Safety and Efficacy of Diverse Mesenchymal Stem Cells Transplantation for Liver Failure

July 4, 2013 updated by: Qi Zhang, MD, Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University

Clinical Comparison of Safety and Efficacy of Allogeneic Umbilical-Cord and Bone Marrow-derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Transplantation for HBV-related Liver Failure

HBV-related liver failure (HBV-LF), a dramatic clinical syndrome, is characterized with massive necrosis of liver cells. Liver transplantation might be the most effective therapy for HBV-LF. However, there are a lot of problems such as lack of donors, surgical complications, transplant rejection, and high cost, which could limit the application of liver transplantation. It is demonstrated that mesenchymal stem cells could directionally differentiate into hepatocytes and cholangiocytes in injured liver, as well as reduce inflammation of the liver by immune regulation. In this study, we assess the safety and efficacy of human bone marrow and umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells transplantation for patients with HBV-LF.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
210

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Qi Zhang, Doctor
  • Phone Number: +86 20 85253106
  • Email: kee_kee@126.com

Study Locations

  • China
    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510630
        • Recruiting
        • Qi Zhang
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Qi Zhang, Doctor

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged 18-65 years
  • Liver failure
  • Negative pregnancy test (female patients in fertile age)
  • Written consent
  • HBsAg positive
  • TB≥171 μmol/L or ascend ≥17.1 μmol/L/per day,
  • INR≥1.5 or 20%<PTA≤40%
  • 17≤MELD score≤30

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Hepatocellular carcinoma or other malignancies
  • Severe problems in other vital organs(e.g.the heart,renal or lungs)
  • Pregnant or lactating women
  • Severe bacteria infection
  • Anticipated with difficulty of follow-up observation
  • Liver failure caused by other reasons, such as autoimmune diseases, alcohol, drug and so on
  • Other candidates who are judged to be not applicable to this study by doctors

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Conventional treatment
Participants will receive conventional treatment and then be followed until the week 72 study visit.
Drug: Conventional treatment

Received conventional treatment including:

A.antiviral drugs(Entecavir,Lamivudine,Adefovir dipivoxil,et al); B.Hepatoprotective drugs(Ademetionine1,4-butanethiosulfonate for Injection, Reduced Glutathione for Injection,Polyene Phosphatidylcholine, et al); C.Plasma.

Other Names:
  • Antiviral drugs
  • Hepatoprotective drugs
  • Plasma
Experimental: Conventional plus BM-MSC treatment
Participants will receive conventional treatment plus a dose of BM-MSC(each subgroups with a different dose ) and then be followed until the week 72 study visit.
Genetic: Conventional plus BM-MSC treatment
Received conventional treatment and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells transplantation by peripheral vein slowly for 30minutes. (1×10e5/Kg,1×10e6/Kg,or 1×10e7/Kg, once a week, 8 times).
Experimental: Conventional plus UC-MSC treatment
Participants will receive conventional treatment plus a dose of UC-MSC(each subgroups with a different dose ) and then be followed until the week 72 study visit.
Genetic: Conventional plus UC-MSC treatment
Received conventional treatment and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells transplantation by peripheral vein slowly for 30minutes. (1×10e5/Kg,1×10e6/Kg,or 1×10e7/Kg, once a week, 8 times)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
survival rate
Time Frame: 72 weeks
The survival rate and time
72 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Liver function
Time Frame: 72 weeks after treatment
The levels of serum Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST),Cholinesterase (CHE) ,Total Bilirubin(TB),Direct Bilirubin(DB), Serum Albumin （ALB）
72 weeks after treatment
Marker of liver cancer
Time Frame: 72 weeks after treatment
The level of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP)
72 weeks after treatment
The degree of hepatic necrosis
Time Frame: 2 years after treatment
The levels of Prothrombin Activity (PA) and Prothrombin Time (PT)
2 years after treatment
The improvement of symptoms
Time Frame: 72 weeks after treatment
The improvement of clinical symptoms [including appetite, debilitation, abdominal distension, edema of lower limbs, et al
72 weeks after treatment
The score for Model for End-Stage Liver Disease
Time Frame: 72 weeks after treatment
72 weeks after treatment
The improvement of immune function
Time Frame: 72 weeks after treatment
cluster of differentiation 4 (CD4+)T/ cluster of differentiation 8 (CD8+)T,T helper cell 1 (Th1)/ T helper cell 1(Th2),natural killer cell(NK),natural killer T(NK T),interleukin-1β(IL-1β),interleukin-4(IL-4),interleukin-6(IL-6),interleukin-8(IL-8),interleukin-12(IL-12),interleukin-15(IL-15),interleukin-17A(IL-17A),Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α),Interferon-gamma (IFN-γ)
72 weeks after treatment
complications
Time Frame: Between 0 to 8 hours after MSC transfusion
The occurrence of complications [including body temperature, tetter and allergy]
Between 0 to 8 hours after MSC transfusion
The incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma
Time Frame: 72 weeks after treatment
72 weeks after treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Qi Zhang, Doctor, Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 1, 2016

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 20, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 27, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 1, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 8, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 4, 2013

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • The Third Affiliated Hospital

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings