Rapid Sequence Intubation Drug Delivery Using Intraosseous and IV Access in Pediatric Patients Observational Study
A Pilot Study of Intubating Conditions Comparing Intraosseous Vascular Access With Peripheral Intravenous Access for Drug Delivery in Rapid Sequence Intubation Using Rocuronium as the Paralytic Agent
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Study Type
Study Type
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Nebraska
-
Omaha, Nebraska, United States, 68198
- Omaha Children's Hospital and Medical Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- subjects requiring rapid sequence intubation for whom rocuronium is chosen as the paralytic agent.
- the operator chooses to place a peripheral intravenous or powered intraosseous catheter to permit rapid sequence intubation.
Exclusion Criteria:
- subjects in whom vascular access for rapid sequence intubation drug administration was established prior to arrival to the emergency department.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Number of groups / cohorts
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / CohortGroup / Cohort |
|---|
|
Intraosseous (IO) drug delivery
patients in whom intraosseous (IO) vascular access has been established for rapid sequence intubation drug delivery.
|
|
Peripheral intravenous (IV) drug delivery
patients in whom peripheral intravenous (IV) vascular access has been established for rapid sequence intubation drug delivery.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Time from determination of need for vascular access for rapid sequence intubation to administration of first does of paralytic agent.
Time Frame: during rapid sequence intubation procedure, average expected time frame 30 minutes
|
Time from determination of need for vascular access for rapid sequence intubation to administration of first does of paralytic agent.
|
during rapid sequence intubation procedure, average expected time frame 30 minutes
|
|
Time from vascular access to intubation first attempt, as indicated by the first attempt to visualize the larynx with the laryngoscope.
Time Frame: during rapid sequence intubation procedure, average expected time frame 30 minutes
|
Time from vascular access to intubation first attempt, as indicated by the first attempt to visualize the larynx with the laryngoscope.
|
during rapid sequence intubation procedure, average expected time frame 30 minutes
|
|
time from vascular access to successful intubation
Time Frame: during rapid sequence intubation procedure, average expected time frame 30 minutes
|
time from vascular access to successful intubation
|
during rapid sequence intubation procedure, average expected time frame 30 minutes
|
|
number of attempts necessary for successful intubation
Time Frame: during rapid sequence intubation procedure, average expected time frame 30 minutes
|
number of attempts necessary for successful intubation
|
during rapid sequence intubation procedure, average expected time frame 30 minutes
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Intubation difficulty
Time Frame: during rapid sequence intubation procedure, average time frame 30 minutes
|
The Intubation Difficulty Scale is a validated tool used to grade the difficulty with which a patient was intubated for airway managment during rapid sequence intubation.
|
during rapid sequence intubation procedure, average time frame 30 minutes
|
|
failure rate of endotracheal intubation
Time Frame: during rapid sequence intubation procedure, average time frame 30 minutes
|
failure rate of endotracheal intubation and requirement for alternative airway management.
|
during rapid sequence intubation procedure, average time frame 30 minutes
|
|
operator satisfaction with intubating conditions
Time Frame: during rapid sequence intubation procedure, average time frame 30 minutes
|
operator satisfaction with intubating conditions
|
during rapid sequence intubation procedure, average time frame 30 minutes
|
|
Time from presentation of patient to vascular access established
Time Frame: during rapid sequence intubation procedure, average time frame 30 minutes
|
Time from presentation of patient to vascular access established
|
during rapid sequence intubation procedure, average time frame 30 minutes
|
|
Determine the incidence of short term catheter related complications for each technique
Time Frame: during emergency department stay, average time frame 24 hours
|
Determine the incidence of short term catheter related complications for each technique
|
during emergency department stay, average time frame 24 hours
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Edward Truemper, MD, University of Nebraska
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Adnet F, Borron SW, Racine SX, Clemessy JL, Fournier JL, Plaisance P, Lapandry C. The intubation difficulty scale (IDS): proposal and evaluation of a new score characterizing the complexity of endotracheal intubation. Anesthesiology. 1997 Dec;87(6):1290-7. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199712000-00005.
- Reades R, Studnek JR, Vandeventer S, Garrett J. Intraosseous versus intravenous vascular access during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Emerg Med. 2011 Dec;58(6):509-16. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.07.020.
- Leidel BA, Kirchhoff C, Bogner V, Braunstein V, Biberthaler P, Kanz KG. Comparison of intraosseous versus central venous vascular access in adults under resuscitation in the emergency department with inaccessible peripheral veins. Resuscitation. 2012 Jan;83(1):40-5. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.08.017. Epub 2011 Sep 3.
- Von Hoff DD, Kuhn JG, Burris HA 3rd, Miller LJ. Does intraosseous equal intravenous? A pharmacokinetic study. Am J Emerg Med. 2008 Jan;26(1):31-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2007.03.024.
- Orlowski JP, Porembka DT, Gallagher JM, Lockrem JD, VanLente F. Comparison study of intraosseous, central intravenous, and peripheral intravenous infusions of emergency drugs. Am J Dis Child. 1990 Jan;144(1):112-7. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1990.02150250124049.
- Laurin EG, Sakles JC, Panacek EA, Rantapaa AA, Redd J. A comparison of succinylcholine and rocuronium for rapid-sequence intubation of emergency department patients. Acad Emerg Med. 2000 Dec;7(12):1362-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2000.tb00493.x.
- Perry JJ, Lee JS, Sillberg VA, Wells GA. Rocuronium versus succinylcholine for rapid sequence induction intubation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Apr 16;(2):CD002788. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002788.pub2.
- Kleinman ME, de Caen AR, Chameides L, Atkins DL, Berg RA, Berg MD, Bhanji F, Biarent D, Bingham R, Coovadia AH, Hazinski MF, Hickey RW, Nadkarni VM, Reis AG, Rodriguez-Nunez A, Tibballs J, Zaritsky AL, Zideman D; Pediatric Basic and Advanced Life Support Chapter Collaborators. Part 10: Pediatric basic and advanced life support: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations. Circulation. 2010 Oct 19;122(16 Suppl 2):S466-515. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.971093.
- Brierley J, Carcillo JA, Choong K, Cornell T, Decaen A, Deymann A, Doctor A, Davis A, Duff J, Dugas MA, Duncan A, Evans B, Feldman J, Felmet K, Fisher G, Frankel L, Jeffries H, Greenwald B, Gutierrez J, Hall M, Han YY, Hanson J, Hazelzet J, Hernan L, Kiff J, Kissoon N, Kon A, Irazuzta J, Lin J, Lorts A, Mariscalco M, Mehta R, Nadel S, Nguyen T, Nicholson C, Peters M, Okhuysen-Cawley R, Poulton T, Relves M, Rodriguez A, Rozenfeld R, Schnitzler E, Shanley T, Kache S, Skippen P, Torres A, von Dessauer B, Weingarten J, Yeh T, Zaritsky A, Stojadinovic B, Zimmerman J, Zuckerberg A. Clinical practice parameters for hemodynamic support of pediatric and neonatal septic shock: 2007 update from the American College of Critical Care Medicine. Crit Care Med. 2009 Feb;37(2):666-88. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31819323c6.
- Deakin CD, Nolan JP, Soar J, Sunde K, Koster RW, Smith GB, Perkins GD. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2010 Section 4. Adult advanced life support. Resuscitation. 2010 Oct;81(10):1305-52. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.08.017. No abstract available.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimated)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2012-03
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Airway Control
-
NCT07274280Active, not recruiting
-
NCT04258215Withdrawn
-
NCT07086378CompletedAirway Management | Endoscopy, Digestive System | Airway Control | Airway Anesthesia
-
NCT01486407Terminated
-
NCT07391969Not yet recruitingAnesthesia | Laparoscopic Surgical Procedures | Airway Control
-
NCT06718361CompletedIntubation | Airway Control | Oxygen Delivery | Concentration
-
NCT04924621RecruitingAirway Control | Sedative, Hypnotic, or Anxiolytic Withdrawal
-
NCT01823328CompletedIntubation | Anesthesia | Complication | Airway Control
-
NCT04100564CompletedTrauma Injury | Airway Control
-
NCT02193737CompletedScheduled General Anaesthesia With Airway Control