Comparison of Obturator Nerve Blockade and Neuromuscular Blockade

March 22, 2021 updated by: University of Florida

Comparison of Obturator Nerve Blockade and Neuromuscular Blockade for the Prevention of Adductor Spasm in Patients Undergoing Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumors.

Patients diagnosed with posterolateral bladder tumors will be invited to participate in the study. Subjects will be randomized to receive an ultrasound-guided obturator block or a neuromuscular blocking agent after the induction of general anesthesia in an attempt to block the obturator reflex during surgery.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The purpose of this research is to compare the incidence of adductor spasm in patients undergoing general anesthesia with neuromuscular blocking agents versus obturator block. Transurethral resection of bladder tumor(s) (TURBT) is a commonly performed procedure to diagnose and treat bladder cancer. The obturator nerve is located lateral to the bladder wall in the pelvis prior to innervating the adductor muscles of the thigh. Depending on the location of the tumor(s), electrocautery or surgical stimulation may result in stimulation of the obturator nerve, resulting in adduction of the leg, which is called the adductor reflex or spasm. This may occur violently and unexpectedly, and result in bladder perforation, bleeding, or cancer dissemination.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
60

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Florida
      • Gainesville, Florida, United States, 32608
        • Malcom Randall VA Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 86 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients ≥ 18 years of age
  • Planned TURBT for unilateral or bilateral posterolateral bladder tumors
  • Ability to understand and provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient refusal or inability to provide informed consent
  • True allergy, not sensitivity, to local anesthetics
  • True allergy, not sensitivity, Propofol
  • True allergy, not sensitivity, general anesthetic agents
  • Pregnancy
  • Severe hepatic impairment
  • Evidence of infection at or near the proposed needle insertion site
  • Any sensorimotor deficit of the lower extremity, whether acute or chronic
  • Inability to walk without assistance
  • Lower extremity joint replacement surgery in the preceding six months

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Obturator block
Comparing the incidence of adductor spasm in patients undergoing general anesthesia with obturator block.
Drug: Obturator block
Subjects allocated to the obturator block group will be monitored for the incidence of block and procedure-related adverse events. In addition to clinical observation, a Nerve Integrity Monitor (Medtronic) will be used to detect adductor spasm using continuous electromyography. Electrodes will be placed on the thigh to objectively detect and record instances of adductor spasm. One hour after arrival to post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU) or when discharge criteria are met (whichever comes first), repeat dynamometer measurements and TUG tests will be performed. Patients will be called 24-48 hours post procedure to inquire about falls or evidence of nerve injury, as well as patient satisfaction.
Other Names:
  • Ultrasound guided nerve block anesthetic
  • Mepivacaine
  • Pajunk SonoPlex needle
Active Comparator: Neuromuscular block
Comparing the incidence of adductor spasm in patients undergoing general anesthesia with neuromuscular blocking agents.
Drug: Neuromuscular block
Subjects allocated to the neuromuscular block group will be monitored for the incidence of block and procedure-related adverse events. In addition to clinical observation, a Nerve Integrity Monitor (Medtronic) will be used to detect adductor spasm using continuous electromyography. Electrodes will be placed on the thigh to objectively detect and record instances of adductor spasm. One hour after arrival to PACU or when discharge criteria are met (whichever comes first), repeat dynamometer measurements and TUG tests will be performed. Patients will be called 24-48 hours post procedure to inquire about falls or evidence of nerve injury, as well as patient satisfaction.
Other Names:
  • Rocuronium
  • Paralysis of the affected skeletal muscles anesthetic

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Patients With Incidence of Intraoperative Adductor Spasm
Time Frame: intraoperative
Nerve Integrity Monitor will be used to detect adductor spasm and below are listed the numbers or patients with increased incidence of adductor spasm.
intraoperative

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number Patients With Increased Risk of Falling
Time Frame: Changes from baseline (pre-op) to 72 hours post-operative
Based on TUG time measurements of patients below are the numbers of patients with an increased risk of falling.
Changes from baseline (pre-op) to 72 hours post-operative
Number of Patients With Incidence of Leg Weakness
Time Frame: Changes from baseline (pre-op) to 72 hours post-operative
Test the strength of subject's lower extremity muscles on the timed up and go (TUG) test and determine how many patients had increased leg weakness.
Changes from baseline (pre-op) to 72 hours post-operative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Florida

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
US Department of Veterans Affairs

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 25, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 19, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 19, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 8, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 20, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 24, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 24, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 22, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • IRB201601962 -V
  • OCR18950 (Other Identifier: University of Florida)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cancer of Bladder

Clinical Trials on Obturator block

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings