The Effect of Transcutaneous Vagal Nerve Stimulation on Reducing Oesophageal Pain Hypersensitivity

November 28, 2015 updated by: Adam Farmer, Wingate Institute of Neurogastroenterology

The Effect of Transcutaneous Vagal Nerve Stimulation on Reducing Oesophageal Pain Hypersensitivity in Healthy Volunteers

We are evaluating the role of transcutaneous electrical vagal nerve stimulation in the prevention of oesophageal pain hypersensitivity using a validated human model in healthy volunteers.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Chronic oesophageal pain is a symptomatic feature of disorders such as erosive oesophagitis, non-erosive reflux disease and non-cardiac chest pain. Patients often display heightened sensitivity to intra-oesophageal stimuli, which is referred to as oesophageal pain hypersensitivity. However, the experience of oesophageal pain is highly individual with a multitude of factors proposed to account for this variability. Amongst the physiological factors is the autonomic nervous system (ANS). The ANS has been postulated to play a pivotal role in the modulation of pain through its multiple interactions with pain processing. The ANS has two broadly antithetic branches, the parasympathetic nervous system (PNS) and the sympathetic nervous system (SNS). The primary neural substrate of the PNS is the vagus nerve. The vagus nerve is increasingly considered to play an integral role in modulating oesophageal pain. Electrical vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) was first used in humans in 1988 and is an efficacious treatment for drug resistant epilepsy. Traditional VNS is undertaken in a procedure where a bipolar helical electrode is placed around the cervical vagal nerve, which is connected to a pulse generator placed in subcutaneous pocket in the chest, not dissimilar to a cardiac pacemaker. However, this method of VNS necessitates surgical implantation with its attendant risks and complications. Recently, an external transcutaneous VNS (t-VNS) system, consisting of an earplug-like electrode to interface with the concha of the outer ear and a handheld battery-powered electrical stimulator, has become commercially available (NEMOS system). The auricular branch of the vagus nerve innervates the concha of the ear and is located directly under the skin, making it a suitable target for transcutaneous stimulation. t-VNS has been demonstrated to be safe, well tolerated and have a high degree of user-friendliness. A preliminary study has reported that t-VNS reduces sensitivity to heat pain in healthy volunteers. Furthermore, recent studies have demonstrated that t-VNS patterns of cerebral activation, as determined by functional magnetic resonance imaging, were similar to those evoked by traditional VNS. Thus, VNS per se represents an attractive proposition for investigating the role of the PNS in oesophageal pain and t-VNS specifically, a viable, safe and acceptable technology for achieving this. The pivotal experiments evaluating the analgesic role of VNS in the development of acid induced oesophageal pain hypersensitivity have not been conducted. Using the aforementioned model of oesophageal pain hypersensitivity, we seek to determine the analgesic effect of t-VNS.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
15

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • United Kingdom
      • London, United Kingdom, E1 @AJ
        • Recruiting
        • Wingate Institute of Neurogastroenterology
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Ability to provide Informed written consent
  • Healthy volunteers aged 18-65, who have no medical history

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any inclusion criteria not met
  • Subjects unable to provide informed consent.
  • Subjects with any systemic disease or medications that may influence the autonomic nervous system (e.g. beta-agonists or Parkinson's disease).
  • Pregnant females to prevent any confounding effects on pregnancy related nausea.
  • Subjects who suffer from reflux disease
  • Subject who take any medication, including over the counter preparations

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Transcutaneous vagal nerve stimulation
Active vagal nerve stimulation to the left auricular branch of the vagus nerve.
Device: Transcutaneous vagal nerve stimulation
Trans-auricular vagal nerve stimulation
Other Names:
  • NEMOS
Placebo Comparator: Sham vagal nerve stimulation
Placebo vagal nerve stimulation stimulation. The stimulator is attached to the left ear, but rotated 180 degrees, so that it is not stimulating the auricular branch of the vagal nerve.
Device: Transcutaneous vagal nerve stimulation
Trans-auricular vagal nerve stimulation
Other Names:
  • NEMOS

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sensitisation to electrical stimuli in the proximal oesophagus following a distal oesophageal acid infusion in comparison to baseline
Time Frame: 90 minutes post acid infusion
Pain tolerance thresholds to electrical stimulation in the proximal oesophagus decrease following a distal oesophageal acid infusion due to central sensitisation and are defined as a reduction of >6mA in thresholds. Prevention of sensitisation will be defined as this threshold not being met.
90 minutes post acid infusion

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sensitisation to electrical stimuli in the proximal oesophagus following a distal oesophageal acid infusion in comparison to baseline
Time Frame: 30 minutes post acid infusion
Pain tolerance thresholds to electrical stimulation in the proximal oesophagus decrease following a distal oesophageal acid infusion due to central sensitisation and are defined as a reduction of >6mA in thresholds. Prevention of sensitisation will be defined as this threshold not being met.
30 minutes post acid infusion
Sensitisation to electrical stimuli in the proximal oesophagus following a distal oesophageal acid infusion in comparison to baseline
Time Frame: 60 minutes post acid infusion
Pain tolerance thresholds to electrical stimulation in the proximal oesophagus decrease following a distal oesophageal acid infusion due to central sensitisation and are defined as a reduction of >6mA in thresholds. Prevention of sensitisation will be defined as this threshold not being met.
60 minutes post acid infusion
Effect of vagal nerve stimulation on cardiac vagal tone during stimulation in comparison to baseline
Time Frame: 30 minutes
The effect of vagal stimulation on the validated parameter of cardiac vagal tone
30 minutes
Effect of vagal nerve stimulation on cardiac sympathetic index during stimulation in comparison to baseline
Time Frame: 30 minutes
The effect of vagal stimulation on the validated parameter of cardiac sympathetic index.
30 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Wingate Institute of Neurogastroenterology

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 1, 2016

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 15, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 28, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 2, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 2, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 28, 2015

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Farmer-2

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Esophageal Diseases

Clinical Trials on Transcutaneous vagal nerve stimulation

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings