Application of Guidelines for Medico-professional Supervision of Workers Exposed to Carcinogenic Action of Wood Dust: CERBois Cohort (CERBois)

August 25, 2016 updated by: Central Hospital, Nancy, France

Application of Guidelines for Medico-professional Supervision of Workers Exposed to Carcinogenic Action of Wood Dust: CERBois Cohort. Feasibility Evaluation

The purpose is to evaluate feasibility of medical supervision of professionally active asymptomatic wood workers with questionnaires and nasofibroscopy.

Secondary purposes are:

  • Feasibility evaluation of identification of former and actual professional expositions to wood dust and to various naso-sinusal carcinogenics in case of co-expositions (formaldehyde, chrome, nickel, leather)
  • Description of abnormal symptoms identified by occupational doctor and needing an otorhinolaryngology test
  • Description of results and examinations induced by nasofibroscopy in symptomatic or asymptomatic individuals: counting of naso-sinusal adenocarcinoma cases
  • Evaluation of participation of workers retiring in 2 years after inclusion to medical supervision program
  • Evaluation of information flow among different players
  • Assessment of costs induced by this targeted screening: direct medical costs (screened pathologies, induced additional examinations…) and indirect costs for company (duration of worker absence for transfer, medical and additional examinations).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
800

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • France
      • Bordeaux, France
        • AHI 33
      • Lille, France
        • Pôle Santé Travail
      • Paris, France
        • Gnmst-Btp
      • Paris, France
        • Ville de Paris
      • Suresnes, France
        • ACMS
      • Vandoeuvre Les Nancy, France
        • Centres de Consultations de Pathologies Professionnelles

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

44 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Population under analysis consists of all workers seen in occupational health consultation and exposed to wood dust at least for cumulated 12 months and with first exposition back to more than 30 years

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Employee or craftsman
  • Actual or former professional exposition to wood dust
  • Onset of exposition to wood dust back to more than 30 years (latency >30 years)
  • Cumulated exposition to wood dust longer than 12 months
  • Exposition to wood dust during machining tasks (sawing, milling, planing, drilling, bridging) or all documented activities exposing to wood dust concentration > 1 mg/m3 for 8 hours
  • Worker followed by occupational doctor of participant occupational health departments
  • Worker accepting medico-professional supervision recommended by guidelines
  • Affiliation to social security

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Difficulty with comprehension of wood auto-questionnaire

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Workers exposed to wood dust
Procedure: Nasofibroscopy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Participation to medical supervision program of professionally active asymptomatic workers
Time Frame: Day 0
Day 0
Participation to medical supervision program of professionally active asymptomatic workers
Time Frame: 3 months
3 months
Participation to medical supervision program of professionally active asymptomatic workers
Time Frame: 24 months
24 months
Participation to medical supervision program of professionally active asymptomatic workers
Time Frame: 27 months
27 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Former and actual professional expositions to wood dust and to various naso-sinusal carcinogenics
Time Frame: Day 0
Day 0
Presence of abnormal symptoms assessed by doctor, needing an otorhinolaryngology test
Time Frame: Day 0
Day 0
Presence of abnormal symptoms assessed by doctor, needing an otorhinolaryngology test
Time Frame: 24 months
24 months
Counting of diagnoses of naso-sinusal adenocarcinoma in symptomatic and asymptomatic workers after nasofibroscopy
Time Frame: 3 months
3 months
Counting of diagnoses of naso-sinusal adenocarcinoma in symptomatic and asymptomatic workers after nasofibroscopy
Time Frame: 27 months
27 months
Participation to medical supervision program of workers retiring in 2 years after inclusion
Time Frame: Day 0
Day 0
Evaluation of information flow among different players
Time Frame: 3 months
3 months
Evaluation of information flow among different players
Time Frame: 27 months
27 months
Medical costs Induced by screening
Time Frame: 3 months
3 months
Medical costs Induced by screening
Time Frame: 27 months
27 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Central Hospital, Nancy, France

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Christophe PARIS, Pr, Centre de Consultations de Pathologies Professionnelles - Hôpitaux de Brabois - CHU de Nancy - France

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 23, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 25, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 30, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 30, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 25, 2016

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2011/INCA/CERBOIS/PARIS-HERIN

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings