Quality of Life Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive and Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer

August 5, 2021 updated by: Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
The goal of this study is to evaluate how surgery for esophageal cancer affects the patient's quality of life over time. The investigators hope this study will provide important information that can be used to improve the quality of life of patients with esophageal cancer. This study will also look at how standard tests and information collected from the patients difficulty swallowing can predict the extent of their esophageal cancer before surgery.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
257

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10065
        • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Subjects will be recruited from the Thoracic Surgery clinics.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18 or older
  • Diagnosis of esophageal cancer, stages I-IIIC, with no prior esophageal resection. Neoadjuvant therapy given prior to presentation at MSKCC will be accepted.
  • Anticipated to undergo surgical resection (Ivor Lewis, Trans Hiatal, thoracoabdominal, or McKeown procedure) of esophageal cancer either by open or minimally invasive methods
  • Chest and abdomen CT scan
  • Ability to speak read and write English.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to give informed consent
  • Patients requiring a laryngectomy or colon interposition as part of their surgical resection.
  • Patients with scleroderma.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Pts having Minimally Invasive esophagectomy
This is a prospective non-randomized study comprising two surgical cohorts of esophageal cancer patients. Patients will be assigned to each of the two intervention groups, MIE versus OE, based on a combination of patient referral patterns, patient preference, and surgeon preference/expertise.
Behavioral: Quality of Life instruments, FACT-E, Symptom Assessment Scale, Brief Pain Inventory and Daily Analgesic Log
Initial pre-operative assessment post-operative assessment in-hospital assessment at first post-operative visit (clinic visits, or by telephone or mail) assessments at 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24 months post-operatively (+/- 2 month window). For patients who have their surgery delayed, they may be asked to complete another, more updated set of pre-surgery surveys. For the dysphagia score and CT Scan vs EUS subset will be a dysphagia questionnaire, administered at the time of the initial clinic visit.
Pts having open esophagectomy
This is a prospective non-randomized study comprising two surgical cohorts of esophageal cancer patients. Patients will be assigned to each of the two intervention groups, MIE versus OE, based on a combination of patient referral patterns, patient preference, and surgeon preference/expertise.
Behavioral: Quality of Life instruments, FACT-E, Symptom Assessment Scale, Brief Pain Inventory and Daily Analgesic Log
Initial pre-operative assessment post-operative assessment in-hospital assessment at first post-operative visit (clinic visits, or by telephone or mail) assessments at 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24 months post-operatively (+/- 2 month window). For patients who have their surgery delayed, they may be asked to complete another, more updated set of pre-surgery surveys. For the dysphagia score and CT Scan vs EUS subset will be a dysphagia questionnaire, administered at the time of the initial clinic visit.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
short-term pain
Time Frame: 4 months
Pain intensity (average of the four pain severity items) measured by BPI at Post-op Days 1 and 3, after epidural removal, at first post-operative clinic visit, at 4 months
4 months
short -term quality of life (QOL)
Time Frame: 4 months
FACT-E score at the post-op visit and at the 4 months
4 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
long-term pain
Time Frame: 2 years
Pain intensity assessed by BPI at 8 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months (average of the four pain severity items) Presence of symptoms with intensity ≥3, as assessed by the Symptom Assessment Scale at post-op visit, at 4 months visit (adjusted for pre-operative symptom intensity )
2 years
long time quality of life (QOL)
Time Frame: 2 years
FACT- E score at 8 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months. Presence of symptoms with intensity ≥3, assessed by the Symptom Assessment Scale at 8 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months
2 years
differences in surgical outcomes
Time Frame: 90 days
operative time, estimated blood loss, length of hospital stay, ICU admission rates, ICU days, complication type, rates and severity as determined by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) utilized by MSKCC, rate of anastomotic leak, rate of anastomotic stricture, 90-day (post-operative) hospital readmission rates, time to oral intake, and time to first ambulation.
90 days
Complications
Time Frame: 90 days
operative time, estimated blood loss, length of hospital stay, ICU admission rates, ICU days, complication type, rates and severity as determined by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) utilized by MSKCC, rate of anastomotic leak, rate of anastomotic stricture, 90-day (post-operative) hospital readmission rates, time to oral intake, and time to first ambulation.
90 days

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
predict EUS T3/T4/stricture disease
Time Frame: 2 years
To evaluate whether a combination of a dysphagia score of 2-4 and a specific CT scan maximal tumor thickness. the patient's CT scan (either performed elsewhere or at MSK) will be reviewed by one radiologist, who will assess the maximal thickness of tumor involvement (>=cm). Patients will then undergo their planned a staging Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) by the gastroenterology service, at which time the EUS depth of invasion will be assigned. The dysphagia score and CT thickness will then be compared to the EUS depth (considered the 'gold standard')
2 years
predict EUS T3/T4/stricture or earlier EUS disease
Time Frame: 2 years
the patient's CT scan (either performed elsewhere or at MSK) will be reviewed by one radiologist, who will assess the maximal thickness of tumor involvement (>=cm). Patients will then undergo their planned staging Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) by the gastroenterology service, at which time the EUS depth of invasion will be assigned. The dysphagia score and CT thickness will then be compared to the EUS depth (considered the 'gold standard')
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Matthew Bott, MD, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 14, 2012

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 4, 2021

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 4, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 16, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 19, 2012

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 20, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 6, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 5, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 12-003

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings