A Randomized Study Evaluating the Incidence of Post Lumbar Puncture Headache With Atraumatic Needles in Hematology (SPPLAASH)

February 7, 2022 updated by: Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne

SPPLAASH Study : a Randomized Study Aiming at Evaluating the Incidence of Post Lumbar Puncture Headache (PLPH) With the Use of Atraumatic Needles in Hematology

Lumbar punctures are implemented for the diagnosis of patients with hematologic symptoms as well as for the intrathecal chemotherapy injections. Post lumbar puncture headache is a common complication for patients and is characterized by the occurrence of a headache with an orthostatic component, with additional symptoms such as nausea. Some studies in neurology, anesthesia and gynecology have previously shown a decreased incidence for post lumbar puncture headache while using atraumatic needles as compared to standard needles. In this context, it is necessary to better document the incidence of post lumbar puncture headache with the use of atraumatic needles in hematologic patients.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Lumbar punctures (LP) are implemented for the diagnosis of patients with hematologic symptoms as well as for the intrathecal chemotherapy injections. Post lumbar puncture headache (PLPH) is a common complication in around 30% of patients. PLPH is characterized by the occurrence of a headache with an orthostatic component within 12-72 hours after LP with additional symptoms such as nausea. Even if this phenomenon spontaneously resolves within 3 to 5 days, symptoms can immobilize the patient and can interfere with his daily activities. Technical procedures largely influence the incidence of PLPH. Indeed, some studies in neurology, anesthesia and gynecology have previously shown a decreased incidence for PLHP while using atraumatic needles as compared to standard needles. So far, few data are available for hematology. In this context, it is necessary to better document the incidence of PLPH with the use of atraumatic needles in hematologic patients.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
68

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • France
      • Lyon, France, 69000
        • Centre Leon Berard
      • Saint-Étienne, France, 42055
        • CHU de Saint-Etienne

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with hematologic syndromes undergoing a diagnostic lumbar puncture
  • Signed written informed consent form
  • Patient affiliated to a social security regimen or beneficiary of the same

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any known contraindication for the lumbar puncture procedure: increased intracranial pressure, blood clotting disorder, thrombocytopenia
  • Any known infection
  • Patient with a Body Mass index < 18 or Body Mass index > 40
  • Any patient that requires an ultrasound guided lumbar puncture
  • Patient that underwent a lumbar puncture within 6 months
  • Patient under guardianship or deprived of his liberty or any condition that may affect the patient's ability to understand and sign the informed consent (art. L.1121-6, L.112-7, L.1211-8, L.1211-9)
  • Refusing participation
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding women

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: PREVENTION
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Standard needle
Patients perform a spinal punction according to the usual practice, with a standard needle.
Device: Standard needle

Patients will perform a spinal punction with a standard needle, used in the usual practice. The standard needles have the following characteristics : BD 22 G x 3 ½ in, 90mm, Quincke spinal needle, Black hub.

When more than 2 attempts for lumbar puncture fail, the investigator will proceed with standard techniques (BD 20G x 3 ½ in, Quincke spinal needle, 90mm, yellow hub). This is a failed lumbar puncture.

Other Names:
  • BD Yale 405256
EXPERIMENTAL: Atraumatic needle
Patients perform a spinal punction according to the usual practice, with an atraumatic needle.
Device: Atraumatic needle

Patients will perform a spinal punction with an atraumatic needle, used in the hematological service of the CHU of Saint-Etienne. The atraumatic needles have the following characteristics : Vygon 24 G × 3 ½ in, 90mm, Whitacre Pencil Point Spinal Needle, Purple hub.

When more than 2 attempts for lumbar puncture fail, the investigator will proceed with standard techniques (BD 20G x 3 ½ in, Quincke spinal needle, 90mm, yellow hub). This is a failed lumbar puncture.

Other Names:
  • Vygon 181.95

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of headache
Time Frame: 5 days
Incidence of patients with mild and severe headache within 5 days following lumbar puncture as evaluated by verbal rating scales (intensity score ≥4) will be reported.
5 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Intensity of headache
Time Frame: 5 days
Maximum intensity of headache as evaluated by verbal rating scale (scoring from 0 to 10) within 5 days following lumbar puncture will be reported for each patient.
5 days
Duration of significant headache
Time Frame: 5 days
Duration in days of mild and severe headache (verbal rating scale score ≥ 4) within 5 days following lumbar puncture will be reported for each patient.
5 days
Pain intensity
Time Frame: 5 days
Local and immediate Intensity Pain during lumbar puncture will be reported for each patient. Intensity is evaluated by verbal rating scale.
5 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Institut de Cancérologie de la Loire

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 22, 2017

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 20, 2020

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
October 31, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 20, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 20, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 24, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 8, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 7, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2017-0302 (Other Identifier: M D Anderson Cancer Center)
  • 2017-A00915-48 (OTHER: ANSM)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lymphoma

Clinical Trials on Standard needle

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings