Diabetic Retinopathy Assessed by Ultra-wide (REGARD1)

June 7, 2017 updated by: Association Pour La Recherche En Vision Du Service D'Ophtalmologie De L'Hôpital

Peripheral Ischemia Evolution Assessed by Ultra-wide Field Angiography in Patients With Diabetic Macular Edema

Patients with diabetic macular edema treated with aflibercept injections for visual impairment will be observed in standard care during 12 months. They will undergo visual assessments by Ultrawide Field angiography at baseline and at 12 months

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Detailed Description

Diabetic retinopathy imaged by ultra wide field angiography (200°): the California (Optos, Scotland) allows ultrawide field pictures of 200° of the retina. This new imaging allows seeing beyond what was seen by the classic 7 ETDRS fields angiography:

  • In pivotal studies assessing the effect of antiVEGFs on diabetic retinopathy (DR) in patients treated for diabetic macular edema (DME), ETDRS DR classification was used based on the 7 classical ETDRS field fundus photographs. However, it has been identify that antiVEGF may modified the semiology (hemorrhages, micro-aneurisms) and consecutively modify the stage of DR. There is no assessment of the regression of peripheral ischemia of the retina (non perfused retina) by angiography during an antiVEGF treatment.
  • DR severity score (1) based on ETDRS classification assess the number of retinal lesions within the 7 classic retinal fields corresponding to around 30% of the total retina. It has been recently shown that peripheral lesions non visible on the classic 7 fields angiography could be predictive of progression of DR (2,3) at 4 years of follow-up independently of the initial stage of DR, HbA1C level, and could be new arguments for Laser treatment. This UWF imaging could help to understand some cases of patients with worst progression than expected, and to identify new therapeutic indications (4). These UWF pictures need to be explored in order to better characterize the severity of DR forms and probably find new therapeutics.

Impact of anti VEGF treatments on DR: pivotal studies assessing the efficacy of ranibizumab on DME explored also the effect of antiVEGFs on DR. One of the secondary endpoints of RISE and RIDE (5) studies, comparing the effect of ranibizumab 0.3mg versus 0.5mg versus sham injections, was the rate of new proliferative DR (PDR). This rate was of 33.8% in the sham group versus 11% in the treated group at 2 years of follow-up.

In Protocole I (6), the DRCRnet, found a 2 times lower risk to evolve toward PDR in case of ranibizumab treatment versus sham (7).

VIVID and VISTA showed at least 2 ETDRS steps improvement of DR for 30% of patients treated by aflibercept versus 8.2% to 15.6% at 2 years in the sham group.

It would be very interesting to have complementary data on improvement and worsening of DR under antiVEGF treatment with an angiographic analysis of the retinal periphery perfusion on larger field of the fundus than we usually have, and instead of color fundus photographs usually available in pivotal study to assess DR severity.

The purpose of this study is to characterize at one year the effect of aflibercept used for DME treatment on retinal periphery assessed by UWF angiography instead of the classic 7 ETDRS fields in order to quantify ischemia.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
49

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • France
      • Bobigny, France, 93000
        • Recruiting
        • Giocanti-Auregan

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Diabetic patients (type 1 or 2) over 18 years of age with mild to severe non proliferative diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female patients, ≥ 18 years
  • type 1 or type2 diabetes mellitus
  • patients with at least 1 eye with best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) between 24 and 78 ETDRS letters due to center-involved diabetic macular edema (DME). DME was defined by a central retinal thickness (CRT) >300µm and the loss of foveal pit on SD-OCT
  • Aflibercept treatment administred
  • Afilliated to social security scheme
  • agree to participate

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of treatment with any anti-VEGF agents within 12 months prior to inclusion
  • Application of any intra-vitreal treatment within 12 months prior to inclusion
  • Any aflibercept contraindication
  • History of panretinal photocoagulation laser (PRP)
  • Proliferative diabetic retinopathy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
DME patients treated with aflibercept
angiography by ultrawide field

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
AntiVEGF effects on best visual acuity
Time Frame: 12 months
Retinian peripheral ischemia decrease
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Association Pour La Recherche En Vision Du Service D'Ophtalmologie De L'Hôpital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 19, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 18, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 18, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 12, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 16, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 17, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 8, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 7, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • avoph_RNI_2016-001

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetic Macular Edema

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings