High Cut-Off Continuous Veno-venous Hemodialysis (CVVHD) in Patients Treated for Acute Renal Failure After Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS)/Septic Shock (HICOSS)

March 5, 2018 updated by: Baxter Healthcare Corporation

High Cut-off Continuous Venovenous Hemodialysis (CVVHD) to Improve Hemodynamic Stability and Organ Function Scores in Patients Treated for Acute Renal Failure After Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS)/Septic Shock

This study will assess the influence of the High Cut-Off (HCO) CVVHD treatment on the disease progression in septic patients. The primary aim of the study is to evaluate whether HCO CVVHD leads to a significant improvement of the hemodynamic status (mean arterial pressure, vasopressor requirements) in septic patients in comparison to CVVHD treatment with conventional high-flux filters. For the HCO-group the investigators expect a 50% lower dosage of vasopressors needed to maintain an adequate organ perfusion.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Severe sepsis is a devastating disorder that results from a complex host response to insult after infection. Despite advances in intensive care technologies sepsis remains an important and life-threatening problem. Sepsis is the most common cause of death in the intensive care unit.

Local or systemic release of bacteria-derived compounds, leading to the production of proinflammatory cytokines, induce systemic inflammatory reactions in septic patients. Continuous renal replacement therapies (CRRT) such as hemodialysis (CVVHD), hemofiltration (CVVH) or hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) with conventional high-flux membranes allow to control fluid and electrolyte balance, and to improve the hemodynamic status of the patients. However, conventional high flux membranes have a limited permeability for sepsis-associated mediators with molecular weights in the range of 15.000 to 60.000 Da.

A promising approach to enhance the mediator removal is to use membranes having larger pores and permeability characteristics than those currently used in CRRT.

For that purpose a High Cut-Off (HCO) membrane has been developed and is manufactured by Gambro Research.After demonstrating the safety as well as the cytokine removal effectiveness in a clinical pilot study this study will assess the influence of the HCO treatment on the disease progression in septic patients.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Innsbruck, Austria, 6020
        • Leopold Franzens Universität Innsbruck
      • Berlin, Germany, 10117
        • Medizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Nephrologie Charite, Campus Mitte
      • Berlin, Germany, 13353
        • Charité-Virchow Klinik
      • Tübingen, Germany, 72076
        • Universitatsklinikum Tubingen

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Fulfilling at least two of the SIRS criteria as defined by the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP)/Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) Consensus Conference
  2. Having signs of renal dysfunction
  3. Requirement for catecholamine administration (norepinephrine or others)
  4. Acute Physiology And Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) score at enrolment greater than or equal to 19 and less than or equal to 30

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Lack of written informed consent from patients or a legally authorized surrogate
  2. Duration of septic shock greater than 4 days
  3. Hypoproteinemia (characterized by serum albumin less than 18 g/l)
  4. End stage renal failure
  5. Known active malignancy
  6. Known human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection
  7. Age younger than 18 years or older than 80 years
  8. Known pregnancy
  9. Immunosuppression after transplantation
  10. Participation in another clinical study
  11. Renal replacement therapy greater than 24 hours before randomization

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: TRIPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: HCO
High cut-off filters HCO1100
dialysate flow rate 35 ml/h/kg. Blood flow rate should be aimed at 200 ml/min, but not less than 150 ml/min. Bicarbonate- or lactate-buffered solutions will be used as dialysis fluids. Study dialyzers will be changed routinely every 24 h or earlier if the filter is obstructed by clotting.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: control
conventional high-flux filters
dialysate flow rate 35 ml/h/kg. Blood flow rate should be aimed at 200 ml/min, but not less than 150 ml/min. Bicarbonate- or lactate-buffered solutions will be used as dialysis fluids. Study dialyzers will be changed routinely every 24 h or earlier if the filter is obstructed by clotting.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Dosage of vasopressors
Time Frame: day 1 to day 5
day 1 to day 5
Mean arterial pressure
Time Frame: day before inclusion and day 1 to day 5
day before inclusion and day 1 to day 5
Heart rate
Time Frame: day before inclusion and day 1 to day 5
day before inclusion and day 1 to day 5
Central venous pressure
Time Frame: day before inclusion and day 1 to day 5
day before inclusion and day 1 to day 5

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Survival
Time Frame: 28 days
28 days
Sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score
Time Frame: at ICU admission, at inclusion and day 1 to day 5
at ICU admission, at inclusion and day 1 to day 5
Length of need for catecholamine application
Time Frame: 28 days follow up
28 days follow up
Length of need for mechanical ventilation
Time Frame: 28 days
28 days
Length of need for renal replacement therapy
Time Frame: 28 days
28 days
Length of stay in intensive care unit (ICU)
Time Frame: 28 days
28 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Study Director: Werner Beck, Dr., Gambro Dialysatoren GmbH

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2004

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

June 1, 2009

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

June 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 9, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 3, 2009

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

April 6, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

March 7, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 5, 2018

Last Verified

March 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome

Clinical Trials on continuous venovenous hemodialysis

3
Subscribe