Continuous Venovenous Hemofiltration Versus Conventional Treatment for Acute Severe Hypernatremia

July 9, 2015 updated by: Shiren sun, Air Force Military Medical University, China

To Effect and Safety of Continuous Venovenous Hemofiltration (CVVH) Versus Conventional Treatment for Acute Severe Hypernatremia in Critical Ill Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial

The patients with severe hypernatremia who received conventional treatment are often undertreated. Continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) can effectively remove solute or water from circulation system. Several case reports demonstrated that CVVH could effectively decrease serum sodium concentration of the patients with severe hypernatremia. The use of CVVH for acute severe hypernatremia in critically ill patients could improve patient survival by effectively decreasing the serum sodium concentration to a normal level.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Date collection:

  1. Demographic (gender, age, race, weight, history of drug allergy, complicating diseases, drug combination and combination therapy)
  2. CVVH treatment (time, blood vessel, blood flow, replacement fluid flow, the type and dose of anticoagulant, limited to the test group)
  3. Vital signs (blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory frequency, body temperature)
  4. Severity of disease
  5. General treatment (Vasoactive drugs, mechanical ventilation, diuretic, steroid hormones) 6.24 hours input 7.24 hour output

8.Daily sodium intake 9.Adverse events were confirmed 10.Laboratory date: Routine blood test Blood biochemical Blood gas analysis Blood electrolyte Plasma osmotic pressure Urine osmotic pressure Plasma osmotic pressure Urinary electrolyte excretion fraction

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
60

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • China
    • Shaanxi
      • Xi'an, Shaanxi, China, 710032
        • Recruiting
        • Xijing Hospital of Nephrology
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Shiren Sun, M.D.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age≥18 years
  2. Acute severe hypernatremia(increasing of serum sodium levels from normal levels to ≥160 mmol/L within 48 hours)
  3. ICU patients

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Hypovolemic hypernatremia fractional excretion of sodium <0.5% and Urea/Creatinine >40 receiving diuretics: Urea/Creatinine >40, No edema.
  2. Acute kidney injure network III
  3. End-stage renal disease Hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis
  4. K+>6.5mmol/L The drug is difficult to treat hyperkalemia
  5. Hydrogen ion concentration<7.2 The drug is difficult to treat metabolic acidosis
  6. Acute pulmonary edema
  7. Systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg vasoactive drugs in the treatment of systolic blood pressure less than 90 mmHg
  8. The heparin or low molecular allergic patients
  9. HIV positive patients
  10. Pregnant women or lactational pregnancy women
  11. Suspected tuberculosis patients

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: continuous venovenous hemofiltration
CVVH was mainly determined by the differences of sodium concentration between serum and replacement fluid. The rate of decline serum sodium could be real-time adjusted using different-sodium-concentration replacement fluid according to the updated serum sodium concentration.
Procedure: continuous venovenous hemofiltration
If the serum sodium concentration >150mmol/L, When filter occurred clotting, replace the filter to CVVH treatment
Other Names:
  • continuous renal replacement therapy
Active Comparator: Control group
Treatment of hypernatremia is correction of water deficit.
Drug: Control group
If the serum sodium concentration ≤150mmol/L, When filter occurred clotting, as the end of treatment.
Other Names:
  • standard treatments

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
7-day all cause mortality
Time Frame: 7days
7days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Glasgow Coma score changes
Time Frame: 3 days
On the third day of the Glasgow Coma score minus baseline of the Glasgow Coma score
3 days
Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score changes
Time Frame: 3 days
On the third day of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score minus baseline of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score
3 days
Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score changes
Time Frame: 3 days
On the third day of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score minus baseline of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score
3 days
The average reduce rate of serum sodium
Time Frame: 3 days
The average reduce rate of serum sodium was calculated as following: (serum sodium concentration before treatment (mmol/L) - serum sodium concentration after treatment (mmol/L)) / time after treatment (hours)
3 days
24-hour correction of hypernatremia
Time Frame: 24-hour
Twenty-four-hour correction of hypernatremia was defined as the reduction of serum sodium concentration to ≤145 mmol/L within 24 hours after the start of treatment.
24-hour

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Air Force Military Medical University, China

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Shiren Sun, M.D., The First Affiliated Hospital of Fourth Military Medical University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2017

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 11, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 16, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 20, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 13, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 9, 2015

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CVVH-Na-002

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Critically Ill

Clinical Trials on continuous venovenous hemofiltration

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings