An Efficacy and Safety Study Comparing Oral Contraceptive Containing Norgestimate or Desogestrel for Acne Treatment

June 14, 2013 updated by: Janssen-Cilag Ltd.,Thailand

Comparative Study of the Effect on Acne With Norgestimate Containing Triphasic Oral Contraceptive and Biphasic Preparation Containing Desogestrel

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Ethinyl estradiol and Norgestimate (EE/NGM) compared to Ethinyl estradiol and Desogestrel (EE/DSG), for treatment of female participants with mild to moderate acne vulgaris (pimples).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This is a single-blind (physician does not know the name of the assigned drug) and randomized (study drug assigned by chance) study to compare the effectiveness and safety of EE/NGM and EE/DSG in female participants using oral contraceptive and have mild to moderate acne vulgaris. Tablets of EE/NGM and EE/DSG will be administered orally once daily for 6 months and will be instructed to visit for evaluation at Month 1, 3 and 6 post-administration. The efficacy will be evaluated efficacy primarily through total acne lesions count, which will be recorded at these evaluation visits. Unused study medications will be collected and drug accountability will be documented. Participants' safety will be monitored throughout the study.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
201

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Thailand
      • Bangkok, Thailand
        • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University
      • Bangkok, Thailand
        • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University
      • Chiang Mai, Thailand
        • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 45 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria: - Needs contraception in the family planning - Mild to moderate acne vulgaris - Agrees to take only the supplied study drug as treatment for acne during the 6-month treatment phase of the study - Signs and dates an informed consent to participate in the study - female participants aged 18 to 45 years Exclusion Criteria: - Pregnant or nursing - Known hypersensitivity to any of the ingredients and currently having significant adverse experiences from ethinyl estradiol, norgestimate or desogestrel - Any coexisting medical condition or were taking any concomitant medication that is likely to interfere with safe administration of ethinyl estradiol/norgestimate and ethinyl estradiol/desogestrel, in the Investigator's opinion - Taking system retinoids, systemic antimicrobials, and topical acne treatments within 6 months, 1 month, and 2 weeks prior to enrollment, respectively - Taking investigational medication or oral contraceptives within 30 days prior to Screening

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Ethinyl estradiol/Norgestimate (EE/NGM)
Drug: Ethinyl estradiol/Norgestimate (EE/NGM)
Ethinyl estradiol/Norgestimate encapsulated oral tablet will be administered once daily at bed time as 0.035/0.18 milligram (mg) for Days 1-7, 0.035/0.215 mg for Days 8-14, and 0.035/0.250 mg for Days 15-21 of EE/NGM, respectively up to 6 consecutive menstrual cycles consisting of 21 days each.
Other Names:
  • Tricilest
Active Comparator: Ethinyl estradiol/Desogestrel (EE/DSG)
Drug: Ethinyl estradiol/Desogestrel (EE/DSG)
Ethinyl estradiol/Desogestrel oral formulation will be administered once daily at bed time as 0.040/0.025 mg for Days 1-7, 0.030/0.125 mg for Days 8-22 of EE/DSG, respectively up to 6 consecutive menstrual cycles consisting of 22 days each.
Other Names:
  • Oilezz

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Total and Each Type of Acne Lesions Count at Month 1
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 1
Total acne (pimples) lesion (abnormal area of tissue, such as a wound, sore, rash, or boil) count is summation of all lesions which includes all comedones (open and closed), papules, pustules, and nodules. Change from Baseline means lesions at Baseline minus lesions at Month 1. Positive value indicates decrease in lesion count while negative value indicates increase in lesion count.
Baseline and Month 1
Change From Baseline in Total and Each Type of Acne Lesions Count at Month 3
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 3
Total acne (pimples) lesion (abnormal area of tissue, such as a wound, sore, rash, or boil) count is summation of all lesions which includes all comedones (open and closed), papules, pustules, and nodules. Change from Baseline means lesions at Baseline minus lesions at Month 3. Positive value indicates decrease in lesion count while negative value indicates increase in lesion count.
Baseline and Month 3
Change From Baseline in Total and Each Type of Acne Lesions Count at Month 6
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 6
Total acne (pimples) lesion (abnormal area of tissue, such as a wound, sore, rash, or boil) count is summation of all lesions which includes all comedones (open and closed), papules, pustules, and nodules. Change from Baseline means lesions at Baseline minus lesions at Month 6. Positive value indicates decrease in lesion count while negative value indicates increase in lesion count.
Baseline and Month 6

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Abnormal Vaginal Blood Loss at Month 1, 3 and 6
Time Frame: Month 1, 3 and 6
Vaginal blood loss encompasses spotting and bleeding. Spotting is defined as a bleeding requiring no or at most one sanitary pad per day; however, bleeding requires two or more sanitary pads per day.
Month 1, 3 and 6
Number of Participants Non-Compliant With Therapy
Time Frame: Month 1, 3 and 6
Compliance was assessed by transforming the data of forgotten tablets listed in the diary cards. Number of participants who forgot to take the drug was reported.
Month 1, 3 and 6
Percentage of Participants With Categorical Score for Sebum Assessment at Month 1, 3 and 6
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 1, 3 and 6
Sebum assessment that is facial seborrhea (very oily skin) was assessed using sebutape strip on the forehead. Percentage of participants with facial seborrhea were assessed using categorical scores ranging from level 1 (lowest) to level 5 (highest). Highest level indicates worsening.
Baseline and Month 1, 3 and 6
Percentage of Participants Showing Treatment Response on the Investigator's Global Assessment at Month 6
Time Frame: Month 6
Percentage of participants showing treatment response on the Investigator's global assessment was graded on a 5-point scale as 0=worse, 1=no change, 2=fair, 3=good, and 4=excellent.
Month 6
Number of Participants With Treatment Response at the End-of-Therapy by Participant's Self-Assessment at Month 6
Time Frame: Month 6
Participant's self-assessment at end-of-therapy was measured by using the self-assessment questionnaire which included 3 questions, about the rating of acne improvement since start of study; comparison of this acne treatment with the one used in past and the continuity of treatment on physician's prescription to evaluate efficacy and acceptability of the study medication. The score was graded at 4 parameters as excellent, better, no change and worse.
Month 6
Change From Baseline in Blood Pressure (BP) at Month 6
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 6
Blood pressure is the pressure of blood flowing through blood vessels. Change from Baseline in blood pressure is the value at Month 6 minus value at Baseline.
Baseline and Month 6
Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Month 6
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 6
Change from Baseline in body weight is the value at Month 6 minus value at Baseline.
Baseline and Month 6

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Janssen-Cilag Ltd.,Thailand

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 24, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 3, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 8, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 19, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 14, 2013

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CR015448
  • NRGMONCON4003

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings