Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test to Quantify Enzyme Replacement Response in Pediatric Pompe Disease

May 14, 2017 updated by: Rambam Health Care Campus

Introduction: Enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) with Myozyme improved the prospect of Pompe disease patients. Our aim was to evaluate ERT acute effect on exercise capacity in pediatric Pompe patients.

Methods: Pompe patients (10-19 years) were evaluated before and two days after ERT using cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET), six minutes walking test (6MWT) and motor function test (GMFM-88).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Detailed Description

Pompe disease is an inherited autosomal recessive glycogen storage disease caused by partial or total deficiency of acid α-glucosidase (GAA), resulting in the accumulation of glycogen in the lysosomes of skeletal muscles, heart, liver and other tissues. There is an inverse correlation between the amount of residual GAA activity and disease severity. The clinical phenotype varies with regard to age of onset, organ involvement, and severity of progression. In 2006, enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) with recombinant human GAA (Genzyme Corporation, Cambridge MA, USA) was approved and, since then, decisive modification of the course of the disease has been reported. Clinical studies in infants showed that ERT led to improvement in cardiac, respiratory and skeletal muscle functions, with achievement of independent walking, higher levels of physical activity, and survival beyond infancy.

Exercise capacity significantly affects Pompe patients' clinical picture and quality of life [5]. However, data on the effects of ERT on physiological variables related to exercise capacity is scarce. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is a well-known procedure to assess exercise capacity in adults and children in healthy and chronic conditions. Little is known regarding exercise capacity in the pediatric Pompe population. Our aim was to evaluate the acute effect of ERT on exercise capacity and different physiological variables in pediatric Pompe patients.

Patients were evaluated before and two days after ERT (20mg/kg/EOW). Each evaluation included CPET, pulmonary function tests, 6MWT and GMFM-88. All tests were carried out by the same experienced physician, exercise physiologist, and physiotherapist.

Visit 1: Patients arrived at that hospital at 7:00 am, vital signs were collected and a complete neuromuscular evaluation was carried out (gross motor function measure score sheet (GMFM-88), 6MWT, pre-CPET questionnaire (demographics, physical activity level, risk assessment, asthma/atopy/smoking history, family history), pulmonary function tests and CPET. Following the evaluation, at approximately 9 am, the patient started infusion of ERT.

Visit 2: Two days following visit 1, the patient arrived at the hospital at 2:00 pm, vital signs were assessed and GMFM-88, 6MWT, pulmonary function tests, and CPET were performed.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
5

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

8 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Pediatric Pompe patients diagnosed by a deficiency of acid alpha-glucosidase enzyme activity in dry blood spot and/or lymphocytes, followed by the study of the disease-causing mutations using DNA analysis of the GAA gene. Age ≥8 y/o, ERT ≥1 year, capable of cycling on a stationary bicycle.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Pompe disease diagnosed by a deficiency of acid alpha-glucosidase enzyme activity in dry blood spot and/or lymphocytes, followed by the study of the disease-causing mutations using DNA analysis of the GAA gene
  • Age ≥8 y/o
  • ERT ≥1 year
  • Capable of cycling on a stationary bicycle.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Invasive ventilation
  • Continuous ventilation and/or continuous oxygen supplementation to maintain oxygen saturation >90%
  • Acute illness on visit day or one day prior.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Pediatric Pompe patients

Visit 1: Patients arrived at that hospital at 7:00 am, vital signs were collected and a complete neuromuscular evaluation was carried out (gross motor function measure score sheet (GMFM-88), 6MWT, pre-CPET questionnaire (demographics, physical activity level, risk assessment, asthma/atopy/smoking history, family history), pulmonary function tests and CPET. Following the evaluation, at approximately 9 am, the patient started infusion of ERT.

Visit 2: Two days following visit 1, the patient arrived at the hospital at 2:00 pm, vital signs were assessed and GMFM-88, 6MWT, pulmonary function tests, and CPET were performed.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in oxygen Uptake
Time Frame: 3 days
Change in mount of oxygen consumed per amount of time measured during 15 minutes of an exercise test.
3 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
6 Minute walk test
Time Frame: 3 days
The distance an individual walked in 6 minutes.
3 days
Gross motor function measure score sheet (GMFM-88)
Time Frame: 3 days
The patient is evaluated in the active performance of 88 physical tasks and the scoring range for each task ranges from 0=does not initiate, 1=initiates, 2=partially completes, 3=completes, NT=not tested. The total score is the sum of all tasks divided to the maximal potential score in percentage. Evaluation time ~ 30 minutes.
3 days
Spirometry
Time Frame: 3 days.
Pulmonary function as assessed by spirometry. Evaluation time - 5 minutes.
3 days.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Rambam Health Care Campus

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Lea Bentur, Prof., Rambam Health Care Campus

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 30, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 30, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 30, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 7, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 10, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 16, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 14, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 3190-RMB-CTIL

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Enzyme Replacement Therapy in Pompe Disease

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings