STOP DIABETES - Knowledge-based Solutions (StopDia)

May 15, 2017 updated by: University of Eastern Finland
The aim of the Stop Diabetes - Knowledge based solutions (StopDia) consortium project (University of Eastern Finland, National Institute for Health and Welfare, and Technical Research Centre of Finland) is to develop and test approaches to identify individuals at increased risk of type 2 diabetes and to empower them in adopting and maintaining a healthy lifestyle by combining individual and environment level strategies into a dual-process approach targeting deliberative and automatic processes of behavior. We also aim to identify barriers and facilitators of adopting a healthy lifestyle in the society, create a model for the prevention of type 2 diabetes by joint actions of health care, third sector, and other societal actors, and develop methods to monitor the cost-effectiveness of these actions. We will carry out a 1-year randomized controlled trial on the effects of among 10 000 individuals aged 18-70 years at increased risk of type 2 diabetes living in Finland. The participants will be randomized into the control group, the digital lifestyle intervention group, or the combined digital and face-to-face lifestyle intervention group. The aim of the interventions is to enhance diet quality, increase physical activity, decrease body weight, and improve glucose tolerance in individuals at increased risk of type 2 diabetes.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Type 2 diabetes is a major public health and economical problem all over the world, including Finland. A healthy diet and physical activity are the cornerstones for the prevention of type 2 diabetes. The aim of the Stop Diabetes - Knowledge based solutions (StopDia) study is to develop and test approaches to identify individuals at increased risk of type 2 diabetes and to empower them in adopting and maintaining a healthy lifestyle by combining individual and environment level strategies into a dual-process approach targeting deliberative and automatic processes of behavior. We also aim to identify barriers and facilitators of adopting a healthy lifestyle in the society, create a model for the prevention of type 2 diabetes by joint actions of health care, third sector, and other societal actors, and develop methods to monitor the cost-effectiveness of these actions. We will recruit 10 000 individuals aged 18-70 years at increased risk of type 2 diabetes living in the hospital district of Northern Savo, Päijät-Häme, or South Karelia in Finland for a 1-year randomized controlled trial. We will assess body height and weight, body mass index, waist circumference, and blood pressure, take blood samples for biochemical analyses, and perform a 2-hour oral glucose tolerance test at baseline. The participants will be asked to fill out a detailed digital questionnaire on factors related to the risk of type 2 diabetes, including diet, physical activity, sedentary behavior, health status, physical, psychic, and social well-being, as well as the use of health care services and medications. The participants will be randomized into the control group, the digital lifestyle intervention group, or the combined digital and face-to-face lifestyle intervention group. The aim of the interventions is to enhance diet quality, increase physical activity, decrease body weight, and improve glucose tolerance in individuals at increased risk of type 2 diabetes. We will also investigate the effects of environmental interventions at certain workplaces and the synergistic effects of the individual level and environmental interventions in a subsample of the study population. All baseline assessments will be repeated after the 1-year follow-up. The primary outcomes will be the changes in diet, total physical activity, body weight, and plasma glucose levels from the oral glucose tolerance test. After the 1-year intervention study, follow-up examinations will be performed 3, 5, 10, 15, and 20 years after the baseline examinations.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
10000

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Timo A Lakka, MD, PhD
  • Phone Number: +358 40 7707 329
  • Email: timo.lakka@uef.fi

Study Locations

  • Finland
      • Kuopio, Finland
        • Recruiting
        • University of Eastern Finland
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age of 18-70 years
  • 12 points or more in the Finnish diabetes risk score or previous gestational diabetes or repeated impaired fasting glucose (IFG) (fasting plasma glucose level 6,1 - 6,9 mmol/l) or impaired glucose tolerance (2-hour glucose level 7,8 - 11,0 mmol/l in oral glucose tolerance test)
  • living in the hospital district of Northern Savo, Päijät-Häme or South Karelia
  • possibility to use computer, smartphone or tablet with internet connection
  • having own self-phone number
  • adequate Finnish language skill

Exclusion Criteria:

  • type 1 or 2 diabetes
  • pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • current cancer or less than 6 months from the end of cancer treatment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: PREVENTION
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
NO_INTERVENTION: Control group
At baseline, individuals in the control group receive digital information package about lifestyle risk factors of type 2 diabetes with recommendations on healthy diet and physical activity in accordance with the Finnish Nutrition Recommendations and the national recommendation for health enhancing physical activity.
EXPERIMENTAL: Digital lifestyle intervention group
Participants are instructed to use a digital self-help tool for 12 months. This tool is developed in the StopDia-study to enact positive changes in participant's health behaviour. The digital intervention consists of 2 components which motivate, enable and trigger the participants to improve their health behaviours. B.J. Fogg's Tiny Habits -ideology. The digital intervention is based on the Fogg Behaviour Model (FBM) and the Behaviour Wizard.
Behavioral: Digital lifestyle intervention group
Intervention with digital application for lifestyle changes
EXPERIMENTAL: Combined digital and face-to-face lifestyle intervention group
Participants are using the StopDia digital solution tool as described above. In addition, they have six face-to-face group coaching (6-15 participants/group) sessions at local health centers facilitated by trained nurses. The face-to-face group intervention is based on the Self-Determination Theory and theories of self-regulation, and delivered using intrinsic motivational coaching approach designed and tested in the GOAL lifestyle intervention, and further developed in several other studies in Finland and internationally.
Behavioral: Combined digital and face-to-face lifestyle intervention group
Intervention with digital application and group meetings for lifestyle changes

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in diet
Time Frame: From baseline to one year follow-up, to 3 year follow-up, to 5 year follow-up, to 10 year follow-up, to 15 year follow-up, 20 year follow-up
Change in diet is assessed by the dietary score based on Finnish Nutrition Recommendations and is formulated according to food frequency questionnaire.
From baseline to one year follow-up, to 3 year follow-up, to 5 year follow-up, to 10 year follow-up, to 15 year follow-up, 20 year follow-up
Change in total physical activity level
Time Frame: From baseline to one year follow-up, to 3 year follow-up, to 5 year follow-up, to 10 year follow-up, to 15 year follow-up, 20 year follow-up
Change in total physical activity level is assessed by the physical activity questionnaire.
From baseline to one year follow-up, to 3 year follow-up, to 5 year follow-up, to 10 year follow-up, to 15 year follow-up, 20 year follow-up
Change in plasma glucose levels
Time Frame: From baseline to one year follow-up, to 3 year follow-up, to 5 year follow-up, to 10 year follow-up, to 15 year follow-up, 20 year follow-up
Assessed in the 2 hour oral glucose tolerance tests
From baseline to one year follow-up, to 3 year follow-up, to 5 year follow-up, to 10 year follow-up, to 15 year follow-up, 20 year follow-up
Change in body weight
Time Frame: From baseline to one year follow-up, to 3 year follow-up, to 5 year follow-up, to 10 year follow-up, to 15 year follow-up, 20 year follow-up
Assessed with digital weight scales
From baseline to one year follow-up, to 3 year follow-up, to 5 year follow-up, to 10 year follow-up, to 15 year follow-up, 20 year follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in waist circumference
Time Frame: From baseline to one year follow-up, to 3 year follow-up, to 5 year follow-up, to 10 year follow-up, to 15 year follow-up, 20 year follow-up
Assessed with validated guidelines for the measure
From baseline to one year follow-up, to 3 year follow-up, to 5 year follow-up, to 10 year follow-up, to 15 year follow-up, 20 year follow-up
Change in insulin concentration
Time Frame: From baseline to one year follow-up, to 3 year follow-up, to 5 year follow-up, to 10 year follow-up, to 15 year follow-up, 20 year follow-up
Assessed in the 2 hour oral glucose tolerance tests
From baseline to one year follow-up, to 3 year follow-up, to 5 year follow-up, to 10 year follow-up, to 15 year follow-up, 20 year follow-up
Change in glycated hemoglobin
Time Frame: From baseline to one year follow-up, to 3 year follow-up, to 5 year follow-up, to 10 year follow-up, to 15 year follow-up, 20 year follow-up
Assessed from fasting blood sample
From baseline to one year follow-up, to 3 year follow-up, to 5 year follow-up, to 10 year follow-up, to 15 year follow-up, 20 year follow-up
Change in plasma lipid concentration
Time Frame: From baseline to one year follow-up, to 3 year follow-up, to 5 year follow-up, to 10 year follow-up, to 15 year follow-up, 20 year follow-up
Plasma total, HDL and LDL cholesterol, and triglyceride concentrations are measured.
From baseline to one year follow-up, to 3 year follow-up, to 5 year follow-up, to 10 year follow-up, to 15 year follow-up, 20 year follow-up
Change in resting blood pressure
Time Frame: From baseline to one year follow-up, to 3 year follow-up, to 5 year follow-up, to 10 year follow-up, to 15 year follow-up, 20 year follow-up.
Resting systolic and diastolic blood pressure is measured by automatic sphygmomanometer in sitting position.
From baseline to one year follow-up, to 3 year follow-up, to 5 year follow-up, to 10 year follow-up, to 15 year follow-up, 20 year follow-up.
Change in inflammation markers
Time Frame: From baseline to one year follow-up, to 3 year follow-up, to 5 year follow-up, to 10 year follow-up, to 15 year follow-up, 20 year follow-up.
Serum high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and interleukine-1Ra (IL-1Ra) are measured as biomarkers of inflammation.
From baseline to one year follow-up, to 3 year follow-up, to 5 year follow-up, to 10 year follow-up, to 15 year follow-up, 20 year follow-up.
Change in liver function
Time Frame: From baseline to one year follow-up, to 3 year follow-up, to 5 year follow-up, to 10 year follow-up, to 15 year follow-up, 20 year follow-up.
Plasma aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) are measured as biomarkers of liver function.
From baseline to one year follow-up, to 3 year follow-up, to 5 year follow-up, to 10 year follow-up, to 15 year follow-up, 20 year follow-up.
Change in metabolite profiles
Time Frame: From baseline to one year follow-up, to 3 year follow-up, to 5 year follow-up, to 10 year follow-up, to 15 year follow-up, 20 year follow-up
Metabolites and metabolic profiles related to diet, other lifestyle factors and predicting type 2 diabetes measured from serum and plasma samples
From baseline to one year follow-up, to 3 year follow-up, to 5 year follow-up, to 10 year follow-up, to 15 year follow-up, 20 year follow-up
Change in sedentary behavior
Time Frame: From baseline to one year follow-up, to 3 year follow-up, to 5 year follow-up, to 10 year follow-up, to 15 year follow-up, 20 year follow-up
Change in sedentary behavior is described as the total amount spent in sitting and lying position during waking hours, and is assessed by the questionnaire.
From baseline to one year follow-up, to 3 year follow-up, to 5 year follow-up, to 10 year follow-up, to 15 year follow-up, 20 year follow-up
Change in sleeping behavior
Time Frame: From baseline to one year follow-up, to 3 year follow-up, to 5 year follow-up, to 10 year follow-up, to 15 year follow-up, 20 year follow-up
Formulated according to sleeping behavior questionnaire
From baseline to one year follow-up, to 3 year follow-up, to 5 year follow-up, to 10 year follow-up, to 15 year follow-up, 20 year follow-up
Change in smoking behavior
Time Frame: From baseline to one year follow-up, to 3 year follow-up, to 5 year follow-up, to 10 year follow-up, to 15 year follow-up, 20 year follow-up
Assessed by questionnaire
From baseline to one year follow-up, to 3 year follow-up, to 5 year follow-up, to 10 year follow-up, to 15 year follow-up, 20 year follow-up
Change in alcohol consumption
Time Frame: From baseline to one year follow-up, to 3 year follow-up, to 5 year follow-up, to 10 year follow-up, to 15 year follow-up, 20 year follow-up
Assessed by food frequency questionnaire
From baseline to one year follow-up, to 3 year follow-up, to 5 year follow-up, to 10 year follow-up, to 15 year follow-up, 20 year follow-up
Change in eating behavior
Time Frame: From baseline to one year follow-up, to 3 year follow-up, to 5 year follow-up, to 10 year follow-up, to 15 year follow-up, 20 year follow-up
Eating behavior is assessed by questionnaires.
From baseline to one year follow-up, to 3 year follow-up, to 5 year follow-up, to 10 year follow-up, to 15 year follow-up, 20 year follow-up
Change in mental wellbeing
Time Frame: From baseline to one year follow-up, to 3 year follow-up, to 5 year follow-up, to 10 year follow-up, to 15 year follow-up, 20 year follow-up
Change in mental wellbeing is assessed by questionnaire.
From baseline to one year follow-up, to 3 year follow-up, to 5 year follow-up, to 10 year follow-up, to 15 year follow-up, 20 year follow-up
Change in quality of life
Time Frame: From baseline to one year follow-up, to 3 year follow-up, to 5 year follow-up, to 10 year follow-up, to 15 year follow-up, 20 year follow-up.
Quality of life is assessed by questionnaire.
From baseline to one year follow-up, to 3 year follow-up, to 5 year follow-up, to 10 year follow-up, to 15 year follow-up, 20 year follow-up.
Use of health-care services and associated costs
Time Frame: From baseline to one year follow-up, to 3 year follow-up, to 5 year follow-up, to 10 year follow-up, to 15 year follow-up, 20 year follow-up
Use of health-care services are assessed by questionnaire and registers. Associated costs are calculated based on these data.
From baseline to one year follow-up, to 3 year follow-up, to 5 year follow-up, to 10 year follow-up, to 15 year follow-up, 20 year follow-up
Work ability and associated costs
Time Frame: From baseline to one year follow-up, to 3 year follow-up, to 5 year follow-up, to 10 year follow-up, to 15 year follow-up, 20 year follow-up.
Work ability is assessed by questionnaire. Associated costs are calculated based on these data.
From baseline to one year follow-up, to 3 year follow-up, to 5 year follow-up, to 10 year follow-up, to 15 year follow-up, 20 year follow-up.
User experience of the Internet intervention
Time Frame: During the intervention at the time point of two weeks, and at one year follow-up
Measured by the questionnaires.
During the intervention at the time point of two weeks, and at one year follow-up
Usage of the Internet intervention
Time Frame: During the intervention at the time point of two weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and at one year follow-up
Measured by the log data
During the intervention at the time point of two weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and at one year follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Eastern Finland

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
University of Oslo
Karolinska Institutet
University of Copenhagen
University of Manchester
Maastricht University
Cornell University
University of York
University of Melbourne
Flinders University
University of Konstanz
National Institute of Health and Welfare
Technical Research Centre of Finland
Danube-University
Roskilde University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Jussi Pihlajamäki, MD, PhD, University of Eastern Finland

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 10, 2017

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2018

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2037

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 13, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 15, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 17, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 17, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 15, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 467/2016

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Physical Activity

Clinical Trials on Digital lifestyle intervention group

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings