll patients who have already had a Direct MRA as part of their standard of care diagnostic test for shoulder pain, if it is determined by their surgeon that arthroscopic surgery is indicated they will be asked if they would be willing to have an Indirect MRA prior to their arthroscopic surgery. The patient will need to have a blood test(BUN and Creatinine)done to ensure kidney function is normal, and a serum and urine pregnancy test, if female, to ensure there is no pregnancy, prior to the completion of the Indirect MRA. After the patient's scheduled shoulder arthroscopic surgery, the results of the two MR arthrography techniques will be compared for sensitivity and specificity in detecting partial and full thickness rotator cuff tears, labral tears, long head biceps dislocation/tearing, and grade IV cartilage lesions by comparing the results to the actual arthroscopic findings. The Direct MR arthrography and arthroscopic surgery are standard of care and would occur regardless of this study, the Indirect MR arthrography is the diagnostic intervention that is study-related.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Pennsylvania
      • Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States, 17033
        • Bone and Joint Institute, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients between 18 - 70 years old
  • Continued shoulder pain for 2 months duration that limits his/her activity despite conservative treatment
  • Had a standard of care Direct MR arthrogram performed from which the surgeon determined that arthroscopic surgery was indicated.

Exclusion Criteria:

Clinical Evidence of

  • Tumor
  • Infection
  • Previous shoulder surgery
  • Contraindication for MRI
  • Allergy to contrast
  • Coagulopathy
  • Known allergy to gadolinium DTPA
  • Renal failure with creatinine clearance of less than 30ml/min
  • Pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: DIAGNOSTIC
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
EXPERIMENTAL: Indirect MRA
After patient has signed consent and had blood tests to ensure normal kidney function (BUN and Creatinine) as well as serum and urine pregnancy tests for females to ensure there is no pregnancy, the patient will have an Indirect MRA. The participant will be weighed and the correct dose of 0.1 mmol/kg calculated. An IV will be inserted into participant's arm. The gadopentetate dimeglumine will be injected into the IV and the patient will be asked to gently exercise the shoulder (small windmills and flexion/extension) for 5 minutes. The patients then undergo MRI imaging 15-30 minutes after the injection. Contraindications include known allergy to gadopentetate dimeglumine, and renal failure with creatinine clearance of less than 30ml/min.
Procedure: Indirect MRA of shoulder
Patient will be weighed and the correct dose of 0.1 mmol/kg calculated. An IV will be inserted into patient's arm. The gadopentetate dimeglumine will be injected into the IV and the patient is asked to gently exercise the shoulder (small windmills and flexion/extension) for 5 minutes. The patients then undergo MRI imaging 15-30 minutes after the injection. Contraindications include known allergy to gadopentetate dimeglumine, and renal failure with creatinine clearance of less than 30ml/min.
Drug: Gadopentetate Dimeglumine
Patient will be weighed and the correct dose of 0.1 mmol/kg calculated. An IV will be inserted into patient's arm. The gadopentetate dimeglumine will be injected into the IV and the patient is asked to gently exercise the shoulder (small windmills and flexion/extension) for 5 minutes. The patients then undergo MRI imaging 15-30 minutes after the injection. Contraindications include known allergy to gadopentetate dimeglumine, and renal failure with creatinine clearance of less than 30ml/min.
Other Names:
  • Magnevist
  • gadolinium DTPA

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sensitivity and specificity of Direct and Indirect MR Arthrograms in detecting pathologies of the shoulder when compared with Arthroscopic findings.
Time Frame: Patients will be foollowed from their Indirect MRA to their arthoscopic shoulder surgery, approximately one month from time of consent
This study will compare the findings of the Indirect MRA and the retrospective data of the Direct MRA, to the results obtained during their arthroscopic shoulder surgery in patients with shoulder pain. The incidence of partial and full thickness rotator cuff tears, long head biceps dislocation/tearing, and grade IV cartilage lesions will be recorded for each type of MRA of the shoulder. The sensitivity and specificity of both direct and indirect MR arthrography in diagnosing shoulder problems will be determined by what was actually visualized during their arthroscopic shoulder surgery.
Patients will be foollowed from their Indirect MRA to their arthoscopic shoulder surgery, approximately one month from time of consent

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Milton S. Hershey Medical Center

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Robert Lyons, MD, Milton S. Hershey Medical Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 1, 2009

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 1, 2012

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 11, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 12, 2011

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 15, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 26, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 24, 2014

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2011

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 31905

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Shoulder Pain

Clinical Trials on Indirect MRA of shoulder

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings