Effects of Functional Electrical Stimulation Cycling Versus Cycling Only on Walking and Quality of Life in MS (MSCycling)

September 27, 2019 updated by: Lori Hochman, Stony Brook University

Effects of Functional Electrical Stimulation Cycling Versus Cycling Only on Walking Performance and Quality of Life in Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis: A Pilot Study

This study will seek to determine the benefits that FES-LE cycling has over cycling alone on walking performance and quality of life in people with multiple sclerosis.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) is a rehabilitation tool that stimulates nerves via electrical current, causing muscles to contract. When FES is appled to leg muscles during stationary cycling the legs move in a fixed rhythmical pattern. Previous studies have demonstrated that FES during cycling is a safe and effective exercise for individuals recovering from spinal cord injury or stroke, but few have applied this tool to a progressive disorder, such as multiple sclerosis (MS). The aim of this study is to assess the immediate and short-term effect of an 8-week training program comparing FES lower extremity cycling to cycling without FES. Twenty volunteers with MS will participate. They will be randomly assigned to a training group. This study examine the effects of training on quality of life, endurance, walking speed, and step quality. Participants will sign an informed consent and complete a questionnaire that includes medical history and demographic data. Before training, immediately after training finishes and one month after training, self-report questionnaires, timed walking tests will be completed. During the walking tests, step quality and speed will be measured with a sensor that is worn on a belt

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
15

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • New York
      • Stony Brook, New York, United States, 11794
        • Stony Brook Univeristy

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Medical Diagnosis of MS
  • Patient-determined Disease Steps score between 3.0 and 6.0 inclusive
  • Ability to attend training sessions 3 times per week for an 8-10 week period
  • Passing a submaximal exercise test
  • Adequate hip range of motion (at least 110 degrees)
  • Adequate knee range of motion (10-90 degrees)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cognitive deficits that would interfere in ability to sign consent and understand the procedures for the study.
  • History or presence of other neurological pathologies that interfere with movement
  • Received physical therapy within the last 4 weeks prior to the study
  • History of an acute exacerbation of their MS symptoms within 4 weeks prior to the study
  • Immunosuppressive or steroid therapy within the past 4 weeks
  • Significant spasticity in the legs that interferes with the cycling motion
  • History of congestive heart failure
  • Coronary Artery Disease
  • Uncontrolled Hypertension
  • History of epilepsy or seizures
  • Cardiac demand pacemaker or implanted defibrillator
  • Unhealed fractures in the legs
  • Pressure sores or open wounds on the legs
  • Pregnant or trying to conceive

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: FES Cycling
The intervention consists of electrical stimulation to five lower extremity muscle groups (quadricep, hamstring, anterior tibialis, gluteal, and gastrocnemius muscle groups) while cycling for 45 minutes, 3 times per week for 8 weeks. Outcome measures will be collected at baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 4 weeks after training is completed).
Device: RT 300: Lower Extremity Cycling
Individuals will be randomly assigned to either the FES cycling or cycling only group and will perform lower extremity cycling. Individuals will participate in an interval training cycling program 3 times per week for 8 weeks.
Other Names:
  • RT 300
  • Lower Extremity Ergometer
Active Comparator: Cycling Only
The intervention consists of lower extremity cycling for 45 minutes, 3 times per week for 8 weeks. Electrical stimulation will not be applied to any muscles. Outcome measures will be collected at baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 4 weeks after training is completed.
Device: RT 300: Lower Extremity Cycling
Individuals will be randomly assigned to either the FES cycling or cycling only group and will perform lower extremity cycling. Individuals will participate in an interval training cycling program 3 times per week for 8 weeks.
Other Names:
  • RT 300
  • Lower Extremity Ergometer

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Gait Velocity: Timed Walking
Time Frame: Baseline
Gait velocity was reported in meters/second based on a 25 foot walk test called the Timed 25 foot Walk Test. Faster gait speeds are better outcomes.
Baseline
Gait Velocity: Timed Walking
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Gait velocity was reported in meters/second based on a 25 foot walk test called the Timed 25 foot Walk Test. Faster gait speeds are better outcomes.
4 weeks
Gait Velocity: Timed Walking
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Gait velocity was reported in meters/second based on a 25 foot walk test called the Timed 25 foot Walk Test. Faster gait speeds are better outcomes.
8 weeks
Gait Velocity: Timed Walking
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Gait velocity was reported in meters/second based on a 25 foot walk test called the Timed 25 foot Walk Test. Faster gait speeds are better outcomes.
12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Self-reported Fatigue Using Modified Fatigue Impact Scale
Time Frame: Baseline
The Modified Fatigue Impact Scale is a 21 item self-report questionnaire that takes 5-10 minutes to complete. It uses a 5-point likert scale to rate the patient's perception of how Multiple Sclerosis related fatigue affects an individual's life on an everyday basis. It contains three subscales that include: cognitive, physical, and psychosocial dimensions. Scores on the subscales can be analyzed individually or as a summed score to give an overall fatigue score. Higher scores indicate a greater impact of fatigue. The minimum score is a 0 and the maximum score is 81.
Baseline
Self-reported Fatigue Using Modified Fatigue Impact Scale
Time Frame: 8 weeks
The Modified Fatigue Impact Scale is a 21 item self-report questionnaire that takes 5-10 minutes to complete. It uses a 5-point likert scale to rate the patient's perception of how Multiple Sclerosis related fatigue affects an individual's life on an everyday basis. It contains three subscales that include: cognitive, physical, and psychosocial dimensions. Scores on the subscales can be analyzed individually or as a summed score to give an overall fatigue score. Higher scores indicate a greater impact of fatigue. The minimum score is a 0 and the maximum score is 81.
8 weeks
Self-reported Walking Using 12 Item Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale
Time Frame: Baseline
The Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale is a 12-item self-report questionnaire that takes approximately 10 minutes to complete and reflects a persons' perception of the impact that multiple sclerosis has on walking ability during the past 2 weeks. Each of the items scored ranges from 1 to 5, in which higher scores indicate a greater impact of multiple sclerosis on their walking. Scores on the 12 items are summed. To transform to a 0-100 scale, the minimum score of 12 is subtracted from the sum; the result is divided by 48 and then multiplied by 100. The lowest score is 0 and the highest score is 100. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Baseline
Self-reported Walking Using 12 Item Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale
Time Frame: 8 weeks
The Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale is a 12-item self-report questionnaire that takes approximately 10 minutes to complete and reflects a persons' perception of the impact that multiple sclerosis has on walking ability during the past 2 weeks. Each of the items scored ranges from 1 to 5, in which higher scores indicate a greater impact of multiple sclerosis on their walking. Scores on the 12 items are summed. To transform to a 0-100 scale, the minimum score of 12 is subtracted from the sum; the result is divided by 48 and then multiplied by 100. The lowest score is 0 and the highest score is 100. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
8 weeks
Overall Self-reported Quality of Life Using Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life- 54
Time Frame: Baseline
The Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life-54 is a self-report quality of life questionnaire. It measures health-related quality of life using both generic and disease-specific measures and was constructed by experts in the field. There is no overall score for this scale since it contains 12 subscales, two summary scores, and two single-item measures. The quality of life subscale was the chosen outcome measure reported below. The scores range from 0-100. Higher scores on the scale notes improved outcome.
Baseline
Overall Self-reported Quality of Life Using Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life- 54
Time Frame: 8 weeks
The Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life-54 is a self-report quality of life questionnaire. It measures health-related quality of life using both generic and disease-specific measures and was constructed by experts in the field. There is no overall score for this scale since it contains 12 subscales, two summary scores, and two single-item measures. The quality of life subscale was the chosen outcome measure reported below. The scores range from 0-100. Higher scores on the scale notes improved outcome.
8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Stony Brook University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Lori I Hochman, PT, PhD, Stony Brook University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 19, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 14, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 17, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 30, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 27, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 534378-1

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Multiple Sclerosis

Clinical Trials on RT 300: Lower Extremity Cycling

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings