Effects of Intraarticular Botulinum Toxin A in Ankle Osteoarthritis
Comparing Effects of Intraarticular Botulinum Toxin A Versus Hyaluronate Plus Rehabilitation Exercise in Patients With Unilateral Ankle Osteoarthritis
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Kaohsiung, Taiwan, 813
- Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, No 386, Ta-Chung 1st Road
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- an age of 20-85 years with diagnosis of ankle osteoarthritis
- unilateral ankle pain that had lasted for at least 6 months, with no significant benefit from conservative treatment or with an inability to tolerate the side effects of medications
- ankle radiographs taken within 6 months equivalent to grade 2 on the Kellgren-Lawrence grading system
- a current total Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale (AOS) score of >3 and < 9 (possible range, 0-10)
- a normal activity level-i.e., not bedridden or confined to a wheelchair, and are able to walk 30 meters without the aid of a walker, crutches or cane
- no changes in shoes or orthotic devices during the study period.
Exclusion Criteria:
- pregnancy or lactation in women
- lower leg trauma other than ankle trauma
- previous surgery involving the spine, hip or knee
- the presence of an active joint infections of foot or ankle
- previous surgery or arthroscopy on the ankle within 12 months
- history of chicken or egg allergy
- intraarticular steroid or hyaluronate injection in the treated ankle within the previous 6 months
- treatment with anticoagulants or immunosuppressives
- a history of rheumatoid arthritis, gout, or any other inflammatory arthropathy
- the presence of other comorbidity (such as neoplasms, diabetes mellitus, paresis or recent trauma) or poor health status that would interfere with the clinical assessments during the study.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: The Botulinum Toxin A group
The Botulinum Toxin A group received intraarticular injections of 100 units of Botulinum Toxin A (Allergan, Inc, Irvine CA) reconstituted in 2 cc normal saline.
|
patients received intraarticular injections by the same experienced physician using aseptic procedures.
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: The hyaluronate group (Hyalgan, Italy)
The hyaluronate group received intraarticular injections of 2 ml sodium hyaluronate (Hyalgan, molecular weight 500-730kDa, Fidia Pharmaceutical Corporation, Abano Terme, Italy) and subsequent 6 sessions of rehabilitation exercise for 50 miniutes/day, 3 days per week for 2 weeks and home exercise for 2 weeks .
|
The rehabilitation program consists of 6 sessions of rehabilitation exercise for 50 miniutes/day, 3 days per week for 2 weeks and home exercise program for another 2 weeks.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale (AOS) score
Time Frame: at 6 months after the injection
|
The AOS is a patient-rated, validated outcome measure that includes nine items on a pain subscale and nine items on a disability subscale.Using the AOS, a score of 0 represent no pain or disability and 10 represent worst pain or disability imaginable
|
at 6 months after the injection
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
AOFAS ankle/hindfoot score
Time Frame: pre-injection and at 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months post injection.
|
AOFAS ankle/hindfoot score is a 100-point scale that devotes 40 points to pain, 50 points to function and 10 points to alignment.
|
pre-injection and at 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months post injection.
|
|
Visual analog scale (VAS)
Time Frame: pre-injection and at 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months post injection
|
The patient rate the intensity of average ankle movement pain in the previous week using a 10-cm horizontal Visual analog scale (VAS)
|
pre-injection and at 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months post injection
|
|
Single-leg stance test (SLS)
Time Frame: pre-injection and at 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months post injection
|
Single-leg stance test (SLS) is done by raising one foot up without touching it to the supported lower extremity with ankle OA and maintain balance for as long as possible
|
pre-injection and at 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months post injection
|
|
Timed " Up-and-Go" test (TUG)
Time Frame: pre-injection and at 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months post injection
|
A Timed " Up-and-Go" test (TUG) measures functional mobility and the dynamic balance of an individual.
|
pre-injection and at 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months post injection
|
|
global Patients satisfaction
Time Frame: at 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months post injection.
|
This rating is based on a 7-point categorical scale ranging from completely satisfied, satisfied, somewhat satisfied, no change, somewhat unsatisfied, unsatisfied to completely unsatisfied.
|
at 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months post injection.
|
|
adverse effects
Time Frame: at 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months post injection.
|
patients recorded any systemic and local adverse effects (defined as any unwanted effect whether it was thought to be related to the study or not) on a diary card.
|
at 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months post injection.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Shu-Fen Sun, MD, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Aoki KR. Evidence for antinociceptive activity of botulinum toxin type A in pain management. Headache. 2003 Jul-Aug;43 Suppl 1:S9-15. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-4610.43.7s.3.x.
- Sun SF, Chou YJ, Hsu CW, Hwang CW, Hsu PT, Wang JL, Hsu YW, Chou MC. Efficacy of intra-articular hyaluronic acid in patients with osteoarthritis of the ankle: a prospective study. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2006 Sep;14(9):867-74. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2006.03.003. Epub 2006 Apr 24.
- Sun SF, Hsu CW, Sun HP, Chou YJ, Li HJ, Wang JL. The effect of three weekly intra-articular injections of hyaluronate on pain, function, and balance in patients with unilateral ankle arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Sep 21;93(18):1720-6. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.00315.
- Mahowald ML, Singh JA, Dykstra D. Long term effects of intra-articular botulinum toxin A for refractory joint pain. Neurotox Res. 2006 Apr;9(2-3):179-88. doi: 10.1007/BF03033937.
- Singh JA, Mahowald ML, Kushnaryov A, Goelz E, Dykstra D. Repeat injections of intra-articular botulinum toxin a for the treatment of chronic arthritis joint pain. J Clin Rheumatol. 2009 Feb;15(1):35-8. doi: 10.1097/RHU.0b013e3181953b14. No abstract available.
- Singh JA, Mahowald ML, Noorbaloochi S. Intra-articular botulinum toxin A for refractory shoulder pain: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. Transl Res. 2009 May;153(5):205-16. doi: 10.1016/j.trsl.2009.02.004. Epub 2009 Mar 13.
- Mahowald ML, Krug HE, Singh JA, Dykstra D. Intra-articular Botulinum Toxin Type A: a new approach to treat arthritis joint pain. Toxicon. 2009 Oct;54(5):658-67. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2009.03.028. Epub 2009 Apr 5.
- Sun SF, Chou YJ, Hsu CW, Chen WL. Hyaluronic acid as a treatment for ankle osteoarthritis. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2009 Jun;2(2):78-82. doi: 10.1007/s12178-009-9048-5. Epub 2009 Mar 13.
- Konttinen YT, Kemppinen P, Segerberg M, Hukkanen M, Rees R, Santavirta S, Sorsa T, Pertovaara A, Polak JM. Peripheral and spinal neural mechanisms in arthritis, with particular reference to treatment of inflammation and pain. Arthritis Rheum. 1994 Jul;37(7):965-82. doi: 10.1002/art.1780370701. No abstract available.
- Sun SF, Hsu CW, Lin HS, Chou YJ, Chen JY, Wang JL. Efficacy of intraarticular botulinum toxin A and intraarticular hyaluronate plus rehabilitation exercise in patients with unilateral ankle osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial. J Foot Ankle Res. 2014 Feb 6;7(1):9. doi: 10.1186/1757-1146-7-9.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Joint Diseases
- Musculoskeletal Diseases
- Rheumatic Diseases
- Arthritis
- Osteoarthritis
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Neurotransmitter Agents
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Peripheral Nervous System Agents
- Cholinergic Agents
- Immunologic Factors
- Protective Agents
- Membrane Transport Modulators
- Adjuvants, Immunologic
- Acetylcholine Release Inhibitors
- Neuromuscular Agents
- Viscosupplements
- Botulinum Toxins
- Botulinum Toxins, Type A
- abobotulinumtoxinA
- Hyaluronic Acid
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- VGHKS100-061
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.